CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03876561CONTICAREUpdated Apr 20, 2026

"Impact of Pelvic Floor Prehabilitation Using Biofeedback on the Severity of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients Undergoing a Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer"

An interventional study of Pelvic floor prehabilitation in Rectal Cancer, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Terminated at 6 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-20.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
lack of inclusion
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is currently no specific treatment and only few measures to prevent the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). The LARS often results in a severe alteration of quality of life. This study is designed to assess pelvic floor prehabilitation using biofeedback in the prevention of LARS following total mesorectal excision for cancer. The pelvic floor rehabilitation with biofeedback has already been tested postoperatively in patients suffering from LARS with heterogeneous results. However, this rehabilitation has never been evaluated in the prevention of LARS.

The prehabilitation is an innovative concept currently evaluated in the prevention of functional complications following orthopedic surgery and also prostate surgery. In high-risk abdominal surgery, cardiopulmonary prehabilitation offers satisfying results in terms of morbidity and mortality rates. This study will be the first to assess pelvic floor prehabilitation in the prevention of LARS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rectal Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Rectal Neoplasms

1,761 studies on the registry are indexed under Rectal Neoplasms; 518 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 65 across 1,297 interventional studies indexed under Rectal Neoplasms.

Browse Rectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 825 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 80 years old
  • Total mesorectal excision with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis protected by an ileostomy or a colostomy for rectal cancer
  • Absence of anastomotic leakage or stenosis
  • Informed consent to participate in the study
  • Social security insurance affiliation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency and/or chronic diarrhea requiring a specific treatment before rectal cancer management
  • Absence of ileostomy or colostomy
  • Anastomotic leakage
  • Sensorial or cognitive disorders impeding pelvic floor rehabilitation exercise
  • Pregnant women
  • Minors
  • Adults under guardianship
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prehabilitation

    The systematic pelvic floor prehabilitation will start 4 weeks before stoma closure and will include 1 sessions per week before stoma closure and 1 sessions per week during 6 weeks following stoma closure. Complementary sessions are allowed if necessary.

    Procedure: Pelvic floor prehabilitation

  • No intervention
    No intervention

    No pelvic floor prehabilitation will be proposed before stoma closure. The pelvic floor prehabilitation will be proposed to patients suffering from LARS

Interventions

  • ProcedurePelvic floor prehabilitation

    The systematic pelvic floor prehabilitation will start 4 weeks before stoma closure and will include 1 session per week before stoma closure and 1 session per week during 6 weeks following stoma closure. The prehabilitation will be performed according to a predefined protocol based on a biofeedback strategy.

    Also known as: Preoperative rehabilitation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS score)

    questionnaire assessing the five symptoms of the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome : fecal incontinence, gas incontinence, stool frequency, stool clustering and urgency.Total score is reported (minimum score :0 / maximal score : 42)

    Time frame: 6 months following stoma closure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of fecal incontinence symptoms evaluated by the dedicated and validated score : Jorge and Wexner score

    questionnaire to assess the severity of fecal incontinence symptoms, including stool frequency, stool and gas leakage, social impact and the frequency of pads.a total score is reported (minimum score :0 / maximal score : 20)

    Time frame: 6 months following stoma closure

  2. Impact on quality of life evaluated by the dedicated and validated questionnaire

    questionnaire quality of life to assess the global quality of life in patients suffering from colorectal cancer Total score is reported

    Time frame: 6 months following stoma closure

  3. Morbidity of pelvic floor prehabilitation using biofeedback.

    Biofeedback prehabilitation requires a small rectal manometry probe. This outcome will evaluate the morbidity of the rectal introduction of the probe following a colorectal anastomosis.

    Time frame: 6 months following stoma closure

  4. Medico-economic impact of pelvic floor prehabilitation including the fecal incontinence related costs

    The fecal incontinence related costs will be quantified by the data obtained from the social security insurance and the patients' estimation. The differential benefit of the pelvic floor prehabilitation will be correlated to the quality of life estimated by the QALYS using the EQ-5D questionnaire.

    Time frame: 6 months following stoma closure

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • CHU Angers
    Angers, France
  • APHP-Hôpital Beaujon
    Clichy, France
  • CHD Vendée
    La Roche-sur-Yon, France
  • Clinic Jules Verne
    Nantes, France
  • CHU de Poitiers
    Poitiers, France
  • CHU de Tours
    Tours, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alexandra P, Noemie P, Solene SB, Jean-Benoit H, Riche VP, Odile C, Michel G, Guy V, Hamy A, Mehdi O, Yannick T, Jeremie H L, Amar A, Emeric A, Jean-Michel B, Bridoux V, Dumont F, June F, Alexandra J, Meurette G, Duchalais E. Evaluation of pelvic floor rehabilitation in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome: Study protocol of the CONTICARE trial. Colorectal Dis. 2025 Mar;27(3):e70045. doi: 10.1111/codi.70045. PubMed 40055837 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03876561
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 15, 2019
Start date
May 27, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 17, 2025
Completion
Dec 17, 2025
Last update
Apr 20, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion