CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03824067POC-EIDUpdated Feb 5, 2021

Impact of Point-of-Care EID for HIV-Exposed Infants

An interventional study of Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis and Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis in HIV/AIDS, Infant Morbidity and Pediatric HIV Infection, sponsored by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-05.

Sponsored by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2017, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9,539
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This mixed methods study will utilize a randomized step-wedge design to assess the impact of point-of-care (POC) versus conventional early infant diagnosis (EID) on key outcomes including timely return of results to caregivers and time to initiation on treatment for HIV-infected infants. Data will be collected through longitudinal clinical follow-up and medical chart extraction of routine records and lab forms. Feasibility and acceptability data will be collected through interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants, and community focus groups.

Read the detailed description

This study seeks to evaluate the impact of point of care (POC) early infant HIV diagnosis (EID) on turn-around time from sample collection until notification of parents/caregivers of test result, linkage to care, and time to initiation of treatment, and early retention in HIV care (3-6 months) for those infected.

The study will take place in two countries, Zimbabwe and Kenya, with high HIV prevalence, and where EGPAF-supported POC EID platforms are being implemented as part of a Unitaid-funded POC EID project. As part of POC program implementation activities, in each country up to 50 EGPAF-supported sites will implement POC EID platforms. These sites may be prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV clinics, HIV clinics or multidisciplinary health facilities. Project sites have been selected as part of the program implementation. In each country, 18 sites will be randomly selected as study sites for the impact evaluation.

Using a stepped wedge design, the intervention (the POC EID platforms) will be rolled out sequentially to the study facilities over three randomly-assigned time periods. Quantitative data will be derived from routine medical and laboratory charts and longitudinal tracking and follow-up of HIV-infected infants.

Qualitative data on feasibility and acceptability of POC will be derived from in-depth interviews with mothers/caregivers of HIV-exposed infants at the beginning and end of the study and community focus group discussions at the end of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV/AIDS
  • Infant Morbidity
  • Pediatric HIV Infection
  • Transmission, Perinatal Infection

Keywords

  • HIV/AIDS
  • Point of Care
  • Early infant diagnosis
  • Health systems
  • Diagnostic tools
  • LMIC
03

In context

Infections

6,687 studies on the registry are indexed under Infections; 807 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9,539 is above the median of 120 across 4,200 interventional studies indexed under Infections.

Browse Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation is the lead sponsor of 29 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Any infant who receives an EID test, either conventional or POC, for the 4-6 week EID indication at one of the study sites (which were randomly selected from project sites in country)
  • HEI under 12 weeks of age or their parents/caregivers
  • Some methods will only include HEI who test positive (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow up)
  • Purposively selected caregivers of HEI for in-depth interviews
  • Focus groups with community members will not require participants to have sought testing for EID

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants not at selected study sites
  • For some methods (medical chart extraction and longitudinal follow-up), HEI who test negative
  • For qualitative component, excluded if unable to consent due to age, competence, or inability to speak any of the study languages
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9,539 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis

    Conventional laboratory based (standard of care - SOC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing: SOC EID

    Diagnostic Test: Standard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis

  • Experimental
    Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis

    The intervention is Point of Care (POC) early infant diagnosis (EID) testing, where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing.

    Diagnostic Test: Point of Care Early Infant Diagnosis

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPoint of Care Early Infant Diagnosis

    HIV testing where the blood sample is processed at either the facility itself or a nearby site that is closer to the facility than a laboratory. With POC EID, blood samples do not have to travel to the laboratory for processing.

    Also known as: POC EID

  • Diagnostic testStandard of Care Early Infant Diagnosis

    Conventional laboratory based EID testing

    Also known as: SOC EID

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of HIV exposed infants (HEI) who have received the 4-6 week EID test result by 12 weeks

    The number of children for whom a sample was drawn for the 4-6-week indication receiving EID result by 12 weeks, divided by the number of HEI who presented to the clinic and had an indication for 4-6 week EID testing

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Testing coverage for the 4-6 week indication

    Number of EID samples collected for 4-6 week indication divided by the number of HEI who presented to the clinic and had an indication for 4-6 week EID testing

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Time from sample collection for 4-6 week EID test indication to parent's/ caregiver notification

    Date of sample collection to the date that results were given to care giver

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. Age of patient at test result notification for 4-6 week EID test indication

    HEIs date of birth, date of sample collection and date of result notification to care giver

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. Time from test result received for 4-6 week EID test to initiation of ART, for HIV-infected infants

    Date positive result received at facility to the date the result was communicated to mother and date of ART initiation

    Time frame: 18 months

  5. Percentage of HIV positive infants diagnosed during 4-6 week EID testing initiated on ART

    Number of HIV-infected infants initiated on ART after 4-6 week EID test divided by the number of HIV-infected infants identified after 4-6 week EID test

    Time frame: 18 months

  6. Number of HIV-infected infants diagnosed at the 4-6 week EID with retention in care at 6 months

    Total number of infants initiated on ART 6 months ago and number of active on ART at 6 months

    Time frame: 24 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
    Nairobi, Kenya
  • Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
    Harare, Zimbabwe
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03824067
Lead sponsor
Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
Collaborators
UNITAID
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 31, 2019
Start date
Aug 1, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2019
Completion
Oct 31, 2019
Last update
Feb 5, 2021

Study contacts

Emma Sacks, PhD
principal investigator · George Washington University School of Public Health
Collins Odhiambo, MD
principal investigator · Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - Kenya
Agnes Mahomva, MD
principal investigator · Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric Aids Foundation - Zimbabwe
Jennifer Cohn, MD MPH
study director · Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion