CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03928080Updated Jan 11, 2022

Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Non-clinical Screening Tests for Early Detection of Periodontitis

An observational study in Periodontitis and Gingivitis, sponsored by The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio). Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-11.

Sponsored by The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
408
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Gum disease is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and inability to chew properly. It is one of the top 80 human disease contributing 3.5 million years lived with disability and the major cause of increasing oral health costs. Addressing this major public health problem requires greater attention to prevention and early detection.

Gum disease cases in the population remain largely undetected because an affected individual does not feel the presence of gum disease and as a consequence people seek attention in the later stages of the disease once tooth loss has occurred.

In this study the investigators will compare different methods of screening for gum disease and compare them against a full professional examination. The investigators hope to be able to propose simple and effective methods for self-assessment that will allow people to suspect the presence of the disease before tooth loss occurs and thus allow early diagnosis and better treatment.

The whole study procedures consist 3 screening tests and the standard clinical examination. The screening tests involves:(1) a screening questionnaire; (2) a saliva test; (3) a toothbrushing test. Thereafter the participants will receive a standard clinical examination which is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of gum disease. Results of these tests will be compared with the standard clinical examination to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these tests.

The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on a toothbrush test as an early sign and a self-performed saliva test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional dental care early in the gum disease process.

The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of toothbrush test with a saliva test as an assessment of key inflammatory process underlying gum disease will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.

Read the detailed description

Introduction:

Severe periodontitis is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation and biofilm dysbiosis; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and masticatory dysfunction. It is: i) one of the top 80 human disease contributing 3.5 million years lived with disability, ii) a source of social inequality, iii) together with its major sequel - tooth loss - it is responsible for 88% of lost productivity from oral diseases (estimated at 54 billion USD), and iv) it is the major cause of escalating oral health costs ( 442 billion USD/year) that in advanced economies represent up to 10% of total medical expenses. Addressing this major public health problem requires greater attention to prevention and early detection.

Periodontitis cases in the population remain largely undetected due to lack of knowledge of early warning signs that can be self detected and to the fact that affected individuals adapt to life with increased degrees of disability as the disease progresses from an early stage (stage I) towards increasingly severe and invalidating stages (III-IV). Not unexpectedly, treatment outcomes improve with early detection while costs increase for later diagnosis due to the need for surgical intervention and rehabilitation of the teeth that have been lost. In partnership with the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United states, has validated a questionnaire (CDC/AAP questionnaire) for first step is important but its focus on more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease towards specialist care, is unlikely to produce cost-effective health gains.

Spontaneous gingival bleeding or gingival bleeding upon tooth brushing (BoB) is a key sign of periodontitis with the potential to become a useful sentinel sign for self-detection. Surprisingly little is known about BoB and its relationship to professional assessment and diagnosis. Few studies have shown that it is highly sensitive to detect gingival inflammation but it has low to moderate specificity for periodontitis as it is shared by both gingivitis (superficial gum inflammation) and periodontitis. Its diagnostic performance, however, may be improved by combining it with salivary test able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis. Salivary activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) is a biomarker associated with the inflammatory driven destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar characteristic of periodontitis; it has been shown to be able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis in a point of care, professional setting.

The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on BoB as a sentinel sign and a consumer version of a point of care aMMP-8 test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional attention early in the periodontitis disease process.

Aims and Hypotheses to be Tested The aims of this diagnostic trial are to assess the diagnostic performance of: i) bleeding on brushing (BoB) as a sentinel sign, ii) salivary aMMP-8 as a biomarker, iii) a validated questionnaire alone and/or in combination for the early detection of periodontitis.

The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of a sentinel sign with a biomarker assessment of key inflammatory process underlying periodontitis will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.

Plan of Investigation (i) Subjects The study will involve two populations: i) a convenience sample of adult and elderly subjects reporting for oral health care at Prince Philip Dental Hospital and ii) a validation sample drawn from the Hong Kong adult and elderly population.

Study 1. Consecutive patients reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital reception clinic (screening and admission clinic) will be invited to participate.

Study 2. A validation sample will be drawn from a population of Hong Kong adult and elderly population in community and primary care settings. Subjects will be invited to participate and will be examined at the Clinical Research Center of the Prince Philip Dental Hospital.

The prevalence of different stages of periodontitis in the population is estimated at 8-12% for stage III-IV periodontitis and 28-32% for stage I-II periodontitis.

A sample size of 332 subjects has been estimated based on previous studies evaluating the area under the receiving operating curve (ROC curve) of the CDC/AAP questionnaire (0.68) and the ability to detect a 0.07 improvement with 80% power and p\<0.05. A total of 400 subjects will be recruited in each trial to compensate for missing data.

(ii) Methods Consenting subjects will be subject to 3 sequential index tests in a specified sequence: i) they will be administered a validated Cantonese version of CDC/AAP questionnaire; ii) subjects will be instructed to perform a 30 second mouthwash with a standard buffer in order to collect a full mouth sample for aMMP-8 analysis. This will be quantitatively assessed with a point of care test. iii) Subjects will then be instructed to brush their teeth for 2 minutes and the obtained slurry (saliva) quantitatively analyzed for the presence of blood with a spectrophotometric test.

Positive CDC/AAP test will be defined based on the pattern of response to 5 questions according to the criteria specified by a previous study.

Positive BoB test will be defined by the subject's identification of traces of blood in the brushing slurry and later validated quantitatively with a spectrophotometric method based on hemoglobin concentrations.

Positive aMMP-8 test for periodontitis will be defined as a concentration of aMMP-8 > 20 ng/ml as determined with quantitative point of care lateral flow immunoassay.

After completion of the 3 experimental tests, subjects will undergo a full-mouth periodontal examination conducted by a trained and calibrated periodontal specialist who will determine the clinical diagnosis based on the 2017 international classification and case definition of periodontitis and gingivitis.

(iii) Study design Cross sectional diagnostic trial with independent blind comparison of experimental tests with a reference standard (professional diagnosis of periodontitis by a registered specialist in a clinical setting). First trial on a convenience sample of subjects reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital for oral health care, validation trial in a representative sample of the Hong Kong population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Periodontitis
  • Gingivitis

Keywords

  • diagnostic accuracy
  • early detection
  • self-assessment
  • periodontitis
03

In context

Gingivitis

590 studies on the registry are indexed under Gingivitis; 104 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 408 is above the median of 90 across 104 observational studies indexed under Gingivitis.

Browse Gingivitis studies →

Lead sponsor

The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio) is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

a convenience sample of consecutive untreated subjects seeking dental care at Prince Philip Dental Hospital

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 and above.
  • Having the ability to learn the standard toothbrushing method with artificial intelligence powered toothbrush.
  • Ability and willingness to give written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Edentulous mouth.
  • Pregnant females.
  • Having received professional periodontal treatment (other than supragingival cleaning) within the previous 12 months.
  • Having received antibiotic medication within the previous 3 months.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
408 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Experimental cohort

    Primary study to assess diagnostic accuracy

    Diagnostic Test: Bleeding on brushing

  • Confirmation cohort

    Second cohort to confirm results from the first study on independent population

    Diagnostic Test: Bleeding on brushing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testBleeding on brushing

    Index tests are bleeding on brushing and aMMP-8 Gold standard: clinical diagnosis performed by specialist

    Also known as: aMMP-8

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity measure

    Sensitivity of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination

    Time frame: 1day

  2. Specificity measure

    Specificity of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination

    Time frame: 1day

  3. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measure

    The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination

    Time frame: 1day

  4. The post-test probability measure

    The post-test probability of BoB, aMMP-8 and CDC/AAP screening questionnaires alone and in combination to correctly identify periodontitis cases at the time of completion of clinical examination

    Time frame: 1day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Prince Philip Dental Hospital, the Univerisity of Hong Kong
    Hong Kong, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Blicher B, Joshipura K, Eke P. Validation of self-reported periodontal disease: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2005 Oct;84(10):881-90. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401003. PubMed 16183785 ↗
  • Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527. PubMed 26511519 ↗
  • Carra MC, Gueguen A, Thomas F, Pannier B, Caligiuri G, Steg PG, Zins M, Bouchard P. Self-report assessment of severe periodontitis: Periodontal screening score development. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jul;45(7):818-831. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12899. Epub 2018 May 16. PubMed 29611224 ↗
  • Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Beck JD, Taylor GW, Borgnakke WS, Page RC, Genco RJ. Self-reported measures for surveillance of periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):1041-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034513505621. Epub 2013 Sep 24. PubMed 24065636 ↗
  • Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26. PubMed 24582925 ↗
  • Izadi Borujeni S, Mayer M, Eickholz P. Activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 in saliva as diagnostic test for periodontal disease? A case-control study. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2015 Dec;204(6):665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00430-015-0413-2. Epub 2015 Apr 5. PubMed 25841875 ↗
  • Kallio P, Ainamo J, Dusadeepan A. Self-assessment of gingival bleeding. Int Dent J. 1990 Aug;40(4):231-6. PubMed 2397955 ↗
  • Kallio P. Self-assessed bleeding in monitoring gingival health among adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;24(2):128-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00829.x. PubMed 8654034 ↗
  • Leppilahti JM, Ahonen MM, Hernandez M, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Uitto VJ, Sorsa T, Mantyla P. Oral rinse MMP-8 point-of-care immuno test identifies patients with strong periodontal inflammatory burden. Oral Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01716.x. PubMed 20659259 ↗
  • Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S159-S172. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0006. Erratum In: J Periodontol. 2018 Dec;89(12):1475. doi: 10.1002/jper.10239. PubMed 29926952 ↗
  • Trombelli L, Farina R, Silva CO, Tatakis DN. Plaque-induced gingivitis: Case definition and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S46-S73. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0576. PubMed 29926936 ↗
  • Uy SNMR, Deng K, Fok CTC, Fok MR, Pelekos G, Tonetti MS. Food intake, masticatory function, tooth mobility, loss of posterior support, and diminished quality of life are associated with more advanced periodontitis stage diagnosis. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Mar;49(3):240-250. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13588. Epub 2022 Jan 20. PubMed 34935175 ↗
  • Deng K, Pelekos G, Jin L, Tonetti MS. Gingival bleeding on brushing as a sentinel sign of gingival inflammation: A diagnostic accuracy trial for the discrimination of periodontal health and disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Dec;48(12):1537-1548. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13545. Epub 2021 Oct 4. PubMed 34494292 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03928080
Lead sponsor
The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)
Collaborators
The University of Hong Kong
Responsible party
Maurizio Tonetti (Clinical Professor, The University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 25, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Last update
Jan 11, 2022

Study contacts

Maurizio Tonetti, DMD,PhD,MMSc
principal investigator · The University of Hong Kong

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion