CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03892382Updated Feb 10, 2020

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Therapy for Apathy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

An interventional study of rTMS in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, sponsored by Jagiellonian University. Withdrawn at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-10.

Sponsored by Jagiellonian University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Participants were not able to stay near our center for two weeks
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of central and peripheral motor neurons. ALS leads to death usually within 3 to 5 years from the onset of the symptoms. Available treatment can prolong the disease duration but cannot modify the disease course. Apathy is a frequent complication of ALS, affecting up to 30% of patients and affecting negatively the survival. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity with confirmed beneficial effect on apathy in several neurologic and psychiatric conditions. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the apathy in patients with ALS with placebo stimulation.

Read the detailed description

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of central and peripheral motor neurons. ALS leads to death usually within 3 to 5 years from the onset of the symptoms. Available treatment can prolong the disease duration but cannot modify the disease course. Apathy is a frequent complication of ALS, which negatively influences quality of life (caga et al. 2018) and is an independent poor prognostic factor for survival (Caga et al. 2016). Similarly, the depression is also a frequent complication of ALS. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive method of modulation of brain plasticity with confirmed beneficial effect on apathy in several neurologic and psychiatric conditions like mild cognitive impairment (Padala et al. 2018), stroke (Sasaki et al. 2017), Alzheimer disease (Nguyen et al. 2017) and schizophrenia (Prikryl et al. 2013). The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of rTMS in improving the apathy in patients with ALS with placebo stimulation and - as a secondary outcome - depression in patients with ALS.

Intervention will include ten daily sessions of rTMS. In each session 3000 magnetic pulses will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Stimulation intensity will equal 120% of the motor threshold value for the right first dorsal interosseus.

Assessment of apathy and of depression and daily functioning will be made before and after therapy, as well as two and four weeks later.

02

Conditions studied

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
  • rTMS
  • apathy
  • depression
03

In context

Motor Neuron Disease

717 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Neuron Disease; 137 are open to participants now.

Browse Motor Neuron Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Jagiellonian University is the lead sponsor of 156 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of definite or probable ALS according to el Escorial criteria (Brooks et al. 2000)
  • Moderate or severe depression defined as the score in Beck's Depression Inventory ≥20
  • Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥26

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric symptoms, which may negatively influence patient's tolerance and adherence to therapy
  • Respiratory insufficiency and other complications od advanced stages of ALS, which may compromise patient's ability to undergo the study procedure
  • Contraindications for rTMS as listed by the Guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al. 2009) i.e. seizure in the past, epilepsy, presence of magnetic material in the reach of magnetic field, pregnancy, likelihood to get pregnant, intracranial electrodes, cardiac pacemaker or intracardiac lines, frequent syncopes
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active rTMS

    10 hertz (Hz) rTMS will be administered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Therapy will include 10 daily sessions (on consecutive week days). In every sessions 3000 magnetic pulses of 120% of the resting motor threshold intensity will be elicited.

    Device: rTMS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    Sham stimulation will mimic the active one except that the stimulating coil will be held perpendicularly to the scalp, which assures similar impression as the active stimulation but prevents that significant magnetic field will reach brain tissue.

    Device: rTMS

Interventions

  • DevicerTMS

    High frequency rTMS to induce the long term potentiation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version after rTMS, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS

  2. Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version first follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS

  3. Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version second follow up, total score, range 18 to 72 with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in Apathy Evaluation Scale Clinical Version to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised after rTMS, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome

    Change from baseline score in Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS

  2. Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised first follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome

    Change from baseline score in the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS

  3. Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised second follow up, total score, range 0 to 40 with higher values representing a better outcome

    Change from baseline score in Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS

  4. Beck's Depression Inventory ater rTMS, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken directly after finishing rTMS.

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, directly (on the same 1 day) after finishing rTMS

  5. Beck's Depression Inventory first follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken two weeks after finishing rTMS.

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, two weeks after finishing rTMS

  6. Beck's Depression Inventory second follow up, total score, range 0 to 63, with higher values representing a worse outcome

    Change from baseline score in the Beck's Depression Inventory to the measurement taken four weeks after finishing rTMS.

    Time frame: Baseline rTMS, four weeks after finishing rTMS

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Neurology
    Kraków, 31503, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brooks BR, Miller RG, Swash M, Munsat TL; World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases. El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2000 Dec;1(5):293-9. doi: 10.1080/146608200300079536. No abstract available. PubMed 11464847 ↗
  • Caga J, Hsieh S, Highton-Williamson E, Zoing MC, Ramsey E, Devenney E, Ahmed RM, Kiernan MC. Apathy and its impact on patient outcome in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol. 2018 Jan;265(1):187-193. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8688-4. Epub 2017 Nov 30. PubMed 29189922 ↗
  • Caga J, Turner MR, Hsieh S, Ahmed RM, Devenney E, Ramsey E, Zoing MC, Mioshi E, Kiernan MC. Apathy is associated with poor prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2016 May;23(5):891-7. doi: 10.1111/ene.12959. Epub 2016 Jan 29. PubMed 26822417 ↗
  • Lefaucheur JP, Andre-Obadia N, Antal A, Ayache SS, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Cantello RM, Cincotta M, de Carvalho M, De Ridder D, Devanne H, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Langguth B, Nyffeler T, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Poulet E, Rossi S, Rossini PM, Rothwell JC, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Siebner HR, Slotema CW, Stagg CJ, Valls-Sole J, Ziemann U, Paulus W, Garcia-Larrea L. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Nov;125(11):2150-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 5. PubMed 25034472 ↗
  • Nguyen JP, Suarez A, Kemoun G, Meignier M, Le Saout E, Damier P, Nizard J, Lefaucheur JP. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Neurophysiol Clin. 2017 Feb;47(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Feb 1. PubMed 28161090 ↗
  • Padala PR, Padala KP, Lensing SY, Jackson AN, Hunter CR, Parkes CM, Dennis RA, Bopp MM, Caceda R, Mennemeier MS, Roberson PK, Sullivan DH. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for apathy in mild cognitive impairment: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.063. Epub 2018 Jan 5. PubMed 29331848 ↗
  • Prikryl R, Ustohal L, Prikrylova Kucerova H, Kasparek T, Venclikova S, Vrzalova M, Ceskova E. A detailed analysis of the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a double-blind trial. Schizophr Res. 2013 Sep;149(1-3):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jun 25. PubMed 23810122 ↗
  • Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19833552 ↗
  • Sasaki N, Hara T, Yamada N, Niimi M, Kakuda W, Abo M. The Efficacy of High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Improving Apathy in Chronic Stroke Patients. Eur Neurol. 2017;78(1-2):28-32. doi: 10.1159/000477440. Epub 2017 Jun 3. PubMed 28578330 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — After completing the study, the details of neurophysiologic diagnostics including motor threshold, the age and gender as well as individual scores of Mini-Mental State Examination, AES-C, Beck's Depression Inventory and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised will be made available to other researchers on request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03892382
Lead sponsor
Jagiellonian University
Responsible party
Jakub Antczak (Principal Investigator, Jagiellonian University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2019
Start date
Nov 15, 2019 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 10, 2020

Study contacts

Jakub M Antczak, MD
principal investigator · Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion