CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03814928Updated May 22, 2026

Caregivers' eCourse for Recovery After Hip Fracture

An interventional study of Caregivers eCourse in Hip Fractures and Family, sponsored by University of British Columbia. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-22.

Sponsored by University of British Columbia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this two part study, we will seek 1. general feedback on the feasibility of an online education and skill development program for family/caregivers of older adults recovering from a surgically repaired low-trauma hip fracture. We will also 2. test its feasibility and acceptability with family caregivers.

Read the detailed description

This is a cross-sectional mixed methods study to obtain feedback from health providers and family caregivers on eCourse for the post-hip fracture period. For participants who access the course via the PI's website, participants will only be asked to provide feedback on the content, layout, and delivery of the eCourse.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Fractures
  • Family

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • education
  • caregivers
  • eCourse
  • feasibility
03

In context

Hip Fractures

822 studies on the registry are indexed under Hip Fractures; 160 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 90 across 529 interventional studies indexed under Hip Fractures.

Browse Hip Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 1,309 studies on the registry; 253 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (17%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Family/caregivers of older adults with hip fracture, health providers, older adults, and/or general public

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults less than 19 years of age
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Caregivers eCourse

    Education post-hip fracture delivered via eCourse.

    Behavioral: Caregivers eCourse

Interventions

  • BehavioralCaregivers eCourse

    Investigators will request that family/caregivers/general public watch a self-paced (60-90 minutes) online e-learning training session for recovery after hip fracture.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. eCourse Acceptibility

    Participants will be asked to rate (using a Likert scale 1 to 10) perceptions of acceptability of the (1) delivery mode and (2) program. All three questions are rate from 1 (lowest) - 10 (highest). A higher score is better.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. eCourse Feasibility

    Participants will be asked to rate (using a Likert scale 1 to 10) perceptions of feasibility of the (1) delivery mode and (2) program. All three questions are rate from 1 (lowest) - 10 (highest). A higher score is better.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. eCourse Satisfaction

    We will ask people to rate their satisfaction with the eCourse \[1 (not satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied)\]. The higher the score the better.

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. eCourse Usefulness

    We will ask people to rate their perception of the usefulness for the eCourse \[1 (not useful) to 10 (very useful)\]. The higher the score the better.

    Time frame: Day 1

  5. Modified Computer Self-Efficacy Scale

    Questionnaires will assess participants' perceptions of self-efficacy (Modified Computer Self-Efficacy Scale) for using a computer and the online program. Scale of 1-10, 1 (not at all confident) - 10 (completely confident). The higher the score the better.

    Time frame: Day 1

  6. Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

    Questionnaires will assess participants' perceptions on technology usability (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2). Participants will rate on a scale of 1-5, how much they disagree/agree with statements. 1 (strongly disagree) - 5 (strongly agree)

    Time frame: Day 1

  7. Caregivers' eCourse semi-structured interviews

    We will conduct semi-structured interviews with caregivers to further explore perceptions and experience with eCourse and caregiving after hip fracture.

    Time frame: Day 1

  8. Feedback on eCourse for participants who enrol via the PI's website: PEMAT

    Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) to evaluate the understandability and actionability of the material in our eCourse.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Caregiver Strain Index

    Ten questions on factors affected by caregiving with a yes or no response.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. EQ5D-5L (health-related quality of life)

    Five domains of questions with five responses each. Calculate an index of 0 (lowest) - 1 (highest). There is also a Visual Analogue Scale \[1 (worse health) - 100 (best health)\]

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. ICECAP-O (general quality of life)

    Five domains of questions with four responses each. Calculate an index of 0 (lowest) - 1 (highest).

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • UBC
    Vancouver, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03814928
Lead sponsor
University of British Columbia
Responsible party
Maureen C. Ashe (Professor, University of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2019
Start date
Dec 1, 2022
Primary completion
May 20, 2026
Completion
May 20, 2026
Last update
May 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion