An interventional study of C type natriuretic peptide in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, c Type Natriuretic Peptide and Menstrual Irregularity, sponsored by Near East University, Turkey. Completed at 1 site in Cyprus. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-05.
Sponsored by Near East University, Turkey · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Recent studies have shown that C natriuretic peptide is produced from granulosa cells, increasing cumulative guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production by affecting cumulus cells through natriuretic peptide receptors. It is suggested that produced cGMP maintains the transport of oocytes via the gap junctions and leads to a continuous increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels in the oocyte. An important role of increased internal cAMP levels in the oocyte is shown to suppress meiotic progression.
Deoxyribonucleic acid studies in animals have shown that expression of the natriuretic peptide precursor increases during the periovulatory period and shows that this increase decreases rapidly after luteinizing hormone / human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation.Human studies have shown that after ovulation induction, the CNP level in follicular fluid decreases following ovulatory dose of hCG.Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disease in the reproductive period, characterized by hyperandrogenism, oligo-anovulation, and polycystic ovarian morphology on ultrasonography, and in an animal study investigating the relationship between CNP and PCOS, serum CNP levels were increased in polycystic ovary syndrome.CNP serum level is thought to show differences between healthy women and women with polycystic ovary syndrome.
In this prospective study, a total of 60 patients are planed to be included. PCOS group will be consisted of 30 women and control group will include 30 healthy women with regular menstruation aged between 18-40 years old. PCOS diagnosis will be made according to Rotterdam criteria.
Age and body mass index of all participants will be recorded. BMI will be calculated by dividing weight by height in square meters. Then morning fasting venous blood samples will be taken from the patients between 2nd-5th day of menstruation for both groups. All blood samples will be centrifuged on the day of collection. Sera will be aliquoted into 1.5 mL Eppendorf (Eppendorf, Milano, Italy) tubes, and will be kept at -80°C until the day of CNP test. For the PCOS patients describing oligo/anovulation, after excluding pregnancy, progesterone withdrawal bleeding will be created and then the patients will be evaluated. Serum levels of LH, FSH, estradiol, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), prolactin (PRL), androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), glucose and insulin levels will be analyzed. For insulin sensitivity, homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) will be used and it will be calculated by the formula: HOMA-IR ¼ fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)fasting insulin (mIU/mL)/405. Free androgen index will be calculated by the formula 100x (Total testosteron/SHBG).
Serum CNP levels of the patients will be analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) assay for human C-type natriuretic peptide in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (SEA721Hu, ELISA Kit for Human C-Type Natriuretic Peptide, Wuhan USCN Business Co., Ltd., Cloud-Clone Corp., CCC, USA).
Data will be analyzed using Statistical Packege for Social Sciences software (SPSS v15, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Independent t-test will be used to compare the parameters with normal distribution. Parameters that don't fulfill the parametric test assumptions will be compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation of CNP with other parameters will be analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve will be used to evaluate diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CNP for PCOS. P values less than 0.05 will be regarded as statistically significant.
956 studies on the registry are indexed under Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; 176 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 90 is above the median of 70 across 697 interventional studies indexed under Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
Browse Polycystic Ovary Syndrome studies →Near East University, Turkey is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
36 patients with PCOS
Diagnostic Test: C type natriuretic peptide
30 patients with regular normal menstrual cycle
Diagnostic Test: C type natriuretic peptide
Serum level of CNP in PCOS and healthy women
Serum CNP Levels of PCOS and Healthy Participants
The comparison of serum levels of C type natriuretic peptide among PCOS and healthy women
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Roc Curve of CNP
We made a cut off value estimation for the diagnosis of PCOS by serum CNP levels using Receiver operator characteristics. The ROC curve incorporates both sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) providing a single assessment incorporating both measures. The higher the total area under the curve, the greater the predictive power of the CNP for diagnosing PCOS
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Comparison of FSH and LH of PCOS and Healthy Women
Serum FSH and LH of PCOS and healthy women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Estradiol Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women
Serum Estradiol levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Tiroid Stimulating Hormone of PCOS and Healthy Women
serum tiroid stimulating hormone of PCOS and healthy women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Prolactin Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women
serum prolactin levels of PCOS and healthy women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Androstenedione Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women
Serum Androstenedione Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEAS) Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women
Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Total Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women
Serum Total Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Free Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women
Serum Free Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women
Serum Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Free Androgen Index of Participants
Free androgen index of participants were compared. It was calculated with the formula 100XTotal testosterone/Sex hormone binding globulin
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation
Serum Glucose, Total Cholesterol and Triglycerides Levels of Participants
Serum glucose, total cholesterol and triglycerides levels of participants were compared
Time frame: Second or third day of menstruation and morning fasting
High Density Lipoprotein and Low Density Lipoprotein Levels of Participants
High density lipoprotein and low density lipoprotein levels of participants were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation-morning fasting
Serum Insulin Levels of Participants
Serum Insulin Levels of Participants were compared
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation-morning fasting
Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance of Participants
homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance of participants were compared. The calculation was made with formula Glucose X Insulin/405.
Time frame: Second or Third Day of Menstruation-morning fasting
The patients were recruited from Near East University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
| Milestone | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 48 | 42 |
| Completed | 36 | 30 |
| Not completed | 12 | 12 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 8 | 7 |
| Withdrew: Missing serum samples | 2 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Insufficient sample volume | 2 | 3 |
The comparison of serum levels of C type natriuretic peptide among PCOS and healthy women
| pg/ml | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum CNP Levels of PCOS and Healthy Participants | 110 (90.9 to 182) | 57 (43.3 to 151.3) |
We made a cut off value estimation for the diagnosis of PCOS by serum CNP levels using Receiver operator characteristics. The ROC curve incorporates both sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (true negative rate) providing a single assessment incorporating both measures. The higher the total area under the curve, the greater the predictive power of the CNP for diagnosing PCOS
| probability | All Participants |
|---|---|
| Roc Curve of CNP | 0.706 (0.574 to 0.838) |
Serum FSH and LH of PCOS and healthy women were compared
| mIU/mL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Follicle Stimulating Hormone | 4.7 (3.95 to 5.7) | 4.97 (4.55 to 6.06) |
| Luteinizing Hormone | 4.23 (3.21 to 6.34) | 5.36 (3 to 6.89) |
Serum Estradiol levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
| pg/mL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Estradiol Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women | 31 (23.5 to 45) | 36.5 (25 to 47.3) |
serum tiroid stimulating hormone of PCOS and healthy women were compared
| mIU/L | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Tiroid Stimulating Hormone of PCOS and Healthy Women | 1.61 (1.14 to 2.15) | 1.47 (1.28 to 1.94) |
serum prolactin levels of PCOS and healthy women were compared
| ng/mL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Prolactin Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women | 17.21 ± 6.65 | 16.80 ± 6.26 |
Serum Androstenedione Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
| ng/dL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Androstenedione Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women | 148.89 ± 52.38 | 84.66 ± 11.56 |
Serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
| µg/dL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone Sulfate (DHEAS) Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women | 304.55 (224.85 to 411.20) | 299.95 (213.8 to 356.3) |
Serum Total Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
| nmol/L | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Total Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women | 1.38 ± 0.48 | 0.92 ± 0.36 |
Serum Free Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
| pg/mL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Free Testosterone Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women | 1.71 ± 0.64 | 1.12 ± 0.30 |
Serum Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women were compared
| nmol/L | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Sex Hormone Binding Globulin Levels of PCOS and Healthy Women | 30.4 (26.8 to 53.8) | 59.4 (46.6 to 78.1) |
Free androgen index of participants were compared. It was calculated with the formula 100XTotal testosterone/Sex hormone binding globulin
| % of T testosterone per SHBG | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Free Androgen Index of Participants | 4.39 ± 2.58 | 1.55 ± 0.89 |
Serum glucose, total cholesterol and triglycerides levels of participants were compared
| mg/dL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Total cholesterol | 164 (154.3 to 185) | 171 (146 to 189) |
| triglycerides | 78 (63.8 to 107.8) | 77 (60 to 90) |
| Glucose | 88.5 (83.3 to 97.8) | 89 (82.3 to 94.3) |
High density lipoprotein and low density lipoprotein levels of participants were compared
| mg/dL | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| High density lipoprotein | 53.82 ± 11.06 | 62.15 ± 19.48 |
| Low density lipoprotein | 98.50 ± 23.61 | 92.92 ± 23.56 |
Serum Insulin Levels of Participants were compared
| mU/L | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Serum Insulin Levels of Participants | 7.10 (4.9 to 10) | 7.10 (5.75 to 8) |
homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance of participants were compared. The calculation was made with formula Glucose X Insulin/405.
| HOMA-IR Index | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age |
|---|---|---|
| Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance of Participants | 1.50 (1.05 to 2.15) | 1.45 (1.33 to 1.88) |
Collected over Adverse events were not assessed.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | — | — | — |
| Healthy Women of Reproductive Age | — | — | — |
36 PCOS patient according to Rotterdam criterias and 30 healthy control women
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 36 | 30 | 66 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 22 (21 to 24.8) | 24 (21.8 to 25) | 23 (21 to 25) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 36 | 30 | 66 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cypriot | 36 | 30 | 66 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyprus | 36 | 30 | 66 |
| Body Mass Index(kg/m^2) | Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome | Healthy Women of Reproductive Age | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 23.20 ± 4.26 | 21.17 ± 1.88 | 22.28 ± 3.52 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Near East University, Turkey