ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03888378Updated Mar 5, 2021

Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Minocycline Ointment in Subjects With Inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

A Phase 2 interventional study of 0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment and 1% Topical Minocycline Ointment in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction and MGD-Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, sponsored by Hovione Scientia Limited. Completed at 20 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-05.

Sponsored by Hovione Scientia Limited · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Sep 2020, 6 years 1 month ago, and no results have been posted to the registry; the sponsor requested a delay in submitting them in Feb 2021.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
270
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 63 studies in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction with a site in United States — 7 open to participants now, 10 under way, none of them phase 3. Meibomian Gland Dysfunction · United States.

Enrollment
3rd of 61
270 · median 44
Started
2019
with 4 others
Phase 2
10 of 63
none open now
Registered
30th of 63
by date

Among the 63 studies in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction with a site in United States, this one is the 3rd largest by enrollment of the 61 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2019, is one of 10 in phase 2, and was the 30th registered.

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

172 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 23 are open to participants now.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 63 studies in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

All 7 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 13 Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies recruiting now, 10 (77%) set no upper age limit and 1 (8%) stop at 75 or younger; 1 take children under 18; 1 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 63 studies in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two strengths of HY02 Ointment versus Vehicle administered twice daily for twelve weeks in subjects with a diagnosis of Inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

03

Conditions studied

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  • MGD-Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Minocycline Topical
  • Tetracycline
  • Doxycycline
  • MGD
  • Meibomian Gland Disorder
  • Anti-Bacterial Agent
  • Anti-imflammatory Agent
  • Minocycline
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • At Visit 1, individuals of any gender or any race will be eligible for study participation if they:

    1. Have provided written prior to any study procedures.
    2. Are 18 years of age or above.
    3. Have a clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe MGD and who meet the following criteria, in a qualifying eyelid, at both Visit 1 (Screening) and Visit 2 (Randomization) examinations:

      1. Clinical sign severity score of at least 2 (moderate) on vascular engorgement at the eyelid margin and
      2. Clinical sign severity score of at least 2 (moderate) on plugging of the meibomian glands.
      3. Eye Discomfort Symptom score of ≥ 40 using VAS (0-100 point scale)
    4. Meet the following criteria, in a qualifying eye (same eye that qualifies for Inclusion #3), at both the Visit 1 (Screening) and Visit 2 (Randomization) examinations:

      1. Fluorescein corneal staining (FCS) total score ≥ 3 in the inferior, central, and nasal region combined score (NEI/Industry Workshop sections 1, 4 and 5 with 0-9 scale)
      2. Schirmer score of >7 mm without topical anesthesia
    5. Are willing and able to follow instructions and can be present for the required study visits for the duration of the study.
    6. Have a BCVA, using corrective lenses if necessary, in both eyes of at least +0.7 as assessed by Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) or modified ETDRS.
    7. If female, are non-pregnant, non-lactating and women of (WOCBP) must be using an acceptable method of [e.g., an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD) with a failure rate of \<1%, hormonal contraceptives, or a barrier method] for the duration of the study. If a female subject is currently abstinent, they must agree to use one of the acceptable methods of birth control before they become sexually active.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

In order for subjects to be eligible at Visit 1 they may not:

  1. Have presence of inflammation and/or active structural change in the iris or anterior chamber.
  2. Have lid structural abnormalities such as entropion or ectropion.
  3. In the eyelid that qualifies (based on Inclusion #3), have grade level 4 (Obstructed) on Character of Secretion of Meibomian Glands or grade level 4 (No glands are expressible) on the Expressibility of Meibomian Glands.
  4. Subjects with ocular inflammatory conditions (e.g., conjunctivitis, keratitis, anterior blepharitis, etc.) not related to MGD.
  5. Subjects who have FCS total score = 15 or a score = 3, in either eye, in the superior region NEI/Industry Workshop scale or subjects who have FCS with diffuse confluent staining, filaments or frank epithelial defects.
  6. Have suspected ocular fungal, viral or bacterial infection.
  7. Have had penetrating intraocular surgery in the past 90 days or require penetrating intraocular surgery during the study.
  8. Have had ocular surface surgery within 12 months of Visit 1 (e.g., LASIK, refractive, pterygium removal).
  9. Subjects who within the past 90 days have had cauterization of the punctum or changes to the status (insertion or removal) of punctal plug(s) before the Screening Visit.
  10. Have used topical ocular or oral antibiotics within 30 days of the study or expect to use during the study.
  11. Have used LipiFlow or hypochlorous acid spray within 30 days of the study or expect to use during the study.
  12. If using inhaled or intranasal , unable to maintain a stable dose for the duration of the study.
  13. Have ever used isotretinoin.
  14. If using Omega-3 supplements, dose must be stable for 3 months prior to Visit 1 and for the duration of the study.
  15. Have used topical cyclosporine within 30 days of the study or during the study.
  16. Have used topical lifitegrast within 30 days of the study or during the study.
  17. Have used systemic corticosteroids within 30 days prior to study entry or during study participation.
  18. Have used topical ocular corticosteroids or ocular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) within 30 days prior to study entry and during study participation.
  19. Have used topical ocular antihistamine and/or mast cell stabilizers within 30 days prior to study entry or during study participation.
  20. Are unable or unwilling to discontinue using any preserved or unpreserved topical ocular medications (including artificial tears) upon Screening and for the duration of the study.
  21. Are unwilling to discontinue use of contact lenses during the study.
  22. Are unwilling to discontinue use of cosmetic makeup applied to the eyelids or eye lashes at the Screening Visit and during the study. If makeup was used, it should be removed at least 12 hours prior to Visit 1.
  23. Have a known to minocycline, any other tetracycline antibiotic, or to any of the other ingredients in the product.
  24. Are unable or unwilling to withhold the use of eyelid scrubs or use of mechanical therapy during the study.
  25. Have been diagnosed with glaucoma or are currently using any glaucoma medication.
  26. Have a history of herpetic keratitis.
  27. Have a concomitant ocular pathology other than condition under study assessed as potentially confounding by the investigator.
  28. Have a serious systemic disease or uncontrolled medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance.
  29. Have been exposed to any investigational drug or investigational device within the preceding 30 days.
  30. Are an employee of the site that is directly involved in the management, administration, or support of this study or be an immediate family member of the same.
  31. Have trigger factors including conjunctivochalasis, allergic conjunctivitis, contact lens intolerance, trichiasis, epithelial basement membrane dystrophy, infectious keratitis or conjunctivitis.
  32. Have a documented history of ocular allergies, which, in the judgment of the investigator, are likely to have an acute increase in severity due to the expected timing of the exposure to the allergen to which the subject is sensitive. Subjects sensitive to seasonal allergens that are not expected to be present during the study are permitted.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
270 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment

    Topical administration of 0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment. Regimen: Apply BID (twice daily), morning and evening to eyelid margin

    Drug: 0.3% Topical Minocycline Ointment

  • Active comparator
    1% Topical Minocycline Ointment

    Topical administration of 1% Topical Minocycline Ointment. Regimen: Apply BID (twice daily), morning and evening to eyelid margin

    Drug: 1% Topical Minocycline Ointment

  • Placebo comparator
    Topical Vehicle Ointment

    Topical administration of Topical Vehicle Ointment. Regimen: Apply BID (twice daily), morning and evening to eyelid margin

    Other: Topical Vehicle Ointment

Interventions

  • 0.3% Topical Minocycline ointment to treat inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

    Also known as: HY02 Topical Ointment, 0.3%

  • 1% Topical Minocycline ointment to treat inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

    Also known as: HY02 Topical Ointment, 1%

  • OtherTopical Vehicle Ointment

    Topical vehicle ointment to treat inflamed Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

    Also known as: HY02 Topical Ointment, 0%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Vascular Engorgement in 1% HY02 Ointment compared to vehicle at week 12

    Changes in Vascular Engorgement at the study eyelid margin are graded on a 5-point scale (0-4) with 0 representing minimal vascular engorgement and 4 representing maximal vascular engorgement. A lower score represents a better outcome for the subject.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. Change from baseline in Eye Discomfort Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at week 12 in the 1% HY02 Ointment arm compared to vehicle

    Eye discomfort will be evaluated on a subject reported visual analog scale. The scores range from 0 (no discomfort) to 100 (maximal discomfort). Lower score indicate a better outcome for the subject.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Change from baseline in Vascular Engorgement in 0.3% HY02 Ointment compared to vehicle at week 12

    Changes in Vascular Engorgement at the study eyelid margin are graded on a 5-point scale (0-4) with 0 representing minimal vascular engorgement and 4 representing maximal vascular engorgement. A lower score represents a better outcome for the subject.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  4. Change from baseline in Eye Discomfort Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at week 12 in the 0.3% HY02 Ointment arm compared to vehicle

    Eye discomfort will be evaluated on a subject reported visual analog scale. The scores range from 0 (no discomfort) to 100 (maximal discomfort). Lower score indicate a better outcome for the subject.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

07

Study locations

20 sites
  • Clinical site - 4
    Azusa, California 91702, United States
  • Clinical site - 16
    Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • Clinical site - 12
    Inglewood, California 90301, United States
  • Clinical site - 13
    Mission Hills, California 91345, United States
  • Clinical site 10
    Rancho Cordova, California 95670, United States
  • Clinical site - 15
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Clinical Site - 18
    Largo, Florida 33773, United States
  • Clinical site - 6
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Clinical site - 20
    New Albany, Indiana 47150, United States
  • Clinical site - 19
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Clinical site - 3
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • Clinical site - 9
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • Clinical site - 7
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89145, United States
  • Clinical site - 5
    Asheville, North Carolina 28803, United States
  • Clinical site - 11
    Mason, Ohio 45040, United States
  • Clinical site - 2
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
  • Clinical site - 14
    Cedar Park, Texas 78613, United States
  • Clinical Site - 1
    El Paso, Texas 79902, United States
  • Clinical site - 8
    League City, Texas 77573, United States
  • Clinical site - 17
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2019 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 17 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 22, 2019
First posted
Mar 25, 2019
StartActual
Apr 2, 2019
Primary completionActual
Sep 18, 2020
CompletionActual
Feb 1, 2021
Results delay requested
Feb 26, 2021
Last update
Mar 5, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03888378
Lead sponsor
Hovione Scientia Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 25, 2019
Start date
Apr 2, 2019
Primary completion
Sep 18, 2020
Completion
Feb 1, 2021
Last update
Mar 5, 2021

Study contacts

George Magrath, MD
study director · Hovione Scientia Limited

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Minocycline

Start the discussion