ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03918733Updated Apr 17, 2019

Comparision of Non Surgical Retreatment and Endodontic Surgery of Failed Root Canal Treated Teeth

An interventional study of surgical treatment and Non surgical retreatment in Root Canal Therapy and Periapical Periodontitis, sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak. Status unknown at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-17.

Sponsored by Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2019), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2018, registered Apr 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To the best of our knowledge, only two studies are available which have provided a direct comparison between outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery. The results of the two studies are contradictory in nature. Two systematic reviews conducted to explore the issue also could not draw any definitive conclusions and suggested that further research is necessary to find out effects of surgical versus nonsurgical approach. Considering the very limited amount of data on this pertinent topic, there is apparent need of high quality randomized controlled studies to further investigate the difference in outcome between nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery.

Read the detailed description

TITLE: Comparative evaluation of clinical and radiographic outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery of root filled teeth.

RATIONALE: To the best of our knowledge, only two studies are available which have provided a direct comparison between outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery. The results of the two studies are contradictory in nature. Two systematic reviews conducted to explore the issue also could not draw any definitive conclusions and suggested that further research is necessary to find out effects of surgical versus nonsurgical approach. Considering the very limited amount of data on this pertinent topic, there is apparent need of high quality randomized controlled studies to further investigate the difference in outcome between nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic surgery.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: Evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of nonsurgical endodontic retreatment and endodontic surgery.

SETTING: Study subjects should be recruited from the Post Graduate Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, PGIDS, Rohtak, Haryana.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized study

Method: Patients with above inclusion criteria will be selected and randomly allocated to one of the two study groups ( nonsurgical retreatment , endodontic microsurgery ). Root canal retreatment will be performed according to standard protocol. Surgical procedures will be carried out under operating microscope with 8 × 16 magnification by following standardized treatment methods.

Outcome measures: Follow up will be done every 3 months till 12 month period to assess clinical and radiographic success of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic microsurgery. Clinical success will be assessed by absence of pain and tenderness to palpation/ percussion, absence of sinus or any associated soft tissue swelling, tooth mobility of grade-I or less, and no deterioration in periodontal probing depth. Radiographic success will be assessed by the criteria followed by Rud et al. (1972) and Molven et al. (1987). Intensity of pain will be assessed using Visual Analog Scale. Pain intensity will be recorded at different intervals (preoperatively, after 6 hours, 12 hours, 18 hours, 1day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days and 7 days). Intake of analgesic will also be recorded.

Statistical Analysis: The data gathered will be analyzed using suitable statistical methods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Root Canal Therapy
  • Periapical Periodontitis

Keywords

  • retreatment
  • endodontic surgery
  • nonsurgical endodontic retreatment
03

In context

Periapical Periodontitis

256 studies on the registry are indexed under Periapical Periodontitis; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 86 is above the median of 60 across 222 interventional studies indexed under Periapical Periodontitis.

Browse Periapical Periodontitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak is the lead sponsor of 213 studies on the registry; 72 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Patient willingness to participate in the study.

      • Previously root filled Permanent teeth with post-treatment apical periodontitis requiring treatment.
      • Radiographic evidence of periapical radiolucency (minimum size ≥ 2.0 × 2.0 mm2).
      • Failure of previous root canal treatment will be determined based on clinical and radiographic examinations.
      • Patient's age more than 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive history of antibiotic use within past three months of the treatment.
  • Positive history of analgesic use within the past 7 days.
  • Procedural errors in previous root canal treatment which are not manageable.
  • Patients who are pregnant, diabetic, having human immunodeficiency virus infection or other immunocompromising conditions, had serious medical illness or requiring antibiotic premedication.
  • Patients with unrestorable lesions, fractures involving the periodontium, and/or periodontal pockets ≥ 4mm deep or having marginal or furcal bone loss due to periodontitis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
86 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    surgical treatment

    surgical treatment of failed root canal treated teeth following secondary root canal treatment.

    Procedure: surgical treatment

  • Experimental
    Non surgical retreatment

    Non surgical retreatment of failed root canal treated teeth

    Procedure: Non surgical retreatment

Interventions

  • Proceduresurgical treatment

    surgical treatment will be done of failed root canal treated teeth

  • ProcedureNon surgical retreatment

    Non surgical retreatment will be done.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiographic success

    Follow up will be done every 3 months till 12 months. scoring of each tooth will be done according to criteria followed by Rud et al (1972) and Molven et al (1987) 1. Complete healing, defined by re-establishment of the lamina dura 2. Incomplete healing (scar tissue) 3. Uncertain healing 4. Unsatisfactory healing (failure)

    Time frame: Baseline to one year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Post graduate institute of dental sciences
    Rohtak, Haryana 124001, India
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2019, 16 months after the start.

Of 151 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Periapical Periodontitis, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 19. This study's planned 16 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 152 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 19.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 15, 2019
First posted
Apr 17, 2019
StartActual
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2019
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2019
Last update
Apr 17, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03918733
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2018
Primary completion
May 1, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion