An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Focal brachytherapy with PSMA PET imaging and (18F)DCFPyL in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-13.
Sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
The Principal Investigator's (PI) working hypothesis is that the PI can utilize the high predictive value of 18F-DCFPyl PSMA to identify clinically significant tumors in patients who will undergo brachytherapy, as well as areas which are uninvolved or contain only clinically insignificant disease.
In the PI's clinical trial, the uninvolved regions (as defined by combined PET-MR-biopsy data) will not be targeted and receive only fall-off dose, which we have shown to be associated with reductions in toxicity.
Current conventional prostate cancer (PCa) imaging modalities (computed tomography, bone scan, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound) have limited accuracy in the initial staging and for determining prognosis of PCa. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a cell surface antigen which is highly expressed in PCa and correlates with prognostic factors such as Gleason score. High PSMA expression in prostate tumor has been significantly associated with lethality of disease, allowing specific identification of tumors most in need of treatment. Combined PET and computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging using small molecules targeting PSMA-expressing cells have been developed and tested clinically, and have shown superiority when compared with conventional imaging.
An added advantage of PET compared to MRI is the ability to identify both distant metastatic disease as well as intraprostatic disease with one imaging modality. PSMA-radiotracers have continued to evolve since their initial development, with successive improvements in imaging and diagnostic characteristics. One such second-generation PSMA-binding compound, 18F-DCFPyl, has been developed and characterized at our institution, and offers superior imaging qualities compared to prior PSMA-based radiotracers.
In realization of the toxicity of current therapies, there is substantial interest throughout the urologic oncology community in utilizing focal therapy to mitigate such toxicities. The rationale for focal therapy is based upon the recognition that whole gland treatment is associated with unacceptable toxicity rates, while concurrently it is also realized that patient morbidity and mortality is due to the progression of major foci of high-grade disease, i.e. the index lesion.
Planning studies have shown that focal brachytherapy is feasible and results in significant reductions of dose to critical structures. In a historic cohort of patients treated at Johns Hopkins, the investigators have demonstrated that a modest reduction in dose results in clinically meaningful reductions in urinary toxicity. Al-Qaiseh et al. found that focal plans resulted in >50% reductions in dose to urethra and rectum. However, focal plans were highly sensitive to seed positioning errors, and focal targeting made seed positioning more critical. This highlights the key utility and importance of the investigators' iRUF system (integrated Registered Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound) in delivering focal therapy.
The investigators have developed a system of true dynamic intraoperative dosimetry which utilizes fluoroscopy for seed cloud reconstruction and fusion to transrectal ultrasound imaging. The investigators previously confirmed this method in a pilot trial of 6 patients with encouraging results. Further refinement of the system was followed by a Phase II clinical trial of this integrated platform on a larger group of patients. The investigators confirmed the primary endpoint to compare intraoperative dosimetric predicted values using iRUF method vs standard ultrasound-based seed tracking. The iRUF Phase II cohort had statistically significant improvements in prostate coverage parameters, as well as lower rates of rectal doses exceeding prescribed tolerance limits when compared to a historical group of patients. Importantly, there was no trend toward higher prostate V200 doses, indicating that excellent coverage did not come at the expense of excessive dose within prostate.
This study will test the combination of PSMA-imaging with iRUF dynamic dosimetry to treat prostate cancer with a focal approach.
6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 58 across 4,822 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.
Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins is the lead sponsor of 572 studies on the registry; 73 are open to participants now.
Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 67 (60%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Drug: 18F-DCFPyl Other names: PET, PSMA Procedure: Focal brachytherapy with PSMA PET imaging Other names: Radiotherapy, Radiation, Prostate seed implant, Focal therapy
Radiation: Focal brachytherapy with PSMA PET imaging · Drug: (18F)DCFPyL
Focal brachytherapy with PSMA PET imaging. Focal (partial prostate gland) brachytherapy following 18F-DCFPyl PET/CT radiotracer imaging. Patients will also undergo pre-treatment transperineal mapping biopsy.
Also known as: Prostate seed implant, Radiotherapy, Radiation, Focal therapy
18F-DCFPyl PET/CT scan
Also known as: PSMA, PET
Percent tumor coverage
Percent coverage of the combined PET-MR based tumor volume achieved when using iRUF intraoperative dosimetry. PET-MR tumor volume D90 will be defined on pre-treatment PET-MR fusion, and dose from seeds will be calculated on post-implant MR/CT (Day \~30); the two volumes will be co-registered to determine tumor volume coverage.
Time frame: Post-implant Day 30
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins