ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03932097RPUpdated Oct 27, 2026Results posted

REAL Parenting Alcohol and Substance Use App

An interventional study of REAL Parenting and Active Control Materials in Underage Drinking and Alcohol Use, Underage, sponsored by Real Prevention, LLC. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Real Prevention, LLC · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 27, 2026Results postedStudy documents posted+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
612
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

High school students' alcohol, nicotine, and marijuana use are major public health problems. Among the many consequences of these risky behaviors are impaired driving and impaired passenger fatalities as well as increased health risks. Both school administrators and parents have requested parent-based interventions (PBIs)for the general high school population that include content on alcohol, nicotine and marijuana use. In addition, digital materials are needed for the "on-the-go" parent. The proposed research will address this omission, curb the alarming trends noted above, and move the field forward by conducting a randomized controlled trial testing a modified, digital version of the Parent Handbook for the all high school students that includes additional content for parents to have broader discussions about combined alcohol nicotine and marijuana use alone (referred to as REAL Parenting). Parent-teen dyads will be invited to participate and complete baseline assessment and parents will receive the REAL Parenting or active control materials shortly afterwards. This will allow an examination of the impact of the RP on alcohol use, and associated consequences and sustained effects across the follow-up period.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this Phase II SBIR is to provide an efficient, engaging, and effective means to enhance parents' ability to reduce prevalence of alcohol use and consequences, and other substance use through the development and evaluation of REAL Parenting (RP). RP is a brief, interactive, self-paced, and digital curriculum for parents of high-school-aged adolescents, a frequently neglected population created from the evidence-based Parent Handbook,available in hard copy and DVD for college-bound youth only. The curriculum is needed because most parent-based prevention interventions target children or young adolescents, neglecting older adolescents, despite that fact that alcohol use increases in frequency and risk through midadolescence. Also, unlike other evidence-based parenting curricula, RP is brief, requires only the parents, does not require training, and can be used "on the go" through any digital device. This provides a market niche for the proposed project that addresses this curriculum gap through the innovative use of both technology and prevention science. This format will allow us to personalize or target parents based on their communication style and allows parents to customize their experience by choosing or clicking through the optional content. Personalization and customization are two essential engagement strategies for digital prevention interventions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Underage Drinking
  • Alcohol Use, Underage

Browse trials for

03

In context

Underage Drinking

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Underage Drinking; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 612 is above the median of 360 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Underage Drinking.

Browse Underage Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

Real Prevention, LLC is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • High school students (ages 15-18) who may be at risk for alcohol, marijuana and nicotine use and abuse, and whose parent/guardian is willing to participate in the proposed study as part of a parent/student dyad.
  • High school students ages 15-18 with their parents/guardians; English fluency; Internet access; at least one parent/guardian fluent in English and with Internet access

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not high school aged (not ages 15-18)
  • Parent/guardian was not willing to participate
  • Does not have English fluency;
  • Does not have access to Internet access
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
612 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    REAL Parenting

    REAL Parenting digital intervention emphasizing parent-teen/young adult communication on drinking/risks of drinking/risks of alcohol abuse, with the addition of a communication component on the risks of nicotine and marijuana use, with the goal of reducing alcohol, nicotine and marijuana use in college students.

    Behavioral: REAL Parenting

  • Active comparator
    Active Control Materials

    NIAAA materials on underage drinking for parents

    Other: Active Control Materials

Interventions

  • BehavioralREAL Parenting

    REAL Parenting digital intervention emphasizing parent-teen/young adult communication on drinking/risks of drinking/risks of alcohol abuse, with the addition of a communication component on the risks of nicotine and marijuana use, with the goal of reducing alcohol, nicotine and marijuana use in college students.

  • OtherActive Control Materials

    NIAAA materials on underage drinking for parents

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency Past 3-month Drinking

    Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, on how many days did you have at least one drink of alcohol?". Response options ranged from 0 to 6 where, 0=0 days, 1=1 or 2 days, 2=3 to 5 days, 3=6 to 9 days, 4=10 to 19 days 5=20 to 29 days, and 6=30 days or more. Higher scores indicated the participant consumed alcohol more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T5 (12-months post baseline)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Past 3-month Marijuana Use

    Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, how many times did you use marijuana?". Response options were on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=0 times, 1=1 or 2 times, 2=3 to 9 times, 3=10 to 19 times, 4=20 to 39 times, and 5=40 or more times. Higher scores indicated the participant used marijuana more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)

  2. Combined Use of Alcohol and Marijuana

    Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, how many of the times when you used marijuana did you use it at the same time as alcohol - that is, so that their effects overlapped?". Response options were on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5 where 0=0 times, 1=1 or 2 times, 2=3 to 9 times, 3=10 to 19 times, 4=20 to 39 times, and 5=40 or more times. Higher scores indicated the participant combined alcohol and marijuana more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)

  3. Consequences of Alcohol Use

    Alcohol-related consequences (e.g., have a hangover, do poorly on schoolwork) were adapted using the established Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ; Read, Kahler, Strong, \& Colder, 2006). Teens responded to 10-items asking them, "During the past 3 months, how many times did you \[insert consequence item here\]". Response options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=0 times, 1=1 time, 2=2 times, 3=3 times, and 4=4 or more times. Responses were summed with higher scores indicating the participant experienced more alcohol-related consequences in the past 3-months (range=0-40). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)

  4. Frequency of Past 3-month Nicotine Use

    Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, on how many days did you use an electronic vapor product?". Response options were on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 to 6 where 0=0 days, 1=1 or 2 days, 2=3 to 5 days, 3=6 to 9 days, 4=10 to 19 days, and 5=20 to 29 days, 6=30 days or more. Higher scores indicated the participant used an electronic vapor product more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)

Other outcomes

  1. Alcohol Motives

    Teens were asked to respond to 12 items, "In the past 3 months, how often did you \[insert item\]?". Sample items include, "because it's fun", "to be liked", "so you won't feel left out". Response options were on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2 where 0=Never, 1=Sometimes, and 3=Almost always. Responses from the 12 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant had higher motives to consume alcohol (range=0-3). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T2 (3-months post-baseline)

  2. Alcohol Expectancies

    Teens were asked, "Please respond to the following items by selecting the response that corresponds with how much you agree or disagree with the statement.". The 5 items included on this scale included things like, "drinking makes people feel good" and "drinking is an acceptable way to cope with problems". Response options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=Strongly disagree, 1=Disagree, 2=Neither agree nor disagree, 3=Agree, and 4=Strongly agree. The 5 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant had more positive alcohol expectancies (range=0-5). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T2 (3-months post-baseline)

  3. Alcohol Willingness

    Teens were asked, "Please indicate the amount you agree with the following statements.". The 5 items included statements like, "I am willing to drink alcohol on weekend evenings" and "I am willing to drive a car when I have consumed alcohol". Responses options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=Strongly disagree, 1=Disagree, 2=Neither agree nor disagree, 3=Agree, and 4=Strongly agree". The 5 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant was more willing to drink alcohol and engage in risky behaviors while consuming alcohol (range=0-4). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T2 (3-months post-baseline)

  4. Alcohol Injunctive Norms

    Teens were asked, "How acceptable do you think your close friends find each of the following behaviors?". The 5 items included things like, "Drinking alcohol once in a while" and "Drinking alcohol on special occasions". Response options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=very unacceptable, 1=unacceptable, 0=neither acceptable nor unacceptable, 3=acceptable, and 4=very acceptable. The 5 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant had more positive injunctive norms about alcohol (range=0-5). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: T2 (3-months post-baseline)

  5. Parental Alcohol Communication

    Teens were asked, "The next set of items asks specifically about communication with your \[mother/father\]. Please indicate if your \[mother/father\] has spoken to you about the following topics in the past 3 months.". The 19 items included things like, "Alternative options to drinking", "Whether I drink alcohol", and "How even small amounts of alcohol can effect my brain". Response options were on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=not at all, 1=very little, 2=somewhat, and 3=a great deal. The 19 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participants parent communicated with them about various alcohol topics more frequently (range=0-3). Higher scores indicate a better outcome and lower scores indicate a worse outcome.

    Time frame: T2 (3-months post-baseline)

07

Results

Posted Oct 27, 2026

Participant flow

Parent-teen dyads were recruited from a nationally representative probability-based web panel (KnowledgePanel) maintained by the consumer information company Ipsos during January of 2021. Ipsos randomly sampled households with at least one parent or legal guardian to at least one 15-18-year-old. Selected parents who met this eligibility criteria were invited to participate in the study via email.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Started320292
T2 parent survey (3-months post-baseline)126122
T2 teen survey (3-months post-baseline)126122
T3 (6-months post-baseline)124115
T4 (9-months post-baseline)132106
T5 (12-months post-baseline)127103
Completed254206
Not completed6686

Outcome measures

PrimaryFrequency Past 3-month Drinking

Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, on how many days did you have at least one drink of alcohol?". Response options ranged from 0 to 6 where, 0=0 days, 1=1 or 2 days, 2=3 to 5 days, 3=6 to 9 days, 4=10 to 19 days 5=20 to 29 days, and 6=30 days or more. Higher scores indicated the participant consumed alcohol more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T5 (12-months post baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Frequency Past 3-month Drinking
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Frequency Past 3-month Drinking0.50 ± 0.090.45 ± 0.10
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.70Controlled for baseline (T1) frequency of past 3-month drinking.
SecondaryFrequency of Past 3-month Marijuana Use

Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, how many times did you use marijuana?". Response options were on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5, where 0=0 times, 1=1 or 2 times, 2=3 to 9 times, 3=10 to 19 times, 4=20 to 39 times, and 5=40 or more times. Higher scores indicated the participant used marijuana more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T5 (12-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Frequency of Past 3-month Marijuana Use
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Frequency of Past 3-month Marijuana Use0.29 ± 0.070.42 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.23Controlled for baseline (T1) past 3-month marijuana use.
SecondaryCombined Use of Alcohol and Marijuana

Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, how many of the times when you used marijuana did you use it at the same time as alcohol - that is, so that their effects overlapped?". Response options were on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 5 where 0=0 times, 1=1 or 2 times, 2=3 to 9 times, 3=10 to 19 times, 4=20 to 39 times, and 5=40 or more times. Higher scores indicated the participant combined alcohol and marijuana more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T5 (12-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Combined Use of Alcohol and Marijuana
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Combined Use of Alcohol and Marijuana1.18 ± 0.360.96 ± 0.63
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.77Controlled for baseline (T1) combined use of alcohol and marijuana.
SecondaryConsequences of Alcohol Use

Alcohol-related consequences (e.g., have a hangover, do poorly on schoolwork) were adapted using the established Brief Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire (BYAACQ; Read, Kahler, Strong, \& Colder, 2006). Teens responded to 10-items asking them, "During the past 3 months, how many times did you \[insert consequence item here\]". Response options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=0 times, 1=1 time, 2=2 times, 3=3 times, and 4=4 or more times. Responses were summed with higher scores indicating the participant experienced more alcohol-related consequences in the past 3-months (range=0-40). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T5 (12-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Consequences of Alcohol Use
score on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Consequences of Alcohol Use0.82 ± 0.310.83 ± 0.35
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.99Controlled for baseline (T1) consequences of alcohol use.
SecondaryFrequency of Past 3-month Nicotine Use

Teens were asked, "During the past 3 months, on how many days did you use an electronic vapor product?". Response options were on a 7-point scale ranging from 0 to 6 where 0=0 days, 1=1 or 2 days, 2=3 to 5 days, 3=6 to 9 days, 4=10 to 19 days, and 5=20 to 29 days, 6=30 days or more. Higher scores indicated the participant used an electronic vapor product more frequently in the past 3 months. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T5 (12-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Frequency of Past 3-month Nicotine Use
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Frequency of Past 3-month Nicotine Use0.33 ± 0.100.36 ± 0.11
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.86Controlled for baseline (T1) nicotine use.
Other pre-specifiedAlcohol Motives

Teens were asked to respond to 12 items, "In the past 3 months, how often did you \[insert item\]?". Sample items include, "because it's fun", "to be liked", "so you won't feel left out". Response options were on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 to 2 where 0=Never, 1=Sometimes, and 3=Almost always. Responses from the 12 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant had higher motives to consume alcohol (range=0-3). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T2 (3-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Alcohol Motives
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Alcohol Motives0.09 ± 0.020.07 ± 0.02
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.53Controlled for baseline (T1) alcohol motives.
Other pre-specifiedAlcohol Expectancies

Teens were asked, "Please respond to the following items by selecting the response that corresponds with how much you agree or disagree with the statement.". The 5 items included on this scale included things like, "drinking makes people feel good" and "drinking is an acceptable way to cope with problems". Response options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=Strongly disagree, 1=Disagree, 2=Neither agree nor disagree, 3=Agree, and 4=Strongly agree. The 5 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant had more positive alcohol expectancies (range=0-5). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T2 (3-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Alcohol Expectancies
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Alcohol Expectancies1.20 ± 0.061.13 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.48Controlled for baseline (T1) alcohol expectancies.
Other pre-specifiedAlcohol Willingness

Teens were asked, "Please indicate the amount you agree with the following statements.". The 5 items included statements like, "I am willing to drink alcohol on weekend evenings" and "I am willing to drive a car when I have consumed alcohol". Responses options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=Strongly disagree, 1=Disagree, 2=Neither agree nor disagree, 3=Agree, and 4=Strongly agree". The 5 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant was more willing to drink alcohol and engage in risky behaviors while consuming alcohol (range=0-4). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T2 (3-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Alcohol Willingness
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Alcohol Willingness0.84 ± 0.050.2 ± 0.05
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.10Controlled for baseline (T1) alcohol willingness.
Other pre-specifiedAlcohol Injunctive Norms

Teens were asked, "How acceptable do you think your close friends find each of the following behaviors?". The 5 items included things like, "Drinking alcohol once in a while" and "Drinking alcohol on special occasions". Response options were on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=very unacceptable, 1=unacceptable, 0=neither acceptable nor unacceptable, 3=acceptable, and 4=very acceptable. The 5 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participant had more positive injunctive norms about alcohol (range=0-5). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome and lower scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
T2 (3-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Alcohol Injunctive Norms
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Alcohol Injunctive Norms1.33 ± 0.071.09 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.02Controlled for baseline (T1) alcohol injunctive norms.
Other pre-specifiedParental Alcohol Communication

Teens were asked, "The next set of items asks specifically about communication with your \[mother/father\]. Please indicate if your \[mother/father\] has spoken to you about the following topics in the past 3 months.". The 19 items included things like, "Alternative options to drinking", "Whether I drink alcohol", and "How even small amounts of alcohol can effect my brain". Response options were on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 where 0=not at all, 1=very little, 2=somewhat, and 3=a great deal. The 19 items were averaged with higher scores indicating the participants parent communicated with them about various alcohol topics more frequently (range=0-3). Higher scores indicate a better outcome and lower scores indicate a worse outcome.

Time frame:
T2 (3-months post-baseline)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Parental Alcohol Communication
units on a scaleREAL ParentingActive Control Materials
Parental Alcohol Communication1.73 ± 0.071.50 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • REAL Parenting vs Active Control Materials · ANOVA · p = 0.01Controlled for baseline (T1) parent alcohol communication.

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
REAL Parenting0/320 (0%)0/320 (0%)0/320 (0%)
Active Control Materials0/292 (0%)0/292 (0%)0/292 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The overall number of baseline participants includes both parents and their teens. REAL Parenting includes 320 parents and teens (160 parent-teen dyads) and Active Control includes 292 participants (146 parent-teen dyads).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)REAL ParentingActive Control MaterialsTotal
Parents45.64 ± 7.1846.35 ± 6.6245.96 ± 6.91
Teens16.31 ± 0.9516.42 ± 0.7916.36 ± 0.92
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)REAL ParentingActive Control MaterialsTotal
Teens — Male7564139
Teens — Female8178159
Teens — Transgender man/trans man/female-to-male (FTM)011
Teens — Transgender woman/trans woman/male0to-female (MTF)101
Teens — Genderqueer/gender nonconforming neither exclusively male nor female224
Teens — Decline to answer112
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)REAL ParentingActive Control MaterialsTotal
Parents — Female9881179
Parents — Male6265127
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)REAL ParentingActive Control MaterialsTotal
Hispanic or Latino413475
Not Hispanic or Latino117112229
Unknown or Not Reported202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)REAL ParentingActive Control MaterialsTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native336
Asian9918
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American241135
White112111223
More than one race101121
Unknown or Not Reported213
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)REAL ParentingActive Control MaterialsTotal
Parents — White, Non-Hispanic9097187
Parents — Black, Non-Hispanic261339
Parents — Other, Non-Hispanic101020
Parents — Hispanic302151
Parents — 2+ Races, Non-Hispanic459
Frequency past 3-month drinking
Frequency past 3-month drinking(units on a scale)REAL ParentingActive Control MaterialsTotal
Mean0.32 ± 0.770.29 ± 0.800.31 ± 0.78
08

Study locations

1 site
  • REAL Prevention, LLC
    Clifton, New Jersey 07013, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Results
Results posted
posted Oct 27, 2026
Enrollment
306→612
Oct 27, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • ChangedBefore Alcohol UseNow Frequency Past 3-month DrinkingTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T5 (12-months post baseline)
Oct 27, 2026
Documents
Secondary outcomes
3 edited, 4 time frame changed, 2 added, 2 removed, 4 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedCombined Use of Alcohol and MarijuanaTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T5 (12-months post-baseline)
  • AddedFrequency of Past 3-month Marijuana UseTime frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)
  • AddedFrequency of Past 3-month Nicotine UseTime frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)
  • RemovedMarijuana UseTime frame: Project years 1-2
  • RemovedNicotine UseTime frame: Project years 1-2
  • Time frameConsequences of Alcohol UseProject years 1-2 → T5 (12-months post-baseline)
  • DescriptionConsequences of Alcohol Use: how it is measured was reworded
  • Editedother outcomeAlcohol Injunctive NormsTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
  • Editedother outcomeParental Alcohol CommunicationTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
  • Time frameother outcomeAlcohol MotivesProject years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
  • Time frameother outcomeAlcohol ExpectanciesProject years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
  • Time frameother outcomeAlcohol WillingnessProject years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
  • Descriptionother outcomeAlcohol Expectancies: how it is measured was reworded
  • Descriptionother outcomeAlcohol Motives: how it is measured was reworded
  • Descriptionother outcomeAlcohol Willingness: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Results posted
    Enrollment 306→612
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • ChangedBefore Alcohol UseNow Frequency Past 3-month DrinkingTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T5 (12-months post baseline)
    Secondary outcomes 3 edited, 4 time frame changed, 2 added, 2 removed, 4 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedCombined Use of Alcohol and MarijuanaTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T5 (12-months post-baseline)
    • AddedFrequency of Past 3-month Marijuana UseTime frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)
    • AddedFrequency of Past 3-month Nicotine UseTime frame: T5 (12-months post-baseline)
    • RemovedMarijuana UseTime frame: Project years 1-2
    • RemovedNicotine UseTime frame: Project years 1-2
    • Time frameConsequences of Alcohol UseProject years 1-2 → T5 (12-months post-baseline)
    • DescriptionConsequences of Alcohol Use: how it is measured was reworded
    • Editedother outcomeAlcohol Injunctive NormsTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
    • Editedother outcomeParental Alcohol CommunicationTime frame: Project years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
    • Time frameother outcomeAlcohol MotivesProject years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
    • Time frameother outcomeAlcohol ExpectanciesProject years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
    • Time frameother outcomeAlcohol WillingnessProject years 1-2 → T2 (3-months post-baseline)
    • Descriptionother outcomeAlcohol Expectancies: how it is measured was reworded
    • Descriptionother outcomeAlcohol Motives: how it is measured was reworded
    • Descriptionother outcomeAlcohol Willingness: how it is measured was reworded
    + 5 other changes: registry notes, index terms, identifiers, verification date and responsible party

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03932097
Lead sponsor
Real Prevention, LLC
Responsible party
Michael Hecht (President, Real Prevention, LLC) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 30, 2019
Start date
Jan 15, 2021
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2022
Completion
May 31, 2022
Results posted
Oct 27, 2026
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Hecht
principal investigator · REAL Prevention

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion