CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06515444Updated Jul 23, 2024

Experimental Evaluation of a Program to Foster Socioemotional Competence of Children in Third Grade and Their Teachers

An interventional study of 10 minutes program and 1 hour PD program in Social Skills and Emotion Regulation, sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-23.

Sponsored by Universidad de los Andes, Chile · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
750
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The 10-minutes project is an experimental study to assess the impact of a SEL program for children in 3th and 4th grade and their teachers called 10-minutes.

The program is a curriculum that provides 10-minute activities (thus the name) for children to be implemented by the teachers daily throughout the school year. The activities do not require prior knowledge of teachers on SEL development, nor planning or material preparation.

The 10-minute project is a quantitative study developed to evaluate whether the 10-minute curriculum and an expanded version with professional development activities for teachers or counselors, 10-minute plus, at third grade would improve students and teachers' socioemotional competence. The randomized control trail involves 30 schools in Chile, matched on socioeconomic measures, size, and urban/rural conditions, assigned randomly to 1 of 3 conditions. Ten schools will receive 10-minutes only, the SEL curriculum taught by teachers or school counselors, during the 2024 and 2025 school years. Ten schools will receive 10-minutes plus during the 2024 school year. Ten schools will serve as "delayed program" control, which will have the opportunity to receive the program (10-minutes plus) after the final follow-up. To examine the possibility of fade-out of the effects of the SEL intervention on students, the first experimental condition (10-minutes only) will be randomly divided into two groups, one will receive the intervention for one year only, whereas the second one will receive the intervention for two consecutive years.

It is expected the program will yield positive effects on the experimental groups (both students and teachers), and effects are expected to be greater in the group offered the 10-minutes plus intervention which entails both a curriculum for children and professional development for teachers, than the effects in the group offered the 10-minutes curriculum exclusively. If the program proves to be effective, then cost-benefit analyses will follow to assess the efficiency of the program. The estimated benefits of the program are expected to be lower than the costs.

Read the detailed description

Over the last 20 years the science of learning and economics of education has uplifted the relevance of socioemotional competence both for learning and other societal outcomes. Findings from neurobiology have illuminated how environmental factors such as poverty, exposure to stress or experiencing trauma, affect children's development of brain systems that support neurocognitive functions such as language, memory and self-regulation and therefore affecting their behavior, lifelong learning, and health (Immordino-Yang \& Damasio, 2007; Twardosz \& Lutzker, 2010; Noble, 2014; Chapko, 2015; Kolb \& Gibb, 2015; Thomason \& Marusak, 2017). Findings from the economics of education consistently indicates positive relationships between noncognitive skills and societal outcomes such as educational attainment (Farrington et al., 2012; Levin, 2012; Garcia, 2015), labor productivity and adult earnings (Casner-Lotto \& Barrington, 2006; Heckman, Stixrud \& Urzua, 2006; Murnane et al., 2001), and civic participation (Almlund, Duckworth, Heckman \& Kautz, 2011). This has led educators to pursue new strategies to support the social and emotional competence of children as well as their academic learning. Socioemotional learning (SEL hereafter) is the process through which individuals acquire socioemotional competence, the "process through which all young people and adults acquire and apply the knowledge, skills, and attitudes to develop healthy identities, manage emotions and achieve personal and collective goals, feel and show empathy for others, establish and maintain supportive relationships, and make responsible and caring decisions" (Niemi, 2020).

The 10-minutes project is a pilot study to assess the impact of a SEL program for children in 3th and 4th grade and their teachers called 10-minutes.

The program is a curriculum that provides 10-minute activities (thus the name) for children to be implemented by the teachers daily throughout the school year. The activities do not require prior knowledge of teachers on SEL development, nor planning or material preparation. Each activity is presented along with knowledge for teachers on how to develop socioemotional skills in children. The curriculum is complemented by professional development for teachers on the development of their own socioemotional competencies.

The 10-minute project is a pilot study, primarily exploratory. It will provide data on the feasibility of the program, and its acceptability. The 10-minute project also has a quantitative study developed to evaluate whether the 10-minute curriculum and an expanded version with professional development activities for teachers or counselors, 10-minute plus, at third grade would improve students and teachers' socioemotional competence. The randomized control trail involves 30 schools in Chile, matched on socioeconomic measures, size, and urban/rural conditions, assigned randomly to 1 of 3 conditions. Ten schools will receive 10-minutes only, the SEL curriculum taught by teachers or school counselors, during the 2024 and 2025 school years. Ten schools will receive 10-minutes plus during the 2024 school year. Ten schools will serve as "delayed program" control, which will have the opportunity to receive the program (10-minutes plus) after the final follow-up. To examine the possibility of fade-out of the effects of the SEL intervention on students, the first experimental condition (10-minutes only) will be randomly divided into two groups, one will receive the intervention for one year only, whereas the second one will receive the intervention for two consecutive years. Surveys will be used to collect data on student, classroom, and teacher outcomes in the 30 schools in fall 2024 (baseline), spring 2024 (first follow-up), and among fourth grade students in the same schools in spring 2025 (final follow-up). The intervention will take place after the baseline data is collected in March and April 2024.

It is expected the program will yield positive effects on the experimental groups (both students and teachers), and effects are expected to be greater in the group offered the 10-minutes plus intervention which entails both a curriculum for children and professional development for teachers, than the effects in the group offered the 10-minutes curriculum exclusively. If the program proves to be effective, then cost-benefit analyses will follow to assess the efficiency of the program. The estimated benefits of the program are expected to be lower than the costs.

Why this program and study matters? This program and study are relevant for two main reasons: First, children and adults are facing a mental health crisis in Chile and elsewhere (Humphreys \& Irarrazaval, 2022; World Health Organization, 2022), and SEL programs have proven to be an effective way to increase children and adults' socioemotional competence (Durlak et al., in press), fundamental skills to cope with environmental stressors and daily challenges. Second, Chilean teachers have received little to no training in pre-service education (Milici \& Alcalay, 2020) and admit not having the necessary tools to tackle SEL in schools (Berger et al., 2009). This project presents an intervention that helps tackle both challenges and present a robust study design to argue for the causal impact of the intervention on children's and teachers' socioemotional competencies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Social Skills
  • Emotion Regulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Universidad de los Andes, Chile is the lead sponsor of 44 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • . The inclusion criteria for schools: at least one third and one fourth grade class.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria for schools are as follows: schools implementing a similar intervention in grades 3 and 4, and special needs schools.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
750 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    10 minutes only

    Group will only receive a socioemotional development material for teachers to implement with their students

    Behavioral: 10 minutes program

  • Experimental
    10 minutes plus

    Group will receive socioemotioanl devleopment material for teachers to implement with their students plus professional development for teachers

    Behavioral: 10 minutes program · Behavioral: 1 hour PD program

  • Other
    Delayed

    While intervention in arms 1 and 2, this arm will not receive internvention. It will receive the 10 minutes plus, once the other two arms have their second year follow up measure.

    Behavioral: 10 minutes program · Behavioral: 1 hour PD program

Interventions

  • Behavioral10 minutes program

    The curriculum component offers 10-minute daily doses of activities targeting the development of eight socioemotional competences in children: (i) emotional knowledge and management, (ii) developing a healthy identity, (iii) establishing and maintaining positive relationships, (iv) feeling and showing empathy, (v) establishing and reaching goals, (vi) responsible decision-making, (vii) contributing to the community and (viii) developing spirituality. The activities do not require the teacher to plan or to prepare material for the students.

  • Behavioral1 hour PD program

    The professional development (PD) component is a 1-hour dose of activities targeting each of the eight SECs on which the curriculum focuses. The focus of PD is not to teach about SEC development in children but to develop SEC in teachers. Thus, this is an 8-hour PD program distributed throughout the academic year.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Learning characteristics, leadership, motivation, communication, and planning skills.

    The Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students developed by Renzulli et al. (2002) will be used. This scale has 14 subscales. Only 5 will be used: leadership, learning characteristics, motivation, communication, and planning skills. The other scales refer to learning behavior in specific disciplines (such as arts, music, science, etc.) and that is why they will not be used. The items of these scales will be responded by parents.

    Time frame: Months 1, 5 and 12

  2. Self-control

    will be assessed using the Impulsivity Scale for Children (ISC). This is an 8-item survey responded by children that assesses the inability to regulate behavior, attention, and emotions in specific goals (Tsukayama, Duckworth \& Kim, 2013).

    Time frame: Months 1, 5 and 12

  3. Grit

    The 10-item likert scale that measures perseverance, the Oviedo Grit Scale (OGS; Postigo, Cuesta, García-Cueto et al., 2021) will be used. The scale has been adapted to Chile (reliability = 0.92; Postigo, Barria, Cuesta, Garcia-Cueto, 2023).

    Time frame: Months 1, 5 and 12

  4. Mindset

    Whether children view intelligence as a fixed trait rather than a trait that can be improved will be assessed using a 3-item scale developed by Dweck, Chiu and Hong (1995), widely used in Chile with an internal consistency of 0.86 (Claro, Paunesku \& Dweck, 2016).

    Time frame: Months 1, 5 and 12

  5. Pro-social attitude

    will be assessed using the 18-item Empathy Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (EmQue-CA) developed by Overgaauw, and colleagues (2017).

    Time frame: Months 1, 5 and 12

  6. Behavioral difficulties

    will be assessed using the 20-item parental or teacher survey Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) developed by Goodman (1997). The version for children was validated in Chile by Gaete et al. (2018) with internal consistency fluctuating between .76 and .85.

    Time frame: Months 1, 5 and 12

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 23, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06515444
Lead sponsor
Universidad de los Andes, Chile
Collaborators
Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
Responsible party
Barbara Hanisch Cerda (PhD, Universidad de los Andes, Chile) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 23, 2024
Start date
Jul 22, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 23, 2024

Study contacts

Barbara Hanisch-Cerda, PhD
Contact
barbarahanisch@gmail.com
56996975001
Barbara Hanisch-Cerda, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad de los Andes, Chile

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion