CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03767192ImpACT-24AUpdated Jan 28, 2019

Implant for Augmentation of Cerebral Blood Flow Trial, Effectiveness and Safety in a 24 Hour Window (ImpACT-24A)

An interventional study of Active Stimulation and Sham Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Stroke, sponsored by BrainsGate. Terminated at 8 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-28.

Sponsored by BrainsGate · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Protocol Amendment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jan 2011, 15 years 9 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
  • Registered 9 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2009, registered Dec 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
327
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of SPG stimulation with the ISS in patients with an acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation initiated within 24 hours from stroke onset.

Read the detailed description

This study was first registered as NCT00826059 on January 19, 2009 under the name ImpACT-24.

Background:

Recruitment to ImpACT-24 was halted, the protocol was amended and then the study was resumed. Later, it was decided to define the first part (before the halt) as a separate study - ImpACT-24A, and identify the continuation of the study as ImpACT-24B. ImpACT-24B continues to be registered as NCT00826059, and ImpACT-24A is registered in this new record.

Detailed Description:

A multi-center, multinational, randomized, double blind, sham control, adjunctive to Standard of Care, parallel arm study with ongoing DSMB review of accumulated safety data.

Screening:

Treatment should be initiated between 8 and 24 hours from stroke onset. All screened patients will be identified by patient number and will sign the informed consent prior to any study procedure initiation.

Period 1: Day 1-5

Day 1- Eligible subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 (ISS Stimulation: Sham Control) ratio:

Group 1: Implantation and ISS Stimulation during five consecutive days \& Standard of Care Group 2: Implantation and Sham Stimulation during five consecutive days \& Standard of Care The implantation will be performed by a trained physician. Stimulation/sham stimulation will be delivered Day 2-5 ISS / Sham Stimulation will be repeated during the following four consecutive days by trained personnel within 18-26 hours from preceding stimulation.

Day 5 / Day of Discharge. Following the last ISS /Sham Stimulation, explantation will be performed.

Subjects will continue with Standard of Care as needed and will be released from the hospital upon investigator's judgment.

Period 2: Day of Discharge - 90±7 days During this period both groups (ISS Stimulation and Sham Control) will be treated according to Standard of Care either at the hospital, rehabilitation center or at home.

Scheduled visits will be performed on day 30±7 and day 60 ±7, which will include safety and effectiveness assessments.

Final Visit Day 90±7 days: The final visit will be performed at the study site and will include safety and effectiveness evaluations.

Patients will be contacted by study personnel via telephone on Day 180±7 and on Day 360±7 in order to assess their quality of life status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

  • acute ischemic stroke
  • randomized clinical trial
  • effectiveness
  • safety
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 327 is above the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

BrainsGate is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: ≥ 18 years and ≤ 85 of both genders.
  2. Clinical diagnosis of an acute ischemic stroke in the Carotid, Middle or Anterior Cerebral Artery territories
  3. Baseline NIHSS ≥ 7 and ≤ 18
  4. Ability to initiate treatment within 8- 24 hours from stroke onset.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Intracranial hemorrhage or hemorrhagic transformation
  2. Massive stroke
  3. Acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation
  4. Minor stroke
  5. Treated with IV-tPA ,IA-tPA or neurothrombectomy devices for the current stroke
  6. Previous stroke in the last 6 months or pre-existing disability
  7. Patients with bleeding propensity or any condition in the oral cavity that prevents implantation
  8. Known cerebral arteriovenous malformation, cerebral aneurysm.
  9. Clinical suspicion of septic embolus.
  10. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >185 mmHg and/or diastolic >110 mmHg)
  11. Serious systemic infection.
  12. Women known to be pregnant or having a positive or indeterminate pregnancy test.
  13. Patients with other implanted neural stimulator/ electronic devices (pacemakers).
  14. Life expectancy \< 1 year from causes other than stroke.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
327 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Stimulation

    Device: The Ischemic Stroke System SPG stimulation and standard of care

    Device: Active Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation

    Device: Sham control Sham stimulation and standard of care

    Device: Sham Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceActive Stimulation

    SPG stimulation and standard of care

  • DeviceSham Stimulation

    Sham SPG stimulation and standard of care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sliding Dichotomy modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 3 months

    Final global disability level on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months better than expectation (sliding dichotomy analysis) ) assessed in the modified intention to treat (mITT) population defined as all randomized subjects receiving at least the minimal exposure of 1 treatment (ISS Stimulation or Sham Control) session out of the 5 planned sessions. mRS Scale: * 0 - No symptoms. * 1 - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. * 2 - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. * 3 - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. * 4 - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. * 5 - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. * 6 - Dead.

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

  2. Number of participants with Serious Adverse Events

    Comparison between the active and sham stimulation groups of all serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

  3. Number of participants with neurological deterioration

    Comparison between the active and sham stimulation groups of the rate of neurological deterioration, defined as an increase of 4 or more points on the NIHSS related to any neurological event within the first 10 days after stroke onset

    Time frame: 10 days

  4. Number of participants with implantation complications

    The rate of implantation complications as classified by the investigator

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

  5. Number of participants with stimulation-related adverse events

    Comparison between the active and sham stimulation groups of stimulation-related adverse events as classified by the investigator

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

  6. Mortality rate

    Comparison of mortality rates between the active and sham stimulation groups

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sliding Dichotomous 90-day mRS for patients with Aphasia at baseline

    Sliding Dichotomous 90-day mRS for patients with Aphasia at baseline mRS Scale: * 0 - No symptoms. * 1 - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms. * 2 - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities. * 3 - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted. * 4 - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted. * 5 - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent. * 6 - Dead.

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

  2. Binary NIHSS at Day 90

    Binary NIHSS (success for score ≤1 or for ≥ 9-point improvement versus baseline) The NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Score) is a 42-point scale that quantifies neurological deficits in 11 categories. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades, with 0 as normal.

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

  3. Stroke-related quality of life at 3 months: Stroke Impact Scale-16

    Stroke-related quality of life at 3 months according to the Stroke Impact Scale-16 (SIS-16) The scale is based on a questionnaire with 16 items. Each answer ranges from 1 (poor) to 5 (good). A final single-item Recovery domain assesses the individual's perception of his/her recovery from stroke, where: 0 = no recovery 100 = full recovery. Domain scores range from 0-100 and are calculated using the following equation: Domain score = \[(Mean item score - 1) / (5-1) \] x 100

    Time frame: 90 ±7 days

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Erlanger Stroke Center
    Chattanooga, Tennessee 37404, United States
  • Erlangen University Clinic
    Erlangen, Germany
  • Essen University Clinic
    Essen, Germany
  • Heidelberg University Clinic
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • Leipzig University Clinic
    Leipzig, Germany
  • Munster University Clinic
    Münster, Germany
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari de Girona
    Girona, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bornstein NM, Saver JL, Diener HC, Gorelick PB, Shuaib A, Solberg Y, Devlin T, Leung T, Molina CA; ImpACT-24A Investigators. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation to Augment Cerebral Blood Flow: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2108-2117. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024582. Epub 2019 May 23. PubMed 31117920 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03767192
Lead sponsor
BrainsGate
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2018
Start date
Jan 2009
Primary completion
Jan 2011
Completion
Mar 2012
Last update
Jan 28, 2019

Study contacts

Eyal Shay
study director · BrainsGate

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion