CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03861741ReSTUpdated May 3, 2021

A Study to Evaluate the Feasibility of Screening Relatives of Patients Affected by Non-Syndromic Thoracic Aortic Diseases

An interventional study of WES and MRI in Screening, Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection and Genetic Disease, sponsored by University of Leicester. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-03.

Sponsored by University of Leicester · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary hypothesis is that a tailored programme of genetic and imaging screening of first- and second-degree relatives of patients affected by non-syndromic forms of thoracic aortic diseases will identify individuals at risk of death from these conditions. These individuals would constitute specific population of patients, requiring dedicated imaging surveillance and/or earlier prophylactic aortic surgery.

Read the detailed description

Diseases involving the thoracic aorta (the major artery in the body) are a major health problem affecting an increasing number of people worldwide.

In particular, a group of these conditions termed Non-Syndromic Aortic Diseases (NS-TAD), can develop without any obvious symptoms or external features which prevents early identification. Unfortunately, if not treated, the aorta may enlarge and lead to dissection, a life-threatening medical emergency. For this reason, the investigators believe it might be helpful to investigate relatives of patients undergoing surgery for thoracic aortic disease to understand if there are tests that could help identify and treat this condition at the right time.

Therefore the investigators propose to conduct a feasibility study to identify the practical issues and challenges that would need to be overcome in order to perform a successful tailored genetic (by collecting a small blood sample) and imaging (with exams such as echocardiography and MRI) screening in such population of individuals.

Moreover, all participants will receive two questionnaires to ask their opinion about the study and to measure their levels of anxiety and depression, to judge whether and how this study has affected their emotional status.

The study will be carried out at the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust.

02

Conditions studied

  • Screening
  • Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection
  • Genetic Disease

Keywords

  • screening, aortic disease, mortality, genetic testing, imaging
03

In context

Aortic Aneurysm

663 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Aneurysm; 117 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 62 across 318 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Aneurysm.

Browse Aortic Aneurysm studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Leicester is the lead sponsor of 166 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  1. NS-TAD probands operated on (n=16).
  2. FDR and SDR, aged 16 and above:

    1. At least two relatives willing to participate in the screening programme.
    2. Relatives able to understand English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Probands with syndromic aortopathies, including Marfan Syndrome, Loeys-Dietz Syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome, aneurysm-osteoarthritis syndrome, arterial tortuosity syndrome, and cutis laxa syndrome.
  2. Probands with aortic lesions associated with trauma and infections.
  3. Probands/relatives unable to give informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Participants

    All participants will be screened through complete clinical evaluations, genetic tests and imaging modalities (TTE and MRI) for the presence of newly Non Syndromic-Thoracic Aortic Diseases. Demographic and clinical data from all participants will be collected using case report forms, and by accessing their medical records. Data on imaging investigations will be obtained from TTE and MRI. Blood samples will be used for the purpose of isolation of genetic material and subsequent whole exome sequencing along with the analysis of selected loci. Additional citrated blood samples and plasma will be collected and stored for the potential analysis of circulating microvesicles and miRNA.

    Genetic: WES · Diagnostic Test: MRI · Diagnostic Test: TTE · Other: Questionnaire

Interventions

  • GeneticWES

    A peripheral venous blood sample will be processed internally, and externally subjected to WES. Only genetic material from relatives of probands in which a mutation has been identified will be sequenced.

    Also known as: Whole exome sequencing

  • Diagnostic testMRI

    A MRI of the thoracic aorta will be performed in all relatives able to attend the Glenfield Hospital and who have no contra-indications to this imaging modality; pulse-wave velocity will be recorded.

    Also known as: Magnetic resonance imaging

  • Diagnostic testTTE

    TTE screening will be performed by a trained physiologist. Aortic diameter will be measured from the parasternal long-axis view at the sinuses of Valsalva and at the widest level of the ascending aorta. All measurements will be made in end-diastole.

    Also known as: Trans-thoracic echocardiography

  • OtherQuestionnaire

    Acceptability questionnaires will be submitted to assess a baseline score of depression/anxiety that will be compared with a follow up value at three months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of genetic diagnosis

    Frequency of first and second degree relatives with newly identified genetic loci associated with NS-TADs.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Rate of diagnosis through imaging modalities

    Frequency of newly diagnosed TAD through imaging modalities in first- and second-degree relatives of probands affected by NS-TADs.

    Time frame: At the end of recruitment stage, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Genetic variants

    Genetic variants associated with NS-TADs, identified from a panel of 55 loci, and rate of identification of each mutation.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Family rate of genetic carriers

    Rate of genetic carriers in each affected family.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Penetrance

    Genetic penetrance of the NS-TADs (proportion of individuals carrying a particular variant of a gene that are also affected by NS-TAD).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Mode of inheritance

    Pattern of inheritance of the NS-TADs.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Male: female preponderance

    Male: female preponderance of NS-TADs.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Aortic Compliance

    Measured as an MRI feature of affected and unaffected thoracic aortas.

    Time frame: Imaging tests completion, an average of 6 months.

  7. Aortic Distensibility

    Measured as an MRI feature of affected and unaffected thoracic aortas.

    Time frame: Imaging tests completion, an average of 6 months.

  8. Rates of concomitant external and cardiovascular characteristics

    Rates of concomitant cardiovascular diseases (e.g. patent ductus arteriosus, cerebrovascular aneurysm) and external physical features (e.g. pectus excavates, livedo reticularis).

    Time frame: Baseline clinical assessment

  9. Response rate

    Response rates (recruitment) among the probands and their relatives.

    Time frame: Baseline clinical assessment

  10. Acceptability questionnaires

    Semi-quantitative evaluation of the participant experience awareness and acceptability of the screening and consent process, obtained by questionnaires administered to the patients and relatives. Scales will be composed by 10 items, each can be rated with a score from 1 to 5. No threshold will be preset. Descriptive statistics will be used to present the results.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months follow up

  11. Depression evaluation

    Semi-quantitative evaluation of the impact of the screening process on depression in probands and their relatives (baseline and 3 months), based on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score. Score range goes from 0 to 27, proposed cut-off for active treatment is 15.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months follow up

  12. Anxiety evaluation

    Semi-quantitative evaluation of the impact of the screening process on anxiety in probands and their relatives (baseline and 3 months), based on Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) score. Score range goes from 0 to 21, proposed cut-off for further assessment is 10.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months follow up

  13. Health-related Quality of Life evaluation

    Semi-quantitative evaluation of the impact of the screening process on health-related quality of life in probands and their relatives (baseline and 3 months), based on Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) score. Said questionnaire is made up of eight scales, which are the weighted sums of the items for each section; a score of zero corresponds to maximum disability while 100 correlates to no disability.

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 months follow up

  14. Resource use of genetic screening

    Resource uses in terms of unitary costs of the genetic screening process.

    Time frame: 3 months follow up

  15. Resource use of imaging screening

    Resource uses in terms of unitary costs of the imaging screening process.

    Time frame: 3 months follow up

  16. Resource use (hospital visits)

    Number of participants reaching the research centre.

    Time frame: 3 months follow up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Cardiovascular Sciences
    Leicester, Leicestershire LE3 9QP, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mariscalco G, Debiec R, Elefteriades JA, Samani NJ, Murphy GJ. Systematic Review of Studies That Have Evaluated Screening Tests in Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 7;7(15):e009302. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009302. PubMed 30371227 ↗
  • Abbasciano RG, Mariscalco G, Barwell J, Owens G, Zakkar M, Joel-David L, Pathak S, Adebayo A, Shannon N, Haines RL, Aujla H, Eagle-Hemming B, Kumar T, Lai F, Wozniak M, Murphy G. Evaluating the Feasibility of Screening Relatives of Patients Affected by Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Diseases: The REST Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 19;11(8):e023741. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023741. Epub 2022 Apr 6. PubMed 35383466 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 25, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 3, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03861741
Lead sponsor
University of Leicester
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2019
Start date
Mar 1, 2019
Primary completion
May 20, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
May 20, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
May 3, 2021

Study contacts

Gavin J Murphy, Prof
principal investigator · University of Leicester
Giovanni Mariscalco, Prof
principal investigator · University of Leicester

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion