ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03901924Updated Jul 13, 2026

Volume Support/Assist Control Mode Ventilation and Diaphragmatic Atrophy

An interventional study of Volume Support Mode Mechanical Ventilation and Assist Control Mode Mechanical Ventilation in Mechanical Ventilation Complication, sponsored by University of Chicago. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-13.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2019; still recruiting 7 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
468
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of the study is to determine how controlled mode ventilation and support mode ventilation impact ventilator-free days and diaphragmatic atrophy.

Read the detailed description

Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD) is characterized by diaphragmatic atrophy and weakness leading to an inability to liberate from the ventilator. Patients with VIDD have increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, higher reintubation rates, and need for tracheostomy. There are two commonly used modes of ventilation in the ICU - controlled and support mode ventilation. Conventional practice is to initiate mechanical ventilation with controlled mode followed by a support mode to facilitate weaning and eventual extubation. However, this approach may induce irreversible diaphragmatic atrophy. Observational studies suggest that controlled ventilation is associated with higher rates of diaphragmatic atrophy than support modes of ventilation. Diaphragmatic atrophy occurs within the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation. To date, it remains unknown whether early initiation of support mode ventilation prevents VIDD and its associated complications in comparison to controlled mode ventilation.

The investigators hypothesize that by initiating subjects on support mode ventilation, an associated increase in ventilator-free days will be seen in comparison to subjects on controlled mode ventilation. Subjects on support mode ventilation will have less diaphragmatic atrophy and weakness than subjects on controlled mode ventilation. To investigate this hypothesis,investigators are conducting a phase III randomized trial examining the effects of volume support mode versus assist control mode ventilation on ventilator-free days and rate of diaphragm atrophy.

enrolled subjects requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized to either volume support mode or assist control mode within 24 hours of mechanical ventilation initiation. Diaphragm thickness will be measured by ultrasound daily and subsequently diaphragm atrophy rate will be calculated in each arm. The operator acquiring ultrasound images will be blinded to the ventilator mode that the subject was randomized to. Subjects in the study will follow standard ICU sedation awakening trials and spontaneous breathing trials. The medical team in charge of the subject will determine when the subject will be liberated from the ventilator.

There will be up to a 24 hour period from initiation of standard, non-study mechanical ventilation during which the subject can be consented and enrolled. This will allow the research team time to contact the subject and/or family in order to obtain informed consent. Once randomized, all subjects will be initiated on study mode of ventilation. The medical team will direct other aspects of care.

The phase III trial will be powered to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in rate of diaphragm atrophy and ventilator-free days between volume support mode and assist control mode.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mechanical Ventilation Complication

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Diaphragm Atrophy
  • Ventilator Induced Diaphragm Dysfunction
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Volume Support Mode
  • Assist Control Mode
  • Diaphragm Thickening Fraction
  • Intubation
  • Delirium
  • Ventilator-Free Days
03

In context

Delirium

933 studies on the registry are indexed under Delirium; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 468 is above the median of 112 across 550 interventional studies indexed under Delirium.

Browse Delirium studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 924 studies on the registry; 185 are open to participants now.

Of its 103 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 72 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

subjects > 18 years of age that have been intubated and mechanically ventilated for \< 36 hours at the time of screening will be eligible for enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. pregnancy
  2. cardiopulmonary arrest
  3. history of diaphragmatic paralysis or neuromuscular disease
  4. (COPD) or asthma exacerbation with evidence of auto-PEEPing requiring intubation
  5. neuromuscular blockade
  6. expectation to be liberated from ventilator in \< 24 hours
  7. history of mechanical ventilation in the last 6 months
  8. presence of tracheostomy
  9. high cervical spine injury
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
468 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Volume Support Mode Mechanical Ventilation

    Volume support mode ventilation is a spontaneous mode where a target goal volume is set on the ventilator. This ventilatory strategy is dependent on patients spontaneously breathing and triggering (or activating) the ventilator to support the breath. The ventilator adjusts the amount of pressure support to deliver with each breath (i.e. if the patient's tidal volume is greater than the set target volume, then the ventilator will decrease the amount of pressure support in the subsequent breath to try to achieve the goal volume and vice versa). The respiratory rate is not set in this mode of ventilation and is dependent on the patient. For patients randomized to this mode, the goal tidal volume will be set at 6 cc/kg of ideal body weight (IBW).

    Other: Volume Support Mode Mechanical Ventilation

  • Active comparator
    Assist Control Mode Mechanical Ventilation

    In assist control mode ventilation, the machine is programmed to deliver a set tidal volume and set respiratory rate. Patients can breathe over the set respiratory rate, but the volume of breath that they receive is fixed and delivered by the ventilator. For patients randomized to this mode, the tidal volume will be set at 6 cc/kg of ideal body weight (IBW).

    Other: Assist Control Mode Mechanical Ventilation

Interventions

  • OtherVolume Support Mode Mechanical Ventilation

    This is a spontaneous mode of mechanical ventilation that depends on the patient's efforts. A target volume (6 cc/kg of IBW), PEEP and FiO2 are set by the medical team, and the ventilator varies the inspiratory pressure support with each breath to achieve the target volume. The respiratory rate is fully dependent on the patient. Sedation while on mechanical ventilation will be set at a goal RASS of 0 to -2.

  • OtherAssist Control Mode Mechanical Ventilation

    This is a controlled mode of mechanical ventilation that is independent of patient's efforts. A tidal volume (6 cc/kg of IBW), respiratory rate, PEEP and FiO2 are set by the medical team. Sedation while on mechanical ventilation will be set at a goal RASS of 0 to -2.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilator-Free Days

    A Phase III Primary Outcome; Defined as days alive and free from mechanical ventilation at day 28

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of Diaphragm Atrophy

    Defined as percentage decline in diaphragm thickness per day

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

Other outcomes

  1. Noninvasive Measurements of Diaphragm Inspiratory Strength 3.+ 9+ Noninvasive Measurements of Diaphragm Function

    negative inspiratory force (nif)--measured unit cm H2O

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  2. Noninvasive Measurements of Diaphragm Expiratory Strength

    positive expiratory force (pef)--measured unit cm H2O

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  3. Diaphragm Thickening Fraction

    (diaphragm thickness at end expiration - diaphragm thickness at end inspiration)/diaphragm thickness at end expiration; measured by ultrasound

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  4. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Days on mechanical ventilation

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. Frequency of Ventilator-Related Complications

    Including the Following: -reintubation * tracheostomy * mechanical ventilation \> 14 days * patients with delirium

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  6. Readmission to ICU During Same Hospital Admission

    Bivariate outcome regarding readmission to ICU--"Yes or No"

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

  7. Death in ICU

    Death that occurs while in the ICU

    Time frame: 90 days

  8. Death in Hospital

    Death that occurs while in the Hospital

    Time frame: 90 days

  9. Discharge Destination

    i.e. home, long term assisted care, skilled nursing facility, death

    Time frame: 90 days

  10. Mortality

    measured at 28 days, 90 days, and 1 year

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 98 months after the start.

Of 219 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Delirium, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 45. This study's planned 98 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 222 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 27, 2019
First posted
Apr 3, 2019
StartActual
Mar 4, 2019
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
May 2027
Last update
Jul 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03901924
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 3, 2019
Start date
Mar 4, 2019
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 13, 2026

Study contacts

Bhakti Patel, MD
Contact
bpatel@bsd.uchicago.edu
773-702-0902
Anne S Pohlman, MSN
Contact
apohlman@bsd.uchicago.edu
773-702-3804
John P Kress, MD
study director · University of Chicago
Bhakti Patel, MD
principal investigator · University of Chicago
Roger Struble, MD
principal investigator · University of Iowa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion