ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03946631Updated Dec 14, 2022

GDM Post Partum Screening

An observational study in Diabetes, Gestational Diabetes and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Pediatrix. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-14.

Sponsored by Pediatrix · Observational

Why this study was terminated
PI and Practice closed
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
21
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Immediate postpartum screening for diabetes mellitus in women with gestational diabetes

The objective of this study is to determine if screening for type 2 diabetes can be done 24 hours after delivery, versus 6-12 weeks postpartum, in recently delivered women having been diagnosed with gestational diabetes requiring medication therapy in the antecedent pregnancy.

Read the detailed description

1 Overview The purpose of the project is to determine if screening for diabetes mellitus, in women with gestational diabetes, can be done 24 hours postpartum versus 6-12 weeks postpartum.

Primary Objective: To compare the results from screening for type 2 diabetes 24 hours postpartum versus 6-12 weeks postpartum.

Design and Project Type Prospective cohort study. Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes and receiving anti-hyperglycemic medication therapy will have testing for type 2 DM done 24 hours after delivery. They will also have routine screening for type 2 DM done at 6-12 weeks postpartum.

Description of Intervention The intervention is early screening for type 2 DM which involves oral intake of a 75-- gram (g) glucose drink and subsequent measurement of fasting, 1- hour, and 2- hour postprandial point of care fingerstick s for blood glucose measurement.

Instruments Fingerstick testing will be done with StatStrip Glucose Hospital Meter (Nova Biomedical). This device is used routinely throughout the hospital and has been validated for use in all patients, including the critically ill. Using point of care testing will allow for accurate results with less pain for the patient, as compared to (fingerstick versus venipuncture).

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes
  • Gestational Diabetes
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

8,290 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,077 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 246 across 1,936 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Pediatrix is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pregnant, or recently postpartum, women with the diagnosis of GDM requiring medication therapy after 20 weeks, >18 years-old (yo), English speaking

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant, or recently postpartum, women with the diagnosis of GDM requiring medication therapy after 20 weeks,
  • >18 years-old (yo)yo,
  • English speaking.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have pre-existing type 2 DM,
  • did not require anti-hyperglycemic medication therapy (GDMA1),
  • early onset GDM (\<20 weeks).
  • do not speak English .
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Blood Glucose Test - 2hour GTT

    Only one arm: intervention group. The intervention is fasting 2 hour glucose tolerance test in the immediate postpartum period. The screening test consists of fingerstick blood glucose testing after a glucose drink. First, a fasting blood glucose finger stick will be performed. Second, the glucose drink is orally ingested containing 75g glucose. The drink is to be orally ingested over 60 seconds. Lastly, fingerstick blood glucose testing is completed at 1 hour post drink and 2 hours post drink.

    Diagnostic Test: 2 hour glucose tolerance test using 75g glucose drink

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test2 hour glucose tolerance test using 75g glucose drink

    intervention is a 2 hour glucose tolerance test. Involves oral intake of a 75g glucose drink followed by using point of care testing. Glucose drink is taken after at least 6 hours of fasting. Fingerstick blood glucose testing done at three time points: fasting, one hour post drink and two hours post drink.

    Also known as: fingerstick testing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of early postpartum overt diabetes screening by 2-hour glucose tolerance testing in postpartum women.

    We will compare the sensitivity of a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (2HR OGTT) for the detection of overt diabetes when performed within 48 hours of delivery ("early") among postpartum women previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes requiring treatment. The "early" 2HR OGTT result will be compared to the current standard of care of a 2HR OGTT performed at 6-12 weeks postpartum.

    Time frame: 24-48 hours postpartum verses 6-12 weeks postpartum.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix
    Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gobl CS, Bozkurt L, Prikoszovich T, Winzer C, Pacini G, Kautzky-Willer A. Early possible risk factors for overt diabetes after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):71-78. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318220e18f. PubMed 21691165 ↗
  • Su X, Zhang Z, Qu X, Tian Y, Zhang G. Hemoglobin A1c for diagnosis of postpartum abnormal glucose tolerance among women with gestational diabetes mellitus: diagnostic meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 11;9(7):e102144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102144. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25014072 ↗
  • Mendez-Figueroa H, Daley J, Breault P, Lopes VV, Paine V, Goldman D, Francis MJ, Delgado B, Coustan DR. Impact of an intensive follow-up program on the postpartum glucose tolerance testing rate. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;289(6):1177-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3157-0. Epub 2014 Jan 31. PubMed 24481876 ↗
  • Kjos SL, Peters RK, Xiang A, Henry OA, Montoro M, Buchanan TA. Predicting future diabetes in Latino women with gestational diabetes. Utility of early postpartum glucose tolerance testing. Diabetes. 1995 May;44(5):586-91. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.5.586. PubMed 7729620 ↗
  • 5. Biljok VR, Bozicevic S, Lovrencic MV, Car N. Performance of the StatStrip Glucose Meter in Inpatient Management of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetologia Croatica 2010; 39-3:105-109.
  • Werner EF, Has P, Tarabulsi G, Lee J, Satin A. Early Postpartum Glucose Testing in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Am J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;33(10):966-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1583193. Epub 2016 Apr 27. Erratum In: Am J Perinatol. 2016 Dec;33(14):1433-1434. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593534. PubMed 27120481 ↗
  • Dinglas C, Muscat J, Heo H, Islam S, Vintzileos A. Immediate Postpartum Glucose Tolerance Testing in Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Pilot Study. Am J Perinatol. 2017 Oct;34(12):1264-1270. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606620. Epub 2017 Sep 14. No abstract available. PubMed 28910846 ↗
  • Vucic Lovrencic M, Radisic Biljak V, Bozicevic S, Pape-Medvidovic E, Ljubic S. Validation of Point-of-Care Glucose Testing for Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:206309. doi: 10.1155/2013/206309. Epub 2013 Dec 8. PubMed 24382960 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2019 to primary completion in Oct 2022, 38 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 15, 2019
First posted
May 10, 2019
StartActual
Aug 20, 2019
Primary completionActual
Oct 21, 2022
CompletionActual
Oct 21, 2022
Last update
Dec 14, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03946631
Lead sponsor
Pediatrix
Collaborators
Banner University Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2019
Start date
Aug 20, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 21, 2022
Completion
Oct 21, 2022
Last update
Dec 14, 2022

Study contacts

Laura Wilkes
study director · Banner University Medical Center
Kisti Fuller, MD
principal investigator · Phoenix Perinatal Associates, Mednax

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion