ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03835429Updated Sep 30, 2025

Effect of Oral Appliance Therapy on Atrial Fibrillation

An interventional study of MyTAP oral appliance plus mouth shield in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Texas A&M University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-30.

Sponsored by Texas A&M University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Recruitment difficulties.

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jan 2025, 1 year 10 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot study is expected to determine the efficacy of using the midline traction designed MyTAP plus mouth shield (MyTAP + MS) oral appliance combination in decreasing the number of Atrial Fibrillation events. The MS is a patient comfort accessory to the MyTAP.

Read the detailed description

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in the U.S. and possesses a greater risk in patients with sleep disordered breathing (SDB) versus patients without SDB. AF recurrence after catheter ablation is associated with 25% increased risk in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). One hypothesis suggests that the repeated hypoxic episodes time-linked to OSA and central sleep apnea may act as chemo-reflex triggers that enhances brainstem sympathetic activity in conjunction with responses to OSA-event hypoxia. This hypothesis is believed to induce tachycardia and cardiovascular stress. In an animal model, episodes of hypoxia were shown to induce pulmonary vein burst firing and reduction of the negative tracheal pressure promptly restored normal sinus rhythm. The Trigemino-cardiac reflex hypothesis implicates chemo- and mechanoreceptors in the oronasal cavity that provides signaling to the reticular formation via the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve and serves to control breathing, cardiac function, blood pH (acidity), amongst other body functions.

The sympathetic system in patients with OSA syndrome is considered to be chronically hypersensitized. A hyperarousal state suggests AF patients with OSA would tend to have AF occur more frequently in conjunction with apnea hypopnea events. An increase in autonomic sympathetic cardiac dominance with a withdrawal of cardiac parasympathetic control could easily be driven by mechanoreceptors in the oropharynx upon airway narrowing and present as decreased heart rate variability. Considering that the upper airway is often the site of greatest airflow restriction (i.e. snoring), a potential sudden rise in autonomic sympathetic nerve activity in sensory afferent fibers from the oropharynx should be the first to communicate the airflow reduction to brainstem. This theory is supported by the investigators' preliminary data and those in other reports. Oral appliance (OA) therapy that prevents snoring in conjunction with a mouth shield should simultaneously facilitate an open airway and prevent mouth breathing. The combination effect is expected to decrease vagus nerve motor efferent activity to the esophagus, facilitate nasal breathing, reduce sympathetic tone, promote stable sleep and increase HRV(heart rate variability). In patients with AF, the MyTAP + MS intervention is likely to also facilitate putatively effective medical therapies, reduce noxious AF triggers, and maintain normal oral bacterial flora levels and cardiac functioning.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

  • oral appliance
  • atrial fibrillation
  • sleep apnea
  • mouth shield
  • snoring
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3 is below the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Texas A&M University is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (29%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pre-qualified for ablation AF intervention
  • AF > 1 documented episode in a 24-hour (ECG) Holter examination or implanted AF monitor in the previous 1 month prior to study enrollment; [AF episode defined as at least 12 hours duration]
  • At least 8 teeth per arch to support OA device
  • Use of continuous positive air pressure (CPAP)therapy and willingness to switch to OA use
  • Willing and able to provide verbal and written
  • Ability to understand how to apply and utilize the sleep recorder and the OA device

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with implantable cardiac rhythm device [pacemakers or internal cardiac device (ICDs)] or cardiopulmonary disease [heart failure, (COPD), ventricular dysrhythmia]
  • Unable or unwilling to complete the study demands and schedule
  • Comorbidities of other sleep disorders other than OSA
  • No active temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) or jaw muscle pain, or morphological airway abnormalities
  • Pre-existing difficulty swallowing; throat or neck related health issues; endocrine dysfunction; severe psychiatric and neurological disorders; intellectually disabled; handicaps limiting sleep position
  • Previous OA therapy or restrictions in jaw opening
  • Prior ablation of AF, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or decompensation of heart failure within the last six months, untreated overt hyper- or hypothyroidism
  • Commencement of new anti-arrhythmic drug since last monitor check
  • Pharmacological dependency
  • Concomitant use of hypnotic agents or other sleep aids, nicotine or alcohol intake
  • Mallampati score > III
  • Palatine tonsils - grade > 2
  • History of Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
3 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MyTAP oral appliance plus mouth shield

    MyTAP plus mouth shield

    Device: MyTAP oral appliance plus mouth shield

Interventions

  • DeviceMyTAP oral appliance plus mouth shield

    The midline traction oral appliance (MyTAP, Airway Management Inc.(AMI), Dallas Texas) is currently marketed as a medical device to treat snoring and obstructive sleep apnea and is FDA cleared.

    Also known as: Oral appliance midline traction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AF incidence

    Measured (%) incidence of paroxysmal AF episodes \>10 seconds in duration, 1-month after starting OA (T1) therapy compared with 1-month prior to using OA.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Periodontal conditions

    Periodontal conditions (defined according to classification developed by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Periodontology (CDC-AAP)) 24 assessment at (T0) before MyTAP + MS initiation and after 1-month (T1).

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. MyTAP advancement change from T1 to T2

    OA advancement in mm

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Heart rate variability analysis after 1 month compared with baseline (T0)

    HRV in ms

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Apnea hypopnea index after 1 month (T2) compared with T0-1

    Number of apneas and hypopneas per hour of recording

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. Oxygen desaturation index after 1 month (T2) compared with T0-1

    Percent oxygen desaturation

    Time frame: 1 month

  5. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS); Score ≥10 is sleepy, ≥ 18 is very sleepy.

    Change in subjective ESS score pre-OA intervention vs. after 4-weeks of OA use

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Texas A&M School of Dentistry, Health Science Center
    Dallas, Texas 75246, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Jan 2025, 71 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2019
First posted
Feb 8, 2019
StartActual
Jan 15, 2019
Primary completionActual
Jan 3, 2025
CompletionActual
Jan 3, 2025
Last update
Sep 30, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 30, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03835429
Responsible party
Emet D. Schneiderman, PhD (Professor, Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 8, 2019
Start date
Jan 15, 2019
Primary completion
Jan 3, 2025
Completion
Jan 3, 2025
Last update
Sep 30, 2025

Study contacts

Emet Schneiderman, PhD
principal investigator · TAMHSC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion