ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03989596SINDIRUpdated Feb 1, 2021

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy With Hyperthermia in Unresectable or Marginally Resectable Soft Tissue Sarcomas

A Phase 2 interventional study of Hypofractionated radiotherapy and Hyperthermia in Sarcoma, Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma and Clear Cell Sarcoma, sponsored by Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology. Status unknown at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-01.

Sponsored by Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2020), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2018, registered Jun 2019).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

After a screening, which consists of biopsy, physical examination, initial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) or body computed tomography (CT) scan, blood tests and case analysis on Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) meeting, a patient will receive the hypofractionated radiotherapy 10x 3.25 Gy with regional hyperthermia (twice a week) within two weeks. The response analysis in CT or DWI-MRI and toxicity assessment will be performed after at least 6 weeks. At the second MDT meeting, a final decision about resectability of the tumor will be made. In case of resectability or consent for amputation, if required, a patient will be referred to surgery. In case of unresectability or amputation refusal, the patient will receive the second part of the treatment which consists of 4x 4 Gy with hyperthermia (twice a week).

Read the detailed description

There is a lack of standard treatment of unresectable and marginally resectable sarcomas. Results of commonly used approaches are unsatisfactory, especially in patients who are not candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy due to poor performance status, comorbidities, radioresistant pathology or disease progression on the commonly used chemotherapy regimens. The addition of regional hyperthermia to irradiation and in the prolonged gap between the end of hypofractionated 10x 3.25 Gy radiotherapy and surgery may allow obtaining the long-term local control with the maintenance of a good treatment tolerance.

Hypofractionation represents a variation of radiotherapy fractionation in which the total dose is divided into fewer fractions with an increased fraction dose. Such treatment may lead to additional biological effects when compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (eg. vascular damage, increased immunogenicity, and antigenicity). The main advantages of hypofractionation are those related to the decreased overall treatment time which is more convenient for both patients and physicians, increased compliance and makes the treatment more cost-effective. Intriguing, such an approach may provide an additional benefit when treating non-radiosensitive tumors with a low alpha/beta ratio (eg. sarcomas).

Hyperthermia is a method of increasing the temperature in the tumor to damage cancer cells with minimum injury to the normal cells. It should be combined with another treatment modality (radio- or chemotherapy) rather than used alone. Its efficacy was proven in clinical trials. The treatment tolerance is usually very good.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcoma
  • Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma
  • Clear Cell Sarcoma
  • Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors
  • Myxoid Liposarcoma
  • Liposarcoma, Dedifferentiated
  • Synovial Sarcoma
  • Leiomyosarcoma
  • Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
  • Fibrosarcoma
  • Pleomorphic Rhabdomyosarcoma

Keywords

  • Dose Hypofractionation
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Sarcoma
  • Hyperthermia
  • Dose Fractionation
03

In context

Sarcoma

1,607 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcoma; 366 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 40 across 1,255 interventional studies indexed under Sarcoma.

Browse Sarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able to provide ; age ≥18 years old
  • performance status 0 - 2
  • Histologic diagnosis of locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma
  • Marginally resectable or unresectable tumor (assessed at Multidisciplinary Tumor Board)
  • Radioresistant sarcoma subtype (low-grade tumor or radioresistant histology) or contradictions to chemotherapy (assessed at Multidisciplinary Tumor Board) or progression after chemotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Radiation-induced sarcoma or previous radiation to the affected volume
  • Histologic diagnosis of rhabdomyosarcoma (except pleomorphic subtype), osteogenic sarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma/PNET, aggressive fibromatosis
  • to radiotherapy or hyperthermia
  • Distant
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Radiotherapy with hyperthermia

    10x 3.25 Gy + hyperthermia + surgery or radiotherapy boost (4x 4 Gy + hyperthermia)

    Radiation: Hypofractionated radiotherapy · Other: Hyperthermia

Interventions

  • RadiationHypofractionated radiotherapy

    Preoperative hypofractionated 10x 3.25 Gy radiotherapy (5 consecutive days in a week, two weeks) prescribed on planned target volume (tumor volume + elective margins + setup/error margin) with daily image guidance with cone beam-CT or kV-portal position verification. Radiotherapy boost 4x 4 Gy within one week in case of unresectability after 6 weeks.

  • OtherHyperthermia

    Deep hyperthermia (Celsius TCS or BSD-2000) according to local protocol combined with radiotherapy, twice a week.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of the treatment schedule

    The exact 95% confidence interval for an estimated feasibility proportion of 80% (23 of 30 patients) does not include (60-80%) a value of 50%. Thus, for a sample size of 30 patients, the feasibility of 80% is above chance level performance (50%).

    Time frame: Up to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. One-year local control rate

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment completion

  2. One-year progression-free survival

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment completion

  3. One-year sarcoma-specific survival

    Time frame: 12 months after treatment completion

  4. Rate of late toxicities

    Rate of late toxicities of a planned schedule of therapy according to CTCAE 5.0

    Time frame: Two years after treatment completion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center
    Warsaw, Mazovian 02-781, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kosela-Paterczyk H, Szacht M, Morysinski T, Lugowska I, Dziewirski W, Falkowski S, Zdzienicki M, Pienkowski A, Szamotulska K, Switaj T, Rutkowski P. Preoperative hypofractionated radiotherapy in the treatment of localized soft tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;40(12):1641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Sep 20. PubMed 25282099 ↗
  • Lindner LH, Issels RD. Hyperthermia in soft tissue sarcoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2011 Mar;12(1):12-20. doi: 10.1007/s11864-011-0144-6. PubMed 21360087 ↗
  • Pennacchioli E, Fiore M, Gronchi A. Hyperthermia as an adjunctive treatment for soft-tissue sarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Feb;9(2):199-210. doi: 10.1586/14737140.9.2.199. PubMed 19192958 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD that underlie results in a publication as supplementary materials

Time frame: Data will be available since a publication (as a study supplementary material)

Access criteria: Based on journal policy, open access is preferred

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03989596
Lead sponsor
Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2019
Start date
Jun 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 1, 2021

Study contacts

Mateusz J Spałek, MD PhD
principal investigator · Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion