ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03924791TEIASUpdated Oct 19, 2023

Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Acute Sciatica

An interventional study of Lidocaine and Methylprednisolone Acetate in Sciatica, Sciatica Due to Intervertebral Disc Disorder and Sciatic Radiculopathy, sponsored by C.L.A.Vleggeert-Lankamp. Recruiting at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-19.

Sponsored by C.L.A.Vleggeert-Lankamp · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2019; still recruiting 7 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
142
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients suffering from sciatica are treated conservatively for the first 8 weeks due to the favourable prognosis. This period is preferably extended up to 14-16 weeks after which patients may opt for surgery. However, patients may experience severe discomfort due to pain in the leg which can lead to decreased physical activity and socio-economic problems. An adequate therapy to alleviate symptoms during this period of 'wait-and-see' is lacking. In this study, patients will be randomized to treatment with transforaminal epidural injections or standard oral pain medication.

Read the detailed description

Sciatica is a condition of radicular pain in the leg and is usually caused by herniation of a lumbar intervertebral disc. The herniated disc compresses a lumbar nerve root that continues its route into the sciatic nerve. About 13% to 40% of all people will suffer from sciatica at least once during their lifetime. Sciatica can have severe socio-economic effects; patients are immobilised by the pain they experience and therefore cannot go to work or participate in social events. Most cases resolve spontaneously with conservative therapy using only standard analgesics and/or physiotherapy. In a large RCT it was demonstrated that outcome of conservative and surgical therapy was comparable after 26 weeks. With this knowledge the guidelines for surgical treatment of sciatica were adjusted and it is nowadays usual care to offer surgery only after at least 8 weeks of conservative care and preferably after 14-16 weeks of conservative care. This decision is made together with the patient in a process of Shared Decision making. Although this treatment regimen has been demonstrated to be efficacious and cost effective, the burden for a patient during these weeks of conservative care is usually high. The investigators seek to find a type of conservative care to reduce the discomfort due to the pain and to enable the patient to remain physically active. Not only will this add to the quality of life of the patient, but it will also prevent the patient from taking a sick-leave. In this study, patients will be randomized to either treatment with transforaminal epidural injections or to standard care consisting of oral pain medication.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sciatica
  • Sciatica Due to Intervertebral Disc Disorder
  • Sciatic Radiculopathy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sciatica
  • Acute sciatica
  • Transforaminal epidural injection
  • Leg pain
  • Lumbar spine
  • Back pain
  • Lumbar surgery
  • Herniated intervertebral lumbar disk
  • Cost-effectiveness
03

In context

Sciatica

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Sciatica; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 142 is above the median of 68 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Sciatica.

Browse Sciatica studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with C.L.A.Vleggeert-Lankamp as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with sciatica by GP
  • NRS leg pain of 6 or more on a 10-point NRS scale
  • Minimum duration of symptoms of 3 weeks and maximum duration of 8 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years
  • Condition preventing to receive transforaminal epidural injection
  • Severe scoliosis
  • Transforaminal epidural injection received in 6 months before randomization date
  • Surgery for sciatica at the same level
  • Surgery for sciatica at another level within one year before inclusion
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
142 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transforaminal Epidural Injection

    Transforaminal Epidural Injection containing 1,5 mL lidocaine 2% and 40mg methylprednisolone acetate for injections L3 or below Transforaminal Epidural Injection containing 1,5 mL lidocaine 1% and 10mg dexamethasone for injections above L3

    Drug: Lidocaine · Drug: Methylprednisolone Acetate · Drug: Dexamethasone

  • No intervention
    Oral pain medication

    Patients will receive oral pain medication according to general practitioner guidelines.

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain

    Pain intensity in the leg using the NRS. 0 is the minimal score indicating no pain, 10 is the maximum indicating the worst imaginable pain. Scale increases with increments of 1.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain

    Pain intensity in the leg using the NRS. 0 is the minimal score indicating no pain, 10 is the maximum indicating the worst imaginable pain. Scale increases with increments of 1.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 4, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization

  2. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for back pain

    Pain intensity in the back using the NRS. 0 is the minimal score indicating no pain, 10 is the maximum indicating the worst imaginable pain. Scale increases with increments of 1.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 4, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization

  3. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Assessment of functionality using the ODI. 0 is the minimal score indicating no disability, 50 is the maximum indicating the worst disability possible. This questionnaire is based on 10 questions with answers corresponding to values of 0-5 points.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 4, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization

  4. EuroQoL Cost Utility (EQ-5D)

    Assessment of cost utility using the EuroQoL EQ-5D analysis tool. The tool measures five dimensions: mobility, self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization

  5. Quality of Life Visual Analogue Scale

    Assessment of the utility by valuation of the patient's health state representing the patient's perspective. 0 is the minimal score indicating 'as bad as death', 100 is the maximum indicating 'perfect health'. Scale increases with increments of 1.

    Time frame: Baseline, 2, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization

  6. Likert scale

    Perceived recovery by the patient using the Likert scale. This is a 7-point scoring scale that ranges from 'completely recovered' to 'worse than ever'.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 2, 4, 10 and 21 weeks after randomization

  7. Cost diary

    Determination of medical expenses due to health care utilization (costs of medication, physiotherapy, treatment by a medical specialist), patient costs (mobility aid, nursing care, domestic help), and absenteeism from work (amount of hours of absenteeism, hourly wage).

    Time frame: 10 and 21 weeks after randomization

  8. Complications from treatment with transforaminal epidural injection (TEI)

    The occurrence and incidence of complications caused by treatment with TEI will be reported.

    Time frame: Throughout the follow-up of 21 weeks

  9. Level and shape of disc herniation from MRI data

    The lumbar intervertebral level and shape of the herniated disc will be described based on MRI data

    Time frame: 21 weeks after randomization

  10. Size of disc herniation from MRI data

    The size of the herniated disc will be reported in millimetres based on MRI data

    Time frame: 21 weeks after randomization

  11. Pfirrmann scale for disc degeneration on MRI

    Disc degeneration on MRI will be assessed using the Pfirrmann scale which distinguishes 5 degrees of disc degeneration. Grade 1 indicates a normal disc. Higher grades indicate a more severe degenerative state of the intervertebral disc.

    Time frame: 21 weeks after randomization

  12. Histology of disc material obtained during surgery

    Identification of immunological cells, macrophages and bacteria in disk material obtained during discectomy using staining, cell culture and polymerase chain reaction techniques.

    Time frame: 21 weeks after randomization

  13. Modic scale for end plate changes on MRI

    The degree of end plate changes on MRI will be assessed using the Modic scale which distinguishes 3 degrees of end plate changes. All three Modic degrees indicate a certain type of underlying pathology in the vertebra. When the vertebra is normal, Modic changes are absent.

    Time frame: 21 weeks after randomization

  14. Weishaupt scale for facet degeneration on MRI

    The degree of facet degeneration on MRI will be assessed using the Weishaupt scale which distinguishes 4 degrees of facet degeneration. Grade 0 indicates normal facet joint space. Higher grades indicate a more severe degenerative state of the facet joint.

    Time frame: 21 weeks after randomization

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Peul WC, van Houwelingen HC, van den Hout WB, Brand R, Eekhof JA, Tans JT, Thomeer RT, Koes BW; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2245-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa064039. PubMed 17538084 ↗
  • Hofstede SN, van Bodegom-Vos L, Wentink MM, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Vliet Vlieland TP, Marang-van de Mheen PJ; DISC study group. Most important factors for the implementation of shared decision making in sciatica care: ranking among professionals and patients. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e94176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094176. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24710328 ↗
  • Joswig H, Neff A, Ruppert C, Hildebrandt G, Stienen MN. The Value of Short-Term Pain Relief in Predicting the Long-Term Outcome of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections. World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.055. Epub 2017 Aug 23. PubMed 28838872 ↗
  • Spijker-Huiges A, Vermeulen K, Winters JC, van Wijhe M, van der Meer K. Epidural steroids for lumbosacral radicular syndrome compared to usual care: quality of life and cost utility in general practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Mar;96(3):381-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.017. Epub 2014 Nov 8. PubMed 25448243 ↗
  • Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;22(2):181-7. PubMed 1826546 ↗
  • Takahashi H, Suguro T, Okazima Y, Motegi M, Okada Y, Kakiuchi T. Inflammatory cytokines in the herniated disc of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jan 15;21(2):218-24. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199601150-00011. PubMed 8720407 ↗
  • El Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama A Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, van den Hout WB, Verwoerd AJ, Koes BW, Peul WC; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Magnetic resonance imaging interpretation in patients with sciatica who are potential candidates for lumbar disc surgery. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e68411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068411. Print 2013. PubMed 23874616 ↗
  • Verwoerd AJ, Peul WC, Willemsen SP, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, el Barzouhi A, Luijsterburg PA, Verhagen AP. Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to assess lumbosacral nerve root compression. Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2028-37. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.049. Epub 2013 Dec 8. PubMed 24325881 ↗
  • el Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama a Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, van den Hout WB, Koes BW, Peul WC; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Reliability of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging findings and their correlation with clinical outcome in patients with sciatica. Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2598-607. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.028. Epub 2014 Feb 21. PubMed 24561397 ↗
  • el Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama a Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, van den Hout WB, Koes BW, Peul WC; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Influence of low back pain and prognostic value of MRI in sciatica patients in relation to back pain. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 17;9(3):e90800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090800. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24637890 ↗
  • Verwoerd AJH, Mens J, El Barzouhi A, Peul WC, Koes BW, Verhagen AP. A diagnostic study in patients with sciatica establishing the importance of localization of worsening of pain during coughing, sneezing and straining to assess nerve root compression on MRI. Eur Spine J. 2016 May;25(5):1389-1392. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4393-8. Epub 2016 Feb 2. PubMed 26842881 ↗
  • El Barzouhi A, Verwoerd AJ, Peul WC, Verhagen AP, Lycklama A Nijeholt GJ, Van der Kallen BF, Koes BW, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):978-85. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15858. Epub 2016 Feb 12. PubMed 26871651 ↗
  • Katz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E. Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Feb 3;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x. PubMed 25645576 ↗
  • Joswig H, Neff A, Ruppert C, Hildebrandt G, Stienen MN. The Value of Short-Term Pain Relief in Predicting the One-Month Outcome of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections. World Neurosurg. 2016 Dec;96:323-333. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Sep 15. PubMed 27641258 ↗
  • Verheijen E, Munts AG, van Haagen O, de Vries D, Dekkers O, van den Hout W, Vleggeert-Lankamp C. Transforaminal epidural injection versus continued conservative care in acute sciatica (TEIAS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019 Sep 3;19(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1445-9. PubMed 31481010 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 19, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03924791
Lead sponsor
C.L.A.Vleggeert-Lankamp
Collaborators
Spaarne Gasthuis, Stichting Achmea Gezondheidszor, Posthumus Meyjes Fonds
Responsible party
C.L.A.Vleggeert-Lankamp (Dr. C.L.A. Vleggeert-Lankamp, Leiden University Medical Center) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 23, 2019
Start date
Jun 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2023

Study contacts

Carmen LA Vleggeert-Lankamp, MD Msc Ph.D
Contact
cvleggeert@lumc.nl
+31715262109
Eduard JA Verheijen, Bsc
Contact
e.j.a.verheijen@lumc.nl
+31715262109
Carmen LA Vleggeert-Lankamp, MD Msc Ph.D
principal investigator · Leiden University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Lidocaine · Methylprednisolone Acetate · Dexamethasone

Start the discussion