CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04014621ImpACT-PUpdated Oct 30, 2019

Augmenting Cerebral Blood Flow to Preserve the Penumbra Trial

An interventional study of SPG stimulation in Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by BrainsGate. Status unknown at 4 sites in Georgia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-30.

Sponsored by BrainsGate · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to demonstrate that SPG (Sphenopalatine Ganglion) stimulation started within 6 hours from stroke onset slows the expansion of the infarct core volume in acute ischemic stroke.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to identify Acute Ischemic Stroke patients who have a potentially salvageable penumbra and to test if 6 hours of SPG (Sphenopalatine Ganglion) stimulation may "freeze" the volume of the penumbra and reduce the extent of tissue death.

Following a minimally-invasive implantation of the ISS injectable implant, patients will be randomized to either the Treated or Control arm in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be dynamic according to the patient's baseline covariates of core volume, total volume, Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio (HIR), time to baseline imaging, age, NIHSS. Patients in the Treated arm will be treated with active SPG stimulation while patients in the Control arm will undergo sham treatment. After treatment/sham treatment, patients in both groups will undergo a follow up brain non-contrast CT, CT perfusion and CT angiography imaging, 6:45hrs±15min after baseline CTP initiation.

In the case the patient is cooperative, hand strength (pinch and grasp) evaluations should be assessed before and during the 1st treatment/ sham SPG stimulation session.

Following the assessment of the penumbra (after 6 hours) patients will be treated or sham treated for 5 additional consecutive sessions (4 hours each), the first starting within 18-24 hours from stroke onset and the others 18-26 hours from previous treatment initiation and will be followed for 90 days to assess their clinical outcome. In one session (preferably at day 2) Common Carotid Doppler examination is performed to evaluate blood flow dynamics before and during the treatment/sham session.

After the last treatment session, the implant is removed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

  • acute ischemic stroke
  • randomized clinical trial
  • anterior circulation
  • penumbra
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

BrainsGate is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signs \& symptoms consistent with the diagnosis of large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation
  2. Age 18-90 years
  3. Baseline NIHSS ≥ 10
  4. Ability to initiate treatment within 6 hours from stroke onset. Stroke onset is defined as the time the patient was last seen well.
  5. Large vessel total occlusion by CTA
  6. Penumbra ≥ 50ml (Difference between Tmax6 volume and the ischemic core volume (CBF\<38% volume)
  7. Mismatch (Tmax6 volume/ischemic core volume (CBF\<38% volume) ≥1.5
  8. Core and HIR (Tmax10 / Tmax6) volumes: 1. HIR ≥ 0.5 or 2. 0.35 ≤ HIR \< 0.5 and "core volume/time from onset to imaging" ≥ 7mililiter/hour
  9. Signed informed consent from patient him/herself or legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to undergo a contrast brain perfusion scan, including an allergy to contrast media
  2. Opportunity for reperfusion therapy (IV thrombolysis or endovascular treatment)
  3. Neuro-imaging evidence of any intracranial hemorrhage or hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarct or other significant abnormality (e.g. tumor, abscess, suspect for subarachnoid hemorrhage, arteriovenous malformation, cerebral aneurysm).
  4. Significant mass effect with midline shift.
  5. Infarct core volume >150 milliliter
  6. Old non-lacunar infarct in the anterior circulation on the ipsilateral hemisphere.
  7. Previous stroke in the last 6 months or previous stroke with existing sequelae or with mRS > 0 for any reason
  8. Pre-existing Modified Rankin Score >1, even if not stroke-related.
  9. Acute symptomatic arterial occlusions in more than one vascular territory confirmed on CTA/MRA (e.g., bilateral MCA occlusions, or an MCA and a basilar artery occlusion).
  10. Seizures at stroke onset
  11. Baseline blood glucose of \<50mg/dL (2.78 mmol) or >400mg/dL (22.20 mmol)
  12. Severe, sustained hypertension (Systolic BP >185 mmHg or Diastolic BP >110 mmHg)
  13. Current participation in another investigational drug or device study
  14. Presumed septic embolus; suspicion of bacterial endocarditis
  15. Clinical signs and symptoms or evidence for a relevant lesion by neuro-imaging of an acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation (Vertebral, Basilar and/or Posterior Cerebral Artery territories), including but not limited to brain-stem findings and/or cerebellar findings and/or isolated homonymous hemianopia or cortical blindness.
  16. Patients with bleeding propensity and/or one of the following: INR > 1.8, prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ≥ 45 sec., platelets count \< 75×10\^9/L.
  17. Serious systemic infection.
  18. Women known to be pregnant or having a positive or indeterminate pregnancy test.
  19. Patients with other implanted neural stimulator/ electronic devices (pacemakers).
  20. History of SPG ablation ipsilateral to the stroke side.
  21. Any condition in the oral cavity that prevents implantation of the INS.
  22. Known sensitivity to any medications to be used during study.
  23. Subjects who have a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that may preclude safe and complete study participation. Conditions may include: cardiovascular, vascular, pulmonary, hepatic, renal or neurological (other than acute ischemic stroke), or neoplastic diseases, as determined by medical history, physical examination, laboratory tests, or ECG.
  24. Subjects who, in the judgment of the investigator, are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treated

    Treated arm patients will be implanted and treated with one session of SPG stimulation for 6 hours and 5 additional consecutive sessions (4 hours each) of SPG stimulation, the first starting within 18-24 hours from stroke onset and the others 18-26 hours from previous treatment initiation.

    Device: SPG stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    Control arm patients will be implanted and receive 6 hours of sham stimulation and 5 additional consecutive sessions (4 hours each) of sham stimulation, the first starting within 18-24 hours from stroke onset and the others 18-26 hours from previous treatment initiation.

    Device: SPG stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceSPG stimulation

    The BrainsGate Ischemic Stroke System (ISS) consists of an implantable neurostimulator designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) and/or nerves within the greater palatine canal and pterygopalatine fossa.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Volume of core expansion

    The primary outcome measure is the volume of core expansion (in milliliters) in 6:45h±15 min. Core expansion is the difference of two volumes: Core volume (CBF\<38%) in follow up CTP (at 6:45h±15 min) and Core volume (CBF\<38%) in baseline CTP. The difference in the mean core expansion between the Treated and Control groups will be assessed as a continuous variable with adjustment for baseline covariates (Core volume, Total volume, HIR, Time to baseline imaging). The two-sided significance level is 0.05. Handling of missing data in the primary analysis: Patients who die before the 6:45h±15 min follow-up imaging will be assigned a final core volume that equal the baseline total volume. Patients with non-interpretable follow-up imaging will be excluded from the analysis.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in infarct volume between baseline CTP core volume and follow up NCCT infarct volume.

    Difference in infarct volume (in milliliters) between baseline CTP core volume (CBF\<38%) and follow up 6:45h±15 min NCCT infarct volume, adjusted using stratification parameters (Core volume, Total volume, HIR, Time to baseline imaging).

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Difference in infarct volume between baseline CTP core volume and Day-5 NCCT infarct volume

    Difference in infarct volume (in milliliters) between baseline CTP core volume (CBF\<38%) and Day-5 NCCT infarct volume, adjusted using stratification parameters (Core volume, Total volume, HIR, Time to baseline imaging).

    Time frame: Day 5

  3. 3 months mRS

    mRS at 90-day: 1. Utility weighted mRS 2. mRS Dichotomy 0-2 3. mRS Dichotomy 0-3

    Time frame: Day 90±7

  4. Increased blood flow in Common Carotid Doppler

    Increased blood flow in Common Carotid Doppler (if available).

    Time frame: Day 2-6

  5. Improvement in hand motor performance

    Improvement in hand motor performance (if available) using a hand dynamometer (Baseline Hydraulic Hand Dynamometers, Fabrication Enterprises Inc, White Plains NY, USA).

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Safety Data Between the Treatment and Control Arms - Serious Adverse Events

    Incidence of Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Day 90±7

  2. Safety Data Between the Treatment and Control Arms - Mortality

    Incidence of Mortality

    Time frame: Day 90±7

  3. Safety Data Between the Treatment and Control Arms - Symptomatic Intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) SAEs

    Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) SAEs

    Time frame: Day 5

  4. Safety Data Between the Treatment and Control Arms - Pain

    Incidence of Pain adverse events during stimulation

    Time frame: Day 1 to 5

07

Study locations

2 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Academian Z.Tskhakaia West Georgia National Center of Interventional Medicine
    Kutaisi, Georgia
    • Tamar Janelidze, Dr. · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Rustavi Central Hospital
    Rustavi, Georgia
    • Nino Kharaishvili, Dr. · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • K. Eristavi National center of clinical and experimental surgery's hospital "New Life"
    Tbilisi, Georgia
    • Natia Zarkua, Dr. · Contact
    Recruiting
  • LTD High Technology Medical Center University Clinic
    Tbilisi, Georgia
    • Giorgi Ingorokva, Prof. · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04014621
Lead sponsor
BrainsGate
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2019
Start date
Oct 20, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2019

Study contacts

Michael Segev
Contact
michaels@brainsgate.com
+972 4 637 7774 ext. 115
Noam Levy
Contact
noaml@brainsgate.com
+972 4 637 7774 ext. 103
Yoram Slolberg, Dr.
study director · BrainsGate

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion