ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04011553Updated Jul 8, 2019

The Effectiveness of Virtual Reality Based Rehabilitation in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of Virtual Reality based Rehabilitation Program in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Istanbul Medeniyet University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-08.

Sponsored by Istanbul Medeniyet University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2018, registered Jun 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

We aimed to investigate the effects of virtual reality based rehabilitation program on patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

Sixty volunteer participants with knee osteoarthritis aged 40 to 65 years who were at stage of 2-3 according to the Kellgren Lawrence radiological evaluation were included in the study.

Participants were randomly divided into two groups as virtual and control group. While a conventional physiotherapy program consisting of electrotherapy and exercise program was applied to both groups 5 days a week for 6 weeks, a virtual reality program was added to the virtual group for 6 weeks, 5 days a week. At the beginning of the treatment and at the end of the sixth week, ROM, pain, kinesiophobia, proprioception, balance, muscle strength and functional status were evaluated between groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Knee osteoarthritis
  • Virtual reality
  • Rehabilitation
  • Balance
  • Kinesiophobia
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,391 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 628 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 69 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul Medeniyet University is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • knee osteoarhritis aged 40 to 75 years who were at stage of 2-3 according to the Kellegren Lawrence radiological evaluation were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who have received physical therapy in the last 6 months
  • Having serious systemic and cardiovascular diseases that may prevent exercise
  • Neurological and orthopedic problems affecting gait
  • Those with sensory defects
  • Malignancy diagnosed
  • Those who have received PRP (Platelet-Rich Plasma) treatment or intra-articular steroid injection treatment in the last 6 months
  • With metal implants
  • Serious hearing loss or visual impairment
  • Communication problems
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual group

    This virtual realtiy was implemented with MarVAJED® (Marmara Visual Auditory Joint Education Device) system which was developed by Marmara University, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul,Turkey. MarVAJED® is a system that evaulates the range of motion of the joints, analyzes the sensation of joint position, provides biofeedback support to increase joint control and the same time allows exercises to be controlled. This device analyzes the joint motion with the help of small sensors (Figure 2). The obtained data transfers to your mobile phone, to the tablet or to your personal computer. It stores the data by downloading it to the central server via internet for storage.

    Other: Virtual Reality based Rehabilitation Program

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Conventional physiotherapy consists of electrotherapy and exercise programs. Hotpack or coldpack, therapeutic ultrasound (US) and conventional TENS were applied as electrotherapy program.

    Other: Virtual Reality based Rehabilitation Program

Interventions

  • OtherVirtual Reality based Rehabilitation Program

    Virtual reality-based rehabilitation was implemented via MarVAJED system. At first the sensors of MarVAJED® were placed under and above the knee joint and then it was calibrated. The content of the game programs included in the MarVAJED system and how to perform these games with the exercises were explained to the participants. We used games called "Crazy Wings and Blasting Ball" included in the MarVAJED®.There was a bird figure in Crazy Wings game and represented knee joint of participants. Although the bird figure moved upwards during knee flexion, it moved downward in knee extension, there were some obstacles on the way of the bird went. The subjects were asked to follow the bird figure visually and to pass through the obstacles by flexing or extending their knees when they encountered obstacles.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postural Balance

    PEDALO® Sensamove Balance System was used to evaluate postural balance of subjects.It has a balance board in which consists of sensors to record and process data about balance performance to a computer.

    Time frame: Change from baseline postural balance at week 6.

  2. Severity of the knee Osteoarthritis

    Severity of the knee Osteoarthritis of participants was evaulated with "Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis" (WOMAC LK 3.1). The WOMAC LK has 24 questions in three subscales (pain , stiffness, physical functions) and a total of 24 questions. Each item is scored 0 to 4. Maxiumum score is 96. the higher the scores indicate that the severity of the disease is worse.

    Time frame: Change from baseline severity of knee osteoarthritis at week 6.

  3. Kinesiophobia

    Kinesiophobia was assessed with TAMPA Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). TSK is a 17-item measure that assesses kinesiophobia (fear of movement). Each item is evaluated on a 4-point Likert scale with scoring alternatives ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree. Total scores range from 17 to 68, with higher scores reflecting greater kinesiophobia.

    Time frame: Change from baseline kinesiophobia at week 6.

  4. Muscle Strength of Knee extensor and flexor Muscles

    Muscle Strength was evaulated with Biodex System Pro 4 Isokinetic Dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Inc, Shirley, NY. USA). The subjects were seated in such a position that knee and hip were at 900 flexion, and shoulders, ankle and pelvis were fixed to the machine. The centre of the knee joint was aligned with the centre of the dynamometer by using a laser-pointing device. Before testing, 5-min warming programme was performed by using treadmill. Isokinetic test was performed with 5 repetitions at 1200/s and 2400/s angular velocities. Tests were performed in a standardized order and all subjects have received identical instructions and encouragements.

    Time frame: Change from baseline muscle strength at week 6.

  5. Knee Pain

    Pain was evaulated with VAS (Visual Analog Scale). The VAS consists of a 10 cm straight line which presents a continuum of intensity and has verbal anchors at opposite ends representing 'no pain' at the bottom and 'pain as bad as it can be' at the top. The participants were asked to mark the representing point of their pain levels. The values were recorded in cm .

    Time frame: Change from baseline knee pain at week 6.

  6. Knee Proprioception

    Knee proprioception was evaulated with MarVAJED system (Marmara Visual Auditory Joint Education Device). MarVAJED® is used in virtual rehabilitation and also has test software which can evaluate knee proprioception. The sensors of the system were placed on the upper and lower parts of the knee joint. The subjects were asked to lie down in prone position. The system was calibrated and then the knee joint was passively flexed at 30 degree. Participants were allowed to wait for ten minutes in this position to perceive the degree of knee flexion. Then the knee joint was passively brought back to the initial position and the patients were asked to actively flex their knee at 300 with their eyes closed. The same protocol was performed in 60 degree. . The difference between the reference degree and the degree that the subject performed during the test was automatically calculated by the MarVAJED system.

    Time frame: Change from baseline knee proprioception at week 6.

  7. Range of Motion (ROM)

    The active range of motion of knee (flexion, extension) was assessed by using a universal goniometer. Kendall-McCreary criteria was considered in the assessments. Measurements were repeated three times and the average value was used in the statistical analysis.

    Time frame: Change from baseline Range of Motion (ROM) at week 6.

  8. Functionality

    Functionality of participants was evaulated with Aggregated Locomotor Function (ALF) test. Aggregated Locomotor Function (ALF) test consists of three parts: stair climbing, walk and transfer tests. The time was recorded for each of the tests. longer periods mean that functionality is worse.

    Time frame: Change baseline from functionality at week 6.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Istanbul Medeniyet University
    Istanbul, 34000, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04011553
Responsible party
EMEL METE (RESEARCH ASSISTANT, Istanbul Medeniyet University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 8, 2019
Start date
Apr 21, 2018
Primary completion
May 27, 2019
Completion
May 29, 2019
Last update
Jul 8, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion