CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03976817SA-AVRUpdated Jun 6, 2019

Aortic Valve Replacement Above the Aortic Annulus (SA-AVR) With the Carpentier-Edwards Magna-Ease Bioprosthesis

An observational study in Aortic Valve Disease and Prosthesis; Cardiac, Heart, Functional Disturbance as Result, sponsored by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-06.

Sponsored by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
117
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Surgical valve replacement is commonly performed in patients with severe aortic valve disease. In small aortic annulus, implantation of bioprosthetic valves can be associated with limited functional capacity. To avoid this condition, we changed our surgical technique to implant a larger bioprosthesis. Briefly, the prosthesis is sutured to the aortic annulus along the left and right coronary sinuses, and in a supraannular position along the noncoronary sinus, therefore allowing us to insert a prosthetic valve with a one-size larger diameter than the native aortic annulus.

Read the detailed description

Surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended for severe aortic valve disease. Bioprosthesis remains the substitute of choice for elderly patients. However, it may be associated with patient-prosthesis mismatch particularly for patients with small aortic annulus. Moreover, "valve-in-valve" transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a suitable therapeutic option for bioprosthesis structural degeneration, especially in patients with high surgical risk. It is therefore of great importance to implant the widest bioprosthesis as possible at the first AVR. The investigators report a surgical technique allowing the implantation of a larger bioprosthesis in patients with small aortic annulus: the supra-annular aortic valve replacement (SA-AVR) above the aortic annulus. The investigators analyzed the postoperative outcomes of the SA-AVR technique using the Perimount Magna Ease (Carpentier-Edwards, Irvine, California) bioprosthesis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Disease
  • Prosthesis; Cardiac, Heart, Functional Disturbance as Result

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • bioprosthesis
  • surgery
  • supra-annular
03

In context

Aortic Valve Disease

231 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Disease; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 117 is below the median of 200 across 112 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Disease.

Browse Aortic Valve Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who underwent aortic valve replacement in our institution

Inclusion criteria

  • patients older than 18 years who underwent a suprannular implantation of the Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease bioprosthetic valve between January 2010 and December 2017 in our institution, whatever the aetiology of the aortic valve disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients younger than 18 years, patients who received a different bioprosthesis valve in the aortic position, patients who were lost of follow-up.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
117 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • SA-AVR group

    Patients who underwent the supra-annular aortic valve replacement (SA-AVR) technique in our institution between December 2010 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed.

    Procedure: aortic valve replacement

Interventions

  • Procedureaortic valve replacement

    After median sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established between the ascending aorta and the right atrium. The aorta was cross-clamped and a high potassium warm cardioplegia was infused and repeated every 15 minutes. The aortotomy was made above the sinuses and the aortic valve was removed. The prosthesis was chosen one size larger than the maximal sizer that could be inserted, which was also used to determine the appropriate height for insertion of the sutures along the wall of the non-coronary sinus.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. In-hospital mortality

    Time frame: Hospital discharge, an average 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional status

    New York Heart Association functional class (from I to IV)

    Time frame: 1 year after the surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hopital Marie Lannelongue
    Le Plessis-Robinson, 92350, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03976817
Lead sponsor
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 6, 2019
Start date
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2018
Completion
Apr 1, 2019
Last update
Jun 6, 2019

Study contacts

Elie Fadel, MD PhD
study chair · Marie Lannelongue Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion