ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04043689HEMIANOTACSUpdated May 8, 2025

Therapeutic Effects of Transcranial Alternative Current Stimulation (tACS) in Chronic Post Stroke Hemianopia

An interventional study of tACS (transcranial Alternate Current Stimulation) in Hemianopsia, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-08.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: The most common visual field deficit after retro-chiasmatic lesions is homonymous hemianopia (HH), defined as the impossibility of seeing the contralesional visual hemisphere without ocular injury. HH affects between 90000 and 120 000 new cases per year in the United States and Europe HH was reported in 30% of patients after stroke (National Audit Office) (in France, with 130,000 strokes per year, 39,000 patients with HH). Despite the 30-year decline, the rehabilitation techniques have a low level of evidence of their effectiveness and few are used in routine clinical practice in France.

Transcranial Alternate Current Stimulation (tACS) is a method of Alternative Current stimulation that can modulate neural activity by imposing local oscillatory activity.

An observational study of occipital tACS in patients with optic nerve lesions showed an increase in visual field size, power, and occipital alpha synchrony. Two transorbital tACS studies showed visual improvements , and compensations for abnormally weak oscillatory activity by temporal resynchronization. Our team has demonstrated a role of noninvasive brain stimulation in right hemisphere frontal eye fields on cortical beta-high (\~ 30 Hz) oscillatory activity, improving the visual perception of both hemi-fields and the fronto-parietal synchrony of the right hemisphere.

Objective:

This project aims to compare, on the same patient population, two tACS stimulation strategies, with the aim of increasing the attentional orientation towards the blind visual hemi-field and thus the visual detection of stimuli in this hemi-field. .

For this, The investigator team will evaluate on the one hand an occipital stimulation (V1-IPS) contralateral to the lesion, at a alfa frequency (10 Hz), which induces the desynchronization of the contralateral hemisphere with the aim of improving the visual perception of targets in the blind visual hemi-field. the study will compare this intervention to a stimulation of the frontal region (FEF) of the right hemisphere at a high-beta frequency (30 Hz), which showed effects of facilitation of endogenous and exogenous attentional orientation. The two previous strategies will be compared to a placebo tACS stimulation session.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Focusing on low-level perceptual activities, and robust, controlled explorations with medium-sized cohorts, several studies have shown tACS effects related to oscillatory activity and inter-regional synchrony.

For example, in healthy subjects, occipital tACS showed an increase in posterior alpha power following tACS alpha (10-14 Hz). At higher frequencies, the 60 Hz tACS showed a sustained reduction in visual contrast sensitivity threshold . Two studies in 2014 have also shown following 40 Hz tACS stimulation of occipital or parietal brain regions in healthy humans, sustained dependent on synchrony of posterior interhemispheric gamma band networks, and modulation effects of moving target perception Very recently, a 10 Hz occipital tACS stimulation study coupled with functional magnetic resonance Imaging recording (fMRI) showed diffuse effects likely to indicate occipito-parieto-temporal synchronization during the delayed phase of effects.

Among patients' trials, an observational study of uncontrolled occipital tACS in patients with optic nerve lesions showed improved visual acuity and visual field size, accompanied by an increase in power and of occipital alpha synchrony by targeting periorbital regions; More recently, a double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial in patients with optic nerve lesions showed, with daily transorbital tACS sessions lasting 10 weeks, a sustained (2.5%) increase in visual field size versus stimulation placebo.

This project aims to compare, on the same patient population, two tACS stimulation strategies, with the aim of increasing the attentional orientation towards the blind visual hemi-field and thus the visual detection of stimuli in this hemi-field. .

For this, the study will evaluate on the one hand an occipital stimulation (V1-IPS) contralateral to the lesion, at a alfa frequency (10 Hz), which induces the desynchronization of the contralateral hemisphere with the aim of improving the visual perception of targets in the blind visual hemi-field. This intervention will be compared to a stimulation of the frontal region (FEF) of the right hemisphere at a high-beta frequency (30 Hz), which showed effects of facilitation of endogenous and exogenous attentional orientation. The two previous strategies will be compared to a placebo tACS stimulation session.

The overall goal of this project is to modulate visual perception in patients with HH in the chronic phase using transcranial AC stimulation. The study aim is to evaluate the behavioral effects of tACS stimulation of the right fronto-parietal network (FEF-IPS) and the occipital and parieto-occipital region (V1-IPS), contralateral to the lesion, on visual perception in static and kinetic perimetry. The effects of stimulation of these two targets on brain activity by electrophysiology (EEG) will be quantified. The hypothesis is that the tACS, by increasing the functional connectivity (phase synchronism at the frequency delivered during the stimulation), will make it possible to modulate the threshold of visual perception.

Specifically, the hypothesis is that a single session of 30 Hz tACS stimulation of the right frontal cortex (around the right FEF) will increase fronto-parietal synchrony within the right hemisphere of patients with lesions acquired brain responsible for chronic HH, thus improving the static and kinetic visual field in the first 30 minutes post-stimulation. The investigator team also hypothesize that a single session of tACS stimulation on the occipital and posterior parietal cortex contralateral to the lesion (around the V1 region) of patients with acquired brain lesions responsible for chronic HH will improve the visual field in the first 30 minutes post-stimulation, but this improvement will be less compared to the improvement caused by the stimulation of the right FEF, which could be accompanied by a temporary decrease in the visual perception of the targets on the healthy visual hemi-field.

Methods:

Monocentric comparative randomized controlled, cross-over and blinded study, Major population, acquired brain lesion responsible for homonymous hemianopia, chronic phase of cerebrovascular accident (between 3 months and 10 years of evolution) and cohort healthy subjects not treated with tACS to obtain normative data from visual fields, neuroimaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG)

  • Each patient or each healthy volunteer will have an inclusion visit including visual static and kinetic perimetry, EEG recordings, cognitive tests, questionnaire and brain MRI.
  • Then, each patient will have 3 visits, including a first evaluation period (perimetry, EEG and reading tests) then a stimulation session (right frontal active tACS or contralesional occipito-parietal active tACS, or placebo tACS) then a second evaluation time (EEG, perimetry , and reading tests)

Discussion:

The investigator team expect an immediate and significant increase in visual field size and improved visual detection capabilities of patients treated with active tACS stimulation on the right frontal region (FEF) and / or contralateral occipital region (V1-IPS) lesion

The project will contribute to the development of an innovative treatment to improve the quality of life of HH brain-injured patients, lacking effective treatment options to date.

TACS is an easily accessible and easily applicable technique in large-scale clinical practice. Coupled with EEG monitoring, it is the only one that allows efficient and safe manipulation of oscillatory activity and interregional synchronicity.

Interest in these new methods of non-invasive brain stimulation guiding brain plasticity, in stroke (130,000 new cases / year) or head trauma is very important. The scientific, clinical and technological implications are major.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemianopsia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hemianopsia

63 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemianopsia; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is above the median of 32 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Hemianopsia.

Browse Hemianopsia studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient aged 18 and over

  • Patient with homonymous lateral hemianopia with brain injury acquired for at least 3 months and at most 10 years after ischemic stroke, cerebral hematoma
  • Patient able to understand French both orally and in writing
  • Patient giving free, informed and written consent
  • Absence of a neurological disease interfering with the passing of tests

Non-inclusion criteria :

  • Patients subject to a legal protection measure (safeguarding of justice, guardianship and trusteeship, protected adults)
  • Pre-existing severe ophthalmological disorders, visual field disorders visual field disorders, monocular visual acuity less than 5/10, severe oculomotor disorders (post-stroke ophthalmological consultation less than at the time of inclusion)
  • of tACS and / or magnetic resonance imaging (pacemaker or implantable defibrillator, intracranial electrodes or other intracranial implant, cranial vault anomalies facing stimulation electrodes (plates, prostheses, uncovered skull)
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  • Recruitment in other interventional studies for the duration of the participation.
  • Non-affiliation to a social security scheme (excluding AME) or non-beneficiary of such a scheme

Healthy participants inclusion criteria are the following:

  • Healthy Subject 18 years and older
  • Healthy subject able to understand French both orally and in writing
  • Healthy subject who has given free and and writes

Healthy participants non-inclusion criteria are the following:

  • Severe neurological, psychiatric, physical, or ophthalmological disorders (binocular visual acuity less than 5/10, ophthalmological consultation less than one year old at the time of inclusion) that interfere with the normal performance of tests and study tasks
  • Contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (pacemaker or implantable defibrillator, intracranial electrodes or other intracranial implant, abnormalities of the cranial vault opposite stimulation electrodes (plates, prostheses, uncovered skull)
  • Recruitment in other interventional studies for the duration of the participation.
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  • Non-affiliation to a social security scheme (excluding AME) or non-beneficiary of such a scheme
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    tACS stimulation of the right frontal region

    Active tACS stimulation of the right frontal region (around the right FEF, EEG electrode FC2) at a high-beta frequency (30 Hz) with the goal of visibly training EEG recordings, frontal oscillatory activity and right fronto-parietal synchrony (FEF-IPS, or between FC2 and P4 electrodes) in the high-beta band (\~ 30 Hz) which facilitates attentional orientation and visual perception in the two visual hemi-fields, but more particularly the targets present on the blind field of vision.

    Device: tACS (transcranial Alternate Current Stimulation)

  • Active comparator
    tACS stimulation of the occipito-parietal region

    Active tACS stimulation of the occipito-parietal posterior contralesional region(around the right IPS, EEG electrode P4), at an alpha frequency (10 Hz) which will induce on the EEG recordings an oscillatory drive in the alpha band ( \~ 10Hz) and an increase in synchrony at this frequency band on the stimulated posterior occipital and parietal lobe (EEG electrodes P4 and 02), but also, by transcallosal push-and-pull phenomena, a desynchronization effect of the contralateral posterior occipital and parietal area (EEG electrodes P3 and 01), which will facilitate attention orientation and target detection in the blind visual field of view.

    Device: tACS (transcranial Alternate Current Stimulation)

  • Sham comparator
    TACS stimulation of the right frontal (FEF)

    . Condition TACS stimulation of the right frontal (FEF) at a high-beta frequency (30 Hz) for half of the patients and unilateral occipital cortex (right / left) at an alfa frequency (10 Hz) for the other half . This condition will control the possible placebo effects of tACS stimulation and the potential effects of visual field enhancement with repetition of perimetry tests. This condition will also verify the lack of changes in cerebral rhythm activity in the case of an application without effective electrical current.

    Device: tACS (transcranial Alternate Current Stimulation)

Interventions

  • DevicetACS (transcranial Alternate Current Stimulation)

    This is a single-centric comparative randomized controlled blind and cross-over study. The order of stimulation conditions will be randomized: (right frontal tACS / occipital tACS / tACS PLACEBO). The 3 stimulation conditions will be performed with a wash-out period of at least 1 week. In this study each patient will be his own control

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the immediate effect of a single tACS session on the static visual field size of patients with chronic phase HH

    To evaluate the immediate effect of a single tACS session, under two different conditions of tACS stimulation (right frontal stimulation (FEF, Frontal Eye Fields) and contralateral occipito-parietal stimulation to the lesion (V1-IPS, primary visual cortex and intraparietal sulcus or intra-parietal furrow) on the static visual field size of patients with chronic phase HH

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • GH Pitié Salpêtrière
    Paris, 75013, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sahraie A. Induced visual sensitivity changes in chronic hemianopia. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007 Dec;20(6):661-6. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e3282f1c70f. PubMed 17992086 ↗
  • Schuett S, Dauner R, Zihl J. Line bisection in unilateral homonymous visual field defects. Cortex. 2011 Jan;47(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Jan 28. PubMed 20172510 ↗
  • Sergeeva EG, Henrich-Noack P, Bola M, Sabel BA. Brain-state-dependent non-invasive brain stimulation and functional priming: a hypothesis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;8:899. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00899. eCollection 2014. No abstract available. PubMed 25414662 ↗
  • Sabel BA, Fedorov AB, Naue N, Borrmann A, Herrmann C, Gall C. Non-invasive alternating current stimulation improves vision in optic neuropathy. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2011;29(6):493-505. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0624. PubMed 22124039 ↗
  • Zaehle T, Rach S, Herrmann CS. Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG. PLoS One. 2010 Nov 1;5(11):e13766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013766. PubMed 21072168 ↗
  • Helfrich RF, Knepper H, Nolte G, Struber D, Rach S, Herrmann CS, Schneider TR, Engel AK. Selective modulation of interhemispheric functional connectivity by HD-tACS shapes perception. PLoS Biol. 2014 Dec 30;12(12):e1002031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002031. eCollection 2014 Dec. PubMed 25549264 ↗
  • Alekseichuk I, Diers K, Paulus W, Antal A. Transcranial electrical stimulation of the occipital cortex during visual perception modifies the magnitude of BOLD activity: A combined tES-fMRI approach. Neuroimage. 2016 Oct 15;140:110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.034. Epub 2015 Nov 23. PubMed 26608246 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2020 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 51 months.

Of 36 interventional studies with no phase under Hemianopsia, half reached primary completion within 47 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 95. This study's 51 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 25, 2019
First posted
Aug 2, 2019
StartActual
Dec 22, 2020
Primary completionActual
Apr 3, 2025
CompletionActual
Apr 3, 2025
Last update
May 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04043689
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 2, 2019
Start date
Dec 22, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2025
Completion
Apr 3, 2025
Last update
May 8, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion