CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03918811ExtubARUpdated Feb 9, 2021Results posted

Comparison of Two Extubation Techniques in Critically Ill Adult Patients

An interventional study of Positive Pressure Extubation Technique and Traditional Extubation Technique in Weaning Failure and Mechanical Ventilation Complication, sponsored by Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni. Terminated at 1 site in Argentina. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-09.

Sponsored by Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Due to the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Argentina and the lack of information about the potential risks of contamination from extubation and aerosolization, we stopped recruiting patients before achieving the predefined sample size.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
725
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Orotracheal extubation consists in the removal of the endotracheal tube (ETT) when it is no longer required. This procedure may carry a considerable risk of complications and extubation failure. The literature points out two methods of extubation: the traditional method and the positive pressure method.

In a noninferiority clinical trial it was demonstrated that EOT with positive pressure and without endotracheal suction was a safe technique and could be better than traditional extubation. Although prior studies reported better clinical outcomes with the positive pressure extubation technique, its superiority has not been deeply studied yet. Therefore, the objective of our study is to determine whether the positive pressure OTE technique, compared with the traditional OTE technique, reduces the incidence of major postextubation complications (up to 60 minutes) in critically ill adult patients.

Read the detailed description

Design: Multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial Methods: Critically ill adult subjects on invasive mechanical ventilation who met extubation criteria will be included. Will be randomly assigned to positive-pressure extubation (n=389) or to traditional extubation (n=389).

The main variable will be incidence of major complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Weaning Failure
  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • airway extubation
  • extubation methods
  • positive pressure
  • positive-pressure extubation
  • tracheal extubation
  • positive-pressure ventilation
  • extubation complications
03

In context

Critical Illness

1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Critical Illness; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 725 is above the median of 90 across 979 interventional studies indexed under Critical Illness.

Browse Critical Illness studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation through an endotracheal tube,
  • Successfully complete a spontaneous breathing trial
  • Adequate level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Score >8)
  • Effective cough.
  • Written informed consent from a relative or legal representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of upper airway injury or surgery
  • Previously extubated or tracheostomized
  • Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) as a weaning method
  • Decision to not reanimate
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
725 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Positive Pressure Extubation Technique

    ETT is removed in PSV 15/10 mode and without endotracheal suction.

    Procedure: Positive Pressure Extubation Technique

  • Active comparator
    Traditional Extubation Technique

    ETT is removed with continuous endotracheal suction

    Procedure: Traditional Extubation Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedurePositive Pressure Extubation Technique

    Positive-pressure extubation is performed by only one operator. Ventilator parameters are set to pressure support ventilation mode, with an inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O and PEEP of 10 cm H2O. Then, the cuff is deflated, and the ETT is removed without endotracheal suction. Once the ETT is removed, a suction catheter is introduced through the mouth to suction secretions drawn to the oropharynx by the air flow from the ventilator passing between the ETT and the larynx.

  • ProcedureTraditional Extubation Technique

    Traditional extubation is performed by 2 operators. Without reconnection to the ventilator, the closed suction system catheter is introduced by one of the operators into the ETT and suctioning is initiated. The cuff is immediately deflated by the other operator, and the ETT is removed with continuous endotracheal suction during the whole procedure by the first operator.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Major Post Extubation Complications

    Clinical evidence of at least one of the following: * Upper airway obstruction * Desaturation * Vomiting

    Time frame: Within15 minutes after extubation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Minor Post Extubation Complications

    Clinical evidence of at least one of the following: * Hypertension * Tachycardia * Tachypnea * Poor respiratory mechanics * Bronchospasm * Severe cough * Post obstructive pulmonary edema

    Time frame: Hypertension, Tachycardia, Tachypnea or Poor Respiratory Mechanics, within 15 minutes after extubation. Bronchospasm, Severe cough or Post Obstructive Pulmonary Edema, within 60 minutes after extubation.

  2. Number of Participants With Overall Post Extubation Complications

    Clinical evidence of at least one of the following: * Upper airway obstruction * Desaturation * Vomiting * Hypertension * Tachycardia * Tachypnea * Poor respiratory mechanics * Bronchospasm * Severe cough * Post obstructive pulmonary edema

    Time frame: Upper airway obstruction, Desaturation, Vomiting, Hypertension, Tachycardia, Tachypnea, Poor Respiratory Mechanics, within 15 minutes after extubation. Bronchospasm, Severe cough or Post Obstructive Pulmonary Edema, within 60 minutes after extubation.

  3. Number of Participants With Post Extubation Pneumonia

    Presence of a new radiographic infiltrate or progression of infiltrates prior to extubation and any of the following: fever, leukocytosis (greater than 10,000 / mm3) or leukopenia (less than 4,000 / mm3) compared to the value prior to extubation and increase in the amount or change in the quality of tracheobronchial secretions.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after extubation.

  4. Number of Participants With Extubation Failure

    Use of Non Invasive Ventilation to treat the failure or need of reintubation.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after extubation.

  5. Number of Participants That Required Reintubation

    Need of reintubation.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours after extubation.

07

Results

Posted Feb 9, 2021

Participant flow

Patients admitted to the ICU, Emergency Unit or Coronary Unit between April 1, 2019, and March 26, 2020, were included in the analysis. We included patients aged \> 18 years, requiring invasive mechanical ventilation through an ETT, who had successfully completed a spontaneous breathing trial and met the following OTE criteria: an adequate level of consciousness and effective cough (cough at order and/or at endotracheal suctioning). Informed consent was also required.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePositive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation Technique
Started367358
Completed363345
Not completed413

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Major Post Extubation Complications

Clinical evidence of at least one of the following: * Upper airway obstruction * Desaturation * Vomiting

Time frame:
Within15 minutes after extubation.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Major Post Extubation Complications
ParticipantsPositive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation Technique
Number of Participants With Major Post Extubation Complications8996
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Minor Post Extubation Complications

Clinical evidence of at least one of the following: * Hypertension * Tachycardia * Tachypnea * Poor respiratory mechanics * Bronchospasm * Severe cough * Post obstructive pulmonary edema

Time frame:
Hypertension, Tachycardia, Tachypnea or Poor Respiratory Mechanics, within 15 minutes after extubation. Bronchospasm, Severe cough or Post Obstructive Pulmonary Edema, within 60 minutes after extubation.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Minor Post Extubation Complications
ParticipantsPositive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation Technique
Number of Participants With Minor Post Extubation Complications144156
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Overall Post Extubation Complications

Clinical evidence of at least one of the following: * Upper airway obstruction * Desaturation * Vomiting * Hypertension * Tachycardia * Tachypnea * Poor respiratory mechanics * Bronchospasm * Severe cough * Post obstructive pulmonary edema

Time frame:
Upper airway obstruction, Desaturation, Vomiting, Hypertension, Tachycardia, Tachypnea, Poor Respiratory Mechanics, within 15 minutes after extubation. Bronchospasm, Severe cough or Post Obstructive Pulmonary Edema, within 60 minutes after extubation.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Overall Post Extubation Complications
ParticipantsPositive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation Technique
Number of Participants With Overall Post Extubation Complications190197
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Post Extubation Pneumonia

Presence of a new radiographic infiltrate or progression of infiltrates prior to extubation and any of the following: fever, leukocytosis (greater than 10,000 / mm3) or leukopenia (less than 4,000 / mm3) compared to the value prior to extubation and increase in the amount or change in the quality of tracheobronchial secretions.

Time frame:
Within 72 hours after extubation.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Post Extubation Pneumonia
ParticipantsPositive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation Technique
Number of Participants With Post Extubation Pneumonia1824
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Extubation Failure

Use of Non Invasive Ventilation to treat the failure or need of reintubation.

Time frame:
Within 72 hours after extubation.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Extubation Failure
ParticipantsPositive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation Technique
Number of Participants With Extubation Failure4861
SecondaryNumber of Participants That Required Reintubation

Need of reintubation.

Time frame:
Within 72 hours after extubation.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants That Required Reintubation
ParticipantsPositive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation Technique
Number of Participants That Required Reintubation4451

Adverse events

Collected over 72 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Positive Pressure Extubation Technique41/363 (11.3%)0/363 (0%)0/363 (0%)
Traditional Extubation Technique45/345 (13%)0/345 (0%)0/345 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Positive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation TechniqueTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years203203406
>=65 years164155319
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Positive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation TechniqueTotal
Median64 (52 to 74)63 (51 to 73)63 (51 to 74)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Positive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation TechniqueTotal
Female146134280
Male221224445
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Positive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation TechniqueTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White367358725
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Positive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation TechniqueTotal
Argentina367358725
High Risk of Extubation Failure
High Risk of Extubation Failure(Participants)Positive Pressure Extubation TechniqueTraditional Extubation TechniqueTotal
Count of participants302295597
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Santojanni
    Buenos Aires, 1408, Argentina
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Andreu MF, Salvati IG, Donnianni MC, Ibanez B, Cotignola M, Bezzi M. Effect of applying positive pressure with or without endotracheal suctioning during extubation: a laboratory study. Respir Care. 2014 Dec;59(12):1905-11. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03121. Epub 2014 Nov 25. PubMed 25425709 ↗
  • Andreu MF, Dotta ME, Bezzi MG, Borello S, Cardoso GP, Dib PC, Garcia Schustereder SL, Galloli AM, Castro DR, Di Giorgio VL, Villalba FJ, Bertozzi MN, Carballo JM, Martin MC, Brovia CC, Pita MC, Pedace MP, De Benedetto MF, Delli Carpini J, Aguirre P, Montero G. Safety of Positive Pressure Extubation Technique. Respir Care. 2019 Aug;64(8):899-907. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06541. Epub 2019 Mar 26. PubMed 30914493 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 28, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03918811
Lead sponsor
Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni
Collaborators
Matías Bertozzi, Marco Bezzi, Borello, Silvina, M.D., Daniela Castro, Victoria Di Giorgio, Mariana Aguirre, Karina Miralles, Diego Noval, Sebastián Fredes, Eliana Wilhelm, Mauricio Zakimchuk, Julián Buffarini Cignoli, Mariana Bernardini, Leticia Rey, Valeria Pieroni, Pablo D´Annunzio, Gustavo Plotnikow, Romina Prato, Matías Lompizano, María Guaymas, Matías Accoce, Javier Dorado, Gimena Cardoso, Patricia Torres, Vanesa Pavlotsky, Emiliano Navarro, Eliana Markman, Paula Di Nardo, Ivonne Kunzi Steyer, Thomsen, Carolina, M.D., Cecilia Palacios, Mariela Davies, Mercedes Ruffo, Victoria Leon, Fernando Tapia
Responsible party
Mauro Andreu (Physical Therapist, Hospital Donación Francisco Santojanni) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 18, 2019
Start date
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 26, 2020
Completion
Mar 26, 2020
Results posted
Feb 9, 2021
Last update
Feb 9, 2021

Study contacts

Mauro F Andreu, Prof
principal investigator · Hospital Santojanni

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion