ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03828630LUSIPUpdated Apr 25, 2019

Lung Ultrasound to Detect Pulmonary Complications in Critically Ill Parturients

An observational study in Obstetric Complication, Lung Injury, Acute and Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA). Completed at 1 site in Sierra Leone. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-25.

Sponsored by Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
168
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims at describing the frequency, timing and type of pulmonary complications detected with lung ultrasound in critically-ill parturients in admitted to a high-dependency unit in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: The three big 'killers' in parturients, peripartum hemorrhage, sepsis and pre-eclampsia all predispose to pulmonary complications. These complications affect management before, during and after the primary obstetric problem has been solved. A timely diagnosis and thorough follow-up of pulmonary complications may benefit parturients. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a point-of-care imaging bedside tool increasingly used in the critical care setting that may prove useful in parturients.

Objective: To describe frequency, timing and type of pulmonary complications detected with LUS in critically ill parturients in a high-dependency unit (HDU), and to determine the association with outcome.

Hypotheses: Pulmonary complications detected by LUS are frequent in parturients admitted to a HDU in a resource-limited setting, and are associated with hospital mortality.

Study design: A prospective observational study. Study population: Critically ill parturients admitted to the HDU of the Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Sample size: No formal sample size calculation is performed. Based on current rates of admissions to the HDU of the PCMH the investigators expect to perform LUS in at least 125 patients.

Methods: A trained physician performs all 12-region LUS investigations. LUS is performed at admission, after 24 and 48 hours, and when a patient's respiratory condition deteriorates. LUS findings are reported using a standardized semi-quantitative visual LUS scoring method.

Main study parameters/primary endpoints: The proportion of critically ill parturients admitted to the HDU of the PCMH with pulmonary complications detected by LUS, including interstitial syndrome, pulmonary consolidation, and pleural effusion.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstetric Complication
  • Lung Injury, Acute
  • Pulmonary Disease
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
03

In context

Acute Lung Injury

382 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Lung Injury; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 168 is above the median of 100 across 131 observational studies indexed under Acute Lung Injury.

Browse Acute Lung Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) is the lead sponsor of 532 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Critically ill parturients admitted to the HDU of the Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) in Freetown, Sierra Leone.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admitted to the HDU of the PCMH during the study period
  • Verbal of the patient or his/her formal representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lung ultrasound not feasible, e.g., due to electricity breakdown, or absence of the trained sonographer.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
168 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of parturients with pulmonary complications

    proportion of parturients with pulmonary complications detected by LUS during stay in the HDU.

    Time frame: From admission to 48 hours later

Secondary outcomes

  1. Description of lung ultrasound findings

    Precise description of ultrasound findings (proportion of patients with a normal lung, interstitial syndrome, lung consolidation, pleural effusion)

    Time frame: From admission to 48 hours later

  2. Description of diagnoses made with lung ultrasound

    Proportion of patients with a diagnosis of pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, fluid overload, no pulmonary complication.

    Time frame: From admission to 48 hours later

  3. Relative risk of death in patients with a pulmonary complication

    Risk of death in the group with pulmonary complication divided by the risk of death in parturients without a pulmonary complication

    Time frame: On the day of HDU discharge or death, whichever came first, assessed up to 12 weeks after enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Princess Christian Maternity Hospital
    Freetown, Sierra Leone
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Leopold SJ, Ghose A, Plewes KA, Mazumder S, Pisani L, Kingston HWF, Paul S, Barua A, Sattar MA, Huson MAM, Walden AP, Henwood PC, Riviello ED, Schultz MJ, Day NPJ, Kumar Dutta A, White NJ, Dondorp AM. Point-of-care lung ultrasound for the detection of pulmonary manifestations of malaria and sepsis: An observational study. PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0204832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204832. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30540757 ↗
  • Vercesi V, Pisani L, van Tongeren PSI, Lagrand WK, Leopold SJ, Huson MMA, Henwood PC, Walden A, Smit M, Riviello ED, Pelosi P, Dondorp AM, Schultz MJ; Lung Ultrasound Consortium. External confirmation and exploration of the Kigali modification for diagnosing moderate or severe ARDS. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Apr;44(4):523-524. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5048-5. Epub 2018 Jan 24. No abstract available. Erratum In: Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;44(3):403-404. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5098-8. PubMed 29368056 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2018 to primary completion in Feb 2019, 7 months.

Of 41 non-industry observational studies under Acute Lung Injury, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 47. This study's 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 46 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 29, 2019
First posted
Feb 4, 2019
StartActual
Jul 8, 2018
Primary completionActual
Feb 27, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 28, 2019
Last update
Apr 25, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03828630
Collaborators
Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, University of Sierra Leone, Doctors with Africa - CUAMM, University of Bari
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Marcus J. Schultz (Professor, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 4, 2019
Start date
Jul 8, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 27, 2019
Completion
Mar 28, 2019
Last update
Apr 25, 2019

Study contacts

Marcella Schiavone, MD, PhD
study chair · Doctors with Africa - CUAMM
Anna de Nicolo, MD, PhD
study chair · University of Bari
Eva Henciles, MD
principal investigator · University of Sierra Leone
Marcus J Schultz, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Amsterdam

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion