ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03801512Updated Dec 5, 2024

Comparing the Efficacy of Steroid, Acupuncture and Platelet Rich Plasma Injection in Patients with Sciatica

An interventional study of Steroid and Acupuncture in Sciatica, sponsored by Taipei Medical University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-05.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Apr 2019; still recruiting 7 years 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Disc herniation, stenosis of the spine and spondylolisthesis are the common causes of radiculitis in medical practice today, and can cause symptoms of sciatica. Steroid injection, acupuncture and platelet-rich plasma injection are often used interventions for the treatments of sciatica. The investigators will investigate the efficacy and safety of steroid injection, acupuncture and platelet-rich plasma injection for sciatica in this single center, parallel, randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

Steroid injection, acupuncture and platelet-rich plasma injection are often used interventions for the treatments of sciatica. The investigators will investigate the efficacy and safety of steroid injection, acupuncture and platelet-rich plasma injection for sciatica in this single center, parallel, randomized-controlled clinical trial.

Participants will be randomized into 3 groups (steroid injection, acupuncture and platelet-rich plasma injection) by central allocation. Randomized participants will complete a questionnaire that solicited information regarding age, sex, marital status, occupation, education, and medical history. The blinding credibility of the treatments will be evaluated at the end of the treatment.

Participants in steroid injection group will receive Triamcinolone 1pc plus lidocaine 1% 1cc injection at neuritis nerve roots. Participants in platelet-rich plasma injection group will receive 15cc blood draw first to concentrate into platelet-rich plasma and then inject at neuritis nerve roots. Participants in acupuncture group received standardized acupuncture treatment. hat treatment was accomplished by selecting a group of acupuncture points that predefined. Acupuncture points will be bladder meridian pattern acupuncture points including Shenshu (BL23), Qihaishu (BL24), Dachangshu (BL25), and Guanyuanshu(BL26). The needles will be inserted perpendicular to a depth of 5 to 35 mm depending on the acupuncture point, which was followed by manual stimulation by bidirectional rotation to induce Deqi sensation. Deqi was defined as a dull, localized, and aching sensation, which signaled the attainment of qi.

Outcome Measures Primary Outcome Measure The primary outcome measure is visual analogue scale for sciatica. To understand the impact of sciatica on the participants' life, visual analogue scale for bothersomeness is chosen instead of pain intensity. The participants will be asked to mark, on a 10 cm visual analogue scale (0, absence of bothersomeness; 10, the worst bothersomeness imaginable), the average degree of bothersomeness due to sciatica experienced within the most recent 1 week from the day of the assessment. This measurement has substantial validity. Bothersomeness of sciatica will be measured at baseline, 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 16-, and 24-week.

Secondary Outcome Measures Numeric Rating Scale for pain intensity is a simple method evaluating the subjective intensity of pain. Pain intensity will be measured in the same way as visual analogue scale for bothersomeness. Validity of its reliability has been demonstrated. The Chinese version Oswestry Disability Index is used to measure back pain-related dysfunction. Health-related quality of life will be measured using the well-validated EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D). A higher score is indicative of a better general health status. Participants satisfaction will be evaluated with 5 point scale (1 is worst, and 5 is best)

We will perform the Shapiro-Wilk normality test to determine whether or not the sample values followed a normal distribution and finally assumed normality according to the test result. For the description of baseline characteristics, mean with standard deviation (SD) for continuous data and frequency with percentage for dichotomous data will be described. Also, for the homogeneity test of baseline characteristics between 3 groups, 2-sample t tests for continuous data and chi-square test for dichotomous data will be performed. A mixed-model approach of repeated-measures 2-factor analysis will be used to analyze the difference and mean change in baseline, 1-, 2-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 16-, and 24-week visual analogue scale score, Oswestry Disability Index, EQ-5D, patient satisfaction difference and mean change between groups, interaction between groups, and periods.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sciatica

Browse trials for

03

In context

Sciatica

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Sciatica; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 68 across 122 interventional studies indexed under Sciatica.

Browse Sciatica studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Female or male, 20 to 80 years of age.
  2. Participants who had dermatome between L3 to S1, or participants whose straight leg raising test was positive, or participants had Meyerding Grade I to II spondylolisthesis or herniated intervertebral disc or spinal stenosis diagnosed by X-rays, Magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography.
  3. Participants whose sciatica symptom doesn't have occur time limit.
  4. Participants who agreed to follow the trial protocol.
  5. Participants who could complete the study treatment and assessments.
  6. Participants who had or pain control injection can participate the study after receiving injection more than 3 days.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with severe progressive neurological symptoms (e.g. cauda equina compression).
  2. Participants who had undergone surgery for lumbar disc herniation within 6 months.
  3. Participants whose sciatica symptom wasn't caused by lumbar radiculopathy.
  4. Participants with cardiovascular, liver, kidney, or hematopoietic system diseases, severe psychiatric or psychological disorder, or cancer.
  5. Women who were pregnant.
  6. Participants with a pacemaker, metal allergy, or severe fear of needles.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Steroid Injections

    Inject steroid at neuritis nerve root.

    Other: Steroid

  • Experimental
    Acupuncture

    Acupuncture at acupoints BL23 to BL26.

    Other: Acupuncture

  • Experimental
    Platelet Rich Plasma Injection

    Inject Platelet Rich Plasma at neuritis nerve root.

    Other: Platelet Rich Plasma

Interventions

  • OtherSteroid

    Triamcinolone 1pc + lidocaine 1% 1cc inject at neuritis nerve roots

  • OtherAcupuncture

    1.5 inch acupuncture needles insert at acupoints BL23, BL24, BL25 and BL26

  • OtherPlatelet Rich Plasma

    Inject investigators Platelet Rich Plasma at neuritis nerve roots

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. visual analogue scale score

    Self reported pain intensity: 1. scales with a middle point, graduations or numbers; 2. meter-shaped scales; 3. "box-scales" consisting of circles equidistant from each other; 4. scales with descriptive terms at intervals along a line

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    An 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain scored 0-10 ( 0=no pain, 10= pain as bad as can be)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  2. EQ-5D

    The EQ-5D questionnaire has two components: health state description and evaluation. In the description part, health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Mobility dimension asks about the person's walking ability. Self-care dimension asks about the ability to wash or dress by oneself, and usual activities dimension measures performance in "work, study, housework, family or leisure activities". In pain/discomfort dimension, it asks how much pain or discomfort they have, and in anxiety/depression dimension, it asks how anxious or depressed they are.

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Oswestry Disability Index (ODQ)

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODQ) has ten sections: pain, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life, and travelling. Respondents choose one of six statements that most applies to them in each section. The first statement is scored 0, the second is scored 1, and so on to 5 for the sixth statement. The sum of the section scores is transformed to a percentage score, adjusted for missed sections. The total possible score ranges 0-100 and a higher score indicates worse function. Scores from 0-20% are claimed to indicate 'minimal disability', 20-40% 'moderate disability', 40-60% 'severe disability', 60-80% 'crippled', and 80-100% 'bedbound or exaggerating'

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Inoue M, Hojo T, Yano T, Katsumi Y. Electroacupuncture direct to spinal nerves as an alternative to selective spinal nerve block in patients with radicular sciatica--a cohort study. Acupunct Med. 2005 Mar;23(1):27-30. doi: 10.1136/aim.23.1.27. PubMed 15844437 ↗
  • Abbasipour-Dalivand S, Mohammadi R, Mohammadi V. Effects of Local Administration of Platelet Rich Plasma on Functional Recovery after Bridging Sciatic Nerve Defect Using Silicone Rubber Chamber; An Experimental Study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2015 Jan;3(1):1-7. PubMed 27162893 ↗
  • Kucuk L, Gunay H, Erbas O, Kucuk U, Atamaz F, Coskunol E. Effects of platelet-rich plasma on nerve regeneration in a rat model. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(4):449-54. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2014.13.0029. PubMed 25230270 ↗
  • Centeno C, Markle J, Dodson E, Stemper I, Hyzy M, Williams C, Freeman M. The use of lumbar epidural injection of platelet lysate for treatment of radicular pain. J Exp Orthop. 2017 Nov 25;4(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40634-017-0113-5. PubMed 29177632 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2025, 73 months after the start.

Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sciatica, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 30. This study's planned 73 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 9, 2019
First posted
Jan 11, 2019
StartActual
Apr 24, 2019
Primary completionEst.
May 28, 2025
CompletionEst.
May 28, 2025
Last update
Dec 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03801512
Lead sponsor
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Responsible party
Meng-Huang Wu (Attending physician, Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 11, 2019
Start date
Apr 24, 2019
Primary completion
May 28, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 28, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 5, 2024

Study contacts

Meng-Huang Wu, PhD
Contact
141036@h.tmu.edu.tw
886 2 27372181 ext. 3740
Ray-Jade Chen, PhD
Contact
Ray-Jade Chen, PhD
study chair · Taipei Medical University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion