CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03850665Updated Oct 6, 2021

Comparison of Functional Outcome in Patients After Hip Arthroplasty Depending on Surgical Approach

An interventional study of Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) and Anterolateral approach in Hip and Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Medical University of Warsaw. Completed at 2 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-06.

Sponsored by Medical University of Warsaw · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of the study will be to compare functional outcomes of the two surgical hip approaches in total hip arthroplasty: anterior, posterolateral and anterolateral. Surgical approach may have influence on patients functional outcome.

Read the detailed description

Patients with primary hip osteoarthritis will be included in a randomized controlled trial and assigned to total hip arthroplasty using one the of hip approaches: anterior or anterolateral. Subjects will be assessed preoperative and 3 and 12 moths postoperative.

Biomechanical gait parameters will be collected using tree-dimensional motion analysis system "BTS SMART".

Evaluation of the function of the middle gluteal muscle with superficial EMG (sEMG) percutaneous surface electromyography. Fatigue assessment (mean frequency and amplitude) of the gluteus medius muscle during isometric muscle contraction.

Balance and coordination as well as fall risk will be assessed with use of dynamometric Biodex Balance platform. The study will determine the values of individual indicators: general stability index (OWS), anterior-posterior stability index (APW), the median lateral stability index (MLW) and the fall risk index (RU).

Subjective assessment will be conducted with use of Visual Analogue Scale, WOMAC Index, Oxford Hip Score, The Short Form-36 (SF-36) and Harris Hip Score

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip
  • Osteoarthritis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • total
  • hip
  • arthroplasty
  • surgical
  • approach
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 140 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw is the lead sponsor of 316 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • patient's consent for anticipation in the study
  • BMI less than 35
  • ability to walk the distance of 10m and stand up from the chair
  • arthroplasty in one hip

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient's lack of consent for anticipation in the study
  • neurological diseases
  • balance disorders
  • reoperations in the area of endoprosthesis
  • muscles diseases
  • rheumatic diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis)
  • dizziness, vasovagal syncope
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
140 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Direct Anterior Approach (DAA)

    Direct Anterior Approach surgery to replace the hip.

    Procedure: Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) · Procedure: Anterolateral approach

  • Active comparator
    Anterolateral approach

    Anterolateral Approach surgery to replace the hip.

    Procedure: Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) · Procedure: Anterolateral approach

  • Active comparator
    Posterolateral approach

    Posterolateral Approach surgery to replace the hip.

    Procedure: Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) · Procedure: Anterolateral approach

Interventions

  • ProcedureDirect Anterior Approach (DAA)

    Direct Anterior Approach surgery to replace the hip.

  • ProcedureAnterolateral approach

    Anterolateral approach surgery to replace the hip.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in biomechanical gait parameters

    Done by a biomechanics lab for patients to test their hip movements

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  2. Gluteus medius muscle fatigue

    Surface Electromyographic analysis performed for testing gluteus medius activity

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  3. Change from baseline in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) activities of daily living (ADL)

    This asks the patient how their hip functions during their daily life. It has 5 subscales measuring Pain, Symptoms, ADL, Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life (which is calculated using all the subscores). Each subscale is calculated using the mean score, with each score range being from 0 to 4. The subscore is normalized such that the lower the number the more extreme the problem is. To calculate Quality of Life, the mean of the other 4 subscores are taken to calculate the score. This asks the patient how their hip functions during their daily life. It has 5 subscales measuring Pain, Symptoms, ADL, Sports/Recreation and Quality of Life (which is calculated using all the subscores). Each subscale is calculated using the mean score, with each score range being from 0 to 4. The subscore is normalized such that the lower the number the more extreme the problem is. To calculate Quality of Life, the mean of the other 4 subscores are taken to calculate the score.

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  4. Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

    This measures health status as it relates to the hip. There are 3 subscales, pain which score ranges from 0-20, stiffness range from 0-8, physical function ranging from 0-68. The total score is just added up from the subscales.

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  5. Change in Oxford scale

    The Oxford scale is a physiotherapist objective-rated scale to asses muscle strength against the resistance. It is graded from 0 (flicker of movement) to 5 (Through full range actively against strong resistance)

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  6. Change in SF-36 scale

    The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire that is a general measure of perceived health status comprising 36 questions, which yields an 8-scale health profile. The vitality sub-score assesses energy and fatigue, and ranges from 0 (worst) - 100 (best).

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  7. Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale

    To measure pain. This is a line with left most end representing no pain with the rightmost representing extreme pain. The participant puts a line where they feel that day and it is measured with a ruler to determine score out of 100. The line is 100mm long.

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  8. Change in biomechanical gait balance

    Done by a biomechanics lab for patients to test their gait balance

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

  9. Change in biomechanical coordination

    Done by a biomechanics lab for patients to test their hip movements coordination

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiological analysis of implants positioning

    To measure angles associated with proper implants positioning

    Time frame: from baseline (can be measured anytime to a maximum of one month before surgery) to 3 and 12 months post-operatively

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
    Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland
  • Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw
    Warsaw, Poland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mariconda M, Galasso O, Costa GG, Recano P, Cerbasi S. Quality of life and functionality after total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Oct 6;12:222. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-222. PubMed 21978244 ↗
  • Sinha A, Twycross-Lewis R, Small C, Morrissey D, Maffulli N. Motion analysis as an outcome measure for hip arthroplasty. Surgeon. 2011 Oct;9(5):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 13. PubMed 21843824 ↗
  • Demos HA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW. Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Dec;(393):168-80. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00020. PubMed 11764347 ↗
  • Wylde V, Blom AW, Bolink S, Brunton L, Dieppe P, Gooberman-Hill R, Grimm B, Mann C, Lenguerrand E. Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Nov 13;13:220. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-220. PubMed 23148591 ↗
  • Cheng TE, Wallis JA, Taylor NF, Holden CT, Marks P, Smith CL, Armstrong MS, Singh PJ. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Total Hip Arthroplasty-Comparing Early Results Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterior Approach. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):883-890. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.027. Epub 2016 Aug 31. PubMed 27687805 ↗
  • Queen RM, Schaeffer JF, Butler RJ, Berasi CC, Kelley SS, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP. Does surgical approach during total hip arthroplasty alter gait recovery during the first year following surgery? J Arthroplasty. 2013 Oct;28(9):1639-43. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 19. PubMed 23518430 ↗
  • Wesseling M, Meyer C, Corten K, Simon JP, Desloovere K, Jonkers I. Does surgical approach or prosthesis type affect hip joint loading one year after surgery? Gait Posture. 2016 Feb;44:74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 23. PubMed 27004636 ↗
  • Foucher KC, Wimmer MA, Moisio KC, Hildebrand M, Berli MC, Walker MR, Berger RA, Galante JO. Time course and extent of functional recovery during the first postoperative year after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty with two different surgical approaches--a randomized controlled trial. J Biomech. 2011 Feb 3;44(3):372-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.10.026. Epub 2010 Nov 13. PubMed 21075378 ↗
  • Rosenlund S, Broeng L, Overgaard S, Jensen C, Holsgaard-Larsen A. The efficacy of modified direct lateral versus posterior approach on gait function and hip muscle strength after primary total hip arthroplasty at 12months follow-up. An explorative randomised controlled trial. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2016 Nov;39:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 30. PubMed 27721093 ↗
  • Yue C, Kang P, Pei F. Comparison of Direct Anterior and Lateral Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Dec;94(50):e2126. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002126. PubMed 26683920 ↗
  • Beaulieu ML, Lamontagne M, Beaule PE. Lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following total hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture. 2010 Jun;32(2):269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 11. PubMed 20541940 ↗
  • Bennett D, Humphreys L, O'Brien S, Kelly C, Orr JF, Beverland DE. Gait kinematics of age-stratified hip replacement patients--a large scale, long-term follow-up study. Gait Posture. 2008 Aug;28(2):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Feb 19. PubMed 18242996 ↗
  • Calo L, Rabini A, Picciotti PM, Laurino S, Passali GC, Ferrara PE, Maggi L, Piazzini DB, Specchia A, Frasca G, Ronconi G, Bertolini C, Scarano E. Postural control in patients with total hip replacement. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep;45(3):327-34. Epub 2009 Feb 11. PubMed 19209135 ↗
  • Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome of total hip replacement: a comparison of different measurement methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Sep;(390):163-72. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200109000-00019. PubMed 11550862 ↗
  • McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Oct;45(5):453-61. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200110)45:53.0.co;2-w. No abstract available. PubMed 11642645 ↗
  • Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S, Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties--a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty. 2005 Dec;20(8):1037-41. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.017. PubMed 16376260 ↗
  • Wylde V, Learmonth ID, Cavendish VJ. The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Oct 31;3:66. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-66. PubMed 16259627 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03850665
Lead sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
Responsible party
Artur Stolarczyk (Head of the Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor, Medical University of Warsaw) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 22, 2019
Start date
Sep 27, 2020
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2021
Completion
Oct 1, 2021
Last update
Oct 6, 2021

Study contacts

Artur Stolarczyk, Ph. D
study director · Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw
Bartosz Maciąg
principal investigator · Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation Department, Medical University of Warsaw

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion