CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04004169PReSiDioUpdated Aug 3, 2026

Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation for Major Depression

An interventional study of Stimulation-ON and Stimulation-OFF in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Andrew Krystal. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-03.

Sponsored by Andrew Krystal · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2019; still recruiting 7 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neurons are specialized types of cells that are responsible for carrying out the functions of the brain. Neurons communicate with electrical signals. In diseases such as major depression this electrical communication can go awry. One way to change brain function is using electrical stimulation to help alter the communication between groups of neurons in the brain.

The purpose of this study is to test a personalized approach to brain stimulation as an intervention for depression. The study researchers will use a surgically implanted device to measure each individual's brain activity related to his/her depression. The researchers will then use small electrical impulses to alter that brain activity and measure whether these changes help reduce depression symptoms. This study is intended for patients with major depression whose symptoms have not been adequately treated with currently available therapies.

The device used in this study is called the NeuroPace Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) System. It is currently FDA approved to treat patients with epilepsy. The study will test whether personalized responsive neurostimulation can safely and effectively treat depression.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center 3-stage feasibility study of personalized closed-loop stimulation for treatment resistant Major Depressive Disorder. Depending on participant's results at each stage, he/she might not be eligible to proceed to all 3 stages.

Stage 1 of the study will involve surgically implanting small, thin electrodes in brain regions that regulate depression in order to identify personalized treatment sites. The researchers will test stimulation in the different brain regions and their effect on depression symptoms. The electrodes will be surgically removed at the end of Stage 1.

Stage 2 will involve a second brain surgery to implant the NeuroPace RNS® System. Researchers will use information from Stage 1 to decide where to implant the electrodes of the RNS System. Over the next \~4-12 months, participants will have regular study visits in the clinic where the researchers will determine a personalized brain activity pattern that correlates with depression symptoms and can be paired with stimulation to improve depression symptoms.

Stage 3 will be 12 months long and will involve turning ON and OFF the intervention to test its effectiveness. Over the course of a year, the participant will have two 6-week periods with no stimulation and will receive the intervention for the remainder of the time.

At the end of this stage the participant can choose to continue with long-term follow-up or have the RNS System surgically removed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Depression
  • Treatment-resistance
  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Closed-loop
  • Biomarker
  • Responsive neurostimulation
  • Brain surgery
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

2,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 559 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 80 across 2,283 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

Andrew Krystal is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 22-70
  • Meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) without psychosis based on a Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V (SCID) with current episode ≥ 2 years that is treatment- resistant (4 adequate trials (including ECT), 3 classes of medications, one augmentation strategy, psychotherapy) as measured by the antidepressant treatment history form (ATHF).
  • Failed electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) due to inability to achieve sustained response (2 failed attempts to discontinue ECT treatment) or discontinued due to intolerable side effects.
  • Has MADRS score of > 26 at both baseline and screening visit
  • The presence of variability on repeated administrations of MDD rating scales (minimum of 2-point variation on the HAMD-6 administered 3 times a day for 3 days), which is required for the identification of a neural biomarker.
  • If patient is on a regimen of psychotropic medication, no changes in this regimen should be made during the 4 weeks prior to entry into and the duration of the study.
  • Willing and able to undergo invasive brain recording/stimulation study
  • Willing and able to attend multiple research visits and perform at-home research protocol
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Ability to speak and read English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meets DSM-V criteria for a psychotic disorder, eating disorder, panic disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, tic disorder, or another comorbid psychiatric disorder other than MDD or generalized anxiety disorder based on a SCID
  • Generalized anxiety disorder is the primary DSM-V disorder during the current MDD episode
  • Active suicidal ideation with intent and plan as defined by a score of 5 on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
  • History of suicide attempt requiring hospitalization in previous 2 years.
  • Meets criteria for alcohol or substance abuse or dependence (other than caffeine) in previous 6 months, determined by the SCID
  • Has a personality disorder based on the investigator's assessment that the investigator believes will adversely impact subject compliance or safety
  • Fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue syndrome
  • Current condition requiring chronic narcotic use
  • History of traumatic brain injury, another neurological disorder, or developmental delay
  • History of seizures
  • MRI (done within one year of the first visit) with significant abnormalities
  • Previous ablative intracranial surgery or previously implanted deep brain stimulation system or any previously implanted device treatment involving brain stimulation
  • Implantable hardware not compatible with MRI or with the study
  • Major medical co-morbidities increasing the risk of surgery including severe diabetes, major organ system failure, history of hemorrhagic stroke, need for chronic anticoagulation other than aspirin, active infection, intracranial space occupying lesion, increased intracranial pressure, cardiovascular accident within the last month, aneurysm/abnormality, retinal detachment, unstable cardiovascular disease (recent myocardial infarction, severe ischemia, severe or uncontrolled hypertension), immunocompromised state, or malignancy with \< 5 years life expectancy
  • Inability to stop Coumadin or platelet anti-aggregation therapy for surgery and after surgery. - Patients taking these medications will need to discuss the need/risk of continuing these medications with their physicians and the PI or study personnel may contact the treating physician(s) to discuss the risks of anticoagulation/antiaggregation therapy discontinuation
  • Coagulopathy. Patients will be excluded unless assessed and cleared by hematology
  • Allergies or known hypersensitivity to materials in the NeuroPace RNS® System (i.e. titanium, polyurethane, silicone, polyetherimide, stainless steel)
  • Subject lives alone without possibility of caregiver support post-hospital stay
  • Inability to comply with study follow-up visits
  • Women who are pregnant, plan to become pregnant, or breast feeding
  • Inability to speak and/or read English
  • Inability to give consent
  • Significant cognitive impairment or dementia (MoCA \< 25)
  • Likely to require ECT during the course of the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: Intervention (stimulation ON)

    This is a crossover trial. Each patient will receive 6 wks of stimulation ON (arm 1), stimulation OFF (arm 2), and Stimulation ON Active Control (sham biomarker) (arm 3) in random order. After 6 months of intervening therapy, this 3-period crossover study will be repeated.

    Device: Stimulation-ON

  • Sham comparator
    Arm 2: Sham Control (stimulation OFF)

    This is a crossover trial. Each patient will receive 6 wks of stimulation ON (arm 1), stimulation OFF (arm 2), and Stimulation ON Active Control (sham biomarker) (arm 3) in random order. After 6 months of intervening therapy, this 3-period crossover study will be repeated.

    Device: Stimulation-OFF

  • Active comparator
    Arm 3: Active Control (stimulation ON triggered by sham biomarker)

    This is a crossover trial. Each patient will receive 6 wks of stimulation ON (arm 1), stimulation OFF (arm 2), and stimulation ON Active Control (sham biomarker) (arm 3) in random order. After 6 months of intervening therapy, this 3-period crossover study will be repeated.

    Device: Stimulation-ON Active Control

Interventions

  • DeviceStimulation-ON

    Active neurostimulation from the NeuroPace RNS® System triggered by a biomarker

  • DeviceStimulation-OFF

    No neurostimulation from the NeuroPace RNS® System

  • DeviceStimulation-ON Active Control

    Active neurostimulation from the NeuroPace RNS® System triggered by a sham biomarker

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. change in MADRS score

    Effect size of active compared to sham stimulation (mean difference in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score before and after the sham and treatment periods). Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression; the overall score ranges from 0 to 60.

    Time frame: administered at baseline and every 2 weeks for the first 18 weeks of stage 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score after 1 year

    Effect size of active compared to sham stimulation (mean difference in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score before and after the sham and treatment periods at the end of Stage 3. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression; the overall score ranges from 0 to 60.

    Time frame: administered at Weeks 30 and every 2 weeks for the last 18 weeks of Stage 3

  2. difference in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score

    Mean difference in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score across the two 6-week cross-over periods. The score for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ranges from 0-50, with a higher score indicating more severe depression.

    Time frame: administered at baseline and every 2 weeks for the first 18 weeks of stage 3

  3. difference in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score after 1 year

    Mean difference in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score across the two 6-week cross-over periods at 1 year. The score for Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ranges from 0-50, with a higher score indicating more severe depression.

    Time frame: administered at Weeks 30 and every 2 weeks for the last 18 weeks of Stage 3

  4. difference in the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) score

    Mean difference in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) score across the two 6-week cross-over periods. The scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: administered at baseline and every 2 weeks for the first 18 weeks of stage 3

  5. difference in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) score after 1 year

    Mean difference in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) score across the two 6-week cross-over periods at the of Stage 3. The scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: administered at Weeks 30 and every 2 weeks for the last 18 weeks of Stage 3

Other outcomes

  1. Stimulation site identification

    Over 50% of patients move from Stage 1 to Stage 2 (stimulation site that acutely improved mood identified)

    Time frame: Final study visit of Stage 1 (roughly 3-6 months after initial enrollment)

  2. Biomarker identification in Stage 1

    The number of patients in whom we can identify a neural biomarker that accounts for a significant amount of variance in depression symptom severity

    Time frame: Final study visit of Stage 1 (roughly 3-6 months after initial enrollment)

  3. Number of patients who had viable biomarker(s) identified in Stage 2

    The number of patients in whom we can identify a neural biomarker utilizing the RNS system that accounts for a significant amount of variance in depression symptom severity

    Time frame: Final study visit of Stage 2 (up to 1 year duration)

  4. The number of patients in whom we can identify a neural biomarker utilizing the RNS system that accounts for a significant amount of variance in depression symptom severity

    The number of patients in whom we can find a personalized biomarker of depression in terms of accounting for significant variance in depression

    Time frame: Assessed at the final study visit of Stage 3 (1 year duration)

  5. The number and type of serious adverse events for patients that occur in closed-loop deep brain stimulation with the device

    The number and type of serious adverse events that occur in comparison to comparable open-loop deep brain stimulation trials

    Time frame: Safety will be monitored continuously throughout the ~2 years of trial enrollment

  6. Relationship of biomarkers identified in Stage 2 and Stage 1

    The number of subjects for whom the biomarker identified with Stage 1 data is able to be replicated in Stage 2 in terms of a measure obtained from the same recording site and in a comparable frequency range accounting for a significant amount of variance in depression severity.

    Time frame: Assessed at the end of Stage 2 (up to 1.5 year duration)

  7. Achievement of Long-Term Symptom Control

    Number of subjects who achieve long-term symptom control with treatment in terms of being in remission at the end of the 3 months of active therapy between the two randomized trials in Stage 3.

    Time frame: Assessed at end of Stage 3 (up to 1 year duration)

  8. Non-inferiority of closed loop vs open-loop intermittent stimulation therapy and sham stimulation

    Number of subjects for whom active closed-loop therapy is associated with equal or lower MADRS scores compared with: 1) active intermittent stimulation driven by a sham biomarker control and 2) sham stimulation control.

    Time frame: administered at baseline and every 2 weeks for the first 18 weeks of stage 3

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of California, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94143, United States
    • Katherine Scangos, MD, PhD · Contact · trdepression@ucsf.edu · 415- 476-7439
    • Rebecca Martinez, MS · Contact · rebecca.martinez@ucsf.edu · 415- 476-7439
    • Katherine Scangos, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Andrew Krystal, MD, MS · Principal investigator
    • Edward Chang, MD · Sub investigator
    • Philip Starr, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04004169
Lead sponsor
Andrew Krystal
Responsible party
Andrew Krystal (Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 1, 2019
Start date
Jul 18, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 28, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 28, 2035 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 3, 2026

Study contacts

Katherine Scangos, MD, PhD
Contact
trdepression@ucsf.edu
415-476-7439
Rebecca Martinez, MS
Contact
rebecca.martinez@ucsf.edu
415-476-7439
Andrew Krystal, MD, MS
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion