CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03848338ECochGUpdated Feb 20, 2019

Electrocochleography Function for Monitoring Residual Hearing

An interventional study of Electrocochleography in Hearing Loss, Cochlear, sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 1 Year and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-20.

Sponsored by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Year and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial is a pilot study to assess the feasibility of using Electrocochleography recorded from a cochlear implant intra-operatively in real time to monitor the progress of its insertion. Correlation between:

  1. Observed changes in this signal during surgery and residual hearing loss post-operatively and
  2. Recordings of this signal post-operatively and actual pure tone audiometry results will also be assessed.
Read the detailed description

Cochlear Implants (CIs) can provide deaf individuals the ability to hear. CIs are electronics packages inserted into the cochlea (hearing organ). An external processor digitises sound and transmits it to the implant. An electric stimulus from the implant mimics the change in electrical potential normally caused by the movement of stereocilia in the cochlea when a sound occurs. This change generates an impulse along the auditory nerve to the brain resulting in perception of sound.

CIs are available in the UK to people who have profound hearing loss. The improvement of CI technology means individuals with less significant losses, or profound losses at only some pitches may now benefit from a CI over a hearing aid. Patients having useful residual hearing has led to interest in better preserving that hearing during surgery. Thus allowing benefit from traditional acoustic amplification in addition to electrical stimulation from the implant.

The investigators propose recording a measurement via the implant during surgery and at audiology appointments called a cochlear microphonic using a technique called electrocochleography (ECochG). This is essentially recording the electrical signal generated by the movement of hair cells in the cochlea in response to a sound. It is hypothesised that reduction of this signal during implantation may correspond to cochlea damage occurring and that with development this signal might be useful feedback for surgeons. The signal is known to be correlated to actual hearing ability so a better understanding of this may allow us to fit the acoustic amplification portion of implants in individuals who are unable to respond reliably to a normal hearing test.

The purpose of this study is a pilot to assess the correlation between observed changes in this signal during surgery and residual hearing loss post-operatively and the degree correlation between recordings of this signal post-operatively and actual hearing test results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hearing Loss, Cochlear

Keywords

  • Cochlear Implant
  • Electrocochleography
03

In context

Hearing Loss

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Hearing Loss; 235 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 40 across 764 interventional studies indexed under Hearing Loss.

Browse Hearing Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Meets normal candidacy requirements for cochlear implantation
  • At least 1 year of age at time of consent being given
  • Patent cochlea as verified by CT or MRI scan
  • No cochlear abnormality that might prevent insertion of the electrode array
  • Measurable residual hearing in the ear to be implanted
  • No additional complex needs that would prevent study procedures or normal clinical follow-up protocol being followed
  • AB Implant selected by patient or MDT
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically complex cases where minimal duration of surgery is required
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Pilot Group

    Intra and Post-operative Electrocochleography

    Procedure: Electrocochleography

Interventions

  • ProcedureElectrocochleography

    Electrocochleography measurement Intra-operatively and Post-operatively at follow-up appointments along with correlative measurements (Impedance, eCAP, PTA, Speech)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cochlear Microphonic Amplitude (micro volts) via Electrocochleography during Cochlear Implant Insertion

    Cochlear Microphonic amplitude from real time electrocochleography using the apical cochlear implant electrode during implant insertion.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  2. Cochlear Microphonic Amplitude (micro volts) via Electrocochleography during post-operative audiological appointments

    Cochlear Microphonic amplitude recorded from varying electrodes and at varying frequencies post-insertion during each follow-up appointment for the first year.

    Time frame: 1 Year

Secondary outcomes

  1. ECochG Correlations

    Correlations between Intra and Post-operative cochlear microphonic amplitudes and other normal clinical measures (Impedance, eCAP, PTA, Speech)

    Time frame: 1 Year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hearing Implant Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
    London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dalbert A, Pfiffner F, Hoesli M, Koka K, Veraguth D, Roosli C, Huber A. Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography. Front Neurosci. 2018 Jan 26;12:18. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00018. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29434534 ↗
  • Pienkowski M, Adunka OF, Lichtenhan JT. Editorial: New Advances in Electrocochleography for Clinical and Basic Investigation. Front Neurosci. 2018 May 8;12:310. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00310. eCollection 2018. No abstract available. PubMed 29867322 ↗
  • Koka K, Saoji AA, Litvak LM. Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Residual Hearing: Comparison With Audiometric Thresholds. Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):e161-e167. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000385. PubMed 27879487 ↗
  • O'Connell BP, Holder JT, Dwyer RT, Gifford RH, Noble JH, Bennett ML, Rivas A, Wanna GB, Haynes DS, Labadie RF. Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation. Front Neurosci. 2017 May 29;11:291. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00291. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28611574 ↗
  • Mandala M, Colletti L, Tonoli G, Colletti V. Electrocochleography during cochlear implantation for hearing preservation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 May;146(5):774-81. doi: 10.1177/0194599811435895. Epub 2012 Jan 30. PubMed 22291043 ↗
  • Soulby A, Connor S, Jiang D, Nunn T, Boyle P, Pai I. Establishing Reproducibility and Correlation of Cochlear Microphonic Amplitude to Implant Electrode Position Using Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1263-1275. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001010. PubMed 33813521 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03848338
Lead sponsor
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 20, 2019
Start date
Jan 24, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 20, 2019

Study contacts

Andrew J Soulby, MSc
Contact
Andrew.Soulby@gstt.nhs.uk
02071886245 ext. 6245
Terry B Nunn, MSc
principal investigator · Head of Audiology and Consultant Clinical Scientist
Dan Jiang, PhD FRCS
study chair · Professor of Otology and Auditory Implantation Surgery.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion