An observational study in Tick-Bite; Fever, Tick Fever and Tick-Borne Diseases, sponsored by Göteborg University. Withdrawn at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-09.
Sponsored by Göteborg University · Observational
The proposed study is a collaboration between Microbiology, SU/Sahlgrenska and the Infectious Diseases clinic at SU/Östra as well as several Infectious Diseases clinics throughout Sweden aiming at improving microbiological diagnostic assays regarding the early identification of tick-borne microorganisms (including as of yet unidentified pathogens) capable of causing human disease using modern diagnostic tools.
At the initial study visit (day 0) plasma, serum, urine, saliva, and PBMCs (and tick, if available) will be collected from patients developing fever within two weeks after a tick bite. Additional follow-up samples will be obtained after 9 and 30 days as well as after 6 months. The initial samples will be analyzed using (a) directed multiplex PCR analysis for Tick-Borne Encephalitis (TBE), Borrelia, Anaplasma, Neoerlichia, Rickettsia, Coxiella, Tularemia, and Babesiosis in plasma, whole blood and urine, (b) conventional IgM and IgG serology for TBE, (c) "Next Generation Sequencing" (NGS) for the detection of bacterial 16s rRNA as well as unknown viruses, (d) potential biomarkers, and (e) host genetic factors. Among patients where initial sampling indicates the presence of a potential pathogen or in patients developing neurological symptoms, a lumbar puncture will be performed and CSF will be further analyzed. Samples will also be evaluated regarding potential microbiological factors predisposing for severity of infection.
The primary objective of the study is to improve diagnostic tools in the initial early phase of infections caused by tick-borne pathogens, especially TBE prior to the affliction of the central nervous system, and to attempt to identify which factors impact the course of infection as it is believed that approximately 75% of infected individuals resolve their infection in this first phase whereas others develop meningoencephalitis with significant subsequent neurological sequelae. Secondary objectives of the study include investigating for the presence of and treating other tick-borne pathogens, setting the stage for coming clinical trials evaluating novel anti-viral therapies for TBE.
438 studies on the registry are indexed under Fever; 55 are open to participants now.
Browse Fever studies →Göteborg University is the lead sponsor of 270 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Men and women ≥18 years old with documented or a medical history of fever (≥38°C) within 2 weeks after a tick bite.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The proposed study is not interventional. However, if a treatable microorganism is detected, e.g. Borrelia or Anaplasma, suitable therapy, e.g. doxycycline, will be in initiated if appropriate.
Etiology of fever (≥38°C) developing within 2 weeks after a tick bite.
Number of participants with detectable Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV), Borrelia, Anaplasma, Neoerlichia, Rickettsia, Coxiella burnetii, Tularemia, and/or Babesia infections.
Time frame: Up to two weeks after the tick bite.
Proportion of subjects developing neurological symptoms after a tick bite.
The proportion of subjects developing neurological symptoms in each of the following etiological categories: Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV), Borrelia, Anaplasma, Neoerlichia, Rickettsia, Coxiella burnetii, Tularemia, and/or Babesia.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Proportion of subjects developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease after a tick bite.
The proportion of subjects developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease in each of the following etiological categories: Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV), Borrelia, Anaplasma, Neoerlichia, Rickettsia, Coxiella burnetii, Tularemia, and/or Babesia.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of body mass index (BMI) of subjects on the risk of development of neurological symptoms.
Evaluation of body mass index (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2) of subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of waist circumference of subjects on the risk of development of neurological symptoms.
Evaluation of waist circumference (measured in cm) of subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of gender of subjects on the risk of development of neurological symptoms.
Evaluation of gender (male vs. female) of subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of age of subjects on the risk of development of neurological symptoms.
Evaluation of age (measured in years) of subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of body mass index of subjects developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Evaluation of body mass index (weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m2) of subjects developing vs. not developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of waist circumference of subjects developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Evaluation of waist circumference (measured in cm) of subjects developing vs. not developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of gender of subjects developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Evaluation of gender (male vs. female) of subjects developing vs. not developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Impact of age of subjects developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Evaluation of age (measured in years) of subjects developing vs. not developing other serious, non-neurological symptoms or disease.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the utility of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for the detection of unknown viruses and of bacterial 16s rRNA vs. directed Multiplex PCR
Number of participants with Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus (TBEV), Borrelia, Anaplasma, Neoerlichia, Rickettsia, Coxiella burnetii, Tularemia, and/or Babesia infections as detected using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in comparison to Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (Multiplex PCR).
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of TBEV-RNA and TBE IgM serology in the early phase of infection, i.e. up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Comparison of the number of subjects correctly identified as being infected with TBEV by means of analysis of TBEV-RNA vs. TBE IgM serology in the early phase of infection, i.e. up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of TBEV-RNA in urine vs. plasma/whole blood in the early phase of TBE infection, i.e. up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Comparison of the number of subjects correctly identified as being infected with TBEV by means of analysis of TBEV-RNA in urine vs. plasma/whole blood in the early phase of TBE infection, i.e. up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of PCR for Borrelia DNA in plasma/serum as well as Borrelia IgM serology in the early phase of infection, i.e. up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Comparison the number of subjects correctly identified as being infected with Borrelia by means of analysis of PCR for Borrelia DNA in plasma/serum as well as Borrelia IgM and IgG serology in the early phase of infection, i.e. up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Time frame: Up to 30 days after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of early evaluation of plasma concentrations of the neurological markers NFL in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Comparison of plasma concentrations of the neurological marker NFL will be evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of early evaluation of plasma concentrations of the neurological marker T-tau in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Comparison of plasma concentrations of the neurological marker T-tau will be evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of early evaluation of plasma concentrations of the neurological marker GFAp in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Comparison of plasma concentrations of neurological marker GFAp will be evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of early evaluation of plasma concentrations of IP-10 (aka CXCL10) in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Comparison of plasma concentrations of IP-10 (aka CXCL10) will be evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the specificity and sensitivity of early evaluation of 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Comparison of plasma concentrations of 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) will be evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) analyzed by FACS, in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Comparison of the proportion of CD56 negative NK, CD4+ CD38+, CD8+ CD38+, CD8+CD16+, Foxp3+, and pDC (CD303+) cells analyzed by FACS will be evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the impact of host genetic polymorphisms in the IFNL4 gene in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Proportion of subjects with genetic polymorphisms in the IFNL4 gene evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the impact of host genetic polymorphisms in the ITPA gene in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
Proportion of subjects with genetic polymorphisms in the ITPA gene evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the impact of prior vaccination against TBE on frequency and outcome of TBEV infection.
Comparison of subjects with vs. without prior vaccination against TBE on frequency and outcome of TBEV infection.
Time frame: From time of prior vaccination until six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the impact of prior vaccination against Yellow Fever on frequency and outcome of TBEV infection.
Comparison of subjects with vs. without prior vaccination against Yellow Fever on frequency and outcome of TBEV infection.
Time frame: From time of prior vaccination until six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the impact of prior vaccination against Japanese Encephalitis on frequency and outcome of TBEV infection.
Comparison of subjects with vs. without prior vaccination against Japanese Encephalitis on frequency and outcome of TBEV infection.
Time frame: From time of prior vaccination until six months after the tick bite.
Prospective evaluation of the association between presence or absence of immunosuppression in relation to the likelihood of developing neurological symptoms.
The proportion of subjects with vs. without immunosuppression will be evaluated among subjects developing vs. not developing neurological symptoms.
Time frame: Up to six months after the tick bite.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.