CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03819582Updated Jan 28, 2019

Visual Performance With a Hydrophobic Aspheric Monofocal IOL

A Phase 4 interventional study of EyeCee One intraocular lens in Cataract, sponsored by University of Plymouth. Status unknown at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-28.

Sponsored by University of Plymouth · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jan 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2018, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
45 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Artificial lenses, otherwise known as intraocular lenses (IOLs), are used to replace the natural crystalline lens within the eye during cataract or refractive lens surgery. Monofocal IOLs are the traditional IOL type used during cataract surgery. These monofocal IOLs provide excellent distance vision, however spectacles are required for reading and intermediate distance tasks. Monofocal Intraocular lenses are the mainstay of cataract surgery, but with advancing technologies and a wider selection of lenses available, demand for improved outcomes, improved lens design and ease of surgical implantation have increased. The purpose of this study is to assess the visual performance of the EyeCee One monofocal intraocular lens. In addition an assessment of the ease of insertion by the surgeon will be quantified.

Read the detailed description

Artificial lenses, otherwise known as intraocular lenses (IOLs), are used to replace the natural crystalline lens within the eye during cataract or refractive lens surgery. Monofocal IOLs are the traditional IOL type used during cataract surgery. These monofocal IOLs provide excellent distance vision, however spectacles are required for reading and intermediate distance tasks. There are many different designs of monofocal IOLs, all with their own unique optical properties, however there is little evidence to support which optical design provides the best visual outcome. This research project allows us to assess the visual outcomes of a specific monofocal IOL. It also allows us to assess the ease of use of the lens to the surgeon.

Each subject will be evaluated at two visits following IOL implantation; visit 1 (1 month post implantation), Visit 2 (3 months post implantation).

At both post-operative visits the patient will undergo:

Refraction Uncorrected and best corrected distance and near visual acuity measurement Optical biometry to assess ELP Slit lamp biomicroscopy to assess for post-operative complications

At the time of surgery, the ophthalmic surgeon will complete a questionnaire, detailing lens insertion time and ease of use.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cataract

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cataract

1,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Cataract; 230 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 80 across 1,155 interventional studies indexed under Cataract.

Browse Cataract studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Plymouth is the lead sponsor of 46 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Clinically significant Cataract requiring cataract surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Amblyopia
  • Corneal astigmatism of >1.00D
  • Dilated pupil size smaller than 5mm
  • Macular pathology
  • Glaucoma
  • Retinal disease
  • Corneal disease
  • Abnormal iris
  • Pupil deformation
  • Any previous corneal or intraocular surgery
  • Any patient who had surgical complications will also be excluded from participation in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intraocular lens

    Subjects implanted with the EyeCee One Intraocular lens

    Device: EyeCee One intraocular lens

Interventions

  • DeviceEyeCee One intraocular lens

    Hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lens

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual acuity early post operative

    Visual acuity measured in LogMAR early post operatively

    Time frame: 1 month post operatively

  2. Visual acuity after 3 months post operatively

    Visual acuity measured in LogMAR measured 3 months post operatively

    Time frame: 3 months post operatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ease of use to surgeons

    Questionnaire completed by the surgeon to determine the usability of the intraocular lens

    Time frame: During surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 28, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03819582
Lead sponsor
University of Plymouth
Responsible party
Dr Phillip J Buckhurst (Associate Head of School for Research, University of Plymouth) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 28, 2019
Start date
Feb 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 28, 2019

Study contacts

Phillip Buckhurst
Contact
phillip.buckhurst@plymouth.ac.uk
07825429121

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion