ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03958058Updated May 21, 2019

Tick-borne Encephalitis and Possible Borrelial Serology

An observational study in Tick Borne Encephalitis and Lyme Disease, sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana. Completed at 1 site in Slovenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-21.

Sponsored by University Medical Centre Ljubljana · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
690
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Europe, tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) virus causing TBE is transmitted by the bite of Ixodes ricinus tick, which can also transmit Lyme borreliae , the causative agent of Lyme borreliosis (LB). Since TBE and LB are both endemic with high incidence rates in Slovenia, we should be attentive to the possibility of double infections. Double infections with TBE virus and Lyme borreliae were reported to occur rarely even in endemic countries, however reliable data on coinfection rates are rather limited. Microbiological diagnosis of TBE virus infection is quite straightforward, and there is no specific therapy for TBE available so far. This markedly differs from borrelial infection, in which case interpretation of serological test results demands more caution, but there is highly efficient antibiotic treatment available for LB. This may lead to over prescribing of antibiotics to TBE patients with documented borrelial antibodies in serum indicating possible coinfection with Lyme borreliae, but missing clinical or microbiological criteria for proven borrelial coinfection. Approximately 10% of patients who had been treated appropriately for LB and about one third of patients after TBE report nonspecific subjective complaints, such as fatigue, headache, arthralgia, and myalgia, termed post-Lyme and post-encephalitic symptoms, respectively. These may not be differentiated clearly from nonspecific symptoms occurring with a rather substantial incidence also in the general population. A trend of ascribing medically unexplained nonspecific subjective symptoms to LB in subjects with positive borrelial antibodies in serum puzzles the situation further.

The aim of this prospective observational study was to assess the proportion and clinical implication of proven and possible coinfection with Lyme borreliae in patients with TBE, and to evaluate the association between anti-borrelial antibiotic therapy and clinical outcome in the subgroup of patients with possible coinfection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tick Borne Encephalitis
  • Lyme Disease
03

In context

Encephalitis, Tick-Borne

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Encephalitis, Tick-Borne; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 690 is above the median of 500 across 11 observational studies indexed under Encephalitis, Tick-Borne.

Browse Encephalitis, Tick-Borne studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 296 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with tick-borne encephalitis.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age ≥18 years
  • admitted between January 2007 and December 2013 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • tick-borne encephalitis defined according to European criteria (febrile illness with symptoms and/or signs of meningitis or meningoencephalitis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (>5 × 106 cells/L), and demonstration of acute TBE virus infection (the presence of specific tick-borne encephalitis virus IgM and IgG antibodies in serum or demonstration of intrathecal production of specific TBE virus IgM and/or IgG antibodies in patients previously vaccinated against tick-borne encephalitis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lyme borreliosis in the past
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
690 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Anti-borrelial antibiotic therapy

    Drug: Anti-borrelial antibiotic therapy

  • No antibiotics

    Patients who received symptomatic therapy (paracetamol, Lekadol®, granisetron, Kytril®, metamizol, Analgin®, parenteral hydration with saline). Patients reported the presence of nonspecific symptoms such as headache, fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia.

    Other: No antibiotic.

Interventions

  • DrugAnti-borrelial antibiotic therapy

    Beside symptomatic therapy, patients received oral doxycycline 100 mg (Doxy®) twice daily or ceftriaxone 2 g (Lendacin®) once daily for 14 days. Antibiotic therapy was left to the discretion of treating physicians. Patients reported the presence of nonspecific symptoms such as headache, fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia.

  • OtherNo antibiotic.

    Patients who received symptomatic therapy (paracetamol, Lekadol®, granisetron, Kytril®, metamizol, Analgin®, parenteral hydration with saline). Patients reported the presence of nonspecific symptoms such as headache, fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with objective manifestations of Lyme borreliosis

    At each visit physical examination was performed and clinical signs indicating objective manifestations of Lyme borreliosis, such as erythema migrans, were searched for and documented.

    Time frame: up to 12 months follow-up

  2. Frequency of nonspecific symptoms such as headache, fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia

    At each visit patients were asked to report the presence of nonspecific symptoms.

    Time frame: up to 12 months follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Ljubljana
    Ljubljana, Slovenia
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2007 to primary completion in Dec 2013, 83 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 17, 2019
First posted
May 21, 2019
StartActual
Jan 1, 2007
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2013
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2013
Last update
May 21, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 21, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03958058
Collaborators
University of Ljubljana School of Medicine, Slovenia
Responsible party
Daša Stupica (Prinicipal Investigator, University Medical Centre Ljubljana) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 21, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2007
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2013
Completion
Dec 31, 2013
Last update
May 21, 2019

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion