CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03851211PERSONALUpdated Feb 28, 2019

Prolaris Enhanced Risk Stratification - an ecONomic and clinicAL Evaluation

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-28.

Sponsored by The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

One in 8 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. The majority of men diagnosed with prostate cancer have early stage disease, which can be managed in a variety of ways, ranging from monitoring to international treatment. However is it not always clear which treatment option is best.

All men with newly diagnosed localised prostate cancer are assigned a disease risk category (low/intermediate/high risk). This is based on clinical findings and prostate biopsy results, but these factors are limited in their ability to distinguish between aggressive and indolent prostate cancers. The current risk grouping can make it difficult to plan appropriate treatment tailored and personalised to the individual patient.

There is evidence reporting overtreatment of localised prostate cancer in the UK. However, many patients with aggressive disease are wrongly assigned a low risk categorisation and are recommended surveillance when better suited to more interventional treatment.

Myriad Genetics have developed a test, called Prolaris which measures how fast cells in a prostate cancer are dividing to assess its aggressiveness. The Prolaris test is performed on routine prostate biopsy tissue, so patients are not subjected to any additional invasive investigations.

In this study, led by Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, the aim is find out if the Prolaris® test score helps patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and their clinical team make better informed treatment choices that are tailored to the individual patient.

The aim to achieve a Prolaris risk score for 100 patients and determine the impact it has on treatment decision making. The research team will look at how the test fits into routine clinical practice, investigate the clinician and patient views and understanding on the test report and assess the quality of life of patients in the different risk and treatment groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

6,370 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,400 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 1,181 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Men who have a diagnosis of prostate cancer on their prostate biopsy.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical suspicion of prostate cancer
  • Able to provide informed written consent
  • No contraindication to prostate biopsy
  • Newly diagnosed treatment-naive patient with histologically proven localised adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • Low or intermediate D'Amico risk prostate cancer
  • Sufficient quantity and quality of tissue remains from biopsy to perform genomic testing
  • No contraindication to radical treatment if diagnosed with localised prostate cancer
  • Estimated life expectancy >10 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men with locally advanced, clinical node positive or metastatic disease
  • Patients who lack capacity to consent to study participation
  • Non-adenocarcinoma prostate cancer histology
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prolaris test outcome received via report.

    Results of the test received.

    Time frame: 30-60mins

  2. Treatment counselling

    Feedback of the results of the prolaris test. Consultant Urologist will see each participant in clinic after receipt of the Prolaris test report. They will explain the results to the patient and the patient will have the opportunity to ask any questions that they may have. The patient will then be able to decide on their treatment option.

    Time frame: 30-60mins

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St James's University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
    • William Cross, MRCS · Contact
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03851211
Lead sponsor
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 22, 2019
Start date
Feb 21, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 28, 2019

Study contacts

William Cross, MRCS
Contact
williamcross@nhs.net
0113 243 3144

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion