A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Electrocautery Ablation (EC) in Lung Cancer Squamous Cell, sponsored by University College, London. Terminated at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-31.
Sponsored by University College, London · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Prevention
This study evaluates whether EC treatment is effective in delaying the progression of high-grade lung lesion(s) to invasive lung cancer. Participants will be randomised to receive either electrocautery (EC) treatment with bronchoscopy surveillance (=intervention), or bronchoscopy surveillance alone (=control) in a 2:1 ratio.
Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung develops through a transition of progressive cytological aberration, from normal to metaplasia, mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia and then carcinoma in situ (CIS) before becoming an invasive cancer. Progression rates to invasive carcinoma can vary depending on the initial grade of the lesion and it is generally accepted that high-grade lesions are more likely to progress to invasive cancer than low-grade lesions. Early detection and treatment of these lesions is critical to improving survival. There is no evidence base examining how, or whether these high-grade lesions (HGLs) should be treated, resulting in diverse treatment practices both nationally and internationally. This is the first randomised clinical trial of a bronchoscopic intervention in treating HGLs using EC.
EARL is a phase II/III multicentre 2:1 randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of electrocautery (EC) in the treatment of high-grade lesions of the lung. All patients consented/registered onto the trial will have an bronchoscopy (AFB or NBI) to check for high-grade lesions (HGLs) in the lung, as verified by tissue biopsy. Only patients with ≥1 lung histologically confirmed lung HGL will be randomised to receive either electrocautery ablation (EC) treatment and bronchoscopy surveillance (= intervention), or bronchoscopy surveillance (= control).
The principal objective of the main phase II trial is to demonstrate that airway High-Grade Lesions (HGLs) that are treated with electrocautery are less likely to progress to lung cancer compared to HGLs that are not treated with electrocautery.
7,243 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,557 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 60 across 5,295 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →University College, London is the lead sponsor of 632 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with ≥1 airway HGL (defined as severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ on histology)
PRE-REGISTRATION
Patient has a high likelihood of having airway HGLs as evaluated by investigator:
PRE-RANDOMISATION Following registration, patients undergo a baseline bronchoscopy and only those with ≥1 airway HGL(s) can continue to randomisation provided they continue to meet all the inclusion/exclusion criteria below
Patients who are women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) must also have a negative pregnancy test at the following time points:
Patient is willing and able to comply to protocol procedures and attend all study visits including all bronchoscopy and EC treatment visits.
Exclusion criteria:
Patients in the intervention arm will receive up to three rounds of EC treatment (no more than one round annually) to all their HGLs identified at baseline. Follow-up is the same as for Control Arm patients: a bronchoscopy surveillance visit at 6, 12, 24, and at 36 months post-randomisation; with further bronchoscopy surveillance visits at 18 and/or at 30 months post-randomisation (dependent on lesion appearance).
Procedure: Electrocautery Ablation (EC)
Patients randomised to the surveillance (Control Arm) will have: bronchoscopy surveillance at 6, 12, 24, and at 36 months post-randomisation; with further bronchoscopy surveillance visits at 18 and/or at 30 months post-randomisation (dependent on lesion appearance).
For the purposes of the trial, one round of EC treatment consists of two individual EC treatments with a post-EC bronchoscopy in between to check for a response to the 1st EC treatment. Within each round, the second EC treatment will only be administered if the post-treatment bronchoscopy confirms presence of persistent high grade disease. Patients in the intervention arm will receive up to three rounds of EC treatment (no more than one round annually) to all their HGLs identified at baseline.
The time to progression of any index HGL in a patient within a 3-year follow up (phase II and III)
The time to progression of any index HGL in a patient to invasive lung cancer
Time frame: 3 years post randomisation
This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University College, London