CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03851588RADIANT-TBUpdated Jul 18, 2024Results posted

Standard Versus Double Dose Dolutegravir in Patients With HIV-associated Tuberculosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Placebo and Dolutegravir 50 mg in HIV Infections and Tuberculosis, sponsored by University of Cape Town. Completed at 1 site in South Africa. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 110 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-18.

Sponsored by University of Cape Town · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 110 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators propose to conduct a phase 2 randomised (1:1) double-blind placebo-controlled trial of the dolutegravir-lamivudine-tenofovir fixed dose combination tablet daily with an additional 50 mg dose of dolutegravir/matching placebo taken 12 hours later in ART-naïve or fisrt-line interrupted HIV-infected patients on rifampicin-based anti-tuberculosis therapy. The hypothesis is that virologic outcomes with standard dose dolutegravir-based ART will be acceptable in patients on rifampicin-based anti-tuberculosis therapy.

Read the detailed description

Dolutegravir is being rolled out to replace efavirenz in first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low-middle income countries (LMICs) because it is more effective, better tolerated, and has a considerably higher genetic barrier to resistance.

Tuberculosis is the commonest cause of HIV-related morbidity and mortality in LMICs. Rifampicin, which is a key component of anti-tuberculosis therapy, induces genes that are important in the metabolism and transport of dolutegravir. The resulting drug-drug interaction between dolutegravir and rifampicin significantly reduces dolutegravir exposure, which can be overcome by increasing the dose of dolutegravir to 50 mg 12 hourly.

The additional dose of dolutegravir will be difficult to implement in high burden settings. Furthermore, the additional dolutegravir tablet increases pill burden and costs. If standard dose dolutegravir is shown to be effective in patients with tuberculosis this would sweep away one of the major barriers to its implementation in LMICs. There are three lines of evidence to support studying standard dose dolutegravir in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis.

First, there are compelling pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data supporting the therapeutic efficacy of lower dolutegravir exposure. Second, the investigators have conducted a drug-drug interaction study of dolutegravir dosed at 50 mg or 100 mg once daily in healthy volunteers with rifampicin. Although, as expected, concomitant rifampicin significantly reduced dolutegravir exposure at both doses, all dolutegravir trough concentrations on rifampicin were above the protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (PA IC90). Third, exposure to the first-generation integrase inhibitor raltegravir is also significantly reduced with concomitant rifampicin. A phase 2 study in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis showed that virologic outcomes were similar with standard and double dose raltegravir. It is plausible that findings could be similar with dolutegravir.

The hypothesis is that virologic outcomes with standard dose dolutegravir-based ART will be acceptable in patients on rifampicin-based anti-tuberculosis therapy. If the proportion of participants who achieve virological suppression on standard dose dolutegravir is acceptable, this would pave the way for a phase 3 trial of dolutegravir 50 mg daily versus an appropriate standard of care regimen, like efavirenz-based ART, in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Infections
  • Tuberculosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Antiretroviral therapy
  • Dolutegravir
  • Rifampicin
  • Tuberculosis
  • Drug-drug interaction
03

In context

Tuberculosis

1,417 studies on the registry are indexed under Tuberculosis; 208 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is below the median of 150 across 952 interventional studies indexed under Tuberculosis.

Browse Tuberculosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cape Town is the lead sponsor of 109 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 110 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • HIV-1 infection as documented by screening plasma HIV-1 RNA >1000 c/mL
  • ART-naïve (short-term antiretroviral use for prevention of mother-to-child transmission will be allowed) or
  • ART treatment interrupters on ART \<6 months prior to interruption or virologically suppressed (\<50 copies/mL or LDL) \<6 months prior to interruption
  • On rifampicin-based therapy for tuberculosis for \<3 months
  • CD4 counts >100 cells/µL
  • Women of child-bearing potential willing to use adequate contraception (defined as either an intrauterine contraceptive device or hormonal contraception as per national guidelines)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant/breastfeeding
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study)
  • Alanine aminotransferase >3 times upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Allergy or intolerance to one of the drugs in regimen
  • Concomitant medication known to significantly reduce or increase dolutegravir exposure (except rifampicin)
  • Active psychiatric disease or substance abuse
  • On treatment for active AIDS-defining condition other than tuberculosis (participants on maintenance therapy may be enrolled)
  • Malignancy
  • Any other clinical condition that in the opinion of an investigator puts the patient at increased risk of participating in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Supplementary dose

    Dolutegravir-lamivudine-tenofovir fixed-dose combination tablet daily with an additional dolutegravir 50 mg dose taken 12 hours later.

    Drug: Dolutegravir 50 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo dose

    Dolutegravir-lamivudine-tenofovir fixed-dose combination tablet daily with placebo taken 12 hours later.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • OtherPlacebo

    Dolutegravir-lamivudine-tenofovir fixed-dose combination tablet daily is not given with a supplementary dose of dolutegravir 50 mg.

  • DrugDolutegravir 50 mg

    Dolutegravir-lamivudine-tenofovir fixed-dose combination tablet daily is given with a supplementary dose of dolutegravir 50 mg.

    Also known as: Tivicay 50 mg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Virological Suppression at 24 Weeks

    Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 24 weeks analysed by modified intention to treat (ITT), which includes all participants who received at least one dose of dolutegravir, and according to the FDA snapshot algorithm.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Virological Suppression at 12 Weeks (Modified ITT)

    Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 12 weeks analyzed modified ITT.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Virological Suppression at 24 Weeks (Per Protocol)

    Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 24 weeks analyzed per protocol.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  3. Virological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Modified ITT)

    Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 48 weeks analyzed modified ITT.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  4. Virological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Per Protocol)

    Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 48 weeks analyzed per protocol.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  5. CD4 Change at 24 Weeks

    Change in CD4 count from screening at week 24.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  6. Dolutegravir Trough Concentrations

    Proportion with dolutegravir trough concentrations above the PA IC90 at week 24

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  7. Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events

    Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events will be accessed throughout the trial.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  8. Change in Sleep Assessment From Baseline - Any Treatment Emergent Insomnia After Baseline Assessed at 4 Weekly Intervals Until Week 24 and Then Again at Week 48

    Insomnia severity index (ISI scored from 0-28. Score categories: 0-7, no clinical significant insomnia; 8-14, sub-threshold insomnia; 15-21, clinical insomnia (moderate severity); 22-28, clinical insomnia (severe). Measures sleep patterns and how this influences daily functioning and quality of life (assessed through 48 weeks). Measure of participants with treatment emergent insomnia from baseline

    Time frame: Through 48 weeks

  9. Change in Mental Health Assessment From Baseline Through Week 48

    Modified MINI screen (MMS) Mental health questionnaire will be assessed by given at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. The questionnaire is standardized and has been based on the mini international neuropsychiatric interview (version 7.0.0). All questions in the questionnaire require a yes/no answer. MMS score increased is worsening MMS includes 22 questions answered yes/no; 2 questions related to experiencing a traumatic event were excluded for a 20 point scale. MMS was measured at baseline, week 12, and week 24 Presenting number of participants with increase in MMS of at least 1 point from baseline through 48 weeks.

    Time frame: Through 48 weeks

  10. Serious Adverse Events

    Document any serious adverse events that occur throughout the trial.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  11. Adverse Events Requiring Discontinuation of an ART Drug

    Any adverse event that requires discontinuation of any drug in the ART regimen throughout the trial.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

  12. Antiretroviral Resistance Mutations Testing by Genotypic Resistance Assay in Participants With Virologic Failure

    If a viral load is \>1000 copies/mL at week 24 or at week 48, or if the viral load was suppressed and then rebounded to \>1000 copies/mL, a sample will be taken for resistance testing. Antiretroviral resistance mutations in participants with virologic failure will be assessed by genotypic resistance assay and compared to stored plasma at baseline to distinguish emergent from pre-treatment resistance. Any ART resistance mutations in participants with virological failure by week 48.

    Time frame: Through 48 weeks

  13. Primary Outcome Differences Among ART-naïve Versus First-line Interruption Status

    The primary outcome measure (proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 24 weeks analysed by modified intention to treat (ITT), which includes all participants who received at least one dose of dolutegravir, and according to the FDA snapshot algorithm) will be stratified by ART-naïve versus first-line interruption status.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 18, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Started5355
Completed5152
Not completed23

Outcome measures

PrimaryVirological Suppression at 24 Weeks

Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 24 weeks analysed by modified intention to treat (ITT), which includes all participants who received at least one dose of dolutegravir, and according to the FDA snapshot algorithm.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Virological Suppression at 24 Weeks
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Virological Suppression at 24 Weeks4344
SecondaryVirological Suppression at 12 Weeks (Modified ITT)

Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 12 weeks analyzed modified ITT.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Virological Suppression at 12 Weeks (Modified ITT)
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Virological Suppression at 12 Weeks (Modified ITT)4246
SecondaryVirological Suppression at 24 Weeks (Per Protocol)

Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 24 weeks analyzed per protocol.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Virological Suppression at 24 Weeks (Per Protocol)
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Virological Suppression at 24 Weeks (Per Protocol)4344
SecondaryVirological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Modified ITT)

Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 48 weeks analyzed modified ITT.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Virological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Modified ITT)
ParticipantsSupplemental Dolutegravir ArmPlacebo Arm
Virological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Modified ITT)3435
SecondaryVirological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Per Protocol)

Proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 48 weeks analyzed per protocol.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Virological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Per Protocol)
ParticipantsSupplemental Dolutegravir Arm Per Protocol at Week 48Placebo Arm Per Protocol at Week 48
Virological Suppression at 48 Weeks (Per Protocol)3435
SecondaryCD4 Change at 24 Weeks

Change in CD4 count from screening at week 24.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Median · cells/uL
CD4 Change at 24 Weeks
cells/uLSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
CD4 Change at 24 Weeks111 (89 to 121)101 (84 to 114)
SecondaryDolutegravir Trough Concentrations

Proportion with dolutegravir trough concentrations above the PA IC90 at week 24

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Dolutegravir Trough Concentrations
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Dolutegravir Trough Concentrations3234
SecondaryGrade 3 or 4 Adverse Events

Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events will be accessed throughout the trial.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events1110
SecondaryChange in Sleep Assessment From Baseline - Any Treatment Emergent Insomnia After Baseline Assessed at 4 Weekly Intervals Until Week 24 and Then Again at Week 48

Insomnia severity index (ISI scored from 0-28. Score categories: 0-7, no clinical significant insomnia; 8-14, sub-threshold insomnia; 15-21, clinical insomnia (moderate severity); 22-28, clinical insomnia (severe). Measures sleep patterns and how this influences daily functioning and quality of life (assessed through 48 weeks). Measure of participants with treatment emergent insomnia from baseline

Time frame:
Through 48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Sleep Assessment From Baseline - Any Treatment Emergent Insomnia After Baseline Assessed at 4 Weekly Intervals Until Week 24 and Then Again at Week 48
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Change in Sleep Assessment From Baseline - Any Treatment Emergent Insomnia After Baseline Assessed at 4 Weekly Intervals Until Week 24 and Then Again at Week 48104
SecondaryChange in Mental Health Assessment From Baseline Through Week 48

Modified MINI screen (MMS) Mental health questionnaire will be assessed by given at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. The questionnaire is standardized and has been based on the mini international neuropsychiatric interview (version 7.0.0). All questions in the questionnaire require a yes/no answer. MMS score increased is worsening MMS includes 22 questions answered yes/no; 2 questions related to experiencing a traumatic event were excluded for a 20 point scale. MMS was measured at baseline, week 12, and week 24 Presenting number of participants with increase in MMS of at least 1 point from baseline through 48 weeks.

Time frame:
Through 48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Change in Mental Health Assessment From Baseline Through Week 48
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Change in Mental Health Assessment From Baseline Through Week 4824
SecondarySerious Adverse Events

Document any serious adverse events that occur throughout the trial.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Serious Adverse Events
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Serious Adverse Events05
SecondaryAdverse Events Requiring Discontinuation of an ART Drug

Any adverse event that requires discontinuation of any drug in the ART regimen throughout the trial.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adverse Events Requiring Discontinuation of an ART Drug
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Adverse Events Requiring Discontinuation of an ART Drug00
SecondaryAntiretroviral Resistance Mutations Testing by Genotypic Resistance Assay in Participants With Virologic Failure

If a viral load is \>1000 copies/mL at week 24 or at week 48, or if the viral load was suppressed and then rebounded to \>1000 copies/mL, a sample will be taken for resistance testing. Antiretroviral resistance mutations in participants with virologic failure will be assessed by genotypic resistance assay and compared to stored plasma at baseline to distinguish emergent from pre-treatment resistance. Any ART resistance mutations in participants with virological failure by week 48.

Time frame:
Through 48 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Antiretroviral Resistance Mutations Testing by Genotypic Resistance Assay in Participants With Virologic Failure
ParticipantsSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Antiretroviral Resistance Mutations Testing by Genotypic Resistance Assay in Participants With Virologic Failure33
SecondaryPrimary Outcome Differences Among ART-naïve Versus First-line Interruption Status

The primary outcome measure (proportion with HIV viral load \<50 copies/mL at 24 weeks analysed by modified intention to treat (ITT), which includes all participants who received at least one dose of dolutegravir, and according to the FDA snapshot algorithm) will be stratified by ART-naïve versus first-line interruption status.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Primary Outcome Differences Among ART-naïve Versus First-line Interruption Status
ParticipantsART Naive Supplemental Dolutegravir ArmART Naive Placebo ArmFirst Line ART Interrupted Supplemental Dolutegravir ArmFirst Line ART Interrupted Placebo Arm
Primary Outcome Differences Among ART-naïve Versus First-line Interruption Status363678

Adverse events

Collected over 48 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Supplementary Dose0/53 (0%)0/53 (0%)3/53 (5.7%)
Placebo Dose3/55 (5.5%)5/55 (9.1%)0/55 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
Treatment resistant oesophageal candidiasisGastrointestinal disorders0/531/55
Lichenoid rash secondary to TB treatmentSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/531/55
Bowel obstructionGastrointestinal disorders0/531/55
TraumaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/531/55
Community acquired pneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/531/55
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSupplementary DosePlacebo Dose
InsomniaNervous system disorders3/530/55

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Supplementary DosePlacebo DoseTotal
Median33 (28 to 38)37 (33 to 44)35 (31 to 40)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Supplementary DosePlacebo DoseTotal
Female191938
Male343670
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Supplementary DosePlacebo DoseTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American5355108
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Supplementary DosePlacebo DoseTotal
South Africa5355108
HIV-1 RNA log10 Viral Load
HIV-1 RNA log10 Viral Load(log10 copies/mL)Supplementary DosePlacebo DoseTotal
Median5.1 (4.6 to 5.6)5.2 (4.6 to 5.7)5.2 (4.6 to 5.7)
CD4
CD4(cells/mm3)Supplementary DosePlacebo DoseTotal
Median197 (145 to 260)183 (145 to 316)188 (145 to 316)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Khayelitsha Site B/Ubuntu Clinic
    Cape Town, Western Cape 8001, South Africa
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Griesel R, Hill A, Meintjes G, Maartens G. Standard versus double dose dolutegravir in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis: a phase 2 non-comparative randomised controlled (RADIANT-TB) trial. Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Jan 11;6:1. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16473.1. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33954265 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 23, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be shared with other organizations or individuals for further research upon a reasonable request to the University of Cape Town PI, provided that certain conditions are met (including but not limited to the ethical standards upheld by HREC that approved the initial study.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 18, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03851588
Lead sponsor
University of Cape Town
Collaborators
Wellcome Trust, Medecins Sans Frontieres, Netherlands
Responsible party
Prof Gary Maartens (Head of Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Cape Town) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2019
Start date
Dec 19, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 20, 2022
Completion
Jun 28, 2022
Results posted
Sep 18, 2023
Last update
Jul 18, 2024

Study contacts

Gary Maartens, MMed
principal investigator · University of Cape Town

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion