CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03826771POWER-DUpdated Apr 24, 2025Results posted

Post-Stroke Optimization of Walking Using Explosive Resistance

A Phase 2 interventional study of Power training and Stretching in Stroke and Depression, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-24.

Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will study the effects of a 12 week strength training program on individuals who have had a stroke and are depressed to see if this type of exercise training helps treat depression and improves walking function. Our goal is to use the information collected in this study to help design treatments for people who have had a stroke that will help with many of the common consequences of stroke, including depression, muscle weakness and slow walking. Progress toward overcoming some of these issues would be incredibly valuable to any person who has had a stroke and their families.

Read the detailed description

Depression is the most common neuropsychiatric manifestation following stroke and current treatments are largely ineffective. Depression has both direct and indirect effects on response to rehabilitation, thus subjects with post-stroke depression (PSD) are routinely excluded from clinical trials and treatment options are extremely limited. The investigators propose to determine the impact of a novel, high-intensity resistance training program, Post-stroke Optimization of Walking using Explosive Resistance (POWER) training, on post-stroke depressive symptoms. Further, the investiators will determine if depression limits training-induced improvements in muscular and locomotor function. This project is based on the premise that depression negatively affects the potential for neuroplastic changes to occur in response to treatment such that rehabilitation may not produce the same adaptations that it does in non-depressed individuals. The investigators propose that effective treatment for PSD would result in a virtuous cycle where reducing depression enhances neuroplastic changes, thereby facilitating functional gains. That is, effectively treating depression will make the individual better able to recover from stroke. Furthermore, in addition to its beneficial effects on depression, POWER training is known to improve post-stroke walking, thus providing an attractive option for treating depression as well as an established vehicle to study the effects of PSD on response to rehabilitation. The experiments proposed as part of this project are designed to address critical questions related to 1) the effects of POWER training on depressive symptoms; 2) the potential for PSD to limit improvements following training; and 3) the interaction between improvements in depression and increases in walking function. Successful completion of this project will provide a foundation for larger scale trials to determine dosing parameters as well as establish therapeutic effectiveness of POWER training on post-stroke depression as well as identify the mechanisms that may be responsible for the changes that occur in response to treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Depression

Keywords

  • stroke
  • rehabilitation
  • depression
  • exercise
03

In context

Stroke

7,286 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,007 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is close to the median of 50 across 5,369 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.

Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • age 50-70
  • stroke within the past 6 to 60 months
  • residual paresis in the lower extremity (Fugl-Meyer LE motor score \<34)
  • ability to walk without assistance and without an AFO during testing and training at speeds ranging from 0.2-0.8 m/s
  • no antidepressant medications or no change in doses of psychotropic medication for at least 4 weeks prior to the study (6 weeks if newly initiated medication)
  • HRSD question #9 regarding suicide \<2; and 7) provision of informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to ambulate at least 150 feet prior to stroke, or experienced intermittent claudication while walking
  • history of congestive heart failure, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis, angina or dyspnea at rest or during ADL's
  • History of COPD or oxygen dependence
  • Preexisting neurological disorders, dementia or previous stroke
  • History of major head trauma
  • Legal blindness or severe visual impairment
  • history of psychosis or other Axis I disorder that is primary
  • Life expectancy \<1 yr.
  • Severe arthritis or other problems that limit passive ROM
  • History of DVT or pulmonary embolism within 6 months
  • Uncontrolled diabetes with recent weight loss, diabetic coma, or frequent insulin reactions
  • Severe hypertension with systolic >200 mmHg and diastolic >110 mmHg at rest
  • attempt of suicide in the last 2 years or at suicidal risk assessed by SCID interview
  • History of seizures or currently prescribed anti-seizure medications
  • Current enrollment in a clinical trial to enhance motor recovery
  • Pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    POWER training

    high velocity strength training

    Behavioral: Power training

  • Active comparator
    Stretching

    Upper and lower body range of motion exercises

    Behavioral: Stretching

Interventions

  • BehavioralPower training

    high-intensity lower extremity resistance training

  • BehavioralStretching

    upper and lower body range of motion exercises

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Mean Score of Depression as Assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

    The HAM-D is a clinician-rated scale with scores based on clinical interview and family report. It addresses both somatic and psychological symptoms of depression. Items are rated on either a 5-point scale (0 to 4) or 3-point scale (0 to 2), where higher scores represent increasing severity of depression. The scores of the 17 items are summed to obtain a total score (minimum score: 0, maximum score: 52).

    Time frame: Visit 1 through visit 24 (up to 12 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Self Selected Walking Speed

    Subjects will walk on a 14-ft. long gait mat (GaitRite) to measure self-selected and fastest comfortable walking speed and other spatiotemporal parameters of walking. Subjects will be permitted a practice trial, and then be asked to complete three trials at each speed. For all trials, subjects will wear their own shoes and be asked to walk without an assistive device or ankle-foot orthosis.

    Time frame: Visit 1 through visit 24 (up to 12 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Apr 24, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePOWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-Depressed
Started191217
Completed12915
Not completed732

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Mean Score of Depression as Assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

The HAM-D is a clinician-rated scale with scores based on clinical interview and family report. It addresses both somatic and psychological symptoms of depression. Items are rated on either a 5-point scale (0 to 4) or 3-point scale (0 to 2), where higher scores represent increasing severity of depression. The scores of the 17 items are summed to obtain a total score (minimum score: 0, maximum score: 52).

Time frame:
Visit 1 through visit 24 (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Mean Score of Depression as Assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
units on a scalePOWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-Depressed
Change in Mean Score of Depression as Assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression5.20 ± 4.312.17 ± 4.720.14 ± 2.83
SecondaryChange in Self Selected Walking Speed

Subjects will walk on a 14-ft. long gait mat (GaitRite) to measure self-selected and fastest comfortable walking speed and other spatiotemporal parameters of walking. Subjects will be permitted a practice trial, and then be asked to complete three trials at each speed. For all trials, subjects will wear their own shoes and be asked to walk without an assistive device or ankle-foot orthosis.

Time frame:
Visit 1 through visit 24 (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · meters per second
Change in Self Selected Walking Speed
meters per secondPOWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-Depressed
Change in Self Selected Walking Speed0.08 ± 0.020.06 ± 0.020.21 ± 0.06

Adverse events

Collected over throughout the 12 week training intervention. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
POWER Training - Depressed0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)2/19 (10.5%)
Stretching0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)
POWER Training - Non-Depressed0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)1/17 (5.9%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPOWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-Depressed
mild injury (sprain/contusion)Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/190/121/17

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)POWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-DepressedTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years168832
>=65 years34916
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)POWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-DepressedTotal
Mean51.37 ± 10.8257.83 ± 12.2562.59 ± 9.856.96 ± 11.70
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)POWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-DepressedTotal
Female108422
Male941326
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)POWER Training - DepressedStretchingPOWER Training - Non-DepressedTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian1001
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American67518
White1251229
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Aug 23, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03826771
Lead sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 1, 2019
Start date
Feb 6, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2024
Completion
May 12, 2024
Results posted
Apr 24, 2025
Last update
Apr 24, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion