ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03824587Updated Mar 6, 2023Results posted

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Tenapanor as Adjunctive Therapy to Phosphate Binder Therapy

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Tenapanor and Placebo in Hyperphosphatemia, sponsored by Ardelyx. Completed at 48 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-06.

Sponsored by Ardelyx · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
236
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of tenapanor on change in s-P levels when tenapanor is administered orally, twice daily for 28 days as adjunctive therapy to ESRD subjects with hyperphosphatemia on stable phosphate binder therapy.

Read the detailed description

The study consists of a Screening visit; a Run-in Period of at least 2 weeks and up to 4 weeks, where existing phosphate binder treatment is maintained; and a 4-week Double-Blind Treatment Period.

At Screening, a subject must be on thrice daily phosphate binder therapy and have a serum phosphate (s-P) level ≥5.5 and ≤10.0 mg/dL to qualify for entering the study. s-P will be measured at each visit during the run-in period to enable the evaluation of the s-P randomization criteria.

Subjects who qualify to enroll in the study will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive tenapanor or placebo while continuing their existing phosphate binder treatment.

During the Double-Blind Treatment Period, subjects will receive tenapanor or placebo starting at a dose of 30 mg bid

02

Conditions studied

  • Hyperphosphatemia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hyperphosphatemia

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperphosphatemia; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 236 is above the median of 101 across 143 interventional studies indexed under Hyperphosphatemia.

Browse Hyperphosphatemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Ardelyx is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed and dated prior to any study specific procedures.
  • Males or females aged 18 to 80 years, inclusive, at Screening
  • Females must be non-pregnant, non-lactating and either be for at least -2 months, have documentation of irreversible surgical sterilization, use of acceptable - method, or sexual abstinence, or a sterile sexual partner from Screening -until 30 days after the last subject visit.
  • Males must agree to avoid fathering a child (or donating sperm), and therefore be either sterile (documented) or agree to use approved methods of contraception, from the time of enrollment until 30 days after end of study.
  • Chronic maintenance hemodialysis (HD) 3x/week for at least 3 months or chronic maintenance peritoneal dialysis (PD) for a minimum of 6 months.
  • If receiving active vitamin D or calcimimetics, the dose should have been unchanged for the last 4 weeks prior to Screening.
  • Kt/V ≥1.2 at most recent measurement prior to Screening.
  • Prescribed and taking phosphate binder medication at least 3 times per day, and the prescribed dose should have been unchanged during the last 4 weeks prior to Screening.
  • Serum phosphorus levels must be ≥5.5 and ≤10.0 mg/dL at Screening and the end of the run-in period, analyzed at the central laboratory used in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe hyperphosphatemia defined as having an s-P level >10.0 mg/dL on phosphate-binders at any time point during routine clinical monitoring for the 3 preceding months before Screening.
  • Serum/plasma parathyroid hormone >1200 pg/mL.
  • Clinical signs of hypovolemia at Screening as judged by the Investigator.
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D).
  • Scheduled for living donor kidney transplant or plans to relocate to another center during the study period.
  • Use of an agent within 30 days prior to Screening.
  • Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study (applies to both Ardelyx/Contract Research Organization (CRO) staff and/or staff at the study site).
  • If, in the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is unable or unwilling to fulfill the requirements of the protocol or has a condition which would render the results uninterpretable.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
236 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tenapanor 30 mg BID

    During the Double-Blind Treatment Period, subjects will receive tenapanor starting at a dose of 30 mg bid (three 10 mg tablets each time). Investigators may decrease or increase the dose of study medication based on s-P levels and/or gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability in 10 mg increments to a minimum of 10 mg bid or a maximum of 30 mg bid at any time during the Double-Blind Treatment Period.

    Drug: Tenapanor · Drug: Phosphate Binder Agents

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    same size, weight and appearance of experimental drug

    Drug: Placebo · Drug: Phosphate Binder Agents

Interventions

  • Active Drug

  • DrugPlacebo

    Inactive Drug

  • standard of care phosphate binder use at study entry was maintained throughout the entire study

    Also known as: sevelamer carbonate, ferric citrate, calcium carbonate, calcium acetate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Serum Phosphorus (s-P) Level From Baseline to Week 4.

    Difference in mean change from baseline in s-P level at Week 4 between the tenapanor and placebo groups.

    Time frame: 4 Weeks (28 days randomization period; from baseline to week 4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. s-P Response at Week 4

    Achieving an s-P level \<5.5 mg/dL

    Time frame: 4 Weeks (28 days randomization period)

  2. Relative Change From Baseline in iFGF23 at Week 4

    iFGF23 at Week 4/baseline iFGF23 - 1

    Time frame: 4 Weeks (28 days randomization period)

  3. Relative Change From Baseline in cFGF23 at Week 4

    cFGF23 at Week 4/baseline cFGF23 - 1

    Time frame: 4 Weeks (28 days randomization period)

07

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2023

Participant flow

Run-in Period
Participant flow — Run-in Period
MilestoneTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
Started0511
Completed0236
Not completed0275
Withdrew: Screen failure0275
Treatment Period
Participant flow — Treatment Period
MilestoneTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
Started117119
Completed112116
Not completed53
Withdrew: Adverse event41
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Kidney transplant11

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Serum Phosphorus (s-P) Level From Baseline to Week 4.

Difference in mean change from baseline in s-P level at Week 4 between the tenapanor and placebo groups.

Time frame:
4 Weeks (28 days randomization period; from baseline to week 4)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mg/dL
Change in Serum Phosphorus (s-P) Level From Baseline to Week 4.
mg/dLTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
Change in Serum Phosphorus (s-P) Level From Baseline to Week 4.-0.84 ± 0.131-0.19 ± 0.130
Statistical analysis
  • Tenapanor 30 mg BID vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0004 · Mean difference (net): -0.65 · 99% CI -1.13 to -0.18
Secondarys-P Response at Week 4

Achieving an s-P level \<5.5 mg/dL

Time frame:
4 Weeks (28 days randomization period)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
s-P Response at Week 4
ParticipantsTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
s-P Response at Week 44326
Statistical analysis
  • Tenapanor 30 mg BID vs Placebo · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0097 · Odds ratio (or): 2.1
SecondaryRelative Change From Baseline in iFGF23 at Week 4

iFGF23 at Week 4/baseline iFGF23 - 1

Time frame:
4 Weeks (28 days randomization period)
Reported as:
Geometric least squares mean · pg/mL
Relative Change From Baseline in iFGF23 at Week 4
pg/mLTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
Relative Change From Baseline in iFGF23 at Week 40.756 (0.686 to 0.834)0.931 (0.845 to 1.025)
Statistical analysis
  • Tenapanor 30 mg BID vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0027
SecondaryRelative Change From Baseline in cFGF23 at Week 4

cFGF23 at Week 4/baseline cFGF23 - 1

Time frame:
4 Weeks (28 days randomization period)
Reported as:
Geometric least squares mean · pg/mL
Relative Change From Baseline in cFGF23 at Week 4
pg/mLTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
Relative Change From Baseline in cFGF23 at Week 40.779 (0.716 to 0.848)0.947 (0.871 to 1.030)
Statistical analysis
  • Tenapanor 30 mg BID vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0011

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected for the 4 week (28 days) treatment period.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tenapanor 30 mg BID0/117 (0%)3/117 (2.6%)50/117 (42.7%)
Placebo0/119 (0%)5/119 (4.2%)8/119 (6.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
Acute Pulmonary EdemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1171/119
Pulmonary EdemaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1170/119
Cardiorespiratory ArrestCardiac disorders1/1170/119
Acute Respiratory FailureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1171/119
Nodal ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders0/1171/119
Arteriovenous Fistula AneurysmInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1171/119
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1171/119
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTenapanor 30 mg BIDPlacebo
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders50/1178/119

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Mean55.10 ± 12.32653.88 ± 12.67354.49 ± 12.491
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Female524597
Male6574139
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino373067
Not Hispanic or Latino7988167
Unknown or Not Reported112
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native415
Asian246
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander123
Black or African American5250102
White5760117
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported123
Serum Phosphorus < 7.5 mg/dL
Serum Phosphorus < 7.5 mg/dL(Participants)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Count of participants7677153
Serum Phosphorus >= 7.5 mg/d:
Serum Phosphorus >= 7.5 mg/d:(Participants)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Count of participants414283
Sevelamer
Sevelamer(Participants)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Count of participants5758115
Non-Sevelamer
Non-Sevelamer(Participants)Tenapanor 30 mg BIDPlaceboTotal
Count of participants6061121
08

Study locations

48 sites
  • Nephrology Consultants, LLC
    Huntsville, Alabama 35805, United States
  • US Renal Care Pine Bluff
    Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603, United States
  • Southeast Renal Research
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • California Institute of Renal Research - Chula Vista
    Chula Vista, California 91910, United States
  • North America Research Institute
    Lynwood, California 90262, United States
  • DaVita Clinical Research - Santa Fe Spring
    Montebello, California 90640, United States
  • Central Coast Nephrology
    Salinas, California 93901, United States
  • North America Research Institute - San Dimas
    San Dimas, California 91773, United States
  • Chabot Nephrology Medical Group
    Union City, California 94587, United States
  • American Institute of Research
    Whittier, California 90603, United States
  • Nova Clinical Research, LLC
    Bradenton, Florida 34209, United States
  • Horizon Research Group - Coral Gables
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • South Florida Research Institute
    Lauderdale Lakes, Florida 33313, United States
  • Total Research Group, LLC
    Miami, Florida 33126, United States
  • Omega Research Consultants, LLC
    Orlando, Florida 32810, United States
  • Genesis Clinical Trials
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • Dialysis Clinic, Inc - Albany GA
    Albany, Georgia 31701, United States
  • Boise Kidney & Hypertension, PLLC - Meridian
    Caldwell, Idaho 83605, United States
  • Renal Associates of Baton Rouge
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
  • Dialysis Clinic, Inc - Boston/Somerville
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Paragon Health PC - Nephrology Center
    Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007, United States
  • InterMed Consultants
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404, United States
  • Nephrology and Hypertension Associates, LTD
    Tupelo, Mississippi 38801, United States
  • Clinical Research Consultants, LLC
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • Dialysis Clinic, Inc - Kansas City
    Kansas City, Missouri 64131, United States
  • Polack Renal, LLC (SMO)
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63121, United States
  • Kidney Specialists of Southern Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89107, United States
  • Sierra Nevada Nephrology Consultants
    Reno, Nevada 89511, United States
  • Dialysis Clinic, Inc - North Brunswick
    North Brunswick, New Jersey 08902, United States
  • Renal Medicine Associates
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109, United States
  • U.S. Renal Care - Gallup
    Gallup, New Mexico 87301, United States
  • Northwell Health
    Great Neck, New York 11021, United States
  • Mountain Kidney and Hypertension Associates
    Asheville, North Carolina 28801, United States
  • Mountain Kidney & Hypertension Associates, P.A.
    Asheville, North Carolina 28805, United States
  • Durham Nephrology Associates
    Durham, North Carolina 27704, United States
  • Southeastern Nephrology Associates - Wilmington
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • University of Cincinnati (UC) - Department of Nephrology
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45267, United States
  • Northeast Clinical Research Center
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017, United States
  • Columbia Nephrology Associates, P.A.
    Columbia, South Carolina 29203, United States
  • South Carolina Nephrology & Hypertension Center Inc.
    Orangeburg, South Carolina 29118, United States
  • DCI - Spartanburg
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29301, United States
  • Knoxville Kidney Center, PLLC
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37923, United States
  • Med Center Dialysis
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • US Renal Care - Waxahachie
    Mansfield, Texas 76063, United States
  • US Renal Care - Mesquite
    Mesquite, Texas 75150, United States
  • Clinical Advancement Center, PLLC
    San Antonio, Texas 78212, United States
  • US Renal Care - Pleasanton Road
    San Antonio, Texas 78221, United States
  • US Renal Care - Westover Hills
    San Antonio, Texas 78251, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pergola PE, Rosenbaum DP, Yang Y, Chertow GM. A Randomized Trial of Tenapanor and Phosphate Binders as a Dual-Mechanism Treatment for Hyperphosphatemia in Patients on Maintenance Dialysis (AMPLIFY). J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jun 1;32(6):1465-1473. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020101398. Epub 2021 Mar 25. PubMed 33766811 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03824587
Lead sponsor
Ardelyx
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2019
Start date
Feb 28, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 17, 2019
Completion
Jul 17, 2019
Results posted
Mar 6, 2023
Last update
Mar 6, 2023

Study contacts

David P Rosenbaum, PhD
study chair · Ardelyx

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tenapanor

Start the discussion