ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03918408Updated Nov 12, 2024

Safety and Effectiveness of the PXL-Platinum 330 System for Corneal Cross-Linking

A Phase 1 interventional study of PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke ribofflavin solution in Keratoconus, Unstable, Bacterial Keratitis and Ectasia of Cornea, sponsored by Pacific Clear Vision Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-12.

Sponsored by Pacific Clear Vision Institute · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2019; still recruiting 7 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine whether the Peschke PXL-330 system is safe and effective in the treatment of corneal thinning conditions.

Read the detailed description

Patients with progressive keratoconus, pellucid marginal degeneration, infectious keratitis, or at risk for post-refractive corneal ectasia will be recruited and undergo epithelial-on corneal crosslinking with the Peschke PXL-330 system using pulsed, accelerated energy delivery. Patients will undergo monitoring for 1 year, with serial measurements of corneal topography, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and visual function questionnaire.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconus, Unstable
  • Bacterial Keratitis
  • Ectasia of Cornea

Browse trials for

03

In context

Keratoconus

313 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 40 across 205 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconus.

Browse Keratoconus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Pacific Clear Vision Institute as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects who have one or both eyes that meet criteria 1 \& 2 and 1 or more of the following criteria will be considered candidates for this study.

  • 12 years of age or older
  • Evidence of progressive keratoconus (based on the discretion of the physician as evidenced by an increase in astigmatism, asymmetry, or worsening vision in the last 3 or more months)
  • Presence of central or inferior steepening.
  • Axial topography consistent with keratoconus
  • Presence of one or more findings associated with keratoconus such as:
  • Fleischer ring
  • Vogt's striae
  • Decentered corneal apex
  • Munson's sign
  • Rizzutti's sign
  • Apical Corneal scarring consistent with Bowman's breaks
  • Scissoring of the retinoscopic reflex
  • Crab-claw appearance on topography
  • Steepest keratometry (Kmax) value ≥ 47.20 D
  • I-S keratometry difference > 1.5 D on the Pentacam/Galilei/Orbscan/Cassini map or topography map
  • Posterior corneal elevation >16 microns
  • Thinnest corneal point \<485 microns
  • AvaGen (Avellino Labs) genetic testing keratoconus risk score of 67 or higher (high risk).
  • Signed written
  • Willingness and ability to comply with schedule for follow-up visits
  • For Contact Lens Wearers Only: Removal of contact lenses for the required period of time prior to the screening refraction:
  • Contact Lens Type Minimum Discontinuation Time:
  • Soft: 1 Week
  • Soft Extended Wear: 2 Weeks
  • Soft Toric: 3 Weeks
  • Rigid gas permeable: 2 Weeks per decade of wear
  • Scleral Lenses
  • Investigator Discretion [Discontinuation of scleral lenses not required unless there is clinical evidence of corneal hypoxia (e.g. corneal neovascularization) at time of screening]
  • Signed written informed consent
  • Willingness and ability to comply with schedule for follow-up visits

Exclusion Criteria (any of the following are reasons for exclusion):

  • Eyes classified as either normal or atypical normal on the severity grading scheme.
  • Corneal pachymetry at the screening exam that is \<330 microns at the thinnest point in the eye(s) to be treated.
  • Previous ocular condition (other than refractive error) in the eye(s) to be treated that may predispose the eye for future complications, for example:
  • History of or active corneal disease (e.g., herpes simplex, herpes zoster keratitis, recurrent erosion syndrome, acanthomeoeba, etc.)
  • corneal scarring in the CXL treatment zone that is not related to keratoconus or, in the investigator's opinion, will interfere with the cross-linking procedure.
  • Pregnancy (including plan to become pregnant) or lactation during the course of the study
  • A known sensitivity to study medications
  • Patients with nystagmus or any other condition that would prevent a steady gaze during the CXL treatment or other diagnostic tests.
  • Patients with active medical implants (e.g. cardiac pacemakers)'
  • Patients who are aphakic/ pseudophakic
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pulsed, accelerated

    18 mW, 5 sec, 5 sec off, 10 minutes of illumination

    Combination Product: PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke ribofflavin solution

  • Active comparator
    Conventional

    9 mW, continuous 10 minutes of illumination

    Combination Product: PXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke ribofflavin solution

Interventions

  • Combination productPXL-330 Platinum device for crosslinking with Peschke ribofflavin solution

    Riboflavin will be used to load the cornea, followed by UV-A crosslinking of the cornea

    Also known as: Corneal crosslinking

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean keratometry in diopters

    Average keratometry across the anterior topography of the cornea computed by a validated Scheimpflug topographer

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Best corrected visual acuity

    Measurement of best corrected visual acuity on the validated early-treatment diabetic retinopathy study scale

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Caporossi A, Baiocchi S, Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Caporossi T. Parasurgical therapy for keratoconus by riboflavin-ultraviolet type A rays induced cross-linking of corneal collagen: preliminary refractive results in an Italian study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 May;32(5):837-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.01.091. PubMed 16765803 ↗
  • Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T. Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;149(4):585-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.10.021. Epub 2010 Feb 6. PubMed 20138607 ↗
  • Chatzis N, Hafezi F. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of pediatric [corrected] corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;28(11):753-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20121011-01. Erratum In: J Refract Surg. 2013 Jan;29(1):72. PubMed 23347367 ↗
  • Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Caragiuli S, Rechichi M. Pulsed vs continuous light accelerated corneal collagen crosslinking: in vivo qualitative investigation by confocal microscopy and corneal OCT. Eye (Lond). 2014 Oct;28(10):1179-83. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.163. Epub 2014 Jul 25. PubMed 25060847 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will be stored in a secure location. While summary outcomes data will be provided on request to other researchers and periodically at scientific conferences, protected health information will not.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03918408
Lead sponsor
Pacific Clear Vision Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2024

Study contacts

BALAMURALI AMBATI, MD, PhD
Contact
bambati@pcvi.com
541-343-5000
BALAMURALI AMBATI, MD, PhD
principal investigator · PCVI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion