ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT039260783D PECTUSUpdated Jul 2, 2020

Three-dimensional Optical Surface Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Pectus Excavatum

An interventional study of 3D optical surface image and Chest radiography in Pectus Excavatum, sponsored by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum. Status unknown at 1 site in Netherlands. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-02.

Sponsored by Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2020), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pectus excavatum (PE) is the most common anterior chest wall deformity. Currently, a chest radiography (CR) or Computed Tomography (CT) scan is acquired to determine and objectify pectus severity using the Haller Index. Alongside other determinants, the Haller Index value is used in the proces of clinical decision making and determine surgical candidacy. However, cross-sectional imaging based calculation of the Haller Index implies exposure to ionizing radiation that should be limited at all times to diminish the cumulative long-term risks of malignancy. Especially in pectus patients that often concerns children.

Three-dimensional (3D) optical surface imaging offers a non-invasive, radiation-free alternative that may be used to obtain thoracic measures and determine pectus severity. However, for 3D images/scans to be used as a diagnostic tool in the proces of clinical decision making and determine surgical candidacy, its diagnostic accuracy should be evaluated. This will be investigated utilizing a pilot study design as no prior accuracy studies are available.

Read the detailed description

This single-centre prospective pilot study is conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 3D optical surface imaging based external Haller Index (EHI) measurements to quantify the severity of pectus excavatum. CR and CT based conventional Haller Indices (HI) are used as reference method.

CR and CT are both used as reference method, as the work-up of pectus patients in our centre is dependent of age. Subsequently, two groups are created: (A) patients under 18 years of age that receive a frontal (anteroposterior) and sagittal chest radiography, and (B) patients aged 18 years or older that receive a chest CT scan.

In this study, patients are their own control. To obtain optical surface images, a handheld 3D scanner is used. During acquisition, subjects will be standing in an upright position with arms abducted. Standard routinely used protocols are used to acquire chest radiographies and CT scans.

The HI is obtained from all chest radiographies and CT scans, calculated by dividing the widest thoracic transverse diameter by the anteroposterior distance, measured from the posterior surface of sternum to the anterior surface of the vertebral body. The EHI, a modified measurement to assess pectus deformity, is used to quantify PE severity based on 3D optical surface images. The EHI is calculated by dividing the widest external thoracic transverse diameter by the distance between the external deepest point or point of maximal protrusion and external vertebral body. The EHI is also calculated from the available chest radiographies and CT scans.

All measurements will be performed by three blinded observers that are not responsible to perform a comprehensive interpretation of the study. Following acquisition of all indices, the inter-observer reliability is calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Based on the means, a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)-curve is created for the 3D scan based EHI measurements, utilizing the surgical indication based on CR and CT (HI larger or equal to 3.25) images as gold standard. The optimal cut-off value, obtained from the ROC-curve is subsequently used to determine the 3D optical surface images' diagnostic accuracy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pectus Excavatum

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Haller Index
  • Optical Imaging
  • Torso Topography
  • Three-dimensional Surface Scan
  • Diagnostic accuracy
03

In context

Funnel Chest

79 studies on the registry are indexed under Funnel Chest; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is below the median of 40 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Funnel Chest.

Browse Funnel Chest studies →

Lead sponsor

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients that visit the Zuyderland Medical Centre outpatient clinic for evaluation of their pectus excavatum.
  • No age restrictions were imposed, however, to be eligible, it was mandatory to be able to stand still in and upright position for 60 seconds.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients that suffer from any form of light or epilepsy were not considered while 3D optical surface images were acquired with the use of structured, flashing light.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Patients under 18 years of age

    Group A consists of patients that receive a chest radiography in the current work-up of PE.

    Other: 3D optical surface image · Radiation: Chest radiography

  • Other
    Patients aged 18 years or older

    Group B consists of patients that receive a CT scan in the current work-up of PE.

    Other: 3D optical surface image · Radiation: CT scan

Interventions

  • Other3D optical surface image

    3D optical surface images will be acquired and used to calculate the EHI

  • RadiationChest radiography

    Chest radiographies will be acquired and used to calculated the HI and EHI

  • RadiationCT scan

    CT scans will be acquired and used to calculate the HI and EHI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of the EHI, calculated from 3D optical surface images

    Dependent of age, the CR or CT based HI is utilized as reference method

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inter-observer reliability

    Inter-observer reliability of CR, CT and 3D image derived (external) Haller Inidices, obtained by 3 observers

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Correlation of CT scan derived HI and EHI

    Correlation is assessed by the Pearson's correlation coefficient

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Correlation of CT scan derived EHI and 3D optical surface image derived EHI

    Correlation is assessed by the Pearson's correlation coefficient

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Correlation of CT and CR derived HI with 3D optical surface image derived EHI

    Correlation is assessed by the Pearson's correlation coefficient

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. Absolute agreement of CT scan derived EHI and 3D optical surface image derived EHI

    Assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Zuyderland Medical Centre
    Heerlen, Limburg 6419PC, Netherlands
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2021, 18 months after the start.

Of 31 interventional studies with no phase under Funnel Chest, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 68. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 18, 2019
First posted
Apr 24, 2019
StartActual
Aug 21, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2021
CompletionEst.
Mar 2021
Last update
Jul 2, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03926078
Lead sponsor
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 24, 2019
Start date
Aug 21, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 2, 2020

Study contacts

Jean Daemen
Contact
j.daemen@zuyderland.nl
+31884597777

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion