CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03880435AGNOHSTICUpdated Jul 30, 2024

HYALOBARRIER® GEL ENDO Versus no HYALOBARRIER® GEL ENDO Following Operative Hysteroscopy for Improving Reproductive Outcome in Women With Intrauterine Pathology Wishing to Become Pregnant

An interventional study of Hyalobarrier® gel endo in Infertility, Polyp Uterus and Myoma;Uterus, sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Belgium. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 47 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-30.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
419
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 47 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

To compare the costs and effects of HYALOBARRIER® GEL ENDO versus no HYALOBARRIER® GEL ENDO for increasing the chance of conception leading to live birth measured at 30 weeks after randomization in women wishing to become pregnant after surgical removal of intrauterine pathology (endometrial polyps, fibroids with uterine cavity deformation, uterine septa, IUAs or RPOC after miscarriage) by hysteroscopy as an outpatient or in hospital treatment.

Read the detailed description

Design:

Multi-centre, parallel group, superiority, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Post market study of a Medical Device class III.

Participant:

Women aged 18 to 47 years attending Belgian gynaecological departments, scheduled for operative hysteroscopy for endometrial polyps, fibroids with uterine cavity deformation, uterine septa, intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) or retained products of conception, and wishing to conceive spontaneously or before fertility treatment with ovulation induction (OI), controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF/ICSI.

Treatment:

Application of Hyalobarrier® gel endo at time of surgery

Control:

No application of Hyalobarrier® gel endo

Follow up:

short term follow-up: 30 weeks after receiving the treatment allocation long term follow-up: 66 weeks after receiving the treatment allocation

To blind all trial participants, fertility physicians and gynaecologists doing second- or third-look hysteroscopy, 10 ml of a sterile ultrasound gel will be applied into the vagina at the end of the procedure in all women regardless of their treatment allocation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility
  • Polyp Uterus
  • Myoma;Uterus
  • Adhesion
  • Hysteroscopy
  • Uterine Septum
  • Retained Products of Conception

Keywords

  • Infertility
  • Reproductive outcome
  • Hysteroscopy
  • Adhesion prophylaxis
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 419 is above the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent is the lead sponsor of 665 studies on the registry; 156 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 47 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Women aged 18 to 47 years attending Belgian fertility clinics, scheduled for operative hysteroscopy for endometrial polyps, fibroids with uterine cavity deformation, uterine septa, intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) and retained products of conception, and wishing to conceive spontaneously or before fertility treatment with ovulation induction (OI), controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), intrauterine insemination (IUI) or IVF/ICSI.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women younger than 18 years
  • Women 48 years of age or older
  • Women with a known allergy to HYALOBARRIER® GEL ENDO
  • Women with an active infection of the genital tract proven by genital swabs for PCR (Chlamydia, gonococci) or endometrial biopsy (endometritis), not treated at the time of the pre- screening visit. Women adequately treated with proven cure (negative swabs or normal endometrial biopsy) can be included
  • Subserosal fibroids (FIGO or PALM-COEIN classification type 6, 7) - leiomyomas that originate from the myometrium at the serosa of the uterus or intramural fibroids without uterine cavity deformation as documented by ultrasound, hysterography or hysteroscopy - as the sole uterine cavity abnormality identified in the screening phase.
  • Women with fibroids, polyps, uterine septa or IUAs suffering from other symptoms, for instance abnormal uterine bleeding, but not wishing to conceive from 6 weeks following surgery
  • Women with other Müllerian tract anomalies other than a uterine septum as the sole uterine cavity abnormality identified in the screening phase
  • Women who participated in the trial but failed to conceive and who present with a recurrence of polyps, fibroids with cavity deformation, uterine septum or IUAs
  • Women who refuse to give written informed consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
419 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hyalobarrier® gel endo

    Application of Hyalobarrier® gel endo immediate after the complete hysteroscopic removal of the polyp, myoma, adhesion, uterine septum or retained products of conception + application of sterile ultrasound gel into the vagina (to blind all trial participants, fertility physicians and gynaecologists doing second-look hysteroscopy)

    Device: Hyalobarrier® gel endo

  • No intervention
    No Hyalobarrier® gel endo

    No application of Hyalobarrier® gel endo after the hysteroscopic removal of the polyp, myoma, adhesion, uterine septum or retained products of conception + application of sterile ultrasound gel into the vagina (to blind all trial participants, fertility physicians and gynaecologists doing second- or third-look hysteroscopy)

Interventions

  • DeviceHyalobarrier® gel endo

    Intra-uterine application of 10ml sterile gel containing 30mg APC. It will be administered once, peroperatively immediate after the complete hysteroscopic removal of the polyp, myoma, adhesion, uterine septum or retained products of conception

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Conception leading to live birth

    the amount of clinical pregnancies at 30 weeks after randomisation, leading to live birth (at least one live foetus after 20 weeks of gestation, that resulted in at least one live baby (the investigators counted the delivery of singleton, twin or multiple pregnancies as one live birth)

    Time frame: > 30 weeks after randomisation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to conception

    the time from receiving the allocated treatment to the date of conception

    Time frame: < 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  2. Clinical pregnancy

    An ultrasound visible gestational sac

    Time frame: < 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  3. Miscarriage

    a spontaneous loss of pregnancy before 20 completed weeks of gestational age, or if gestational age is unknown, the loss of an embryo/fetus of less than 400 grams

    Time frame: < 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  4. Ectopic pregnancy

    a pregnancy in which implantation takes place outside the uterine cavity

    Time frame: < 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  5. Adhesions

    The severity will be scored according to the revised American Fertility Society (AFS) scoring system

    Time frame: > 30w after receiving treatment allocation (in women who failed to conceive)

  6. Pre-eclampsia

    Pre-eclampsia in women who conceived during the study period, leading to an ongoing pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation

    Time frame: > 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  7. Preterm birth

    Preterm birth in women who conceived during the study period, leading to an ongoing pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation

    Time frame: > 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  8. Stilbirth

    Stillbirth in women who conceived during the study period, leading to an ongoing pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation

    Time frame: > 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  9. Low/very low birth weight (gram)

    low/very low birth weight (gram) in women who conceived during the study period, leading to an ongoing pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation

    Time frame: > 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  10. Caesarean section rates

    caesarean section rates in women who conceived during the study period, leading to an ongoing pregnancy beyond 20 weeks of gestation

    Time frame: > 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  11. Neonatal complications

    Neonatal complications in women who conceived during the study period,

    Time frame: > 30 weeks after receiving treatment allocation

  12. The total hospital bill

    Direct health-related costs

    Time frame: measured at the time of diagnosis of an ongoing pregnancy by the detection at 12 weeks in a clinical pregnancy of a positive heart beat on ultrasound examination

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University hospital Ghent
    Ghent, East-Flanders 9000, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Acunzo G, Guida M, Pellicano M, Tommaselli GA, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bifulco G, Cirillo D, Taylor A, Nappi C. Effectiveness of auto-cross-linked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1918-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg368. PubMed 12923149 ↗
  • Bosteels J, Weyers S, Kasius J, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, D'Hooghe TM. Anti-adhesion therapy following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of female subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 9;(11):CD011110. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011110.pub2. PubMed 26559098 ↗
  • Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effects of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006 Feb;22(2):106-9. doi: 10.1080/09513590600604673. PubMed 16603437 ↗
  • Di Spiezio Sardo A, Spinelli M, Bramante S, Scognamiglio M, Greco E, Guida M, Cela V, Nappi C. Efficacy of a polyethylene oxide-sodium carboxymethylcellulose gel in prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):462-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.04.007. PubMed 21777835 ↗
  • Farhi J, Orvieto R. Cumulative clinical pregnancy rates after COH and IUI in subfertile couples. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010 Jul;26(7):500-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590903367036. PubMed 20540664 ↗
  • Farquhar C, Lilford RJ, Marjoribanks J, Vandekerckhove P. Laparoscopic 'drilling' by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD001122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001122.pub3. PubMed 17636653 ↗
  • Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1959-66. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg366. PubMed 12923157 ↗
  • Guida M, Acunzo G, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bifulco G, Piccoli R, Pellicano M, Cerrota G, Cirillo D, Nappi C. Effectiveness of auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2004 Jun;19(6):1461-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh238. Epub 2004 Apr 22. PubMed 15105384 ↗
  • Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00865-6. PubMed 10908775 ↗
  • Kasius JC, Broekmans FJ, Veersema S, Eijkemans MJ, van Santbrink EJ, Devroey P, Fauser BC, Fatemi HM. Observer agreement in the evaluation of the uterine cavity by hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):801-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der003. Epub 2011 Feb 9. PubMed 21310749 ↗
  • McLernon DJ, Maheshwari A, Lee AJ, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rates after one or more complete cycles of IVF: a population-based study of linked cycle data from 178,898 women. Hum Reprod. 2016 Mar;31(3):572-81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev336. Epub 2016 Jan 18. PubMed 26783243 ↗
  • Perez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, Redondo T, Sanfrutos L, Alvarez P, Engels V. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jun;20(6):1632-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh822. Epub 2005 Mar 10. PubMed 15760959 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03880435
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Ghent
Collaborators
Belgium Health Care Knowledge Centre, Nordic Pharma SAS, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Health, Innovation and Research Institute (HIRUZ) UZ Ghent, University of Liege, UCL Bruxelles, Jessa hospital, Hasselt
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 19, 2019
Start date
Apr 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2024
Completion
May 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2024

Study contacts

Steven Weyers, MD,PhD
principal investigator · Women's Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion