A Phase 2 interventional study of ladiratuzumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in Small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Squamous and Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Non-squamous, sponsored by Seagen Inc.. Terminated at 66 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.
Sponsored by Seagen Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This trial will study ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) alone and with pembrolizumab to find out if it works to treat different types of solid tumors. It will also find out what side effects may occur. A side effect is anything the drug does besides treating cancer.
This trial is designed to assess the antitumor activity, safety, and tolerability of LV alone and with pembrolizumab, for the treatment of solid tumors. Participants with the following advanced solid tumors will be enrolled:
Cohort 1: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) Cohort 2: non-small cell lung cancer-squamous (NSCLC-squamous) Cohort 3: non-small cell lung cancer-nonsquamous (NSCLC-nonsquamous) Cohort 4: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) Cohort 5: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (esophageal-squamous) Cohort 6: gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma Cohort 7: castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) Cohort 8: melanoma
Participants will continue to receive study treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, consent withdrawal, study termination by the sponsor, pregnancy, or death, whichever comes first.
6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 205 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.
Browse Carcinoma studies →Seagen Inc. is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 13 (52%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All Cohorts
Cohort 1: SCLC (Parts A and B)
Cohort 2: NSCLC-squamous (Parts A and B)
Must have disease progression during or following systemic therapy
Cohort 3: NSCLC-nonsquamous (Parts A and B)
Must have disease progression during or following systemic therapy
Cohort 4: HNSCC (Parts A and B)
Must have unresectable locally recurrent or metastatic disease
Cohort 5: esophageal-squamous (Parts A and B)
Cohort 6: gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma (Parts A and B)
Cohort 7: CRPC (Part B only)
Must have histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
No prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the metastatic CRPC setting
Participants with measurable disease are eligible if the following criteria are met:
Cohort 8: Melanoma (Parts B and C)
Must have histologically or cytologically confirmed cutaneous malignant melanoma
Exclusion Criteria
Monotherapy dosing schedule 1.
Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin
Monotherapy dosing schedule 2.
Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin
Monotherapy dosing schedule 3.
Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin
Combination dosing schedule 1.
Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin · Drug: pembrolizumab
Combination dosing schedule 2.
Drug: ladiratuzumab vedotin · Drug: pembrolizumab
Intravenous (into the vein; IV) infusion
Also known as: SGN-LIV1A
200mg given by IV on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
Also known as: Keytruda
Part A: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as more than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR or PR or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 8.3 months)
Part B: Confirmed ORR as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1
Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR or PR or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 34.7 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.7 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Part B: Confirmed Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate as Determined by Investigator According to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Criteria, for Prostate Cancer
Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. PSA progression was defined as per PCWG3 criteria- a) if a participant presented first a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir, and which was confirmed by a consecutive second value \>=3 weeks later that fulfilled the same criteria (that is, a confirmed rising trend); b) if a participant did not present a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 ng/mL increased from baseline beyond 12 weeks.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment up to the date of last response assessment (maximum up to 13.5 months)
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs), Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant/ clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline)/worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent/significant disability/incapacity \& may cause congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version (v) 4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months)
Part B: Number of Participants With TEAEs, TESAEs, Treatment Related TEAEs and >= Grade 3 TEAE
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, or a clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent or significant disability or incapacity and may cause congenital anomaly or birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).
Time frame: From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months)
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST v1.1
DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met stable disease (SD) criteria at least once after start of study treatment at minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR, PR or SD or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 4.1 months)
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DCR According to RECIST v1.1
DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met SD criteria at least once after start of study treatment at a minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 centimeter (cm). Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
Time frame: From the first dose of study treatment until the first documented CR, PR or SD or new anticancer therapies or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.5 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 1.5 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST v1.1
DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Time frame: From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.7 months)
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DOR According to RECIST v1.1
DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
Time frame: From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 32.0 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 4.2 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-DOR, for Prostate Cancer
PSA-DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of PSA response (subsequently confirmed at least 3 weeks apart) to the first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. The confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
Time frame: From the first documentation of CR or PR to PD or death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 3 months)
Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST v1.1
PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 8.3 months)
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PFS According to RECIST v1.1
PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 34.7 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.7 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-PFS, for Prostate Cancer
PSA-PFS: time from start of study treatment to first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis or who are removed from study prior to documentation of PD was censored at date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of PD or clinical PD or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 5.7 months)
Part A: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 27.5 months)
Part B: Overall Survival
OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: From first dose of study treatment to the date of death or censoring whichever occurred first (maximum up to 37.5 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 20.9 months for 1 mg/kg dose level)
Part A: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Between Days 0 to 21 (AUC21) of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of LV was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
Time frame: AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)
Part A: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) According to Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Part A: AUC21 of Total Antibody (TAB)
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
Time frame: AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)
Part A: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Part A: AUC21 of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE)
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
Time frame: AUC21 is reported on Day 21 using PK concentrations assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post dose of Cycle 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1 of cycle)
Part A: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 21 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hour, 4 hour, 48 hour, 168 hour and 336 hour post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days)
Part B: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Between Day 0 to 7 (AUC7) of ADC
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of ADC was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
Time frame: AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Part B: Cmax According to ADC Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Part B: AUC7 of TAB
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
Time frame: AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Part B: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle = 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Part B: AUC7 OF MMAE
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
Time frame: AUC7 is reported at Day 7 using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2hr, 4hr, 48hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1; pre-dose PK concentration on Day 8 in Cycle 1 (each cycle=21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Part B: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
Time frame: Cmax during Day 1 to 7 post LV administration on Day 1 was reported using PK concentration assessed at Pre-dose, end of infusion, 2 hr, 4 hr, 48 hr post-dose of LV administration on Day 1 (each cycle= 21 days, LV administered on Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycle)
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline Antitherapeutic Antibody (ATA) Incidence
A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.
Time frame: From first ATA draw to last ATA draw (maximum up to 8.8 months)
Part B: Number of Participants With Positive Post-Baseline ATA Incidence
A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.
Time frame: From first ATA draw to last ATA draw (maximum up to 22.1 months for 1.25 mg/kg and 5.1 months for 1 mg/kg)
This study had Parts A, B and C. Study was terminated and Part C was not opened. A total of 205 participants were enrolled in Part A (49 participants) and Part B (156 participants) of this study. In Part A all enrolled participants received study intervention while in Part B, 2 participants did not receive study intervention.
| Milestone | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 10 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 10 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Death | 9 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Milestone | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 19 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 14 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 | 19 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 14 | 31 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Study termination by sponsor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 7 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR was defined as more than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.
| Percentage of participants | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) | 10 (0.3 to 44.5) | 0 (0.0 to 84.2) | 8 (0.2 to 36.0) | 14 (0.4 to 57.9) | 20 (0.5 to 71.6) | 8 (0.2 to 38.5) |
Confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed CR or PR per RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants who did not have at least 2 post-baseline response assessment (initial response and confirmation scan) were counted as non-responders.
| Percentage of participants | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Confirmed ORR as Determined by Investigator According to RECIST v1.1 | 6 (0.2 to 30.2) | 13 (1.6 to 38.3) | 11 (1.3 to 33.1) | 0 (0.0 to 23.2) | 18 (3.8 to 43.4) | 14 (3.0 to 36.3) | 0 (0.0 to 24.7) | 20 (7.7 to 38.6) | 0 (0.0 to 84.2) | 0 (0.0 to 84.2) | 0 (0.0 to 84.2) | 50 (1.3 to 98.7) |
Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. PSA progression was defined as per PCWG3 criteria- a) if a participant presented first a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir, and which was confirmed by a consecutive second value \>=3 weeks later that fulfilled the same criteria (that is, a confirmed rising trend); b) if a participant did not present a decline from baseline, progression was defined as the first PSA increase that was \>=25% and \>=2 ng/mL increased from baseline beyond 12 weeks.
| Percentage of participants | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg |
|---|---|
| Part B: Confirmed Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Response Rate as Determined by Investigator According to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Criteria, for Prostate Cancer | 23 (5.0 to 53.8) |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant/ clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline)/worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent/significant disability/incapacity \& may cause congenital anomaly/birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version (v) 4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).
| Participants | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAEs | 10 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 12 |
| TESAEs | 5 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Treatment Related TEAEs | 9 | 2 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 11 |
| TEAEs (>= Grade 3) | 7 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, or a clinical investigational participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs included both SAEs ad all non-SAEs. TEAEs were defined as newly occurring (not present at baseline) or worsening after first dose of study treatment. TESAEs were any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that: suspected to cause death; life-threatening; required hospitalization; persistent or significant disability or incapacity and may cause congenital anomaly or birth defect. Treatment related TEAEs were related to study treatment and relatedness was judged by investigator. TEAEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03 (grade 1= mild, grade 2= moderate, grade 3= severe and grade 4= life-threatening).
| Participants | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAEs | 15 | 16 | 19 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 13 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| TESAEs | 6 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Treatment Related TEAEs | 13 | 16 | 18 | 12 | 17 | 19 | 12 | 28 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| TEAEs (>= Grade 3) | 12 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met stable disease (SD) criteria at least once after start of study treatment at minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
| Percentage of participants | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Disease Control Rate (DCR) According to RECIST v1.1 | 40 (12.2 to 73.8) | 50 (1.3 to 98.7) | 46 (19.2 to 74.9) | 57 (18.4 to 90.1) | 60 (14.7 to 94.7) | 33 (9.9 to 65.1) |
DCR was defined as percentage of participants who achieved confirmed and unconfirmed CR or PR per RECIST v1.1 or met SD criteria at least once after start of study treatment at a minimum interval of 5 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as \>= 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 centimeter (cm). Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression.
| Percentage of participants | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DCR According to RECIST v1.1 | 19 (4.0 to 45.6) | 50 (24.7 to 75.3) | 58 (33.5 to 79.7) | 64 (35.1 to 87.2) | 59 (32.9 to 81.6) | 52 (29.8 to 74.3) | 62 (31.6 to 86.1) | 77 (57.7 to 90.1) | 50 (1.3 to 98.7) | 50 (1.3 to 98.7) | 0 (0.0 to 84.2) | 100 (15.8 to 100.0) |
DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
| Months | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST v1.1 | 5.7 (NA to NA) | — | 5.5 (NA to NA) | 3.7 (NA to NA) | 2.7 (NA to NA) | NA (NA to NA) |
DOR:time from 1st documentation of OR(confirmed CR/PR per RECIST Version 1.1) to 1st documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.CR:disappearance of all target lesions.Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm.PR:\>=30 % decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference baseline sum diameters. Participants do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis/are removed from study prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at last disease assessment prior to start of new treatment.PD:at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study.In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must demonstrate absolute increase of 0.5 cm.Appearance of one/more new lesions was considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used.
| Months | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined DOR According to RECIST v1.1 | NA (NA to NA) | 7.5 (5.78 to NA) | NA (16.59 to NA) | — | NA (3.06 to NA) | 3.9 (2.60 to NA) | — | 8.3 (5.62 to NA) | — | — | — | 4.2 (NA to NA) |
PSA-DOR was defined as the time from the first documentation of PSA response (subsequently confirmed at least 3 weeks apart) to the first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Confirmed PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a reduction from baseline PSA level of at least 50%, measured twice \>= 3 weeks apart. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. The confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
| Months | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg |
|---|---|
| Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-DOR, for Prostate Cancer | 3.0 (1.9 to NA) |
PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
| Months | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Confirmed Investigator Determined Progression Free Survival (PFS) According to RECIST v1.1 | 1.4 (0.53 to 2.69) | 1.5 (1.25 to NA) | 2.5 (0.46 to 4.17) | 2.3 (0.33 to 4.86) | 2.9 (0.59 to NA) | 1.4 (1.31 to 4.17) |
PFS: time from start of study treatment to the first documentation of PD by RECIST v1.1 or clinical PD. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: At least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
| Months | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PFS According to RECIST v1.1 | 1.4 (1.18 to 2.04) | 1.8 (1.12 to 5.72) | 2.4 (1.31 to 2.96) | 2.7 (1.18 to 2.86) | 2.8 (1.38 to 3.32) | 2.3 (1.25 to 2.73) | 4.9 (2.10 to 5.65) | 4.2 (2.50 to 6.97) | 1.9 (1.02 to NA) | NA (NA to NA) | 1.5 (1.35 to NA) | 4.2 (2.76 to NA) |
PSA-PFS: time from start of study treatment to first documentation of PSA progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at time of analysis or who are removed from study prior to documentation of PD was censored at date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. PD: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference smallest sum on study (this included baseline sum if that is smallest on study). In addition to relative increase of 20%, sum must also demonstrate absolute increase of at least 0.5 cm. Appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Median was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and CI was calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method.
| Months | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg |
|---|---|
| Part B: Confirmed Investigator Determined PSA-PFS, for Prostate Cancer | 3.7 (2.8 to 5.1) |
OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
| Months | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Overall Survival (OS) | 6.1 (1.38 to 15.84) | 2.5 (1.74 to NA) | 6.5 (2.20 to 16.95) | 4.8 (0.33 to 6.97) | 7.2 (0.59 to NA) | 8.7 (3.98 to NA) |
OS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants who do not have PD and are still on study at the time of an analysis or who are removed from the study prior to documentation of PD was censored at the date of last disease assessment documenting absence of PD. Participants who started a new anticancer treatment prior to documentation of PD were censored at the date of last disease assessment prior to the start of new treatment. Median was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
| Months | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Overall Survival | 4.7 (3.45 to 8.74) | 9.0 (4.53 to 12.68) | 9.3 (2.92 to 20.14) | 5.2 (3.42 to 18.33) | 12.7 (4.17 to 15.28) | 3.8 (1.77 to 8.61) | 10.1 (6.47 to NA) | 11.5 (9.26 to 15.41) | 11.1 (1.22 to NA) | NA (1.71 to NA) | 5.6 (1.64 to NA) | 14.2 (8.34 to NA) |
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of LV was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
| Day*micrograms per milliliter | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Area Under the Serum Concentration Time Curve Between Days 0 to 21 (AUC21) of Ladiratuzumab Vedotin | 142.5 ± 18.9 | 175.6 ± 16.5 | 145.3 ± 35.1 | 146.6 ± 28.3 | 123.2 ± 21.7 | 132.0 ± 26.0 |
Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
| Micrograms per milliliter | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) According to Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Pharmacokinetic Parameters | 50.4 ± 31.2 | 58.6 ± 1.0 | 55.8 ± 29.6 | 52.3 ± 23.6 | 39.6 ± 14.7 | 55.2 ± 64.9 |
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
| Day*micrograms per milliliter | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: AUC21 of Total Antibody (TAB) | 302.4 ± 19.7 | 328.5 ± 17.8 | 280.3 ± 34.1 | 292.3 ± 28.2 | 219.8 ± 28.5 | 258.9 ± 31.6 |
Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
| Micrograms per milliliter | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters | 61.6 ± 23.7 | 66.1 ± 20.8 | 68.2 ± 30.5 | 61.4 ± 16.1 | 50.7 ± 38.3 | 57.2 ± 24.1 |
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 21 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
| Day*nanogram per milliliter | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: AUC21 of Monomethyl Auristatin E (MMAE) | 34.1 ± 21.1 | 50.5 ± NA | 62.9 ± 79.3 | 66.2 ± 45.6 | 91.0 ± 19.3 | 35.2 ± 36.9 |
Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
| Nanogram per milliliter | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters | 2.8 ± 15.7 | 5.7 ± NA | 6.4 ± 83.1 | 6.3 ± 10.6 | 11.3 ± 12.6 | 3.6 ± 41.8 |
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of ADC was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
| Day*micrograms per milliliter | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Area Under the Concentration Time Curve Between Day 0 to 7 (AUC7) of ADC | 57.3 ± 23.2 | 51.7 ± 16.9 | 59.5 ± 29.7 | 60.6 ± 36.7 | 43.3 ± 12.6 | 50.7 ± 27.2 | 66.0 ± 42.8 | 46.8 ± 25.0 | 42.1 ± 0.5 | 52.0 ± 0.1 | 44.8 ± NA | — |
Cmax according to ADC pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
| Micrograms per milliliter | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Cmax According to ADC Pharmacokinetic Parameters | 35.3 ± 35.0 | 27.8 ± 19.7 | 30.9 ± 19.2 | 28.7 ± 28.6 | 25.0 ± 28.8 | 28.0 ± 17.2 | 30.5 ± 15.1 | 25.4 ± 21.9 | 29.5 ± 20.3 | 24.3 ± 10.2 | 24.1 ± 6.2 | — |
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7of TAB was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
| Day*micrograms per milliliter | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: AUC7 of TAB | 101.1 ± 29.4 | 92.7 ± 18.7 | 106.9 ± 29.8 | 91.2 ± 30.9 | 73.9 ± 20.7 | 85.7 ± 26.0 | 106.5 ± 28.2 | 74.7 ± 26.3 | 76.6 ± 22.6 | 88.6 ± 11.1 | 71.4 ± NA | — |
Cmax according to TAB pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
| Micrograms per milliliter | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Cmax According to TAB Pharmacokinetic Parameters | 38.3 ± 17.9 | 31.6 ± 16.6 | 36.8 ± 21.8 | 32.1 ± 26.2 | 27.4 ± 28.9 | 31.3 ± 19.7 | 32.6 ± 25.9 | 32.5 ± 73.8 | 26.8 ± 15.6 | 30.6 ± 14.8 | 27.9 ± 2.0 | — |
Area under the observed concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to Day 7 of MMAE was calculated by noncompartmental analysis.
| Day*micrograms per milliliter | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: AUC7 OF MMAE | 14.6 ± 63.1 | 16.5 ± 55.6 | 11.9 ± 51.5 | 15.6 ± 51.0 | 17.3 ± 67.6 | 13.7 ± 83.0 | 10.7 ± 57.3 | 13.8 ± 45.2 | 10.8 ± 64.1 | 12.4 ± 25.9 | 8.5 ± NA | — |
Cmax according to MMAE pharmacokinetic parameters was reported.
| Nanograms per milliliter | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part B: Cmax According to MMAE Pharmacokinetic Parameters | 2.8 ± 60.7 | 4.5 ± 50.4 | 2.6 ± 59.1 | 2.7 ± 39.9 | 3.3 ± 65.8 | 2.9 ± 114.9 | 1.7 ± 28.9 | 2.4 ± 52.7 | 1.4 ± NA | — | 1.7 ± NA | — |
A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.
| Participants | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline Negative and Negative post-baseline | 8 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| Baseline Negative and Positive post-baseline | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Baseline Positive and Negative post-baseline | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Baseline Positive and Positive post-baseline | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
A positive baseline ATA result was considered positive post-baseline if the post-baseline ATA titer result was at least four times higher than the baseline result.
| Participants | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline Negative and Negative post-baseline | 10 | 11 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Baseline Negative and Positive post-baseline | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Baseline Positive and Negative post-baseline | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Baseline Positive and Positive post-baseline | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Collected over From start of study treatment up to 30 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to 37.5 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | 9/10 (90%) | 5/10 (50%) | 10/10 (100%) |
| Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | 2/2 (100%) | 1/2 (50%) | 2/2 (100%) |
| Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | 10/13 (76.9%) | 7/13 (53.8%) | 13/13 (100%) |
| Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | 7/7 (100%) | 2/7 (28.6%) | 6/7 (85.7%) |
| Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | 4/5 (80%) | 3/5 (60%) | 5/5 (100%) |
| Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | 5/12 (41.7%) | 3/12 (25%) | 12/12 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 13/16 (81.3%) | 6/16 (37.5%) | 15/16 (93.8%) |
| Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 13/16 (81.3%) | 5/16 (31.3%) | 16/16 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 14/19 (73.7%) | 9/19 (47.4%) | 19/19 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 12/14 (85.7%) | 8/14 (57.1%) | 14/14 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 12/17 (70.6%) | 9/17 (52.9%) | 17/17 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 13/21 (61.9%) | 12/21 (57.1%) | 19/21 (90.5%) |
| Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 7/13 (53.8%) | 4/13 (30.8%) | 13/13 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | 16/30 (53.3%) | 11/30 (36.7%) | 30/30 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | 2/2 (100%) | 1/2 (50%) | 2/2 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | 1/2 (50%) | 2/2 (100%) | 2/2 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | 2/2 (100%) | 1/2 (50%) | 2/2 (100%) |
| Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg | 2/2 (100%) | 0/2 (0%) | 2/2 (100%) |
| Event | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 1/10 | 0/2 | 1/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 1/19 | 0/14 | 0/17 | 3/21 | 0/13 | 0/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 0/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 0/14 | 1/17 | 2/21 | 0/13 | 2/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 |
| IleusGastrointestinal disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 0/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 0/14 | 0/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 0/30 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| PneumoniaInfections and infestations | 1/10 | 0/2 | 1/13 | 0/7 | 1/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 1/16 | 2/19 | 1/14 | 1/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 1/30 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 0/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 0/14 | 0/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 0/30 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| Haemorrhage intracranialNervous system disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 0/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 0/14 | 0/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 0/30 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| Spinal cord compressionNervous system disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 0/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 0/14 | 0/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 0/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 |
| Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 0/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 1/14 | 0/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 0/30 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/10 | 1/2 | 0/13 | 0/7 | 0/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 0/14 | 0/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 1/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/10 | 1/2 | 1/13 | 0/7 | 1/5 | 0/12 | 0/16 | 0/16 | 0/19 | 0/14 | 0/17 | 0/21 | 0/13 | 0/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| Event | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 2/10 | 2/2 | 4/13 | 1/7 | 2/5 | 4/12 | 2/16 | 4/16 | 4/19 | 3/14 | 6/17 | 5/21 | 4/13 | 13/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 6/13 | 3/7 | 2/5 | 4/12 | 6/16 | 9/16 | 6/19 | 5/14 | 5/17 | 8/21 | 4/13 | 14/30 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 2/2 | 1/2 |
| Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 3/10 | 0/2 | 6/13 | 4/7 | 3/5 | 2/12 | 7/16 | 2/16 | 5/19 | 6/14 | 10/17 | 8/21 | 6/13 | 11/30 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 2/2 |
| HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 3/10 | 1/2 | 4/13 | 0/7 | 1/5 | 1/12 | 3/16 | 2/16 | 5/19 | 2/14 | 1/17 | 2/21 | 3/13 | 1/30 | 0/2 | 2/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 |
| DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 3/10 | 0/2 | 4/13 | 0/7 | 2/5 | 1/12 | 4/16 | 4/16 | 5/19 | 1/14 | 3/17 | 1/21 | 3/13 | 1/30 | 2/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 1/10 | 0/2 | 10/13 | 5/7 | 2/5 | 2/12 | 7/16 | 9/16 | 12/19 | 7/14 | 12/17 | 11/21 | 7/13 | 13/30 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 3/10 | 1/2 | 8/13 | 3/7 | 1/5 | 3/12 | 6/16 | 7/16 | 11/19 | 6/14 | 8/17 | 9/21 | 4/13 | 16/30 | 1/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 2/10 | 0/2 | 1/13 | 1/7 | 3/5 | 4/12 | 3/16 | 2/16 | 3/19 | 1/14 | 6/17 | 2/21 | 5/13 | 8/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 3/10 | 0/2 | 5/13 | 4/7 | 1/5 | 7/12 | 3/16 | 5/16 | 5/19 | 4/14 | 7/17 | 7/21 | 4/13 | 17/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/10 | 0/2 | 2/13 | 1/7 | 1/5 | 2/12 | 2/16 | 0/16 | 2/19 | 2/14 | 2/17 | 6/21 | 1/13 | 7/30 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 1/2 |
The safety analysis set included all participants who received any amount of study drug.
| Age, Continuous(Years) | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 63.7 ± 9.5 | 80.5 ± 4.9 | 67.2 ± 13.7 | 63.1 ± 12.3 | 70.8 ± 11.2 | 64.7 ± 10.3 | 65.0 ± 10.7 | 67.3 ± 8.8 | 63.9 ± 9.3 | 63.8 ± 9.9 | 60.5 ± 8.3 | 60.9 ± 8.9 | 71.9 ± 8.5 | 63.4 ± 12.2 | 61.0 ± 1.4 | 66.0 ± 2.8 | 56.0 ± 2.8 | 77.5 ± 6.4 | 64.7 ± 10.5 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 46 |
| Male | 8 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 13 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 157 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 10 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 15 | 13 | 18 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 12 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 185 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Part A: Cohort 1, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 2, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 3, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 4, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 5, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part A: Cohort 6, LV 2.5 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 2, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 5, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 7, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 8, LV 1.25 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 1, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 3, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 4, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Part B: Cohort 6, LV 1.0 mg/kg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| White | 5 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 10 | 25 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 140 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seagen Inc.