CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03909009Updated Jun 16, 2020Results posted

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Fibromyalgia

An interventional study of rTMS + Neuronavigation in Fibromyalgia, sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-16.

Sponsored by Izmir Katip Celebi University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of 10 Hz neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on pain, stiffness, fatigue, depression/anxiety, quality of life and cognitive functions in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study in two-arm parallel-group design. Twenty participants will be randomized into 2 groups. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with 1:1 allocation between the active rTMS group (Group 1) and the sham-control group (Group 2). Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS)-A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks). Group 2 will receive sham stimulation-A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).All patients will be evaluated with pain severity (VAS-10mm),stiffness severity (VAS-10mm), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Depression Anxiety Scale (HADS), Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-revised version (ACE-R).Patients will be questioned for the safety of treatment. Available drug therapies will be continued in both groups. Patients and clinical raters will be blinded to treatment. All patients will be reviewed by the investigator in terms of rTMS treatment safety and motor threshold determination before each treatment session and observed for possible side effects after treatment. All side effects will be recorded. Magnetic stimulation will be applied using Neurosoft-Neuro MS/D with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil. rTMS therapy will be applied under the guide of neuronavigation with the following parameters: target-left DLPFC, with the %90 of the RMT, 10 Hz stimulation for 5 seconds intervals (on) with 25 seconds inter-train intervals (off), 15 minutes, 1500 pulses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibromyalgia

Keywords

  • Fibromyalgia, neuronavigated-rTMS, pain, stiffness, fatigue
03

In context

Fibromyalgia

1,336 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibromyalgia; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 1,034 interventional studies indexed under Fibromyalgia.

Browse Fibromyalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Izmir Katip Celebi University is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (age between 18-65 years)
  • Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to 2016 Fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria
  • The mean pain intensity is VAS ≥ 4/10
  • Stable treatment for at least last 3 months
  • Patients accepting participation by signing an informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To have a clinical condition to be contraindicated for TMS (metallic implant, cardiac pace, pregnancy, lactation, epilepsy, head trauma, history of cranial operation...)
  • The presence of malignancy
  • Systemic rheumatic diseases
  • Major orthopedic / neurological problems that limit daily life activities
  • Alcohol or drug addiction
  • Major depression / personality disorder history
  • Have received TMS treatment before
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active rTMS

    Group 1 will receive high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (10hz-HF-rTMS) A total 14 sessions of HF-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).

    Device: rTMS + Neuronavigation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    Group 2 will receive sham stimulation. A total 14 sessions of sham-rTMS, 10 sessions daily (5 days/week, 2 weeks) and 4 sessions weekly (1 day/week, 4 weeks).

    Device: rTMS + Neuronavigation

Interventions

  • DevicerTMS + Neuronavigation

    Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (Neuro-MS/D) + Neural Navigator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale-Pain

    The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: in the second week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale-Pain

    The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: in the sixth week

  2. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

    Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

    Time frame: in the sixth week

Other outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness

    The severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: in the second week

  2. Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

    Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

    Time frame: in the second week

  3. Fatigue Severity Scale

    Severity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale. Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity. (Total score range: 1-7)

    Time frame: in the sixth week

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

    Hospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity. Its subscales are anxiety and depression. It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression. The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively. High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition.

    Time frame: in the sixth week

  5. Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised

    Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities. Total score that can be obtained is 0-100. Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state.

    Time frame: in the sixth week

07

Results

Posted Jun 16, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Current study has several limitations: First is the relatively small sample size. Second, we didn't use sham stimulation probe. Third, our patients only consisted of female gender.

Participant flow

Participants were recruited from Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR) outpatient clinics of a university hospital.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive rTMSSham rTMS
Started1010
Completed1010
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryVisual Analog Scale-Pain

The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame:
in the second week
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Visual Analog Scale-Pain
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Visual Analog Scale-Pain5.30 ± 2.116.80 ± 1.69
SecondaryVisual Analog Scale-Pain

The severity of the pain at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no pain, 10=severe pain) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame:
in the sixth week
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Visual Analog Scale-Pain
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Visual Analog Scale-Pain5.70 ± 2.636.70 ± 1.83
SecondaryFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

Time frame:
in the sixth week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
score on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire51.71 ± 22.1756.02 ± 22.57
Other pre-specifiedVisual Analog Scale-Stiffness

The severity of the stiffness at rest was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (Total score: 0-10)(0=no stiffness, 10=severe stiffness) Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame:
in the second week
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness
units on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness5.10 ± 2.136.60 ± 1.96
Other pre-specifiedFibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire

Functional health status and quality of life of the participants were assessed with the Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire, which measures 10 different features (physical functioning, missed days of work, depression, anxiety, feeling good, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week). The total Fibromyalgia impact questionnaire score is maximum 80 points. Higher scores indicate lower functionality level.

Time frame:
in the second week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
score on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire48.35 ± 16.6454.39 ± 15.47
Other pre-specifiedFatigue Severity Scale

Severity of fatigue was evaluated with Fatigue severity scale, a 9-item self-report questionnaire scale. Each item of this scale consists of statements that are scored on a seven-point Likert type scale ranging from 1 to 7. Total Fatigue severity scale score is calculated as the mean value of nine items. Higher scores indicate higher fatigue severity. (Total score range: 1-7)

Time frame:
in the sixth week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Fatigue Severity Scale
score on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Fatigue Severity Scale4.89 ± 1.595.39 ± 1.62
Other pre-specifiedHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

Hospital anxiety and depression scale is an assessment tool developed to identify the risk of anxiety and depression and measure its level and change of severity. Its subscales are anxiety and depression. It contains 14 questions in total, including 7 (odd numbers) measuring anxiety and 7 (even numbers) measuring depression. The lowest and highest total score that a person can obtain from this scale are 0 and 42, respectively. High scores are associated with a worse psychiatric condition.

Time frame:
in the sixth week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
score on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale18.80 ± 7.8217.60 ± 10.68
Other pre-specifiedAddenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised

Addenbrook Cognitive Examination-Revised is a brief cognitive test that consists of 5 basic sections: attention and orientation, memory, verbal fluency, language and visual-spatial abilities. Total score that can be obtained is 0-100. Higher scores are associated with a better cognitive state.

Time frame:
in the sixth week
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised
score on a scaleActive rTMSSham rTMS
Addenbrook Cognitive Examination Revised66.50 ± 19.6781.40 ± 7.79

Adverse events

Collected over 6 weeks (Between the start of the study and the day when the last outcome measure is evaluated). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active rTMS0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Sham rTMS0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years101020
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Mean46.70 ± 9.0643.80 ± 9.3745.25 ± 9.08
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Female101020
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino000
Unknown or Not Reported101020
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Turkey101020
Visual Analog Scale-Pain
Visual Analog Scale-Pain(units on a scale)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Mean7.20 ± 1.757.40 ± 1.357.30 ± 1.52
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness
Visual Analog Scale-Stiffness(units on a scale)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Mean7.40 ± 1.587.60 ± 1.177.50 ± 1.35
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire(scores on a scale)Active rTMSSham rTMSTotal
Mean65.86 ± 8.2766.44 ± 11.4066.15 ± 9.69

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    İzmir, 35290, Turkey
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10. PubMed 25797650 ↗
  • Klein MM, Treister R, Raij T, Pascual-Leone A, Park L, Nurmikko T, Lenz F, Lefaucheur JP, Lang M, Hallett M, Fox M, Cudkowicz M, Costello A, Carr DB, Ayache SS, Oaklander AL. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research. Pain. 2015 Sep;156(9):1601-1614. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000210. PubMed 25919472 ↗
  • Knijnik LM, Dussan-Sarria JA, Rozisky JR, Torres IL, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Caumo W. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Pract. 2016 Mar;16(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/papr.12276. Epub 2015 Jan 12. PubMed 25581213 ↗
  • Hou WH, Wang TY, Kang JH. The effects of add-on non-invasive brain stimulation in fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Aug;55(8):1507-17. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew205. Epub 2016 May 5. PubMed 27150193 ↗
  • Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5. PubMed 25034472 ↗
  • Saltychev M, Laimi K. Effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with fibromyalgia: a meta-analysis. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Mar;40(1):11-18. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000207. PubMed 27977465 ↗
  • Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1. Erratum In: Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 May;131(5):1168-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.02.003. PubMed 31901449 ↗
  • Baudic S, Attal N, Mhalla A, Ciampi de Andrade D, Perrot S, Bouhassira D. Unilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex does not affect cognition in patients with fibromyalgia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013 Jan;47(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 15. PubMed 23079535 ↗
  • Tekin A, Özdil E, Güleken MD, İlişer R, Bakım B, Öncü J, et al. Efficacy of HighFrequency [10 Hz] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the PrimaryMotor Cortex in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Randomized, DoubleBlind, Sham-Controlled Trial. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. 2014;22(1):20-26.
  • Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19833552 ↗
  • Bilir I, Askin A, Sengul I, Tosun A. Effects of High-Frequency Neuronavigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb 1;100(2):138-146. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001536. PubMed 32701637 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Mar 14, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03909009
Lead sponsor
Izmir Katip Celebi University
Responsible party
İbrahim Bilir (Principal Investigator, Izmir Katip Celebi University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 9, 2019
Start date
Apr 11, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2020
Completion
Apr 10, 2020
Results posted
Jun 16, 2020
Last update
Jun 16, 2020

Study contacts

Ayhan Aşkın, Assoc. Prof.
study director · Izmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion