ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03804970INROADSUpdated Mar 19, 2021

Information, Networks and Rewards to Optimise Adherence to Diabetic Services

An interventional study of cash rewards for the fellow up and Showing retinal photos to participants in Diabetes, sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-19.

Sponsored by Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, randomised controlled trial is to investigate whether the complex intervention, including incentives (inexpensive cellphone top-ups), information (viewing one's own fundus photos and receiving SMS informational reminders) and peer support (Diabetes clubs), improve compliance with eye care among rural persons living with diabetes in southern China.

Read the detailed description

Background: Diabetes affects some 10% of rural-dwellers in southern China. Demand for care of both diabetes and DR is low in this population: Only 25% are in care for diabetes (vs 100% of a matched urban cohort), 0% were being treated for DR (vs 55% of the urban cohort) and 31% said they were likely/very likely to accept diabetic eyecare when it was described to them (vs 78% of the urban group). A simple intervention of informational SMS reminders could significantly increase knowledge about DR and satisfaction with care among rural dwellers, while tripling their compliance with scheduled eye examinations. However, even in the group receiving the SMS reminders, over half failed to present for exams. More effective interventions are needed.

Participants: All the participants with treated diabetes or HbA1c >=6.5% from the Guangdong (Yangjiang) centre of our population-based Rural Diabetic Eye Disease Survey. They must be aged 50-90 years, own a cell phone (ownership is > 95% in the area), have no mobility limitations precluding routine clinic visits or bilateral blindness (\<6/120), and be capable of giving informed consent.

Randomisation: To avoid contamination, we are clustering recruitment and randomisation at the level of village and inviting participants in the two study groups to the Yangjiang eye screening centre for follow-up on different clinic days. Block randomization, at village level, will be balanced by the distribution of education levels and travel times from screening centre.

Intervention. All groups will be offered a brief video, already created and piloted, explaining basic information about diabetes and diabetic eye disease. The Intervention group will also receive (i) non-cash rewards (free eye care and modest mobile phone top ups in return for attendance at retinopathy screenings), the value of which will increase with the risk of vision loss (based on existing level of eye disease and HbA1c). (ii) Informational reminders delivered by SMS text 1 day and 1 week prior to scheduled eye exams. In keeping with health economic research,3 the reminders will emphasize anticipated regret: "Your next eye screening visit is next week, on dd/mm/yy. If you miss your eye screening visit, you might regret this if you subsequently lose your vision."; and (iii) peer and village health worker (VHW) networking (supported by the existing Orbis CREST project). Peer supporters will be a nominated family member or friend who has regular contact with the patient and a VHW or a community member with diabetes who has been trained to run monthly group educational sessions in the local village on optimum self-care and self-management of diabetes/DR. An important function of the family member or peer supporter is also to re-inforce the SMS informational reminders before the scheduled clinic visit.

Primary outcome measure: Proportion of scheduled eye care visits attended over 1 year. Secondary outcomes, not the direct target of our intervention, but which might be improved by a behavioural spill-over effect, will include: follow-up HbA1c; medication adherence; retinopathy grade and visual acuity in the better seeing eye.

Power and sample size: Assuming an effect size d= 0.44, and an attrition of 15% over two years, a full trial of 412 patients (42 villages in each of the two groups and 206 patients per group) would have 90% power (two sided alpha error 0.05).

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes

Keywords

  • Diabetes
  • follow-up
  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • Diabetic teaching
  • SMS
  • rewards
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

11,089 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 80 across 8,491 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University is the lead sponsor of 1,680 studies on the registry; 609 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • They must be aged 50-90 years;
  • Own a cell phone (ownership is > 95% in the area);
  • Have no mobility limitations precluding routine clinic visits or bilateral blindness (\<6/120);
  • Be capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have other serious eye disease;
  • Have mobility limitations precluding routine clinic visits or bilateral blindness (\<6/120).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Cash rewards for the fellow up+SMS reminders for participants and their family+Showing retinal photos to participants+ Having the Diabetic Club+Watching brief video and basic explanation for disease

    Behavioral: cash rewards for the fellow up · Behavioral: Showing retinal photos to participants · Behavioral: SMS reminders for participants and their family · Behavioral: Having the Diabetic Club

  • Experimental
    Adjusted intervention group

    Cash rewards for the fellow up+SMS reminders for participants and their family+Showing retinal photos to participants+Having the Diabetic Club+Watching brief video and basic explanation for disease( But the intensity of intervention based on the severity of diabetic disease)

    Behavioral: cash rewards for the fellow up · Behavioral: Showing retinal photos to participants · Behavioral: SMS reminders for participants and their family · Behavioral: Having the Diabetic Club

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Watching brief video and basic explanation for disease

    Behavioral: Watching brief video and basic explanation for disease

Interventions

  • Behavioralcash rewards for the fellow up

    This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.

  • BehavioralShowing retinal photos to participants

    This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.

  • BehavioralSMS reminders for participants and their family

    This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.

  • BehavioralWatching brief video and basic explanation for disease

    This basic explanation will be offered by professional doctors or nurses.

  • BehavioralHaving the Diabetic Club

    This is a multiple stimulus intervention study, and there are two intervention groups. One is the normal intervention group, and the other is the adjusted intervention group. The intensity of intervention in the latter group is based on the severity of diabetic disease.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of scheduled eye care visits attended over 1 year

    The visits will be recorded during the 1 year

    Time frame: One year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Follow-up HbA1c

    This outcome will be recorded in the baseline and end-line examination

    Time frame: One year

  2. Proportion of scheduled endocrine care visits attended over 1 year

    The outcome will be recorded during the 1 year

    Time frame: One year

  3. Retinopathy grade in the better seeing eye.

    This outcome will be recorded in the baseline and end-line examination

    Time frame: One year

  4. Visual acuity in the better seeing eye.

    This outcome will be recorded in the baseline and end-line examination

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Yangxi hospital
    Yangjiang, Guangdong, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jin G, Xiao W, Ding X, Xu X, An L, Congdon N, Zhao J, He M. Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Diabetic Retinopathy in a Rural Chinese Population: The Yangxi Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):5067-5073. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24280. PubMed 30357401 ↗
  • Chen T, Zhu W, Tang B, Jin L, Fu H, Chen Y, Wang C, Zhang G, Wang J, Ye T, Xiao D, Vignarajan J, Xiao B, Kanagasingam Y, Congdon N. A Mobile Phone Informational Reminder to Improve Eye Care Adherence Among Diabetic Patients in Rural China: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;194:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 24. PubMed 30053472 ↗
  • Whitaker KL, Good A, Miles A, Robb K, Wardle J, von Wagner C. Socioeconomic inequalities in colorectal cancer screening uptake: does time perspective play a role? Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):702-9. doi: 10.1037/a0023941. Epub 2011 May 30. PubMed 21639637 ↗
  • Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E, Knight K, Hasselblad V, Gano A Jr, Ofman JJ. Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness-which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):925. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7370.925. PubMed 12399340 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03804970
Collaborators
Yangxi people hospital, Yangjiang, Guangdong Province
Responsible party
Congdon Nathan (Professor of Preventative Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-sen University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2019
Start date
Aug 15, 2019
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2020
Completion
Dec 30, 2020
Last update
Mar 19, 2021

Study contacts

Nathan Congdon, MD
principal investigator · Zongshan Ophthalmic Center
Wenyong Huang, MD
principal investigator · Zongshan Ophthalmic Center
Chunhui Chen
study director · Yangxi People hospital, Guangdong
Congyao Wang
study chair · Zongshan Ophthalmic Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion