ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03981744Updated Apr 29, 2025Results posted

A Study of Ustekinumab in Participants With Active Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis Who Have Not Adequately Responded to One or More Standard-of-care Treatments

A Phase 3 interventional study of Ustekinumab 6 mg/kg and Ustekinumab 90 mg in Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis, sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.. Terminated at 32 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-29.

Primary conditionDermatomyositisRegistry: PolymyositisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Polymyositis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Dermatomyositis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Dermatomyositis, a narrower term within Polymyositis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
The study did not meet the primary endpoint.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab in participants with active polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM) despite receiving 1 or more standard-of-care treatments (for example, glucocorticoids and/or immunomodulators).

02

Conditions studied

  • Polymyositis
  • Dermatomyositis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dermatomyositis Reclassified

184 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatomyositis; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is above the median of 35 across 130 interventional studies indexed under Dermatomyositis.

Browse Dermatomyositis studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (50%) have results posted.

Compared within Dermatomyositis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Polymyositis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has a diagnosis of polymyositis (PM)/ dermatomyositis (DM) made or confirmed by a physician (such as a rheumatologist, neurologist, or dermatologist) experienced in treatment of PM/DM at least 6 weeks prior to first dose of the study drug
  • Has PM or DM which is considered active despite receiving at least 1 standard-of-care treatment by the investigator
  • Must be receiving 1 or more of the following protocol-permitted, systemic standard-of-care treatments: i) , ii) 1 or 2 of the following immunomodulatory drugs: mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, oral methotrexate, oral tacrolimus, or oral cyclosporine A
  • Regular or as needed treatment with topical use of glucocorticoids are permitted to treat skin lesions on a stable dose for greater than or equal to (>=) 2 weeks prior to first dose of the study drug
  • (birth control) use by men or women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the acceptable methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies
  • Must be medically stable on the basis of clinical laboratory tests performed at screening. If the results of the clinical laboratory tests are outside the normal reference ranges, the participant may be included only if the investigator judges the abnormalities or deviations from normal to be not
  • Demonstrable muscle weakness at screening and Week 0 measured by the Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 less than or equal to (\<=)135 units
  • Demonstrable muscle weakness at screening measured by any 2 or more of the followings: (i) PhGA greater than or equal to (>=) 1.5 centimeter (cm), (ii) 1 or more muscle enzymes (Creatine kinase [CK], and aldolase) >=1.4* (ULN), (iii) Myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT)-Extramuscular Global Assessment >=1.5 cm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has myositis other than PM/DM, including but not limited to amyopathic dermatomyositis (ADM), clinically amyopathic DM, juvenile DM, inclusion body myositis (IBM) immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy diagnosed based on muscle findings and positive anti-SRP or anti-HMGCR antibody, drug-induced myositis, PM associated with (HIV), and muscular dystrophy, congenital myopathy, metabolic myopathy, and mitochondrial myopathy
  • Has other inflammatory diseases that might confound the evaluations of efficacy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), psoriasis, or Crohn's disease
  • Has severe respiratory muscle weakness confirmed by the investigator based on the consultation with a pulmonologist and the measures of respiratory muscle strength such as maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and/or maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) measurements and lung capacity such as forced vital capacity (FVC). The results need to be within population appropriate normal limits
  • Has severe muscle damage (Myositis Damage Index-VAS [Muscle Damage] greater than (>) 7 centimeter [cm]), permanent weakness due to a non-IIM cause, or myositis with cardiac dysfunction
  • Has -induced myopathy which the investigator considers the primary cause of muscle weakness
  • Has positive test result of anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5) antibody (anti clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (C-ADM)-140 antibody).
  • Has had a nontuberculous mycobacterial infection or opportunistic infection
  • Has a history of, or ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease
  • Has past history of severe Interstitial lung disease (ILD) flare, severe non-infectious lung inflammation which required active intervention, or multiple relapses of these conditions
  • Presence or history of within 5 years before screening
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: Ustekinumab

    Participants will receive body weight-range based IV dosing of approximately 6 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) of ustekinumab at Week 0 followed by ustekinumab 90 milligram (mg) subcutaneously (SC) at Week 8 and every 8 Weeks (q8w) administrations through Week 72. At Week 24, participants will receive IV dosing of placebo.

    Drug: Ustekinumab 6 mg/kg · Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg · Drug: Placebo IV

  • Placebo comparator
    Group 2: Placebo

    Participants will receive IV dosing of placebo at Week 0 followed by placebo SC administrations at Weeks 8,16 and 24. At Week 24, participants will receive body weight-range based IV dosing of approximately 6 mg/kg of ustekinumab, followed by ustekinumab 90 mg SC q8w administrations Week 32 through Week 72.

    Drug: Ustekinumab 6 mg/kg · Drug: Ustekinumab 90 mg · Drug: Placebo IV · Drug: Placebo SC

Interventions

  • DrugUstekinumab 6 mg/kg

    Drug page: Ustekinumab

    Participants will receive body weight-range based IV dosing of 6 mg/kg of ustekinumab at Week 0 in Group 1 and at Week 24 in Group 2.

    Also known as: STELARA

  • Participants will receive ustekinumab 90 mg SC at Week 8 and every 8 Weeks (q8w) through Week 72 in Group 1 and q8w Week 32 through Week 72 in Group 2.

    Also known as: STELARA

  • DrugPlacebo IV

    Participants will receive IV dosing of placebo at Week 24 in Group 1 and at Week 0 in Group 2.

  • DrugPlacebo SC

    Participants will receive SC dosing of placebo at Weeks 8,16 and 24.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Improvement in International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at Week 24

    Minimal improvement was defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 in participants with polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM). Criteria used the 6 IMACS core set measures: physician global activity (PhGA)(0-10), patient global activity (PtGA)(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8)(0-80), muscle enzymes (creatine kinase, Aldolase, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase), extramuscular assessment of myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT)(0-10), and health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI)(0-3). Absolute percent change in each core set measure was calculated as final value minus baseline value divided by range\*100. Total improvement score was calculated by sum of 6 core set improvement scores. Total improvement score ranged from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicated greater improvement. This was categorized into 3 categories (minimal \[improvement \>=20\], moderate \[improvement \>=40\] and major \[improvement \>=60\]).

    Time frame: Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24

    Change from baseline in FI-2 at Week 24 was reported. The FI-2 was a functional outcome developed for participants with adult PM or DM to assess muscle endurance in 7 muscle groups (shoulder flexion \[0-60\], shoulder abduction \[0-60\], head lift \[0-60\], hip flexion \[0-60\], step test \[0-60\], heel lift \[0-120\], and toe lift \[0-120\]). Each muscle group was scored as the number of correctly performed repetitions with 60 or 120 maximal number of repetitions depending on muscle group. The FI-2 was performed unilaterally, preferably on the participant's dominant side for muscle groups of shoulder, hip, and step test. The FI-2 score ranged from 0-60 or 0-120 depending on the muscle group. Higher score indicated better muscle endurance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Disease Worsening Up to Week 24 Based on Consensus Criteria for Worsening

    Percentage of participants who experienced disease worsening up to Week 24 based on consensus criteria for worsening was reported. Criteria for disease worsening in a clinical trial were based on international consensus guideline developed by the IMACS. The worsening of disease was defined as 1 of the following criteria: Worsening of the Physician Global Activity by \>=2 centimeter (cm) on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and worsening of findings of MMT-8 by \>= 20 percent (%) from baseline; worsening of MDAAT-global extramuscular organ disease activity (a composite of constitutional, cutaneous, skeletal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and cardiac activity) by \>=2 cm on a 10-cm VAS from baseline; worsening of any 3 of 6 IMACS core set (PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-D) activity measures by \>= 30% from baseline.

    Time frame: Up to Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 Score at Week 24

    Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 24 was reported. Manual Muscle Testing was a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. MMT-8 total score ranged from 0-80, where maximal score was sum of scores from 8 muscle groups (Deltoid middle \[left/right\], Biceps brachii \[left/right\], Gluteus maximus \[left/right\], Gluteus medius \[left/right\], Quadriceps \[left/right\], Wrist extensors \[left/right\], Ankle dorsiflexors \[left/right\], Neck flexors \[axial\]) and each muscle group was scored on a 0 to 10-point scale. The sides (right or left) used for calculating the total score. Higher score indicated greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PhGA) at Week 24

    Change from baseline in PhGA at Week 24 was reported. Physician Global Activity was a partially validated tool to measure the global evaluation by the physician of the participant's overall disease activity at the time of assessment using a 0-10 cm VAS, where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely active or severe disease activity. Negative values indicated improvement from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Assessment by Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 24

    Change from baseline in extramuscular assessment by MDAAT at Week 24 was reported. This validated tool measure the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle on a 0-10 cm VAS. Extramuscular activity ranged between 0 and 10 via VAS where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Muscle Enzyme Levels at Week 24

    Change from baseline in muscle enzyme levels (creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase) at Week 24 was reported.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

07

Results

Posted May 13, 2024
Limitations and caveats
This study was terminated early due to lack of efficacy found at Week 24.

Participant flow

First Intervention (Prior to Week 24)
Participant flow — First Intervention (Prior to Week 24)
MilestonePlaceboUstekinumabPlacebo to UstekinumabUstekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
Started262500
Completed262300
Not completed0200
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0200
Second Intervention (Week 24 to Week 72)
Participant flow — Second Intervention (Week 24 to Week 72)
MilestonePlaceboUstekinumabPlacebo to UstekinumabUstekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
Started002623
Completed002423
Not completed0020
Withdrew: Adverse event0010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0010

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Improvement in International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at Week 24

Minimal improvement was defined as IMACS TIS greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 in participants with polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM). Criteria used the 6 IMACS core set measures: physician global activity (PhGA)(0-10), patient global activity (PtGA)(0-10), manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8)(0-80), muscle enzymes (creatine kinase, Aldolase, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase), extramuscular assessment of myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT)(0-10), and health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI)(0-3). Absolute percent change in each core set measure was calculated as final value minus baseline value divided by range\*100. Total improvement score was calculated by sum of 6 core set improvement scores. Total improvement score ranged from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicated greater improvement. This was categorized into 3 categories (minimal \[improvement \>=20\], moderate \[improvement \>=40\] and major \[improvement \>=60\]).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Improvement in International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at Week 24
Percentage of participantsPlaceboUstekinumab
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Minimal Improvement in International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Total Improvement Score (IMACS TIS) at Week 2461.564.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24

Change from baseline in FI-2 at Week 24 was reported. The FI-2 was a functional outcome developed for participants with adult PM or DM to assess muscle endurance in 7 muscle groups (shoulder flexion \[0-60\], shoulder abduction \[0-60\], head lift \[0-60\], hip flexion \[0-60\], step test \[0-60\], heel lift \[0-120\], and toe lift \[0-120\]). Each muscle group was scored as the number of correctly performed repetitions with 60 or 120 maximal number of repetitions depending on muscle group. The FI-2 was performed unilaterally, preferably on the participant's dominant side for muscle groups of shoulder, hip, and step test. The FI-2 score ranged from 0-60 or 0-120 depending on the muscle group. Higher score indicated better muscle endurance.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Functional Index-2 (FI-2) at Week 24
Scores on a scalePlaceboUstekinumab
Change in Shoulder Flexion2.92 ± 14.6726.88 ± 14.284
Change in Head Lift2.00 ± 11.3315.56 ± 13.364
Change in Hip Flexion2.54 ± 6.8195.84 ± 13.184
Change in Step Test4.15 ± 10.8063.76 ± 16.674
Change in Heel Lift1.27 ± 20.2325.38 ± 29.315
Change in Toe Lift-0.62 ± 17.42210.60 ± 33.800
Change in Shoulder abduction-0.69 ± 11.5899.00 ± 15.419
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Experienced Disease Worsening Up to Week 24 Based on Consensus Criteria for Worsening

Percentage of participants who experienced disease worsening up to Week 24 based on consensus criteria for worsening was reported. Criteria for disease worsening in a clinical trial were based on international consensus guideline developed by the IMACS. The worsening of disease was defined as 1 of the following criteria: Worsening of the Physician Global Activity by \>=2 centimeter (cm) on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) and worsening of findings of MMT-8 by \>= 20 percent (%) from baseline; worsening of MDAAT-global extramuscular organ disease activity (a composite of constitutional, cutaneous, skeletal, gastrointestinal, pulmonary, and cardiac activity) by \>=2 cm on a 10-cm VAS from baseline; worsening of any 3 of 6 IMACS core set (PhGA, PtGA, MMT-8, muscle enzymes, MDAAT, and HAQ-D) activity measures by \>= 30% from baseline.

Time frame:
Up to Week 24
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Disease Worsening Up to Week 24 Based on Consensus Criteria for Worsening
Percentage of participantsPlaceboUstekinumab
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Disease Worsening Up to Week 24 Based on Consensus Criteria for Worsening38.528.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 Score at Week 24

Change from baseline in MMT-8 score at Week 24 was reported. Manual Muscle Testing was a partially validated tool to assess muscle strength. MMT-8 total score ranged from 0-80, where maximal score was sum of scores from 8 muscle groups (Deltoid middle \[left/right\], Biceps brachii \[left/right\], Gluteus maximus \[left/right\], Gluteus medius \[left/right\], Quadriceps \[left/right\], Wrist extensors \[left/right\], Ankle dorsiflexors \[left/right\], Neck flexors \[axial\]) and each muscle group was scored on a 0 to 10-point scale. The sides (right or left) used for calculating the total score. Higher score indicated greater muscle strength, that is, less impairment of muscle.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 Score at Week 24
Scores on a scalePlaceboUstekinumab
Change From Baseline in Manual Muscle Testing (MMT)-8 Score at Week 245.27 ± 5.6475.88 ± 5.207
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PhGA) at Week 24

Change from baseline in PhGA at Week 24 was reported. Physician Global Activity was a partially validated tool to measure the global evaluation by the physician of the participant's overall disease activity at the time of assessment using a 0-10 cm VAS, where 0 cm= no evidence of disease activity and 10 cm= extremely active or severe disease activity. Negative values indicated improvement from baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PhGA) at Week 24
Scores on a scalePlaceboUstekinumab
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Activity (PhGA) at Week 24-1.15 ± 1.623-1.22 ± 2.193
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Extramuscular Assessment by Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 24

Change from baseline in extramuscular assessment by MDAAT at Week 24 was reported. This validated tool measure the degree of disease activity of extramuscular organ systems and muscle on a 0-10 cm VAS. Extramuscular activity ranged between 0 and 10 via VAS where, 0 cm = absent and 10 cm = maximum disease activity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Assessment by Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 24
Scores on a scalePlaceboUstekinumab
Change From Baseline in Extramuscular Assessment by Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) at Week 24-0.68 ± 1.645-1.02 ± 1.437
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Muscle Enzyme Levels at Week 24

Change from baseline in muscle enzyme levels (creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase) at Week 24 was reported.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Enzyme units per liter (Enzyme U/L)
Change From Baseline in Muscle Enzyme Levels at Week 24
Enzyme units per liter (Enzyme U/L)PlaceboUstekinumab
Creatine Kinase140.42 ± 365.562134.80 ± 498.102
Lactate Dehydrogenase-10.77 ± 68.577-0.67 ± 64.513

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 88. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/26 (0%)1/26 (3.8%)16/26 (61.5%)
Placebo to Ustekinumab0/26 (0%)6/26 (23.1%)15/26 (57.7%)
Ustekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)0/25 (0%)8/25 (32%)24/25 (96%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboPlacebo to UstekinumabUstekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
Herpes ZosterInfections and infestations1/260/262/25
PolymyositisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/262/262/25
Cerebral InfarctionNervous system disorders0/262/260/25
SchizophreniaPsychiatric disorders0/262/260/25
Large Intestine PolypGastrointestinal disorders0/260/261/25
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations0/260/261/25
Intervertebral Disc ProtrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/260/261/25
OsteonecrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/260/261/25
Respiratory FailureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/260/261/25
GlaucomaEye disorders0/261/260/25
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboPlacebo to UstekinumabUstekinumab Through End of Study (EOS)
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/264/264/25
PolymyositisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/261/264/25
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders4/260/262/25
DermatomyositisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/260/262/25
Lymphocyte Count DecreasedInvestigations2/260/263/25
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/260/263/25
Iron Deficiency AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/260/262/25
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/262/262/25
Vitreous FloatersEye disorders0/260/262/25
Dental CariesGastrointestinal disorders0/261/262/25

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboUstekinumabTotal
Mean54.5 ± 13.4154.2 ± 11.6254.4 ± 12.44
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboUstekinumabTotal
Female162036
Male10515
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboUstekinumabTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian262551
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PlaceboUstekinumabTotal
JAPAN262551
08

Study locations

32 sites
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital
    Bunkyo Ku, 113 8519, Japan
  • Fukushima Medical University Hospital
    Fukushima, 960 1295, Japan
  • Shinko Hospital
    Hyogo, 651-0072, Japan
  • Tokai University Hospital
    Isehara, 259-1193, Japan
  • Kagoshima University Hospital
    Kagoshima City, 890-8544, Japan
  • St Marianna University Hospital
    Kanagawa, 216 8511, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center
    Kawachi Nagano, 586 8521, Japan
  • Hospital of the University of Occupational and Enviromental Health
    Kita-kyushu, 807-8555, Japan
  • Kumamoto University Hospital
    Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
  • Kurashiki Central Hospital
    Kurashiki, 710-8602, Japan
  • Shinshu University Hospital
    Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan
  • Minaminagano Medical Center Shinonoi General Hospital
    Nagano, 388-8004, Japan
  • Nagasaki University Hospital
    Nagasaki-shi, 852-8501, Japan
  • National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center
    Nagoya-shi, 460-0001, Japan
  • Niigata University Medical And Dental Hospital
    Niigata, 951 8520, Japan
  • Okayama City General Medical Center Okayama City Hospital
    Okayama, 700-8557, Japan
  • Kitasato University Hospital
    Sagamihara, 252-0375, Japan
  • Saga University Hospital
    Saga, 849-8501, Japan
  • Sakai City Medical Center
    Sakai City, 593-8304, Japan
  • Tohoku University Hospital
    Sendai shi, 980 8574, Japan
  • Tohoku Medical And Pharmaceutical University Hospital
    Sendai, 983-8512, Japan
  • Dokkyo Medical University Hospital
    Shimotsuga Gun, 321 0293, Japan
  • Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine
    Shinjuku ku, 162 8655, Japan
  • The Jikei University Hospital
    Tokyo, 105 8471, Japan
  • Nippon Medical School Hospital
    Tokyo, 113 8603, Japan
  • Juntendo University Hospital
    Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan
  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital
    Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan
  • Ehime University Hospital
    Toon, 791-0295, Japan
  • Fujita Health University Hospital
    Toyoake, 470-1192, Japan
  • University of Tsukuba Hospital
    Tsukuba, 305 8576, Japan
  • Yamaguchi University Hospital
    Ube, 755-8505, Japan
  • Yokohama Rosai Hospital
    Yokohama, 222-0036, Japan
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data sharing policy of the Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson \& Johnson is available at www.janssen.com/clinical-trials/transparency. As noted on this site, requests for access to the study data can be submitted through Yale open Data Access (YODA) Project site at yoda.yale.edu

Data sharing details ↗ · www.janssen.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2019 to primary completion in Jan 2022, 29 months.

Results were first posted in May 2024, 2 years 3 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 7, 2019
First posted
Jun 11, 2019
StartActual
Jul 26, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jan 24, 2022
CompletionActual
Jul 12, 2022
Results first posted
May 13, 2024
Last update
Apr 29, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03981744
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2019
Start date
Jul 26, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 24, 2022
Completion
Jul 12, 2022
Results posted
May 13, 2024
Last update
Apr 29, 2025

Study contacts

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Japan Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Ustekinumab

Start the discussion