ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03891511WATSUpdated Mar 27, 2019

TMJ Fibrocartilage Detection Using MRI

An observational study in TMJ Disorders and MRI Scans, sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile. Status unknown at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-27.

Sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
59
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: The aims of this study will be to detect the fibrocartilage layer (FC) of the human temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using 3D SPGR (Spoiled GRASS sequence) (T1 WATS) sequence and to compare these results with those of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (DP, T2 MRI) sequences in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

Read the detailed description

This prospective and observational study will focused on analyzing morphological characteristics of the fibrocartilage layer of the TMJ based on the MRI scans of 59 patients. All 118 TMJs of these patients will be suitable for analysis, (range: 18-60 years old), females and males affected by TMD and did not undergo previous TMJ treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • TMJ Disorders
  • MRI Scans
03

In context

Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

621 studies on the registry are indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders; 161 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 59 is below the median of 90 across 171 observational studies indexed under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.

Browse Temporomandibular Joint Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad de los Andes, Chile is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

participants will be whites, urban, low , medium low and médium socioeconomic level, from Santiago, Chile.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

* Internal derangement in theTMJ

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Cochlear implant
  • Intracranial vascular clips
  • Metal particles in the orbit
  • Head or face trauma
  • Gout
  • Generalized osteoarthrosis
  • Joint hyperlaxity
  • Congenital malformity
  • Facial cysts
  • Facial tumors
  • Previous TMJ surgery
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
59 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Interventions

  • DeviceMRI scann

    MRI will be performed in the TMJ of participants affected with TMD

    Also known as: T1 WATS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence of the TMJ Fibrocartilage layer

    The fibrocartilage layer will be evaluated dichotomously (absent/present) Patients will be examined using bilateral MRI (Phillips Intera 1,5 T, Sense Flex S Dual Coil) in the sagittal PD-weighted, T2-weighted and T1-weighted WATS, all in the oblique axis of the mandible condyle and with a closed mouth; dynamic gradient-echo at open mouth at 10 mm, 20 mm and 30 mm of the interincisal distance. Additionally, a coronal PD-weighted sequence with the mouth closed will be performed. Of each TMJ will be taken with 8×8 cm FOV and 0.2 cm spacing. All sequences will carried out using the same equipment and on the same day.

    Time frame: six months

  2. Discontinuity of the TMJ FC layer

    The TMJ fibrocartilage layer will be evaluated dichotomously (continuous/discontinuous).

    Time frame: six months

  3. Fibrocartilage Signal Intensity

    Six regions of interest (ROIs) will be measured in the fibrocartilage layer of each TMJ. (anterior 0°, center 45° and posterior 90°), three in the mandibular condyle and three in the temporal fossa. The fibrocartilage signal intensity in each ROI will be expressed as the mean value of intensity units (Osirix). All measurements will be made in a simple blinded system by four different observers (ML, MN, CV, GZ) (chi-square test for interobserver agreement: p˂0.05). Measurements will be made separately in the three MRI sequences (length tool, Osirix Imaging software). In all MRI sequences, TMJ will be magnified at a zoom of 3.6. For the T1 WATS sequence, the window width will be set at 90 intensity Units (IU) (all values above +90 Hounsfield Unit (HU) will be white), and the window level was 80 (IU) (all values below +80 HU will be black). All images will be measured and stored in DICOM format., lengt

    Time frame: six month

  4. Thickness of the TMJ fibrocartilage layer

    The TMJ FC thickness will be measured (curve tool, Osirix) and will expressed in millimeters.

    Time frame: Six months

  5. Length of the TMJ fibrocartilage layer

    The lenght of the TMJ FC layer will be measured (curve tool, Osirix) and will expressed in millimeters.

    Time frame: Six moths

  6. Statistical analysis

    The Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene's test will be performed to assess normality of data distribution and homogeneity of variance of the measurements, respectively. To determine the relationship between the presence or absence of fibrocartilage and the different sequences, Fisher's exact test will be used. The thickness, length and signal intensity of the fibrocartilage layer will be expressed as a mean value, separated by MRI sequence, and will be analyzed using descriptive statistics. SPSS v14.0 for Windows, statistical software will be used to perform data analysis.

    Time frame: seven months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • San Vicente de Paul Centro de Diagnóstico
    Santiago, 750005, Chile
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ren YF, Westesson PL, Isberg A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint: value of pseudodynamic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Jan;81(1):110-23. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80158-2. PubMed 8850494 ↗
  • Zhang S, Block KT, Frahm J. Magnetic resonance imaging in real time: advances using radial FLASH. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jan;31(1):101-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21987. PubMed 19938046 ↗
  • Gibbs SJ, Simmons HC 3rd. A protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joints. Cranio. 1998 Oct;16(4):236-41. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1998.11746063. PubMed 10029751 ↗
  • Brady AP, McDevitt L, Stack JP, Downey D. A technique for magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Clin Radiol. 1993 Feb;47(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81189-4. PubMed 8435960 ↗
  • Eberhard D, Bantleon HP, Steger W. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of temporomandibular joint disorders. Eur J Orthod. 2000 Oct;22(5):489-97. doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.5.489. PubMed 11105405 ↗
  • Disler DG, McCauley TR, Wirth CR, Fuchs MD. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Aug;165(2):377-82. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618561. PubMed 7618561 ↗
  • Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, Fuchs MD, Ratner LM, Wirth CR, Hospodar PP. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jul;167(1):127-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659356. PubMed 8659356 ↗
  • Recht MP, Kramer J, Marcelis S, Pathria MN, Trudell D, Haghighi P, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. Radiology. 1993 May;187(2):473-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.187.2.8475293. PubMed 8475293 ↗
  • Moncada G, Cortes D, Millas R, Marholz C. Relationship between disk position and degenerative bone changes in temporomandibular joints of young subjects with TMD. An MRI study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014 Spring;38(3):269-76. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.w43m8474433n7ur2. PubMed 25095324 ↗
  • Dias IM, Coelho PR, Picorelli Assis NM, Pereira Leite FP, Devito KL. Evaluation of the correlation between disc displacements and degenerative bone changes of the temporomandibular joint by means of magnetic resonance images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Sep;41(9):1051-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 31. PubMed 22464851 ↗
  • Larheim TA. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the clinical diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint. Cells Tissues Organs. 2005;180(1):6-21. doi: 10.1159/000086194. PubMed 16088129 ↗
  • Tanaka E, Detamore MS, Mercuri LG. Degenerative disorders of the temporomandibular joint: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Dent Res. 2008 Apr;87(4):296-307. doi: 10.1177/154405910808700406. PubMed 18362309 ↗
  • Stegenga B. Osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint organ and its relationship to disc displacement. J Orofac Pain. 2001 Summer;15(3):193-205. PubMed 11575190 ↗
  • Campos MI, Campos PS, Cangussu MC, Guimaraes RC, Line SR. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics and pain in temporomandibular joints with and without degenerative changes of the condyle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jun;37(6):529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Apr 28. PubMed 18440778 ↗
  • Kurita H, Kojima Y, Nakatsuka A, Koike T, Kobayashi H, Kurashina K. Relationship between temporomandibular joint (TMJ)-related pain and morphological changes of the TMJ condyle in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Sep;33(5):329-33. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/13269559. PubMed 15585811 ↗
  • Hauger O, Dumont E, Chateil JF, Moinard M, Diard F. Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging. Radiology. 2002 Sep;224(3):657-63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2243011227. PubMed 12202695 ↗
  • Zhang S, Uecker M, Voit D, Merboldt KD, Frahm J. Real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance at high temporal resolution: radial FLASH with nonlinear inverse reconstruction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010 Jul 8;12(1):39. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-12-39. PubMed 20615228 ↗
  • Li X, Ma BC, Bolbos RI, Stahl R, Lozano J, Zuo J, Lin K, Link TM, Safran M, Majumdar S. Quantitative assessment of bone marrow edema-like lesion and overlying cartilage in knees with osteoarthritis and anterior cruciate ligament tear using MR imaging and spectroscopic imaging at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Aug;28(2):453-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21437. PubMed 18666183 ↗
  • Duc SR, Pfirrmann CW, Schmid MR, Zanetti M, Koch PP, Kalberer F, Hodler J. Articular cartilage defects detected with 3D water-excitation true FISP: prospective comparison with sequences commonly used for knee imaging. Radiology. 2007 Oct;245(1):216-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2451060990. Epub 2007 Aug 23. PubMed 17717327 ↗
  • Dunn TC, Lu Y, Jin H, Ries MD, Majumdar S. T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology. 2004 Aug;232(2):592-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322030976. Epub 2004 Jun 23. PubMed 15215540 ↗
  • Guler N, Yatmaz PI, Ataoglu H, Emlik D, Uckan S. Temporomandibular internal derangement: correlation of MRI findings with clinical symptoms of pain and joint sounds in patients with bruxing behaviour. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003 Sep;32(5):304-10. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/24534480. PubMed 14709605 ↗
  • Khan HA, Ahad H, Sharma P, Bajaj P, Hassan N, Kamal Y. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings in the knee joint. Trauma Mon. 2015 Feb;20(1):e18635. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.18635. Epub 2015 Jan 7. PubMed 25825695 ↗
  • Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology. 1996 Jan;198(1):209-12. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.1.8539380. PubMed 8539380 ↗
  • Wang Y, Wluka AE, Jones G, Ding C, Cicuttini FM. Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2012 Apr;4(2):77-97. doi: 10.1177/1759720X11431005. PubMed 22870497 ↗
  • Welsch GH, Mamisch TC, Weber M, Horger W, Bohndorf K, Trattnig S. High-resolution morphological and biochemical imaging of articular cartilage of the ankle joint at 3.0 T using a new dedicated phased array coil: in vivo reproducibility study. Skeletal Radiol. 2008 Jun;37(6):519-26. doi: 10.1007/s00256-008-0474-z. PubMed 18408924 ↗
  • Trattnig S, Breitenseher MJ, Huber M, Zettl R, Rottmann B, Haller J, Imhof H. [Determination of cartilage thickness in the ankle joint. an MRT (1.5)-anatomical comparative study]. Rofo. 1997 Apr;166(4):303-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015429. German. PubMed 9198493 ↗
  • Siepmann DB, McGovern J, Brittain JH, Reeder SB. High-resolution 3D cartilage imaging with IDEAL SPGR at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Dec;189(6):1510-5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2661. PubMed 18029893 ↗
  • Hoemann CD, Lafantaisie-Favreau CH, Lascau-Coman V, Chen G, Guzman-Morales J. The cartilage-bone interface. J Knee Surg. 2012 May;25(2):85-97. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1319782. PubMed 22928426 ↗
  • Kuroda S, Tanimoto K, Izawa T, Fujihara S, Koolstra JH, Tanaka E. Biomechanical and biochemical characteristics of the mandibular condylar cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Nov;17(11):1408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.04.025. Epub 2009 May 18. PubMed 19477310 ↗
  • Brem MH, Pauser J, Yoshioka H, Brenning A, Stratmann J, Hennig FF, Kikinis R, Duryea J, Winalski CS, Lang P. Longitudinal in vivo reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface in osteoarthritis of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Apr;36(4):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0208-z. Epub 2007 Jan 12. PubMed 17219231 ↗
  • Mosher TJ, Smith HE, Collins C, Liu Y, Hancy J, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Change in knee cartilage T2 at MR imaging after running: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2005 Jan;234(1):245-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2341040041. Epub 2004 Nov 18. PubMed 15550376 ↗
  • Suenaga S, Ogura T, Matsuda T, Noikura T. Severity of synovium and bone marrow abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint in early rheumatoid arthritis: role of gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted spin echo MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000 May-Jun;24(3):461-5. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200005000-00020. PubMed 10864087 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No IPD included

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2019, 1 month after the start.

Of 58 non-industry observational studies under Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 1 month is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 60 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 19, 2019
First posted
Mar 27, 2019
StartActual
Mar 18, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Apr 30, 2019
CompletionEst.
May 30, 2019
Last update
Mar 27, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03891511
Lead sponsor
Universidad de los Andes, Chile
Collaborators
Universidad Mayor, University of Chile
Responsible party
Gustavo Moncada (Principal investigator, Clinical Professor of Oral Rehabilitation, Universidad de los Andes, Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2019
Start date
Mar 18, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2019

Study contacts

Gustavo Moncada, PhD
Contact
gmoncada@adsl.tie.cl
+56997826334
Daniel Cortés, MS
Contact
drcortessylvester@gmail.com
+56 991233 9154
Gustavo Moncada, PhD
principal investigator · UAndes, Santiago, Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion