ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07830472Updated Sep 21, 2026

Lower-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Training for Sarcopenia

An interventional study of Lower-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Training and Nutrition Education in Sarcopenia, sponsored by Taipei Medical University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Taipei Medical University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Sep 2026).
  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether lower-limb rehabilitation robot training combined with nutrition education can improve muscle mass and physical function in adults aged 60 years or older with sarcopenia. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does lower-limb rehabilitation robot training improve muscle mass and body composition?
  2. Does the training improve muscle strength, walking ability, balance, and physical function?

Researchers will compare participants who receive lower-limb rehabilitation robot training plus nutrition education with participants who receive usual care, including exercise and nutrition education, to see whether adding robot-assisted training provides additional benefits.

Participants will:

  1. Complete assessments before the intervention, around week 5, and after week 8.
  2. Receive either 8 weeks of lower-limb rehabilitation robot training using the MRG-P110 plus nutrition education, or usual care including exercise and nutrition education.
  3. Complete assessments of body composition, muscle strength, walking ability, balance, and health-related quality of life.
Read the detailed description

Sarcopenia is associated with loss of muscle mass, reduced muscle strength, impaired physical function, and increased risks of falls and disability in older adults. Conventional exercise and nutritional interventions often require longer treatment periods to achieve measurable improvements. Lower-limb rehabilitation robots may provide intensive and repetitive gait training over a shorter period, while nutrition education may support maintenance or improvement of muscle health.

This study uses a two-arm, parallel, quasi-experimental design to evaluate the additional effects of lower-limb rehabilitation robot training when added to nutrition education and usual care in adults with sarcopenia. Participants in both groups will undergo assessments at baseline, mid-intervention, and post-intervention. The study is intended to determine whether this combined approach can provide clinically meaningful improvements in muscle-related and functional outcomes and to assess its feasibility for clinical rehabilitation practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sarcopenia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation
  • High-Intensity Training
  • Nutrition Education
  • Physical Function
  • Walking Ability
03

In context

Sarcopenia

1,329 studies on the registry are indexed under Sarcopenia; 420 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 855 interventional studies indexed under Sarcopenia.

Browse Sarcopenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Taipei Medical University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 60 years or older.
  • Meets the diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS).
  • Conscious and able to understand and follow movement instructions.
  • Able to stand for at least 1 minute.
  • Physically able to tolerate lower-limb rehabilitation robot training.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body weight greater than 135 kg.
  • Height less than 145 cm or greater than 190 cm, resulting in incompatibility with the exoskeleton.
  • Presence of an unhealed fracture.
  • Joint contracture or excessive lower-limb muscle tone that prevents participation in robotic training.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robot-Assisted Training Group

    Participants will receive lower-limb rehabilitation robot training using the MRG-P110 for 8 weeks, three sessions per week, 30 minutes per session, for a total of 24 sessions. Nutrition education will be provided after each training session.

    Device: Lower-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Training · Behavioral: Nutrition Education

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care Group

    Participants will receive usual care, including exercise and nutrition education, without additional lower-limb rehabilitation robot training.

    Behavioral: Usual Care Exercise

Interventions

  • DeviceLower-Limb Rehabilitation Robot Training

    Participants will receive lower-limb rehabilitation robot training using the MRG-P110 for 8 weeks, three sessions per week, 30 minutes per session, for a total of 24 sessions. Training parameters will be individualized according to participant height and baseline walking speed. Step length will initially be set at 15% of height, and walking speed at 80% of baseline walking speed. Training intensity will be monitored using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale and maintained at 5-6.

  • BehavioralNutrition Education

    Participants will receive nutrition education as part of the study intervention.

  • BehavioralUsual Care Exercise

    Participants in the control group will receive usual care exercise without additional lower-limb rehabilitation robot training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Skeletal Muscle Mass Index (SMI)

    Skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) will be measured in kg/m². Lower values indicate lower skeletal muscle mass. According to the criteria used in this study, low muscle mass is defined as SMI ≤7.0 kg/m² in men and ≤5.7 kg/m² in women.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  2. Handgrip Strength

    Handgrip strength of the dominant hand will be measured in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate greater muscle strength. According to the criteria used in this study, low muscle strength is defined as \<28 kg in men and \<18 kg in women.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  3. 4-Meter Gait Speed

    Gait speed will be assessed using the 4-meter walk test and reported in meters per second (m/s). Higher values indicate better walking performance. According to the criteria used in this study, a gait speed \<1.0 m/s indicates impaired physical performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Five-Time Sit-to-Stand Test

    The time required to complete five consecutive sit-to-stand movements will be recorded in seconds. A shorter completion time indicates better lower-limb functional performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  2. Functional Ambulation Category

    Walking ability will be assessed using the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  3. Short Physical Performance Battery

    Physical performance and balance will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  4. EQ-5D Health-Related Quality of Life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  5. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)

    Self-reported lower-extremity function will be assessed using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  6. Sarcopenia Health Literacy

    Participants' knowledge and health literacy related to sarcopenia will be assessed using a sarcopenia health literacy questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

  7. Sarcopenia-Specific Quality of Life

    Sarcopenia-specific quality of life will be assessed using the Traditional Chinese short-form sarcopenia quality-of-life questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5, and Week 8

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data are not planned to be shared because no data-sharing arrangement has been established for this study, and participant confidentiality will be maintained.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07830472
Lead sponsor
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Collaborators
HIWIN Technologies Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Mar 9, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

SHENG-WEN SU
Contact

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion