CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03855007Updated Nov 18, 2023

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Iguratimod in RA and Early RA Patients for 6 Months Treatment

A Phase 4 interventional study of Iguratimod and MTX in Arthritis, Rheumatoid, sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-18.

Sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2016, registered Feb 2019).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
16 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to observed prospectively the efficacy and safety of 6 months treatment of iguratimod alone, or with methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and prednisone step by step on Chinese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients who were naïve or shown insufficiency response or intolerance to DMARDs. If volunteered, patients who completed the 6-month study can continue to follow our plans for 24 months.

Read the detailed description

This study will enroll 200 cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients in China, who are naïve or shown insufficiency response or intolerance to DMARDs. The participants plan to be treated with iguratimod alone, or along with methotrexate (MTX)/ hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) / prednisone (Pred) step by step for 6 months if participants are in medium or high disease activity (DAS28≥3.2). Participants can choose to continue the study up to 24 months.The efficacy and safety of 6 months and 24 months Iguratimod treatment in RA and ERA patients will be evaluated with DAS28-ESR and other disease activity indices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords

  • Iguratimod
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 400 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 299 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: -

  1. RA: Patients diagnosed based on 1987 ACR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis(RA);
  2. ERA: Subjects diagnosed by the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR); or by 2012 Chinese classification criteria of early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), and not match the 1987 ACR criteria for RA.
  3. Age ≥16 years;
  4. Extra-articular manifestations (such as pulmonary fibrosis, proteinuria, leukopenia and peripheral neuropathy ) of RA patients are stable or no significant progress;
  5. Patients can be naïve to any DMARDs, or relapse due to DMARDs drug suspended;
  6. Patients have a history of using csDMARDs including csDMARDs(methotrexate,leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, tacrolimus) , any biologic DMARDs(TNFi,tocilizumab or Tofacitinib),glucocorticoid (prednisone,methylprednisolone) or Chinese traditional Medicine(including tripterygium Glycosides, sinomenine)for 3 months, but couldn't achieve clinical remission or intolerance;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with acute or chronic infections such as active bacterial, viral, fungal, tuberculosis infection or active hepatitis B;
  2. Platelet counts(PLT) \<80 x 10\^9 / L, or white blood cell (WBC) \<3 x 10\^9 / L;
  3. Propionate acid aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) is two times higher than the upper limit of normal;
  4. Renal insufficiency: serum Cr ≥ 176 umol / L;
  5. Pregnant or nursing women (breastfeeding) ;
  6. Patients has a history of malignancy (cure time in less than 5 years);
  7. Patients with severe or poorly controlled hypertension, diabetes or cardiac dysfunction;
  8. Other comorbidities that cannot be treated with immune suppressants. In addition, once patients experience severe adverse drug reactions、ineffective treatment or rapid progression of rheumatoid arthritis, then quit this research.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Iguratimod

    The participants plan to be treated with iguratimod alone, or along with methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) , prednisone (Pred) step by step

    Drug: Iguratimod · Drug: MTX · Drug: HCQ · Drug: Pred

Interventions

  • DrugIguratimod

    Iguratimod tablet,25mg, po, twice per day (Bid) prescribed at the beginning and adjusted due to patient response. Then may titer down until the endpoint.

    Also known as: T-614

  • DrugMTX

    MTX,7.5mg to 15mg, po, once per week (Qw) prescribed if needed and adjusted due to patient response or unacceptable toxicity develops.

    Also known as: methotrexate

  • DrugHCQ

    HCQ,200mg, po, twice per day (Bid) prescribed if needed and adjusted due to patient response.

    Also known as: Hydroxychloroquine

  • DrugPred

    Pred, 5-15mg, po, once per day (Qd) prescribed if needed and adjusted due to patient response

    Also known as: Prednisone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission at week 24 using European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria DAS28

    The percentage of patients whose Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints (DAS28) achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2). The DAS28 is a composite score derived from 4 of these measures,that is the count of tender joint count(TJC, 0-28)and swollen joint count(SJC, 0-28), measure erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, mm/h) or C reactive protein (CRP, mg/L) and to make a patient assessment of disease activity i.e. 'global assessment of health' (GH) using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) with 0 = best, 100 = worst. DAS28 values were calculated as follows: DAS28- ESR = 0.56√(TJC) + 0.28√(SJC) + 0.70 ln ESR + 0.014 x GH. High disease activity: DAS28-ESR \> 5.1; Moderate disease activity: 5.1≥ DAS28 \> 3.2 to 5.1; Low disease activity (LDA) and Remission mean Clinical remission.

    Time frame: week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission using DAS28-ESR at week 12

    The percentage of patients whose DAS28 achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at week 12.

    Time frame: week 12

  2. The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission using DAS28-ESR at week 48

    The percentage of patients whose DAS28 achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at week 12.response states were classified as follows: good responders were patients with an improvement from baseline (△DAS28-ESR) of \> 1.2 and a DAS28-ESR at week 12 ≤ 3.2. Moderate responders: △DAS28 \> 1.2 and still DAS28 \> 3.2 at week 12, or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 \> 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 12. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6 or DAS28 \>5.1 at week 12. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of \<2.6.

    Time frame: week 48

  3. The percentage of patients who achieve clinical remission using DAS28-ESR at week 96

    The percentage of patients whose DAS28 achieve remission(DAS28-ESR≤ 2.6)and Low Disease Activity (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at week 12Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 \>5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of \<2.6.

    Time frame: week 96

  4. Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) -ESR Criteria Responders at week 12

    △DAS28 indicates the decline of DAS28-ESR from the baseline to week 12. EULAR response states were classified as follows: good responders were patients with an improvement from baseline (△DAS28-ESR) of \> 1.2 and a DAS28-ESR at week 12 ≤ 3.2. Moderate responders: △DAS28 \> 1.2 and still DAS28 \> 3.2 at week 12, or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 \> 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 12. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6 or DAS28 \>5.1 at week 12. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of \<2.6.

    Time frame: week 12

  5. Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-ESR Criteria Responders at week 24

    EULAR response states were classified as follows: DAS28-ESR Good responders: △DAS28 \> 1.2 and DAS28 ≤3.2 at week 24. Moderate responders:△DAS28 \> 1.2 and still DAS28 \> 3.2 at week 24; or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 \> 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 24. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 \>5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of \<2.6.

    Time frame: week 24

  6. Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-ESR Criteria Responders at week 48

    EULAR response states were classified as follows: DAS28-ESR Good responders: △DAS28 \> 1.2 and DAS28 ≤3.2 at week 24. Moderate responders:△DAS28 \> 1.2 and still DAS28 \> 3.2 at week 24; or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 \> 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 24. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 \>5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of \<2.6.

    Time frame: week 48

  7. Percentage of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)-ESR Criteria Responders at week 96

    EULAR response states were classified as follows: DAS28-ESR Good responders: △DAS28 \> 1.2 and DAS28 ≤3.2 at week 24. Moderate responders:△DAS28 \> 1.2 and still DAS28 \> 3.2 at week 24; or 1.2 ≥△DAS28 \> 0.6 and DAS28 ≤ 5.1 at week 24. Nonresponders:△DAS28 ≤0.6,or DAS28 \>5.1 at week 24. DAS28-defined remission was classified as a score of \<2.6.

    Time frame: week 96

  8. Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 12

    If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).

    Time frame: week 12

  9. Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 24

    If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).

    Time frame: week 24

  10. Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 48

    If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).

    Time frame: week 48

  11. Percentage of participants achieving ACR/EULAR remission at week 96

    If all of the following 4 parameters are fulfilled, it is defined as remission: TJC ≤ 1, SJC ≤ 1, CRP ≤ 1 mg/dL, Patient global assessment(PGA) ≤ 1 cm (on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease).

    Time frame: week 96

  12. Percentage of American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 20 Criteria Responders every 3 months

    Percentage of American College of Rheumatology \[ACR\] 20 Criteria Responders every 3 months

    Time frame: Up to week 96

  13. Change from baseline Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

    The SDAI is a composite score derived from these measures,that is the count of tender joint count(TJC, 0-28), swollen joint count(SJC, 0-28), C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L), Patient global assessment(PGA)and physician global assessment(PHGA), each of the last two was assessed on a visual analog scale ranging from 0-10 cm, with higher scores indicating severe disease. SDAI score will be calculated with formula SDAI = TJC + SJC + PGA+PHGA+ CRP. SDAI score exceeding 26 is considered high disease activity; 11 \<SDAI ≤26,moderate disease activity; 3.3 \<SDAI ≤11, low disease activity; remission is SDAI score ≤ 3.3.

    Time frame: Up to week 96

  14. Change from baseline Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)

    CDAI is a composite score derived from these measures,that is the count of tender joint count(TJC, 0-28), swollen joint count(SJC, 0-28), Patient global assessment(PGA)and physician global assessment(PHGA), each of the last two was CDAI score will be calculated with formula CDAI = TJC + SJC + PGA + PHGA. CDAI \> 22 is considered high disease activity; 10 \<CDAI ≤ 22, moderate disease activity; 2.8 \<CDAI ≤10, low disease activity; remission is CDAI score ≤2.8.

    Time frame: Up to week 96

  15. Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP)

    Change from Baseline in C-reactive Protein (CRP), a component index of ACR20 and SDAI, CRP will be measured with blood samples.

    Time frame: Up to week 96

  16. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

    Change from Baseline in ESR, that is a component index of ACR20, DAS28-ESR and SDAI, ESR will be measured with blood samples.

    Time frame: Up to week 96

  17. Change from baseline Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    Change from Baseline in HAQ-DI, a participant assessed measure of health assessment, shaveing eight dimensions of functional activity: pruning, dressing, rising, eating, walking, personal hygiene, reach, grip, and other routine activities. Each item on a single scale has 4 degrees ranging from 0 (no functional difficulty) to 3 (unable to do), with higher scores indicating severe disease.

    Time frame: Up to week 96

  18. Incidence of participant withdrawal

    Percentage of participants who withdraw from this study.

    Time frame: Up to week 96

  19. Number of participants with"adverse events (AEs)"

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with"adverse events (AEs)"i.e. physical exam abnormalities,vital sign abnormalities,laboratory value abnormalities,symptom or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product.

    Time frame: Up to week 96

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Qilu Hospital
    Jinan, Shandong 250012, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03855007
Lead sponsor
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Responsible party
Qiang Shu (Chief Physician, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 26, 2019
Start date
Jan 1, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2023
Completion
Oct 31, 2023
Last update
Nov 18, 2023

Study contacts

Ming Lv, Dr.
study director · Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion