ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07274046ENCZECHUpdated Dec 10, 2025

Burden of Tick-borne Encephalitis and Cost-effectiveness of Vaccination in the Czech Republic

An observational study in Tick Borne Encephalitis (TBE), sponsored by Charles University, Czech Republic. Recruiting at 4 sites in Czechia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-10.

Sponsored by Charles University, Czech Republic · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2023; still recruiting 3 years 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
209
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This observational study follows children and adults who were hospitalized with tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in the Czech Republic. The aim is to better understand how individuals recover from TBE, which symptoms may persist after the infection, and which patients may require additional support during their recovery. Participants are examined several times after hospital discharge (at 2-4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months) to observe changes in symptoms, functional status, and daily activities. Follow-up assessments include evaluation of common post-infection problems such as tiredness, headaches, memory or concentration difficulties, sleep issues, or limb weakness. Symptoms lasting for several months are categorized as post-encephalitic syndrome (PES).

The study also assesses how TBE affects daily functioning, school and work performance, and overall quality of life using questionnaires and short functional assessments. In addition, the study includes a public-health component that estimates the broader impact of TBE in the population and evaluates the potential benefits of vaccination in preventing long-term health complications.

The findings aim to support improved patient care, follow-up planning, and evidence-based public-health decision-making in the Czech Republic.

Read the detailed description

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a serious viral infection of the central nervous system and represents a longstanding public-health challenge in the Czech Republic, a country with one of the highest TBE incidences in Europe. Although an effective vaccine has been available for decades, population-level vaccination coverage remains low, resulting in persistently high incidence across all age groups and numerous severe cases requiring hospitalization. Despite extensive clinical experience with TBE, the long-term course of the disease, the full spectrum of postencephalitic syndrome (PES), and the associated functional and neurocognitive burden remain incompletely quantified in contemporary, real-world populations. Updated evidence is also needed to inform public-health planning and to evaluate the potential health and economic benefits of broader TBE vaccination in this high-endemicity setting.

The study is a prospective multicenter observational investigation enrolling children and adults hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed TBE across four major infectious disease centers in the Czech Republic. Standardized clinical and functional assessments are applied to capture both the acute clinical course and the long-term recovery trajectory. Acute disease severity is classified using predefined clinical criteria, including the presence of motor deficit (paresis) during hospitalization, intensive-care unit admission, prolonged hospitalization (length of stay >10 days), or death. Follow-up assessments occur at 2-4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge.

Long-term outcomes are evaluated using validated tools, including the modified Rankin Scale (mRankin) to assess global functional disability and the Minimum European Health Module (MEHM) to capture self-perceived health, activity limitation, and chronic morbidity. A central focus of the study is the characterization of postencephalitic syndrome (PES), the most common long-term complication of TBE. PES is defined as the persistence of one or more neurological, cognitive, or functional symptoms lasting for at least 6 months after acute infection. These symptoms may include chronic fatigue, impaired concentration or memory, cognitive slowing, sleep disturbances, headaches, irritability, anxiety, or reduced exercise tolerance. Persistent motor deficits, such as paresis or impaired coordination, are evaluated as integral components of PES, reflecting a more severe neurological phenotype. Detailed symptom-level data and functional assessments are collected to comprehensively describe the prevalence, severity, and heterogeneity of PES and its impact on long-term quality of life.

The study examines demographic and clinical predictors of adverse outcomes, including the role of age, comorbidities, markers of central nervous system involvement during the acute phase, and initial disease severity. These analyses are intended to support improved prognostic counseling and inform follow-up and rehabilitation strategies.

A public-health and economic component quantifies the overall burden of TBE in disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), integrating observed functional outcomes, sequelae duration, disability weights, and TBE-related mortality. DALY estimates are combined with national epidemiological surveillance data to ensure representativeness across age groups and regions. These outcomes will form the basis for a decision-analytic model evaluating the cost-effectiveness of increasing TBE vaccination coverage. The model compares current vaccination uptake with expanded coverage scenarios across different age groups and generates estimates of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), projected health gains, reductions in long-term disability, and potential healthcare cost savings. The economic modeling relies solely on aggregated clinical and epidemiological data and does not include any patient-level interventions.

By integrating prospective clinical follow-up, standardized functional assessments, detailed characterization of PES, and health-economic modeling, the study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the clinical and economic burden of TBE in the Czech Republic. The findings may inform clinical practice, long-term patient management, and national vaccination policy, contributing to improved prevention and mitigation of TBE-related morbidity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tick Borne Encephalitis (TBE)

Keywords

  • tick-borne encephalitis
  • sequelae
  • post-encephalitic syndrome
  • age
  • TBEV
  • encephalitis
  • cost-effectiveness
03

In context

Encephalitis, Tick-Borne

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Encephalitis, Tick-Borne; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 209 is below the median of 500 across 11 observational studies indexed under Encephalitis, Tick-Borne.

Browse Encephalitis, Tick-Borne studies →

Lead sponsor

Charles University, Czech Republic is the lead sponsor of 228 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Hospitalized children and adults with confirmed tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) treated at four infectious disease centers in the Czech Republic. All participants had clinical symptoms of central nervous system involvement, cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, and laboratory confirmation of TBEV infection. Patients were enrolled during their acute hospitalization and followed prospectively for up to 12 months as part of a standardized clinical and functional outcome assessment program.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Hospitalization due to suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection.
  • Laboratory-confirmed TBE, defined as:

the presence of CNS symptoms and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis (>5 × 10⁶/L) and TBEV IgM and IgG seropositivity in serum, or detection of TBEV IgM in CSF in previously vaccinated individuals.

  • All age groups (children and adults).
  • Ability to participate in scheduled follow-up (in person or via telephone).
  • provided by the patient or legal guardian (for minors).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alternative diagnosis explaining the CNS symptoms
  • Missing essential clinical or laboratory data required to confirm TBE or assess outcomes.
  • Refusal or inability to provide .
  • Inability to complete follow-up assessments, including situations where reliable contact cannot be maintained.
  • Coexisting severe neurological disorder unrelated to TBE that prevents meaningful evaluation of sequelae (e.g., advanced neurodegenerative disease, severe preexisting motor disability).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
209 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • TBE cohort

    Children and adults hospitalized with confirmed tick-borne encephalitis, followed prospectively for 12 months.

    Other: No intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention

    Observational study only. Participants receive standard clinical care; no experimental or study-specific interventions are administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence and Severity of Post-Encephalitic Syndrome (PES)

    PES is defined as the presence of ≥1 neurological, cognitive, or functional symptom persisting ≥6 months after acute TBE. PES severity is graded as: Mild: mRankin = 1, no limitation of usual activities Moderate: mRankin = 2 and/or limited but preserved independence, or poor self-perceived health (MEHM) Severe: mRankin ≥3, severe limitation of daily activities, very poor self-perceived health, or death.

    Time frame: 6 months post-discharge and 12 months post-discharge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Persistent Motor Deficit

    Presence of persistent paresis or other objective motor impairment at follow-up attributed to TBE.

    Time frame: 6 months post-discharge and 12 months post-discharge

  2. Acute Disease Severity Classification

    Acute course categorized as severe if any of the following criteria are present: motor deficit (paresis) during hospitalization, ICU admission, hospitalization \>10 days, death. All others classified as mild.

    Time frame: During index hospitalization

  3. Functional Status by Modified Rankin Scale (mRankin)

    Global functional disability assessed by mRankin (0-6).

    Time frame: 2-4 weeks post-discharge; 3 months; 6 months; 12 months

  4. Self-perceived Health and Activity Limitation (MEHM Score)

    Minimum European Health Module (MEHM), including perceived health, activity limitation, and chronic morbidity.

    Time frame: 2-4 weeks post-discharge; 3 months; 6 months; 12 months

  5. Persistence or Resolution of Individual PES Symptoms (Structured Symptom Checklist)

    This outcome is assessed using a structured PES Symptom Checklist developed for standardized evaluation of post-encephalitic symptoms. The checklist captures the presence or absence of individual symptoms associated with post-encephalitic syndrome (PES), including fatigue, exertion intolerance, headache, cognitive slowing, memory problems, concentration difficulties, sleep disturbances, sensory deficits, and emotional instability. Each symptom is recorded as present or absent at each follow-up assessment. The outcome will be reported as: number of symptoms present (range 0-X), and presence/absence of each individual symptom (binary assessment). Unit of Measure: Number of symptoms (count) and binary presence/absence for each symptom

    Time frame: 2-4 weeks post-discharge; 3 months; 6 months; 12 months

  6. Hospital Length of Stay (LOS)

    Total duration of the index hospital stay in days, from hospital admission for acute TBE to hospital discharge.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, assessed over an expected hospitalization period of up to 90 days.

  7. ICU Admission

    Whether the patient was admitted to intensive care during acute TBE and the length of ICU stay.

    Time frame: From hospital admission to hospital discharge, including any ICU stay, assessed over an expected hospitalization period of up to 90 days.

  8. All-Cause Mortality (binary outcome)

    All-cause mortality recorded as a binary outcome (alive/deceased) at predefined time points. Mortality during the index hospitalization and mortality during follow-up (6 and 12 months post-discharge) are recorded separately. Unit of Measure: Proportion of participants deceased (%)

    Time frame: During index hospitalization; 6 months post-discharge; 12 months post-discharge

  9. Cost-Effectiveness of TBE Vaccination

    Cost-effectiveness of increasing TBE vaccination coverage in the Czech Republic based on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) derived from observed functional outcomes (mRankin, MEHM), PES prevalence, symptom duration, and TBE-associated mortality. A decision-analytic model will estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) across different age groups and vaccination coverage scenarios using real-world clinical data combined with national surveillance data.

    Time frame: Final analysis at 12 months after completion of follow-up.

  10. Change in Functional Status (modified Rankin Scale, mRankin)

    Change in global functional disability assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (0-6). Scores are recorded at each follow-up visit to evaluate recovery trajectory and functional outcomes after acute TBE.

    Time frame: Baseline (hospitalization), 2-4 weeks post-discharge, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months.

  11. Change in Self-Perceived Health (Minimum European Health Module, MEHM)

    Change in self-perceived health, activity limitation, and chronic morbidity assessed using the Minimum European Health Module (MEHM). Unit of Measure: MEHM score (categorical responses)

    Time frame: Baseline (hospitalization), 2-4 weeks post-discharge, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months.

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Ostrava University Hospital
    Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region 70800, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Kateřina Pohludková, MD · Contactkaterina.pohludkova@fno.cz · 00420 597 373 480
    • Kateřina Pohludková, MD · Principal investigator
  • Pardubická nemocnice
    Pardubice, Pardubice Region 53001, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Lukáš Chovanec, MD · Contactlukas.chovanec@nempk.cz · +420 466 014 613
    • Lukáš Chovanec, MD · Principal investigator
  • Bulovka University Hospital
    Prague, Prague 18081, Czechia
    Recruiting
  • České Budějovice Hospital
    České Budějovice, South Bohemian Region 37001, Czechia
    Recruiting
    • Vojtěch Pražák, MD · Contactinfekcni@nemcb.cz · 00420387874601
    • Vojtěch Pražák, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared. Only aggregated, anonymized results will be made available in publications.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 32 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2025
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
StartActual
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Dec 10, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07274046
Collaborators
České Budějovice Hospital, University Hospital Ostrava, Hospital Pardubice, Bulovka Hospital
Responsible party
Martin Slížek (Principal Investigator, Department of Infectious Diseases, Charles University, Czech Republic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 10, 2025
Start date
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 10, 2025

Study contacts

Martin Slížek, MD
Contact
martin.slizek89@gmail.com
00420602269494

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion