CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT03819504Updated Oct 19, 2020

Stereotactic Non-invasive Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

An interventional study of 4-D navigated stereotactic radio surgical ablation in Ventricular Tachycardia, sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava. Withdrawn at 3 sites in Czechia. Open to participants aged 30 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-19.

Sponsored by University Hospital Ostrava · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Change in the design of the study

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2018, registered Jan 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

STereotactic Ablative Radiosurgery of recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia in structural heart disease (STAR-VT).

Read the detailed description

The goal of this project is to evaluate feasibility and safety/toxicity of elimination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with structural heart disease by noninvasive strategy, stereotactic radiosurgical ablation in an indication of bail-out procedure after failed catheter ablation. The arrhythmogenic substrate will be identified by imaging techniques and functionally by electroanatomic mapping and pacing. The recipients of stereotactic surgery will be patients after 2 unsuccessful catheter ablations for monomorphic VTs (one of the procedures will be performed in an expert center). The target volume for stereotactic radiosurgical ablation (single dose of 25 Gy) will be a critical region of the substrate defined by a combination of imaging and functional methods with an export of the merged image-electroanatomical map into the radiosurgery planning console. Primary endpoints will be a reduction of the burden of sustained VT, time to death or arrhythmic storm or appropriate therapy with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for isolated VT and/or time do development of radiation toxicity (both acute and late).

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Tachycardia

Keywords

  • Structural Heart Disease
  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • Substrate Ablation
  • Stereotactic Radiosurgery
  • Functional Radiosurgery
  • 4D navigation
03

In context

Tachycardia

623 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia; 81 are open to participants now.

Browse Tachycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ostrava is the lead sponsor of 146 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with structural heart disease (ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, previous surgery for congenital heart disease)
  • Implanted ICD or CRT-D (cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator)
  • Prior ≥1 catheter ablation procedure for monomorphic VT
  • VT recurrence early (\<12 months) after the last ablation with at least 2 episodes of recurrent VT, including 1 episode while on amiodarone (if not contraindicated)
  • Age ≥30 years
  • Signed an IRB-approved (Institutional Review Board) written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute myocardial infarction or recent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or cardiac surgery (\<3 months)
  • Primary electrical disease (channelopathy)
  • Reversible cause of VT (e.g. drug-induced, intoxications, etc)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Chronic heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV
  • Serious comorbidities with presumed life expectancy less than one year
  • Significant peripheral artery disease precluding retrograde aortic mapping
  • History of chest radiotherapy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4-D navigated stereotactic radiosurgical ablation

    Patients with structural heart disease and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia/tachycardias will undergo 4-D navigated stereotactic radiosurgical ablation

    Procedure: 4-D navigated stereotactic radio surgical ablation

Interventions

  • Procedure4-D navigated stereotactic radio surgical ablation

    4-D navigated stereotactic radio surgical ablation will be performed in patients with structural heart disease and sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia/tachycardias

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of sustained VT burden in three 3-month intervals

    Change of sustained VT burden in three 3-month intervals will be assessed. For all arrhythmic events, a 90-day post-radiosurgery blanking period will be applicable.

    Time frame: 50 months

  2. Composite endpoint of (i) all-cause death, (ii) appropriate ICD therapy (both shock and antitachycardia pacing) for VT/VF (ventricular fibrillation) or (iii) sustained VT below the detection threshold

    All-cause death, appropriate ICD therapy (both shock and antitachycardia pacing) for VT/VF (ventricular fibrillation) or sustained VT below the detection threshold will be observed for up to 50 months. For all arrhythmic events, a 90-day post-radiosurgery blanking period will be applicable.

    Time frame: 50 months

  3. 3. Rate of acute (<3 months) and late radiation-induced events according to CTCAE 4.0.

    The rate of acute (\<3 months) and late radiation-induced events according to CTCAE 4.0 will be observed.

    Time frame: 53 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite endpoint of all-cause death and appropriate ICD shock

    The composite endpoint of all-cause death and appropriate ICD shock will be observed for the period of up to 50 months. For all arrhythmic events, a 90-day post-radiosurgery blanking period will be applicable.

    Time frame: 50 months

  2. Electric storm recurrence

    The recurrence of electric storm will be observed. For all arrhythmic events, a 90-day post-radiosurgery blanking period will be applicable.

    Time frame: 53 months

  3. Cardiovascular hospitalisations

    The hospitalisations due to cardiovascular indications will be observed.

    Time frame: 53 months

  4. Change in quality of life

    Change in quality of life will be observed using the standardised EQ-5D (5-dimension) questionnaire. EQ-5D is a standardised instrument in the form of a questionnaire developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life that can be used in a wide range of health conditions and treatments. The quality of life is assessed in five dimensions, with three levels in each dimension. The higher score the patient achieves, the better the quality of life.

    Time frame: 53 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague
    Prague, Central Bohemia 14021, Czechia
  • University Hospital Ostrava
    Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic 708 52, Czechia
  • Hospital Podlesí
    Třinec, Moravian-Silesian Region 73961, Czechia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, Schron EB, Kuck KH, Zipes DP, Greene HL, Boczor S, Domanski M, Follmann D, Gent M, Roberts RS. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study. Eur Heart J. 2000 Dec;21(24):2071-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2476. PubMed 11102258 ↗
  • Moss AJ, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Klein H, Wilber DJ, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Higgins SL, Brown MW, Andrews ML; Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II Investigators. Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. Epub 2002 Mar 19. PubMed 11907286 ↗
  • Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Gent M, Bailin S, Fain ES, Thorpe K, Champagne J, Talajic M, Coutu B, Gronefeld GC, Hohnloser SH; Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Investigators. Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Jan 11;295(2):165-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.2.165. PubMed 16403928 ↗
  • Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, Brown MW, Cannom DS, Daubert JP, Estes NA 3rd, Greenberg H, Hall WJ, Huang DT, Kautzner J, Klein H, McNitt S, Olshansky B, Shoda M, Wilber D, Zareba W; MADIT-RIT Trial Investigators. Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 13;367(24):2275-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211107. Epub 2012 Nov 6. PubMed 23131066 ↗
  • Mallidi J, Nadkarni GN, Berger RD, Calkins H, Nazarian S. Meta-analysis of catheter ablation as an adjunct to medical therapy for treatment of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Apr;8(4):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.12.015. Epub 2010 Dec 13. PubMed 21147263 ↗
  • Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, Thibault B, Rivard L, Gula L, Leong-Sit P, Essebag V, Nery PB, Tung SK, Raymond JM, Sterns LD, Veenhuyzen GD, Healey JS, Redfearn D, Roux JF, Tang AS. Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513614. Epub 2016 May 5. PubMed 27149033 ↗
  • Aldhoon B, Wichterle D, Peichl P, Cihak R, Kautzner J. Outcomes of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with structural heart disease: The impact of electrical storm. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0171830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171830. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28187168 ↗
  • Raymond JM, Sacher F, Winslow R, Tedrow U, Stevenson WG. Catheter ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardias. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2009 May;34(5):225-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2009.01.002. PubMed 19348944 ↗
  • Kumar S, Baldinger SH, Romero J, Fujii A, Mahida SN, Tedrow UB, Stevenson WG. Substrate-Based Ablation Versus Ablation Guided by Activation and Entrainment Mapping for Ventricular Tachycardia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Dec;27(12):1437-1447. doi: 10.1111/jce.13088. Epub 2016 Oct 6. PubMed 27574120 ↗
  • Jais P, Maury P, Khairy P, Sacher F, Nault I, Komatsu Y, Hocini M, Forclaz A, Jadidi AS, Weerasooryia R, Shah A, Derval N, Cochet H, Knecht S, Miyazaki S, Linton N, Rivard L, Wright M, Wilton SB, Scherr D, Pascale P, Roten L, Pederson M, Bordachar P, Laurent F, Kim SJ, Ritter P, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M. Elimination of local abnormal ventricular activities: a new end point for substrate modification in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2012 May 8;125(18):2184-96. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.043216. Epub 2012 Apr 4. PubMed 22492578 ↗
  • Di Biase L, Santangeli P, Burkhardt DJ, Bai R, Mohanty P, Carbucicchio C, Dello Russo A, Casella M, Mohanty S, Pump A, Hongo R, Beheiry S, Pelargonio G, Santarelli P, Zucchetti M, Horton R, Sanchez JE, Elayi CS, Lakkireddy D, Tondo C, Natale A. Endo-epicardial homogenization of the scar versus limited substrate ablation for the treatment of electrical storms in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 10;60(2):132-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.044. PubMed 22766340 ↗
  • Tzou WS, Frankel DS, Hegeman T, Supple GE, Garcia FC, Santangeli P, Katz DF, Sauer WH, Marchlinski FE. Core isolation of critical arrhythmia elements for treatment of multiple scar-based ventricular tachycardias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;8(2):353-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002310. Epub 2015 Feb 13. PubMed 25681389 ↗
  • Tung R, Michowitz Y, Yu R, Mathuria N, Vaseghi M, Buch E, Bradfield J, Fujimura O, Gima J, Discepolo W, Mandapati R, Shivkumar K. Epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia: an institutional experience of safety and efficacy. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Apr;10(4):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.12.013. Epub 2012 Dec 11. PubMed 23246598 ↗
  • Tokuda M, Kojodjojo P, Tung S, Tedrow UB, Nof E, Inada K, Koplan BA, Michaud GF, John RM, Epstein LM, Stevenson WG. Acute failure of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia due to structural heart disease: causes and significance. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 May 31;2(3):e000072. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000072. PubMed 23727700 ↗
  • Loo BW Jr, Soltys SG, Wang L, Lo A, Fahimian BP, Iagaru A, Norton L, Shan X, Gardner E, Fogarty T, Maguire P, Al-Ahmad A, Zei P. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the treatment of refractory cardiac ventricular arrhythmia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Jun;8(3):748-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.002765. No abstract available. PubMed 26082532 ↗
  • Cuculich PS, Schill MR, Kashani R, Mutic S, Lang A, Cooper D, Faddis M, Gleva M, Noheria A, Smith TW, Hallahan D, Rudy Y, Robinson CG. Noninvasive Cardiac Radiation for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 14;377(24):2325-2336. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613773. PubMed 29236642 ↗
  • Chang SD, Main W, Martin DP, Gibbs IC, Heilbrun MP. An analysis of the accuracy of the CyberKnife: a robotic frameless stereotactic radiosurgical system. Neurosurgery. 2003 Jan;52(1):140-6; discussion 146-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200301000-00018. PubMed 12493111 ↗
  • Fariselli L, Marras C, De Santis M, Marchetti M, Milanesi I, Broggi G. CyberKnife radiosurgery as a first treatment for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery. 2009 Feb;64(2 Suppl):A96-101. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000341714.55023.8F. PubMed 19165081 ↗
  • Jumeau R, Ozsahin M, Schwitter J, Vallet V, Duclos F, Zeverino M, Moeckli R, Pruvot E, Bourhis J. Rescue procedure for an electrical storm using robotic non-invasive cardiac radio-ablation. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Aug;128(2):189-191. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 May 9. PubMed 29753550 ↗
  • Regis J, Tuleasca C, Resseguier N, Carron R, Donnet A, Gaudart J, Levivier M. Long-term safety and efficacy of Gamma Knife surgery in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a 497-patient historical cohort study. J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):1079-87. doi: 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142144. Epub 2015 Sep 4. PubMed 26339857 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The investigators have not decided to share the individual participant data with other researchers.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 19, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03819504
Lead sponsor
University Hospital Ostrava
Collaborators
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Hospital Podlesi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2019
Start date
Aug 1, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2020
Completion
Sep 30, 2020
Last update
Oct 19, 2020

Study contacts

Jakub Cvek, Ass.Prof.,MD,Ing.,PhD
study chair · University Hospital Ostrava

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion