CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03856502Updated Feb 28, 2019

Influence of Intrathecal Dexamethasone Administration for Proximal Femoral Fractures

An interventional study of 8 mg of dexamethasone and 12,5 mg of 0,5 % of levobupivacaine in Femoral Fracture, Cognition Disorders and Cortisol; Hypersecretion, sponsored by General Hospital Sveti Duh. Completed at 1 site in Croatia. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-28.

Sponsored by General Hospital Sveti Duh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2012, registered Nov 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spinal anesthesia blocks acute pain in older patients with femur fracture. Delirium is a common complication seen after femur fracture, affecting approximately 10-16% of patients. It is associated with increased mortality at 1st year, delayed rehabilitation efforts, prolonged length of hospital stay, poorer functional outcomes, and increased risk of nursing home placement.

Intrathecal dexamethasone administration improves quality of anesthesia in patients with femur fracture compared to conventional spinal anesthesia.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this research was to establish the influence of intrathecal dexamethasone administration in spinal anaesthesia with levobupivacaine on postoperative pain and changes of consciousness, values of cortisol levels and quality of treatment for patients with femoral fractures compared to spinal anaesthesia with only local anaesthetic.

The study was planned as a prospective, observational, randomised clinical trial. A total of 60 patients ASA2 and ASA3 status, scheduled for surgical procedures were sorted into two groups and underwent surgery in spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine with or without dexamethsone.

02

Conditions studied

  • Femoral Fracture
  • Cognition Disorders
  • Cortisol; Hypersecretion

Keywords

  • spinal anesthesia
  • femoral fracture
  • dexamethasone
03

In context

Fractures, Bone

2,261 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 325 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 69 across 1,482 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

General Hospital Sveti Duh is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • cooperative ASA 2 and ASA 3 status patients with proximal femoral fractures of one leg
  • agreed to be enrolled in the study (Informed Consent signed)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients refused to be enrolled in the study
  • patients with pre-existing cognitive disturbances before surgery
  • conditions or diseases with corticosteroid therapy, long term corticosteroid, diabetes mellitus, neurological conditions or tumors, neuroendocrine disorders or tumors
  • breaking the study protocols
  • patients who no longer wanted to be enrolled in the study
  • unexpected events when the study already started
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    group that received dexamethasone (DLSA)

    The study group of 30 patients ASA status 2 or 3 received 8 mg of dexamethasone with 12,5 mg of 0,5% of levobupivacaine intrathecally for surgical reconstruction of proximal femoral fracture. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in sitting position using middle approach in intervertebral space L2-L3 or L3-L4 with spinal needles 22-27 GA.

    Drug: 8 mg of dexamethasone · Drug: 12,5 mg of 0,5 % of levobupivacaine

  • Active comparator
    group without dexamethasone (LSA)

    The control group of 30 patients ASA status 2 or 3 received 12,5 mg of 0,5% of levobupivacaine intrathecally for surgical reconstruction of proximal femoral fracture. Spinal anaesthesia was performed in sitting position using middle approach in intervertebral space L2-L3 or L3-L4 with spinal needles 22-27 GA.

    Drug: 12,5 mg of 0,5 % of levobupivacaine

Interventions

  • Drug8 mg of dexamethasone

    Effect of intrathecally administered dexamethasone in spinal anaesthesia for surgical correction of the hip fracture.

    Also known as: Dexamethasone KRKA, Chirocaine Abbott

  • Drug12,5 mg of 0,5 % of levobupivacaine

    Local anaesthetic standardly used in spinal anaesthesia for surgical correction of the hip fracture by the particular hospital's protocol.

    Also known as: Chirocaine Abbott

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. postoperative cognitive change

    Assessed using a simplified Confusion Assessment Method scoring scale, a clinical instrument for delirium assessment used by non-psychiatric medical staff after surgery for excluding delirium. Delirium is defined in terms of 4 possible diagnostic criteria (1. acute onset or fluctuating course; 2- inattention; 3- disorganised thinking; 4- altered level of consciousness (may be defined as alert, lethargic, stupor or coma cognitive state)) and is defined as present when 1 plus 2 and either 3 or 4 diagnostic criteria are positive.

    Time frame: Confusion Assessment Method scoring was assessed in 4 measure points: 1. one hour after surgery, 2. on the 3rd postoperative day at 9 am, 3. on the 5th postoperative day at 9 am, 4. on the 10th postoperative day at 9 am

  2. cortisol concentrations changes

    Determined from patient's blood plasma assessed by Roche Elecsys Immunoassay System and defined from the laboratory reference points (185-624)nmol/L equal for each measure point; for single measuring 0,5 ml of patient's blood was taken

    Time frame: Measured in 5 measure points: 1. one hour before surgery, 2. one hour after surgery, 3. on the 3rd postoperative day at 6 am, 4. on the 5th postoperative day at 6 am, 5. on the 10th postoperative day at 6 am

Secondary outcomes

  1. perioperative pain intensity: Visual Analogue Scale score

    Assessed using Visual Analogue Scale score and establishing postoperative analgesic requirements

    Time frame: Visual Analogue Scale scoring (scores: 0-10) was assessed in 5 measure points every 3 hours when patient was awake: 1. 1 h before surgery, 2. 1 h after surgery, 3. on the 3rd postoperative day, 4. on the 5th postoperative day, 5. 10th postoperative day

  2. glucose concentrations changes

    Determined form patient's blood plasma assessed by Beckman Coulter AU400 and AU680 orbOlympus Glucose Analyzer 2 devices defined from the laboratory reference points (4,4-6,4)mmol/L equal for each measure point; for single measuring 0,2 ml of patient's blood was taken

    Time frame: Measured in 5 measure points (units: mmol/L): 1. one hour before surgery, 2. one hour after surgery, 3. on the 3rd postoperative day at 6 am, 4. on the 5th postoperative day at 6 am, 5. on the 10th postoperative day at 6 am

  3. Blood loss

    Determinated by intraoperative blood loss in mililitres, amount of blood in drainage systems in mililitres, transfusion of homologous blood in mililitres

    Time frame: During the surgical repairment and up to the removal of drainage systems (2nd postoperative day)

  4. Number of Participants with pulmonary embolism

    Established by noted pulmonary embolism in the operating room or at the traumatology ward by the ward staff

    Time frame: During surgical reconstruction and during postoperative follow-up of up to ten postoperative days

  5. Number of Participants with heart failure

    Established by noted heart failure in the operating room or at the traumatology ward by the ward staff

    Time frame: During surgical reconstruction and during postoperative follow-up of up to ten postoperative days

  6. Platelets changes

    Determined from laboratory values of platelets data in reference points (158-424)10\^9/L equal for each measure point

    Time frame: Assessed in 5 measure points: 1.one hour before surgery, 2. one hour after surgery, 3. on the 3rd postoperative day at 6 am, 4. on the 5th postoperative day at 6 am, 5. on the 10th postoperative day at 6 am

  7. Haemoglobin changes

    Determined from laboratory values of haemoglobin data measured reference points (119-157)g/L equal for each measure point

    Time frame: Assessed in 5 measure points: 1.one hour before surgery, 2. one hour after surgery, 3. on the 3rd postoperative day at 6 am, 4. on the 5th postoperative day at 6 am, 5. on the 10th postoperative day at 6 am

  8. Haematocrit changes

    Determined from laboratory values of haematocrit data in reference points (0,356-0,470)L/L equal for each measure point

    Time frame: Assessed in 5 measure points: 1.one hour before surgery, 2. one hour after surgery, 3. on the 3rd postoperative day at 6 am, 4. on the 5th postoperative day at 6 am, 5. on the 10th postoperative day at 6 am

  9. Hospitalisation

    Calculated by number of days preoperatively from the day of admission to the day of surgical treatment and postoperatively from the day of surgical treatment to the day of hospital discharge

    Time frame: In the time period of up to 30 days

  10. Number of Participants who underwent surgical procedure during first 48 hours from admission

    It was defined if surgical procedure was performed in first 48 hours from admission to the hospital's Emergency Department or later reflecting morbidity and/or mortality

    Time frame: Calculated in hours after the patient's admission to the hospital's Emergency Department to the point of surgical reconstruction in the time period up to 48 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital "Sveti Duh"
    Zagreb, 10000, Croatia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Neuman MD, Silber JH, Elkassabany NM, Ludwig JM, Fleisher LA. Comparative effectiveness of regional versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jul;117(1):72-92. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182545e7c. PubMed 22713634 ↗
  • Membership of the Working Party; Griffiths R, Alper J, Beckingsale A, Goldhill D, Heyburn G, Holloway J, Leaper E, Parker M, Ridgway S, White S, Wiese M, Wilson I. Management of proximal femoral fractures 2011: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2012 Jan;67(1):85-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06957.x. PubMed 22150501 ↗
  • Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G. Orthopaedic surgery in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Jun;17(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/s1521-6896(03)00007-7. PubMed 12817917 ↗
  • Baumann H, Gauldie J. The acute phase response. Immunol Today. 1994 Feb;15(2):74-80. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(94)90137-6. PubMed 7512342 ↗
  • Buckingham JC. Stress and the hypothalamo-pituitary-immune axis. Int J Tissue React. 1998;20(1):23-34. No abstract available. PubMed 9561443 ↗
  • Munck A, Guyre PM, Holbrook NJ. Physiological functions of glucocorticoids in stress and their relation to pharmacological actions. Endocr Rev. 1984 Winter;5(1):25-44. doi: 10.1210/edrv-5-1-25. PubMed 6368214 ↗
  • Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jul;85(1):109-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/85.1.109. No abstract available. PubMed 10927999 ↗
  • Hogevold HE, Lyberg T, Kahler H, Haug E, Reikeras O. Changes in plasma IL-1beta, TNF-alpha and IL-6 after total hip replacement surgery in general or regional anaesthesia. Cytokine. 2000 Jul;12(7):1156-9. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2000.0675. PubMed 10880268 ↗
  • Kehlet H. Manipulation of the metabolic response in clinical practice. World J Surg. 2000 Jun;24(6):690-5. doi: 10.1007/s002689910111. PubMed 10773121 ↗
  • Bani-Hashem N, Hassan-Nasab B, Pour EA, Maleh PA, Nabavi A, Jabbari A. Addition of intrathecal Dexamethasone to Bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in orthopedic surgery. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;5(4):382-6. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.87267. PubMed 22144925 ↗
  • Kroin JS, Schaefer RB, Penn RD. Chronic intrathecal administration of dexamethasone sodium phosphate: pharmacokinetics and neurotoxicity in an animal model. Neurosurgery. 2000 Jan;46(1):178-82; discussion 182-3. PubMed 10626948 ↗
  • Yao XL, Cowan MJ, Gladwin MT, Lawrence MM, Angus CW, Shelhamer JH. Dexamethasone alters arachidonate release from human epithelial cells by induction of p11 protein synthesis and inhibition of phospholipase A2 activity. J Biol Chem. 1999 Jun 11;274(24):17202-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.24.17202. PubMed 10358078 ↗
  • Dong Y, Zhang X, Tang F, Tian X, Zhao Y, Zhang F. Intrathecal injection with methotrexate plus dexamethasone in the treatment of central nervous system involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. Chin Med J (Engl). 2001 Jul;114(7):764-6. PubMed 11780346 ↗
  • Williams BA, Hough KA, Tsui BY, Ibinson JW, Gold MS, Gebhart GF. Neurotoxicity of adjuvants used in perineural anesthesia and analgesia in comparison with ropivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):225-30. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182176f70. PubMed 21519308 ↗
  • Benzon HT, Chew TL, McCarthy RJ, Benzon HA, Walega DR. Comparison of the particle sizes of different steroids and the effect of dilution: a review of the relative neurotoxicities of the steroids. Anesthesiology. 2007 Feb;106(2):331-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200702000-00022. PubMed 17264728 ↗
  • Kopacz DJ, Lacouture PG, Wu D, Nandy P, Swanton R, Landau C. The dose response and effects of dexamethasone on bupivacaine microcapsules for intercostal blockade (T9 to T11) in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2003 Feb;96(2):576-82, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00050. PubMed 12538215 ↗
  • Macro M, Reznik Y, Leymarie P, Loyau G, Mahoudeau J. The effect of intrathecal dexamethasone injection on plasma cortisol level. Br J Rheumatol. 1991 Jun;30(3):238. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/30.3.238. No abstract available. PubMed 2049597 ↗
  • Bjorkelund KB, Hommel A, Thorngren KG, Gustafson L, Larsson S, Lundberg D. Reducing delirium in elderly patients with hip fracture: a multi-factorial intervention study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jul;54(6):678-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02232.x. Epub 2010 Mar 15. PubMed 20236093 ↗
  • Rasmussen LS, O'Brien JT, Silverstein JH, Johnson TW, Siersma VD, Canet J, Jolles J, Hanning CD, Kuipers HM, Abildstrom H, Papaioannou A, Raeder J, Yli-Hankala A, Sneyd JR, Munoz L, Moller JT; ISPOCD2 Investigators. Is peri-operative cortisol secretion related to post-operative cognitive dysfunction? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Oct;49(9):1225-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00791.x. PubMed 16146456 ↗
  • Mouzopoulos G, Vasiliadis G, Lasanianos N, Nikolaras G, Morakis E, Kaminaris M. Fascia iliaca block prophylaxis for hip fracture patients at risk for delirium: a randomized placebo-controlled study. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Sep;10(3):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s10195-009-0062-6. Epub 2009 Aug 19. PubMed 19690943 ↗
  • Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941. PubMed 2240918 ↗
  • Huang YF, Liang J, Shyu YL. Number of Comorbidities Negatively Influence Psychological Outcomes of the Elderly Following Hip Fracture in Taiwan. J Aging Health. 2016 Dec;28(8):1343-1361. doi: 10.1177/0898264315618922. Epub 2016 Jul 8. PubMed 26786859 ↗
  • Drews T, Franck M, Radtke FM, Weiss B, Krampe H, Brockhaus WR, Winterer G, Spies CD. Postoperative delirium is an independent risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder in the elderly patient: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Mar;32(3):147-51. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000107. PubMed 24979586 ↗
  • Le Manach Y, Collins G, Bhandari M, Bessissow A, Boddaert J, Khiami F, Chaudhry H, De Beer J, Riou B, Landais P, Winemaker M, Boudemaghe T, Devereaux PJ. Outcomes After Hip Fracture Surgery Compared With Elective Total Hip Replacement. JAMA. 2015 Sep 15;314(11):1159-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10842. PubMed 26372585 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The research has been a doctoral thesis.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03856502
Lead sponsor
General Hospital Sveti Duh
Responsible party
Livija Šakić, MD,PhD (MD,PhD Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Medicine, General Hospital Sveti Duh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 27, 2019
Start date
Nov 11, 2012
Primary completion
May 26, 2016
Completion
Jul 4, 2017
Last update
Feb 28, 2019

Study contacts

Livija Šakić, MD,PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital Sveti Duh
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion