CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03936647RISEUpdated Aug 15, 2024

The RISE Trial: A Randomized Trial on Intra-Saccular Endobridge Devices

An interventional study of surgical clipping, simple coiling, high-porosity stenting with/ without coiling, intra-arterial flow diversion with/ without coiling and WEB embolization device in Intracranial Aneurysm, Brain Aneurysm and Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm, sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM). Recruiting at 4 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-15.

Sponsored by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2025, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2019; still recruiting 7 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
250
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Intracranial bifurcation aneurysms are commonly repaired with surgical and with endovascular techniques. Wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) are a difficult subset of aneurysms to successfully repair endovascularly, and a number of treatment adjuncts have been designed. One particularly promising innovation is the WEB (Woven EndoBridge), which permits placement of an intra-saccular flow diverting mesh across the aneurysm neck, but which does not require anti-platelet agent therapy. Currently, which treatment option leads to the best outcome for patients with WNBA remains unknown. There is a need to offer treatment with the WEB within the context of a randomized care trial, to patients currently presenting with aneurysms thought to be suitable for the WEB.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracranial Aneurysm
  • Brain Aneurysm
  • Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm
  • Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm
  • Cerebral Aneurysm

Keywords

  • intracranial aneurysm
  • cerebral aneurysm
  • brain aneurysm
  • unruptured cerebral aneurysm
  • ruptured cerebral aneurysm
  • WEB embolization device
  • embolization
03

In context

Intracranial Aneurysm

427 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm; 115 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 250 is above the median of 110 across 207 interventional studies indexed under Intracranial Aneurysm.

Browse Intracranial Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) is the lead sponsor of 370 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patient with an intracranial aneurysm in whom WEB is considered an appropriate therapeutic option by the participating clinician
  • aneurysm of maximum diameter of 4-11 mm
  • may include (but are not restricted to) saccular bifurcation aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery, basilar bifurcation, carotid terminus, or anterior communicating artery aneurysms
  • Recurring, persistent aneurysm after previous treatment can be included so long as the treating physician judges the aneurysm morphology to be appropriate.
  • Ruptured aneurysms with WFNS ≤ 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute contraindication to surgery, endovascular treatment or anesthesia
  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • diameter of the aneurysm ≤ 4 mm but ≥ 11 mm
  • Ruptured aneurysms with WFNS 4 or 5
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
250 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard conventional treatment (surgical or endovascular)

    Treatment may include the most appropriate amongst surgical clipping, simple coiling, high-porosity stenting with or without coiling, and intra-arterial flow diversion with or without coiling, which will be predetermined by the treating physician prior to randomization.

    Procedure: surgical clipping, simple coiling, high-porosity stenting with/ without coiling, intra-arterial flow diversion with/ without coiling

  • Experimental
    WEB embolization device

    Endovascular treatment with WEB, including standard management of thrombo-embolic risk

    Device: WEB embolization device

Interventions

  • Proceduresurgical clipping, simple coiling, high-porosity stenting with/ without coiling, intra-arterial flow diversion with/ without coiling

    Treatment may include the most appropriate amongst surgical clipping, simple coiling, high-porosity stenting with or without coiling, and intra-arterial flow diversion with or without coiling, which will be predetermined by the treating physician prior to randomization.

  • DeviceWEB embolization device

    WEB embolization device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with imaging showing that index aneurysm has reached complete or near occlusion

    complete or near complete occlusion of the aneurysm

    Time frame: 1 year from procedure

  2. Number of patients with a modified Rankin Score (mRS) below or equal to 2

    mRS ≤2 from evaluation (questionnaire) at follow-up visits throughout study. Grading score is to be assessed as such: Grade 0 No symptoms at all. Grade 1 No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities Grade 2 Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance Grade 3 Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance Grade 4 Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance Grade 5 Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention Grade 6 Dead

    Time frame: 1 year from procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with an interim modified Rankin Scale (mRS) below or equal to 2

    mRS ≤2 from evaluation (questionnaire) at discharge and follow-up visits throughout study. Grading score is to be assessed as such: Grade 0 No symptoms at all. Grade 1 No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities Grade 2 Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance Grade 3 Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance Grade 4 Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance Grade 5 Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention Grade 6 Dead

    Time frame: within 1 week post-procedure, 1-3 months, and 12 months post-treatment

  2. Number of successful deployment of WEB device, coils or successful microsurgical, clipping, along with judgement of patency of parent arteries using imaging (depending on treatment received)

    Successful WEB deployment / aneurysm clipping / aneurysm coiling

    Time frame: within 1 hour from procedure

  3. Number of incidences of successful or unsuccesful patency of parent arteries using imaging

    Analysis of imaging to judge the patency of the parent arteries

    Time frame: within 1 hour from procedure

  4. Number of peri-operative complications

    Peri-operative complications (such as ischemic strokes and intracranial hemorrhages)

    Time frame: ≥5 days

  5. Number of aneurysm re-occurrences, (re-)rupture, or incomplete occlusion based on angiographic imaging

    Angiographic outcome (invasive or non-invasive imaging) results

    Time frame: 12 +/- 2 months

  6. Hospitalization time

    Hospital stay (number of days)

    Time frame: up to first post-procedure visit (around 1 month)

  7. Incidence of discharge destination by type

    Discharge disposition (home; other hospital; rehabilitation facility; death)

    Time frame: up to first post-procedure visit (around 1 month)

  8. Number of participants with stroke, neurological symptom or sign

    Any new stroke, neurological symptom or sign

    Time frame: within 12 +/- 2 months

  9. Number of index aneurysms necessitating or having received retreatment due to re-occurence

    Re-treatment of the index aneurysm as judged by imaging and interventionists neurosurgeons due to incomplete occlusion or hemorrhage

    Time frame: Within 12 +/- 2 months

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • University of Alberta Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Recruiting
  • University of Manitoba Hospital
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3P5, Canada
    • Susan Alcock, RN, MN · Contact · susan.alcock@umanitoba.ca · 204-789-3996
    • Jai Jay Shiva Shankar, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Hamilton Health Sciences - McMaster University
    Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    • Amanda Martyniuk, MSc · Contact · martynia@mcmaster.ca · (905) 521-2100
    • Brian van Adel, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal
    Montréal, Quebec H2X 0C1, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03936647
Lead sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2019
Start date
Jul 18, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 15, 2024

Study contacts

daniela E Iancu, MD
Contact
daniela.iancu.med@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
514-890-8450
Guylaine Gevry, BSc
Contact
guylaine.gevry.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca
514-890-8000 ext. 27235

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion