CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04032704Updated Mar 10, 2025Results posted

A Study of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin in Advanced Solid Tumors

A Phase 2 interventional study of ladiratuzumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in Small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Squamous and Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-squamous, sponsored by Seagen Inc.. Terminated at 66 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.

Sponsored by Seagen Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study closed due to portfolio prioritization
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
205
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial will study ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) alone and with pembrolizumab to find out if it works to treat different types of solid tumors. It will also find out what side effects may occur. A side effect is anything the drug does besides treating cancer.

Read the detailed description

This trial is designed to assess the antitumor activity, safety, and tolerability of LV alone and with pembrolizumab, for the treatment of solid tumors. Participants with the following advanced solid tumors will be enrolled:

Cohort 1: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) Cohort 2: non-small cell lung cancer-squamous (NSCLC-squamous) Cohort 3: non-small cell lung cancer-nonsquamous (NSCLC-nonsquamous) Cohort 4: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Cohort 5: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (esophageal-squamous) Cohort 6: gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma Cohort 7: castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) Cohort 8: melanoma

Participants will continue to receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, consent withdrawal, study termination by the sponsor, pregnancy, or death, whichever comes first.

02

Conditions studied

  • Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Squamous
  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-squamous
  • Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Gastric Adenocarcinoma
  • Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
  • Prostate Cancer
  • Melanoma

Keywords

  • SCLC
  • NSCLC-squamous
  • NSCLC-nonsquamous
  • HNSCC
  • GEJ adenocarcinoma
  • Seattle Genetics
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 205 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Seagen Inc. is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 13 (52%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All Cohorts

    • Measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1 as assessed by the investigator
    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score of 0 or 1
  • Cohort 1: SCLC (Parts A and B)

    • Must have extensive stage disease
    • Must have disease progression during or following prior platinum-based systemic chemotherapy for extensive stage disease;
    • No more than 1 prior line of cytotoxic chemotherapy for extensive disease stage
    • May have received prior anti-PD(L)1 therapy
  • Cohort 2: NSCLC-squamous (Parts A and B)

    • Must have unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease
    • Must have disease progression during or following systemic therapy

      • Participants must have progressed during or after a platinum-based combination therapy administered for the treatment of metastatic disease, OR
      • Participants must have progressed within 6 months of last dose of platinum-based adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or definitive chemotherapy, or concomitant chemoradiation regimen for early stage or locally advanced stage disease.
    • Participants with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), reactive oxygen species (ROS), BRAF, or other actionable mutations are not eligible
    • No more than 1 prior line of cytotoxic chemotherapy for their advanced disease
    • Must have received prior anti-PD(L)1 therapy, unless contraindicated
  • Cohort 3: NSCLC-nonsquamous (Parts A and B)

    • Must have unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease
    • Must have disease progression during or following systemic therapy

      • Participants must have progressed during or after a platinum-based combination therapy administered for the treatment of metastatic disease, OR
      • Participants must have progressed within 6 months of last dose of platinum-based adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or definitive chemotherapy, or concomitant chemoradiation regimen for early stage or locally advanced state disease.
    • Participants with known EGFR, ALK, ROS, BRAF, tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK), or other actionable mutations are not eligible
    • Must have had prior platinum-based chemotherapy
    • No more than 1 prior line of cytotoxic chemotherapy for their advanced disease
    • Must have received prior anti-PD(L)1 therapy, unless contraindicated
  • Cohort 4: HNSCC (Parts A and B)

    • Must have unresectable locally recurrent or metastatic disease

      • Must have disease progression during or following prior line of systemic therapy
      • Disease progression after treatment with a platinum-containing regimen for recurrent/metastatic disease; OR
      • Recurrence/progression within 6 months of last dose of platinum therapy given as part of a multimodal therapy in the curative setting
    • No more than 1 line of cytotoxic chemotherapy for their advanced disease
    • May have received prior anti-PD(L)1 therapy, unless contraindicated
  • Cohort 5: esophageal-squamous (Parts A and B)

    • Must have unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease
    • Must have disease progression during or following systemic therapy
    • Must have had prior platinum-based chemotherapy
    • No more than 1 line of cytotoxic chemotherapy for their advanced disease
  • Cohort 6: gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma (Parts A and B)

    • Must have unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease
    • Must have received prior platinum-based therapy
    • Must have disease progression during or following systemic therapy
    • Participants with known human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression must have received prior HER2-targeted therapy
    • No more than 1 line of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for their advanced disease
    • Participants may have received prior anti-PD(L)1 therapy, unless contraindicated
  • Cohort 7: CRPC (Part B only)

    • Must have histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate

      • Participants with components of small cell of neuroendocrine histology are excluded
    • Must have metastatic castration-resistant disease
    • Must have been ≥28 days between cessation of androgen receptor-targeted therapy and start of study treatment
    • Must have received no more than 1 prior line of androgen receptor-targeted therapy for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer or CRPC
    • No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the metastatic CRPC setting

      • For participants who received cytotoxic chemotherapy in CSPC, at least 6 months must have elapsed between last dose of chemotherapy and start of study treatment
      • No more than 1 prior line of cytotoxic chemotherapy for CSPC
    • Participants with measurable disease are eligible if the following criteria are met:

      • A minimum starting PSA level ≥1.0 ng/mL
      • Participants with measurable soft tissue disease must have evidence of measurable soft tissue disease according to PCWG3 criteria.
    • Participants with known breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations are excluded
    • No prior radioisotope therapy or radiotherapy to ≥30% of bone marrow
  • Cohort 8: Melanoma (Parts B and C)

    • Must have histologically or cytologically confirmed cutaneous malignant melanoma

      • Participants with mucosal, acral, or uveal melanoma are excluded
    • Must have locally advanced unresectable or metastatic stage disease
    • Must have progressive disease following anti-PD(L)1 therapy
    • Must have received BRAF +/- MEK inhibitor therapy if BRAF mutated (Part C)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active concurrent malignancy or a previous malignancy within the past 3 years
  • Any anticancer therapy within 3 weeks of starting study treatment. Participants who are/were on adjuvant hormonal therapy for the treatment of malignancies with negligible risk of metastases are eligible.
  • Known active central nervous system lesions
  • Any ongoing clinically significant toxicity associated with prior treatment (Grade 2 or higher)
  • Ongoing sensory or motor neuropathy of Grade ≥2
  • Has received prior radiotherapy within 2 weeks of start of study treatment
  • History of interstitial lung disease.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
205 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part A: Non-randomized LV monotherapy

    Monotherapy dosing schedule 1.

    Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin

  • Experimental
    Part B: Non-randomized LV monotherapy

    Monotherapy dosing schedule 2.

    Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin

  • Experimental
    Part C - Arm 1: Randomized LV monotherapy

    Monotherapy dosing schedule 3.

    Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin

  • Experimental
    Part C - Arm 2: Randomized LV combination therapy

    Combination dosing schedule 1.

    Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin · Drug: pembrolizumab

  • Experimental
    Part C - Arm 3: Randomized LV combination therapy

    Combination dosing schedule 2.

    Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin · Drug: pembrolizumab

Interventions

  • Drugladiratuzumab vedotin

    Intravenous (into the vein; IV) infusion

    Also known as: SGN-LIV1A

  • Drugpembrolizumab

    200mg given by IV on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

    Also known as: Keytruda

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Part A: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

    Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as more than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR or PR or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 8.3 months)

  2. Part B: Confirmed ORR as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1

    Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR or PR or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 34.7 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.7 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)

  3. Part B: Confirmed Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate as Determined by Investigator According to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Criteria, for Prostate Cancer

    Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. PSA progression was defined as per PCWG3 criteria- a) if a participant presented first a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir, and which was confirmed by a consecutive second value \>=3 weeks later that fulfilled the same criteria (that is, a confirmed rising trend); b) if a participant did not present a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 ng/mL increased from baseline beyond 12 weeks.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to the date of last response assessment (maximum up to 13.5 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant/ clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline)/worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent/significant disability/incapacity \& may cause congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version (v) 4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).

    Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months)

  2. Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, or a clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent or significant disability or incapacity and may cause congenital anomaly or birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).

    Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months)

  3. Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST v1.1

    DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met stable disease (SD) criteria at least once after start of study treatment at minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR, PR or SD or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 4.1 months)

  4. Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DCR According to RECIST v1.1

    DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met SD criteria at least once after start of study treatment at a minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 centimeter (cm). Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

    Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR, PR or SD or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.5 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 1.5 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)

  5. Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST v1.1

    DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.

    Time frame: From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.7 months)

  6. Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DOR According to RECIST v1.1

    DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.

    Time frame: From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 32.0 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 4.2 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)

  7. Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-DOR, for Prostate Cancer

    PSA-DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of PSA response (subsequently confirmed at least 3 weeks apart) to the first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. The confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

    Time frame: From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 3 months)

  8. Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST v1.1

    PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 8.3 months)

  9. Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PFS According to RECIST v1.1

    PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 34.7 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.7 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)

  10. Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-PFS, for Prostate Cancer

    PSA-PFS: time from start of study treatment to first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis or who are removed from study prior to documentation of PD was censored at date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.7 months)

  11. Part A: Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 27.5 months)

  12. Part B: Overall Survival

    OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.5 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 20.9 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)

  13. Part A: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Between Days 0 to 21 (AUC21) of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin

    Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of LV was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

    Time frame: AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)

  14. Part A: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) According to Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

    Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

  15. Part A: AUC21 of Total Antibody (TAB)

    Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

    Time frame: AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)

  16. Part A: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

    Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

  17. Part A: AUC21 of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)

    Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

    Time frame: AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)

  18. Part A: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

    Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)

  19. Part B: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Between Day 0 to 7 (AUC7) of ADC

    Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of ADC was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

    Time frame: AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)

  20. Part B: Cmax According to ADC Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

    Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)

  21. Part B: AUC7 of TAB

    Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

    Time frame: AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)

  22. Part B: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

    Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)

  23. Part B: AUC7 OF MMAE

    Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

    Time frame: AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)

  24. Part B: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

    Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle= 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)

  25. Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) Incidence

    A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.

    Time frame: From first ATA draw to last ATA draw (maximum up to 8.8 months)

  26. Part B: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline ATA Incidence

    A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.

    Time frame: From first ATA draw to last ATA draw (maximum up to 22.1 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.1 months for 1 mg/kg)

07

Results

Posted Mar 10, 2025

Participant flow

This study had Parts A, B and C. Study was terminated and Part C was not opened. A total of 205 participants were enrolled in Part A (49 participants) and Part B (156 participants) of this study. In Part A all enrolled participants received study intervention while in Part B, 2 participants did not receive study intervention.

Part A
Participant flow — Part A
MilestonePart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Started102137512000000000000
Completed000000000000000000
Not completed102137512000000000000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject003017000000000000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100000000000000000
Withdrew: Death9210745000000000000
Part B
Participant flow — Part B
MilestonePart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Started00000016161914172114312222
Completed000000000000000000
Not completed00000016161914172114312222
Withdrew: Other0000000121115130000
Withdrew: Study termination by sponsor000000001000000000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject000000322146210100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up000000000001000000
Withdrew: Death0000001313141212137172122

Outcome measures

PrimaryPart A: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)

Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as more than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR or PR or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 8.3 months)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part A: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Percentage of participantsPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)10 (0.3 to 44.5)0 (0.0 to 84.2)8 (0.2 to 36.0)14 (0.4 to 57.9)20 (0.5 to 71.6)8 (0.2 to 38.5)
PrimaryPart B: Confirmed ORR as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1

Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR or PR or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 34.7 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.7 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part B: Confirmed ORR as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Percentage of participantsPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Confirmed ORR as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.16 (0.2 to 30.2)13 (1.6 to 38.3)11 (1.3 to 33.1)0 (0.0 to 23.2)18 (3.8 to 43.4)14 (3.0 to 36.3)0 (0.0 to 24.7)20 (7.7 to 38.6)0 (0.0 to 84.2)0 (0.0 to 84.2)0 (0.0 to 84.2)50 (1.3 to 98.7)
PrimaryPart B: Confirmed Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate as Determined by Investigator According to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Criteria, for Prostate Cancer

Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. PSA progression was defined as per PCWG3 criteria- a) if a participant presented first a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir, and which was confirmed by a consecutive second value \>=3 weeks later that fulfilled the same criteria (that is, a confirmed rising trend); b) if a participant did not present a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 ng/mL increased from baseline beyond 12 weeks.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study treatment up to the date of last response assessment (maximum up to 13.5 months)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part B: Confirmed Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate as Determined by Investigator According to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Criteria, for Prostate Cancer
Percentage of participantsPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg
Part B: Confirmed Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate as Determined by Investigator According to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Criteria, for Prostate Cancer23 (5.0 to 53.8)
SecondaryPart A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant/ clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline)/worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent/significant disability/incapacity \& may cause congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version (v) 4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).

Time frame:
From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE
ParticipantsPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
TEAEs102137512
TESAEs517233
Treatment Related TEAEs92117511
TEAEs (>= Grade 3)719446
SecondaryPart B: Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, or a clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent or significant disability or incapacity and may cause congenital anomaly or birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).

Time frame:
From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE
ParticipantsPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
TEAEs15161914172113302222
TESAEs65989124111210
Treatment Related TEAEs13161812171912282222
TEAEs (>= Grade 3)1211141113178171210
SecondaryPart A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST v1.1

DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met stable disease (SD) criteria at least once after start of study treatment at minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR, PR or SD or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 4.1 months)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST v1.1
Percentage of participantsPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST v1.140 (12.2 to 73.8)50 (1.3 to 98.7)46 (19.2 to 74.9)57 (18.4 to 90.1)60 (14.7 to 94.7)33 (9.9 to 65.1)
SecondaryPart B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DCR According to RECIST v1.1

DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met SD criteria at least once after start of study treatment at a minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 centimeter (cm). Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.

Time frame:
From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR, PR or SD or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.5 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 1.5 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DCR According to RECIST v1.1
Percentage of participantsPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DCR According to RECIST v1.119 (4.0 to 45.6)50 (24.7 to 75.3)58 (33.5 to 79.7)64 (35.1 to 87.2)59 (32.9 to 81.6)52 (29.8 to 74.3)62 (31.6 to 86.1)77 (57.7 to 90.1)50 (1.3 to 98.7)50 (1.3 to 98.7)0 (0.0 to 84.2)100 (15.8 to 100.0)
SecondaryPart A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST v1.1

DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.

Time frame:
From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST v1.1
MonthsPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST v1.15.7 (NA to NA)—5.5 (NA to NA)3.7 (NA to NA)2.7 (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPart B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DOR According to RECIST v1.1

DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.

Time frame:
From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 32.0 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 4.2 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DOR According to RECIST v1.1
MonthsPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DOR According to RECIST v1.1NA (NA to NA)7.5 (5.78 to NA)NA (16.59 to NA)—NA (3.06 to NA)3.9 (2.60 to NA)—8.3 (5.62 to NA)———4.2 (NA to NA)
SecondaryPart B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-DOR, for Prostate Cancer

PSA-DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of PSA response (subsequently confirmed at least 3 weeks apart) to the first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. The confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

Time frame:
From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 3 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-DOR, for Prostate Cancer
MonthsPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-DOR, for Prostate Cancer3.0 (1.9 to NA)
SecondaryPart A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST v1.1

PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 8.3 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST v1.1
MonthsPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST v1.11.4 (0.53 to 2.69)1.5 (1.25 to NA)2.5 (0.46 to 4.17)2.3 (0.33 to 4.86)2.9 (0.59 to NA)1.4 (1.31 to 4.17)
SecondaryPart B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PFS According to RECIST v1.1

PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 34.7 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.7 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PFS According to RECIST v1.1
MonthsPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PFS According to RECIST v1.11.4 (1.18 to 2.04)1.8 (1.12 to 5.72)2.4 (1.31 to 2.96)2.7 (1.18 to 2.86)2.8 (1.38 to 3.32)2.3 (1.25 to 2.73)4.9 (2.10 to 5.65)4.2 (2.50 to 6.97)1.9 (1.02 to NA)NA (NA to NA)1.5 (1.35 to NA)4.2 (2.76 to NA)
SecondaryPart B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-PFS, for Prostate Cancer

PSA-PFS: time from start of study treatment to first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis or who are removed from study prior to documentation of PD was censored at date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-PFS, for Prostate Cancer
MonthsPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-PFS, for Prostate Cancer3.7 (2.8 to 5.1)
SecondaryPart A: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment to the date of death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 27.5 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part A: Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Overall Survival (OS)6.1 (1.38 to 15.84)2.5 (1.74 to NA)6.5 (2.20 to 16.95)4.8 (0.33 to 6.97)7.2 (0.59 to NA)8.7 (3.98 to NA)
SecondaryPart B: Overall Survival

OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment to the date of death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.5 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 20.9 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Part B: Overall Survival
MonthsPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Overall Survival4.7 (3.45 to 8.74)9.0 (4.53 to 12.68)9.3 (2.92 to 20.14)5.2 (3.42 to 18.33)12.7 (4.17 to 15.28)3.8 (1.77 to 8.61)10.1 (6.47 to NA)11.5 (9.26 to 15.41)11.1 (1.22 to NA)NA (1.71 to NA)5.6 (1.64 to NA)14.2 (8.34 to NA)
SecondaryPart A: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Between Days 0 to 21 (AUC21) of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin

Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of LV was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

Time frame:
AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Day*micrograms per milliliter
Part A: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Between Days 0 to 21 (AUC21) of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin
Day*micrograms per milliliterPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Between Days 0 to 21 (AUC21) of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin142.5 ± 18.9175.6 ± 16.5145.3 ± 35.1146.6 ± 28.3123.2 ± 21.7132.0 ± 26.0
SecondaryPart A: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) According to Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

Time frame:
Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Part A: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) According to Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Micrograms per milliliterPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) According to Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Pharmacokinetic Parameters50.4 ± 31.258.6 ± 1.055.8 ± 29.652.3 ± 23.639.6 ± 14.755.2 ± 64.9
SecondaryPart A: AUC21 of Total Antibody (TAB)

Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

Time frame:
AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Day*micrograms per milliliter
Part A: AUC21 of Total Antibody (TAB)
Day*micrograms per milliliterPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: AUC21 of Total Antibody (TAB)302.4 ± 19.7328.5 ± 17.8280.3 ± 34.1292.3 ± 28.2219.8 ± 28.5258.9 ± 31.6
SecondaryPart A: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

Time frame:
Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Part A: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Micrograms per milliliterPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters61.6 ± 23.766.1 ± 20.868.2 ± 30.561.4 ± 16.150.7 ± 38.357.2 ± 24.1
SecondaryPart A: AUC21 of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)

Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

Time frame:
AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Day*nanogram per milliliter
Part A: AUC21 of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)
Day*nanogram per milliliterPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: AUC21 of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)34.1 ± 21.150.5 ± NA62.9 ± 79.366.2 ± 45.691.0 ± 19.335.2 ± 36.9
SecondaryPart A: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

Time frame:
Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Nanogram per milliliter
Part A: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Nanogram per milliliterPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Part A: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters2.8 ± 15.75.7 ± NA6.4 ± 83.16.3 ± 10.611.3 ± 12.63.6 ± 41.8
SecondaryPart B: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Between Day 0 to 7 (AUC7) of ADC

Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of ADC was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

Time frame:
AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Day*micrograms per milliliter
Part B: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Between Day 0 to 7 (AUC7) of ADC
Day*micrograms per milliliterPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Between Day 0 to 7 (AUC7) of ADC57.3 ± 23.251.7 ± 16.959.5 ± 29.760.6 ± 36.743.3 ± 12.650.7 ± 27.266.0 ± 42.846.8 ± 25.042.1 ± 0.552.0 ± 0.144.8 ± NA—
SecondaryPart B: Cmax According to ADC Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

Time frame:
Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Part B: Cmax According to ADC Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Micrograms per milliliterPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Cmax According to ADC Pharmacokinetic Parameters35.3 ± 35.027.8 ± 19.730.9 ± 19.228.7 ± 28.625.0 ± 28.828.0 ± 17.230.5 ± 15.125.4 ± 21.929.5 ± 20.324.3 ± 10.224.1 ± 6.2—
SecondaryPart B: AUC7 of TAB

Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

Time frame:
AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Day*micrograms per milliliter
Part B: AUC7 of TAB
Day*micrograms per milliliterPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: AUC7 of TAB101.1 ± 29.492.7 ± 18.7106.9 ± 29.891.2 ± 30.973.9 ± 20.785.7 ± 26.0106.5 ± 28.274.7 ± 26.376.6 ± 22.688.6 ± 11.171.4 ± NA—
SecondaryPart B: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

Time frame:
Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Micrograms per milliliter
Part B: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Micrograms per milliliterPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters38.3 ± 17.931.6 ± 16.636.8 ± 21.832.1 ± 26.227.4 ± 28.931.3 ± 19.732.6 ± 25.932.5 ± 73.826.8 ± 15.630.6 ± 14.827.9 ± 2.0—
SecondaryPart B: AUC7 OF MMAE

Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

Time frame:
AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Day*micrograms per milliliter
Part B: AUC7 OF MMAE
Day*micrograms per milliliterPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: AUC7 OF MMAE14.6 ± 63.116.5 ± 55.611.9 ± 51.515.6 ± 51.017.3 ± 67.613.7 ± 83.010.7 ± 57.313.8 ± 45.210.8 ± 64.112.4 ± 25.98.5 ± NA—
SecondaryPart B: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.

Time frame:
Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle= 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Nanograms per milliliter
Part B: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Nanograms per milliliterPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Part B: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters2.8 ± 60.74.5 ± 50.42.6 ± 59.12.7 ± 39.93.3 ± 65.82.9 ± 114.91.7 ± 28.92.4 ± 52.71.4 ± NA—1.7 ± NA—
SecondaryPart A: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) Incidence

A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.

Time frame:
From first ATA draw to last ATA draw (maximum up to 8.8 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) Incidence
ParticipantsPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg
Baseline Negative and Negative post-baseline8294410
Baseline Negative and Positive post-baseline101101
Baseline Positive and Negative post-baseline002101
Baseline Positive and Positive post-baseline000000
SecondaryPart B: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline ATA Incidence

A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.

Time frame:
From first ATA draw to last ATA draw (maximum up to 22.1 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.1 months for 1 mg/kg)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Part B: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline ATA Incidence
ParticipantsPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Baseline Negative and Negative post-baseline1011131211109242012
Baseline Negative and Positive post-baseline114021140200
Baseline Positive and Negative post-baseline102011010000
Baseline Positive and Positive post-baseline010000000000

Adverse events

Collected over From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg9/10 (90%)5/10 (50%)10/10 (100%)
Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg2/2 (100%)1/2 (50%)2/2 (100%)
Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg10/13 (76.9%)7/13 (53.8%)13/13 (100%)
Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg7/7 (100%)2/7 (28.6%)6/7 (85.7%)
Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg4/5 (80%)3/5 (60%)5/5 (100%)
Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg5/12 (41.7%)3/12 (25%)12/12 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg13/16 (81.3%)6/16 (37.5%)15/16 (93.8%)
Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg13/16 (81.3%)5/16 (31.3%)16/16 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg14/19 (73.7%)9/19 (47.4%)19/19 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg12/14 (85.7%)8/14 (57.1%)14/14 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg12/17 (70.6%)9/17 (52.9%)17/17 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg13/21 (61.9%)12/21 (57.1%)19/21 (90.5%)
Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg7/13 (53.8%)4/13 (30.8%)13/13 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg16/30 (53.3%)11/30 (36.7%)30/30 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg2/2 (100%)1/2 (50%)2/2 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg1/2 (50%)2/2 (100%)2/2 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg2/2 (100%)1/2 (50%)2/2 (100%)
Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg2/2 (100%)0/2 (0%)2/2 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 101
Most frequent serious events
EventPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/100/21/130/70/50/120/160/161/190/140/173/210/130/300/20/21/20/2
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/100/20/130/70/50/120/160/160/190/141/172/210/132/300/20/21/20/2
IleusGastrointestinal disorders0/100/20/130/70/50/120/160/160/190/140/170/210/130/300/21/20/20/2
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/100/21/130/71/50/120/161/162/191/141/170/210/131/300/21/20/20/2
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders0/100/20/130/70/50/120/160/160/190/140/170/210/130/300/21/20/20/2
Haemorrhage intracranialNervous system disorders0/100/20/130/70/50/120/160/160/190/140/170/210/130/300/21/20/20/2
Spinal cord compressionNervous system disorders0/100/20/130/70/50/120/160/160/190/140/170/210/130/300/20/21/20/2
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/100/20/130/70/50/120/160/160/191/140/170/210/130/301/20/20/20/2
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/101/20/130/70/50/120/160/160/190/140/170/210/131/300/20/20/20/2
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/101/21/130/71/50/120/160/160/190/140/170/210/130/300/20/20/20/2
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 231
Most frequent other events
EventPart A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/102/24/131/72/54/122/164/164/193/146/175/214/1313/300/20/20/21/2
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/100/26/133/72/54/126/169/166/195/145/178/214/1314/301/20/22/21/2
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/100/26/134/73/52/127/162/165/196/1410/178/216/1311/301/20/21/22/2
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/101/24/130/71/51/123/162/165/192/141/172/213/131/300/22/20/21/2
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/100/24/130/72/51/124/164/165/191/143/171/213/131/302/20/20/20/2
FatigueGeneral disorders1/100/210/135/72/52/127/169/1612/197/1412/1711/217/1313/301/20/20/21/2
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/101/28/133/71/53/126/167/1611/196/148/179/214/1316/301/21/20/20/2
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/100/21/131/73/54/123/162/163/191/146/172/215/138/300/20/20/20/2
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/100/25/134/71/57/123/165/165/194/147/177/214/1317/300/20/20/20/2
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/100/22/131/71/52/122/160/162/192/142/176/211/137/300/20/21/21/2

Baseline characteristics

The safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study drug.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kgTotal
Mean63.7 ± 9.580.5 ± 4.967.2 ± 13.763.1 ± 12.370.8 ± 11.264.7 ± 10.365.0 ± 10.767.3 ± 8.863.9 ± 9.363.8 ± 9.960.5 ± 8.360.9 ± 8.971.9 ± 8.563.4 ± 12.261.0 ± 1.466.0 ± 2.856.0 ± 2.877.5 ± 6.464.7 ± 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kgTotal
Female21821074532307010046
Male81554129121411151813232122157
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kgTotal
Hispanic or Latino0000000100010001003
Not Hispanic or Latino10213751215131814141612272122185
Unknown or Not Reported00000012103413000015
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kgPart B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000000000000000000
Asian30214821319403000041
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000000000000000000
Black or African American1010000011001000005
White52106141413141151210252222140
More than one race0000000000000000000
Unknown or Not Reported10000002113522000017
08

Study locations

66 sites
  • Ironwood Cancer & Research Centers - Chandler
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Adventist Health White Memorial
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Providence Medical Foundation
    Santa Rosa, California 95403, United States
  • Eastern CT Hematology and Oncology Associates
    Norwich, Connecticut 06360, United States
  • GenesisCare USA
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • AdventHealth Cancer Institute
    Orlando, Florida 32804, United States
  • IACT Health
    Columbus, Georgia 31904, United States
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Decatur Memorial Hospital - Illinois
    Decatur, Illinois 62526, United States
  • Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology
    Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804, United States
  • University of Maryland
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • HealthPartners Institute
    Saint Louis Park, Minnesota 55416, United States
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89169, United States
  • Valley Hospital, The / Luckow Pavilion
    Paramus, New Jersey 07652, United States
  • San Juan Oncology Associates
    Farmington, New Mexico 87401, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Stony Brook University Cancer Center
    Stony Brook, New York 11794-7263, United States
  • FirstHealth of the Carolinas
    Pinehurst, North Carolina 28374, United States
  • Gabrail Cancer Center Research, LLC
    Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
  • Providence Portland Medical Center
    Portland, Oregon 97213, United States
  • Saint Francis Hospital / Bon Secours - South Carolina
    Greenville, South Carolina 29601, United States
  • Erlanger Oncology and Hematology
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37403, United States
  • Tennessee Oncology-Nashville/Sarah Cannon Research Institute
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center
    Lubbock, Texas 79410, United States
  • UT Health East Texas Hope Cancer Center
    Tyler, Texas 75701, United States
  • Carbone Cancer Center / University of Wisconsin
    Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
  • Flinders Medical Centre
    Bedford Park, Other 5042, Australia
  • Townsville Cancer Center
    Douglas, Other 4814, Australia
  • Peninsula and South East Oncology
    Frankston, Other 3199, Australia
  • Central Coast Local Health District (Gosford and Wyong Hospitals)
    Gosford, Other 2250, Australia
  • Royal Hobart Hospital
    Hobart, Other 7000, Australia
  • Cabrini
    Malvern, Other 3144, Australia
  • St Vincents Hospital Sydney
    Sydney, Other 2010, Australia
  • Melanoma Institute Australia
    Wollstonecraft, Other 2065, Australia
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
    Bologna, Other 40138, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
    Firenze, Other 50134, Italy
  • ASL 3 Genovese Villa Scassi Hospital
    Genova, Other 16125, Italy
  • San Luca Hospital
    Lucca, Other 55100, Italy
  • Irccs Irst
    Meldola, Other 47014, Italy
  • Istituto Europeo di Oncologia
    Milano, Other 20141, Italy
  • Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital
    Milan, Other 20162, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
    Monza, Other 20900, Italy
  • Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale
    Napoli, Other 80131, Italy
  • Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
    Roma, Other 00168, Italy
  • AOUS Policlinico Le Scotte
    Siena, Other 53100, Italy
  • Dong-A University Hospital
    Busan, Other 49201, Korea, Republic of
  • Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
    Hwasun, Other 58128, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
    Seongnam-si, Other 13605, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, Other 03080, Korea, Republic of
  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
    Seoul, Other 03722, Korea, Republic of
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, Other 06351, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center
    Seoul, Other 07671, Korea, Republic of
  • Korea University Guro Hospital
    Seoul, Other 152-703/08308, Korea, Republic of
  • St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
    Suwon-si, Other 16247, Korea, Republic of
  • Ajou University Hospital
    Suwon-si, Other 16499, Korea, Republic of
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
    Taichung, Other 40705, Taiwan
  • National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, Other 70403, Taiwan
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
    Taipei, Other 10002, Taiwan
  • Taipei Medical University Hospital
    Taipei, Other 110, Taiwan
  • The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
    Glasgow, Other G12 0YN, United Kingdom
  • The Royal Marsden Hospital
    London, Other SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute UK
    London, Other W1G 6AD, United Kingdom
  • UCL Cancer Institute
    London, Other WC1E6DD, United Kingdom
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, Other M20 4BX, United Kingdom
  • The Royal Marsden Hospital (Surrey)
    Sutton, Other SM2 5PT, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 2, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 31, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04032704
Lead sponsor
Seagen Inc.
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 25, 2019
Start date
Oct 9, 2019
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2023
Completion
Nov 28, 2023
Results posted
Mar 10, 2025
Last update
Mar 10, 2025

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion